Twelve tips to stimulate creative problem-solving with design thinking

References

• Aaronson EL, White BA, Black L, Sonis JD, Mort EA. 2020. Using design thinking to improve patient-provider communication in the emergency department. Qual Manag Health Care. 29(1):30–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulla AM, Paek SH, Cramon B, Runco MA. 2020. Problem finding and creativity: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Aesthetics Creativity Arts. 14(1):3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman M, Huang TTK, Breland JY. 2018. Design thinking in Health Care. Prev Chronic Dis. 15:E117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley RA, Strayer DL, Atchley P. 2012. Creativity in the wild: improving creative reasoning through immersion in natural settings. PLoS One. 7(12):e51474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badwan B, Bothara R, Latijnhouwers M, Smithies A, Sandars J. 2018. The importance of design thinking in medical education. Med Teach. 40(4):425–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bate P. 2007. Bringing the design sciences to organization development and change management: introduction to the special issue. J Appl Behav Sci. 43(1):8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Berger W. 2014. A more beautiful question. London (UK): Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Berry LL, Crane J, Deming KA, Barach P. 2020. Using evidence to design cancer care facilities. Am J Med Qual. DOI:10.1177/1062860619897406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T. 2008. Design thinking. Harvard Business Rev. 86(6):84–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T. 2019. Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Cahn PS, Bzowyckyj A, Collins L, Dow A, Goodell K, Johnson AF, Klocko D, Knab M, Parker K, Reeves S, et al. 2016. A design thinking approach to evaluating interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 30(3):378–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo M. 2013. The scientific method: a need for something better? Am J Neuroradiol. 34(9):1669–1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen T. 2015. The creativity challenge: design, experiment, test, innovative, build, create, inspire, and unleash your genius. Holbrook (MA): Adams Media.
   Google Scholar
• Cross N. 2011. Design thinking: understanding how designers think and work. Oxford (UK): Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Curedale R. 2019. Design thinking: process and methods. 5th ed. Topanga (CA): Design Community College Inc.
   Google Scholar
• de Bono E. 1999. Six thinking hats. New York (NY): Back Bay Books.
   Google Scholar
• Debono DS, Greenfield D, Travaglia JF, Long JC, Black D, Johnson J, Braithwaite J. 2013. Nurses' workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 13:175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitte LA, Omary RA. 2019. The power of design thinking in medical education. Acad Radiol. 26(10):1417–1420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck C. 2007. Mindset: the new psychology of success. New York (NY): Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dym CL, Agogino AM, Eris O, Frey DD, Leifer LJ. 2005. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. J Engineering Educ. 94(1):103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Sci Quart. 44(2):350–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson A, Lei Z. 2014. Psycholoigcal safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 1(1):23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MF, Savoy JN, Markey MK. 2020. Teaching cross-cultural design thinking for healthcare. Breast. 50:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, et al. 2010. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 376(9756):1923–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith KH. 2020. Design thinking: an approach to innovative interprofessional education. Nurs Educ Perspect. 41(1):69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glen R, Suciu C, Baughn C. 2014. The need for design thinking in business schools. AMLE. 13(4):653–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfield EC, Park Y-L, Chen B-R, Hsu W-H, Young D, Wehner M, Kelty-Stephen DG, Stirling L, Weinberg M, Newman D, et al. 2012. Bio-inspired design of soft robotic assistive devices: the interface of physics. Biol Behav Ecological Psych. 24(4):300–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham KL, Burghardt GM. 2010. Current perspectives on the biological study of play: signs of progress. Q Rev Biol. 85(4):393–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray D, Brown S, Macanufo J. 2010. Gamestorming: a playbook for innovators, rulebreakers, and changemakers. Sebastopol (CA): O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths C, Costi M. 2019. The creative thinking handbook. Melbourne (AU): Kogan.
