Twelve tips to organise a mock OSCE

References

• Ahmady S, Khajeali N, Sharifi F, Mirmoghtadaei ZS. 2019. Factors related to academic failure in preclinical medical education: a systematic review. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 7(2):74–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmed A, Alwaheedy M, Choudhury A, Chowdhury SN, Khan M, Kunduzi B, Rahyead A. 2017. The value of quality feedback in formative OSCEs. Med Educ Online. 22(1):1353877–1353877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese MA. 2000. Challenges in using rater judgements in medical education [Review]. J Eval Clin Pract. 6(3):305–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery RJ, Bryant WK, Mathios A, Kang H, Bell D. 2006. Electronic course evaluations: does an online delivery system influence student evaluations? J Econ Educ. 37(1):21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besar MNA, Siraj HH, Manap RA, Mahdy ZA, Yaman MN, Kamarudin MA, Mohamad N. 2012. Should a single clinician examiner be used in objective structure clinical examination? Proc Soc Behav Sci. 60:443–449.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan J, Russell B, Marshall B. 2019. A new approach to OSCE preparation – PrOSCEs. BMC Med Educ. 19(1):126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand HS, Schoonheim-Klein M. 2009. Is the OSCE more stressful? Examination anxiety and its consequences in different assessment methods in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ. 13(3):147–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannick MT, Erol-Korkmaz HT, Prewett M. 2011. A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores. Med Educ. 45(12):1181–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Clark T, Chapman R, Mellis C. 2013. Medical student experience as simulated patients in the OSCE. Clin Teach. 10(4):246–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chamberlain S, Taylor R. 2011. Online or face‐to‐face? An experimental study of examiner training. Br J Educ Technol. 42(4):665–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisnall B, Vince T, Hall S, Tribe R. 2015. Evaluation of outcomes of a formative objective structured clinical examination for second-year UK medical students. Int J Med Educ. 6:76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cömert M, Zill JM, Christalle E, Dirmaier J, Härter M, Scholl I. 2016. Assessing communication skills of medical students in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE)-a systematic review of rating scales. PLoS One. 11(3):e0152717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusimano MD, Cohen R, Tucker W, Murnaghan J, Kodama R, Reznick R. 1994. A comparative analysis of the costs of administration of an OSCE (objective structured clinical examination). Acad Med. 69(7):571–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels VJ, Pugh D. 2018. Twelve tips for developing an OSCE that measures what you want. Med Teach. 40(12):1208–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison A, Bate E, Thompson J. 2016. Tablet versus paper marking in assessment: feedback matters. Perspect Med Educ. 5(2):108–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan J, Mader C, Shinsky J. 2010. Constructive student feedback: online vs. traditional course evaluations. J Interact Online Learn. 5(3):283–296.
   Google Scholar
• Dudai E, Cacioppe R. 1992. Improving organizational communication using the team briefing system. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 29(4):81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Fallatah HI, Tekian A, Park YS, Al Shawa L. 2015. The validity and reliability of the sixth-year internal medical examination administered at the King Abdulaziz University Medical College. BMC Med Educ. 15(1):10–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon LM, Collier-Meek MA, Maggin DM, Sanetti LMH, Johnson AH. 2015. Is performance feedback an evidence-based practice? A systematic review and evaluation. Exceptional Children. 81(2):227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feickert JA, Harris IB, Anderson DC, Bland CJ, Allen S, Poland GA, Satran L, Miller WJ. 1992. Senior medical students as simulated patients in an objective structured clinical examination: motivation and benefits. Med Teach. 14(2–3):167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay IG, Stott NC, Kinnersley P. 1995. The assessment of communication skills in palliative medicine: a comparison of the scores of examiners and simulated patients. Med Educ. 29(6):424–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg LR, Tregunno D, Norton PG, Smee S, de Vries I, Sebok SS, VanDenKerkhof EG, Luctkar-Flude M, Medves J. 2015. Development and testing of an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) to assess socio-cultural dimensions of patient safety competency. BMJ Qual Saf. 24(3):188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good Medical Practice. 2013a. General Medical Council. [updated 2019 April; accessed 2020 Jul 03]. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/good-medical-practice–-english-20200128_pdf-51527435.pdf?la=en&hash=DA1263358CCA88F298785FE2BD7610EB4EE9A530.
