854
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Personal Views

The validity argument: Addressing the misconceptions

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (US). 1999. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC): American Educational Research Association.
  • American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. 1966. Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association.
  • Colliver JA, Conlee MJ, Verhulst SJ. 2012. From test validity to construct validity … and back? Med Educ. 46(4):366–371.
  • Cook DA, Beckman TJ. 2006. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 119(2):166.e7–116.e16.
  • Cook DA, Brydges R, Ginsburg S, Hatala R. 2015. A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework. Med Educ. 49(6):560–575.
  • Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R, Brydges R. 2014. What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 19(2):233–250.
  • Downing SM. 2003. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 37(9):830–837.
  • Goodwin LD, Leech NL. 2003. The meaning of validity in the new Standards For Educational and Psychological Testing: Implications for measurement courses. Meas Eval Counseling Dev. 36(3):181–191. English.
  • Kane M. 2006. Validation. In: Brennan RL, editor. Educational measurement. 4th ed. Westport CT: Praeger Publishers; p. 17–64.
  • Messick S. 1989. Validity. In: Linn RL, editor. Educational measurement. 3rd ed. New York, Washington: Macmillan; p. 13–104.
  • Oermann MH, Gaberson K. 2019. Evaluation and testing in nursing education. 6th ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. 2011. General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57. Med Teach. 33(10):783–797.
  • St-Onge C, Young M. 2015. Evolving conceptualisations of validity: impact on the process and outcome of assessment. Med Educ. 49(6):548–550.
  • Young M, St-Onge C, Xiao J, Vachon Lachiver E, Torabi N. 2018. Characterizing the literature on validity and assessment in medical education: a bibliometric study. Perspect Med Educ. 7(3):182–191.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.