   Google Scholar
• Han JL, Pappas TN. 2018. A review of empathy, its importance, and its teaching in surgical training. J Surg Educ. 75(1):88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou I-C, Lan M-F, Shen S-H, Tsai PY, Chang KJ, Tai H-C, Tsai A-J, Chang P, Wang T-F, Sheu S-J, et al. 2020. The development of a mobile health app for breast cancer self-management support in Taiwan: design thinking approach. JMU. 8(4):e15780.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. 2013. Thinking fast and slow. New York (NY): Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley T. 2013. Creative confidence: unleashing the creative potential within us all. New York (NY): Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Kleon A. 2012. Steal like an artist. New York (NY): Workman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp J, Zeratsky J, Kowitz B. 2016. Sprint: How to solve big problems and test new ideas in just give days. New York (NY): Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ku B, Lupton E. 2020. Health design thinking. New York (NY): Cooper Hewitt.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar V. 2012. 101 design methods: a structured approach to driving innovation in your organization. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Leverenz CS. 2014. Design thinking and the wicked problem of teaching writing. Comput Compos. 33(C):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Littman J. 2005. The ten faces of innovation. New York (NY): Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Littman J, Kelley T. 2001. The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from IDEO. New York (NY): Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Luka I. 2020. Design thinking in pedagogy. JECS. 5(2):63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus D, Simone A, Block L. 2020. Design thinking in medical ethics education. J Med Ethics. 46(4):282–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin JE, Wolcott MD, Hubbard D, Umstead K, Rider TR. 2019. A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education. BMC Med Educ. 19(1):98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli PM, Wilner SJS, Bhatti SH, Mura M, Beverland MB. 2019. Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. J Prod Innov Manag. 36(2):124–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell DJ, Russo JE, Pennington N. 1989. Back to the future: temporal perspective in the explanation of events. J Behav Decis Making. 2(1):25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson SW, Germann CA, MacVan CZ, Bloch RB, Fallon TS, Strout TD. 2018. Intern as patient: a patient experience simulation to cultivate empathy in emergency medicine residents. West J Emerg Med. 19(1):41–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozenc K, Hagan M. 2019. Rituals for work. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Konings KD, Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CPM. 2019. Twelve tips to promote a feedback culture with a growth mind-set: swinging the feedback pendulum from recipes to relationships. Med Teach. 41(6):625–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzouk R, Shute V. 2012. What is design thinking and why is it important? Rev Educ Res. 82(3):330–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter SM, Dijksterhuis A. 2014. Creativity-the unconscious foundations of the incubation period. Front Hum Neurosci. 8:215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JP, Fisher TR, Trowbridge MJ, Bent C. 2016. A design thinking framework for healthcare management and innovation. Healthcare. 4(1):11–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato S, Lucente S, Meyer D, Mrazek D. 2010. Design thinking to make organization change and development more responsive. Design Manage Rev. 21(2):44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer K. 2013. Zig Zag: the surprising path to greater creativity. San Francisco (CA): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Seelig T. 2012. InGenius: a crash course in creativity. New York (NY): HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Seelig T. 2015. Creativity rules. New York (NY): HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan H, Reingold EM. 2013. The mechanisms and boundary conditions of the Einstellung effect in chess: evidence from eye movements. PLoS One. 8(10):e75796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver JK, Binder DS, Zubcevik N, Zafonte RD. 2016. Healthcare hackathons provide educational and innovation opportunities: a case study and best practice recommendations. J Med Syst. 40(7):177–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Succi MD, Uppot RN, Gee MS, McLoud TC, Brink JA. 2018. Medically engineered solutions in healthcare: a technology incubator and design-thinking curriculum for radiology trainees. J Am Coll Radiol. 15(6):892–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo M. 2010. Design thinking in legal practice management. Design Manage Rev. 21(3):44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas LR, Nguyen R, Teherani A, Luckey CR, Harleman E. 2020. Designing well-being: using design thinking to engage residents in developing well-being interventions. Acad Med. 95(7):1038–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulibarri N, Cravens AE, Nabergoj AS, Kernbach S, Royalty A. 2019. Creativity in research. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vagal A, Wahab SA, Butcher B, Zettel N, Kemper E, Vogel C, Mahoney M. 2020. Human-centered design thinking in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 17(5):662–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Grift TC, Kroeze R. 2016. Design thinking as a tool for interdisciplinary education in health care. Acad Med. 91(9):1234–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Westhuizen D, Conrad N, Douglas TS, Mutsvangwa T. 2020. Engaging communities on health innovation: experiences in implementing design thinking. Int Q Community Health Educ. 41(1):101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Varol O. 2020. Think like a rock scientist. New York (NY): Hachette Book Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ward A, Runcie E, Morris L. 2009. Embedding innovation: design thinking for small enterprises. J Bus Strategy. 30(2/3):78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Wedell-Wedellsborg T. 2017. Are you solving the right problems? Harvard Business Rev. (Jan-Feb):76–83.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl M, Thompson J, Braaten M. 2008. Beyond the scientific method: model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Sci Ed. 92(5):941–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott MD, McLaughlin JE. 2020. Promoting creative problem-solving in schools of pharmacy with the use of design thinking. Am J Pharm Educ. DOI:10.5688/ajpe8065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott MD, McLaughlin JE, Williams C, Kiser S. 2020. Identifying barriers to rural experiential education through the use of design thinking. Under review.
   Google Scholar