   Google Scholar
• Good Medical Practice. 2013b. General Medical Council. [updated 2019 April; accessed 2020 July 03]. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/good-medical-practice–-english-20200128_pdf-51527435.pdf?la=en&hash=DA1263358CCA88F298785FE2BD7610EB4EE9A530.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley G. 2011. Summative OSCEs in undergraduate medical education. Ulster Med J. 80(3):127–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halestrap P, Leeder D. 2011. GP registrars as teachers: a survey of their level of involvement and training. Educ Prim Care. 22(5):310–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall S, Harrison CH, Stephens J, Andrade MG, Seaby EG, Parton W, McElligott S, Myers MA, Elmansouri A, Ahn M, et al. 2018. The benefits of being a near-peer teacher. Clin Teach. 15(5):403–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardavella G, Aamli-Gaagnat A, Saad N, Rousalova I, Sreter KB. 2017. How to give and receive feedback effectively. Breathe. 13(4):327–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey A, Murphy D. 2019. Disadvantages faced by poorer medical students must be challenged. thebmjopinion. [accessed 2020 Jul 03]. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2019/11/14/disadvantages-faced-by-poorer-medical-students-must-be-challenged/.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie J, Timperley H. 2007. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 77(1):81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodder RV, Rivington RN, Calcutt LE, Hart IR. 1989. The effectiveness of immediate feedback during the objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ. 23(2):184–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges B, Hanson M, McNaughton N, Regehr G. 2002. Creating, monitoring, and improving a psychiatry OSCE: a guide for faculty. Acad Psychiatry. 26(3):134–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey-Murto S, Mihok M, Pugh D, Touchie C, Halman S, Wood TJ. 2016. Feedback in the OSCE: what do residents remember? Teach Learn Med. 28(1):52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal D. 2015. Likert scale: explored and explained. BJAST. 7(4):396–403.
   Google Scholar
• Junod Perron N, Louis-Simonet M, Cerutti B, Pfarrwaller E, Sommer J, Nendaz M. 2016. The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors’ profile. BMC Med Educ. 16(1):293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalet A, Chou CL, Ellaway RH. 2017. To fail is human: remediating remediation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 6(6):418–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan KZ, Gaunt K, Ramachandran S, Pushkar P. 2013. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part II: organisation & administration. Med Teach. 35(9):e1447–e1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Shea JA. 2007. Course evaluation in medical education. Teach Teach Educ. 23(3):251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis Cohen LM, Keith M. 2000. Research methods in education. 5th ed. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Lydon S, Connor P, Mongan O, Gorecka M, McVicker L, Stankard A, Byrne D. 2017. A mixed method, multiperspective evaluation of a near peer teaching programme. Postgrad Med J. 93(1103):541–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumder MAA, Kumar A, Krishnamurthy K, Ojeh N, Adams OP, Sa B. 2019. An evaluative study of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): students and examiners perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 10:387–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin K, Gregor L, Jones A, Coderre S. 2006. Can standardized patients replace physicians as OSCE examiners? BMC Med Educ. 6(1):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meadows M, Billington L. 2005. A review of the literature on marking reliability. Manchester: AQA.
   Google Scholar
• Nestel D, Clark S, Tabak D, Ashwell V, Muir E, Paraskevas P, Higham J. 2010. Defining responsibilities of simulated patients in medical education. Simul Healthc. 5(3):161–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newble D. 2004. Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations. Med Educ. 38(2):199–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol DJ, Macfarlane‐Dick D. 2006. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud Higher Educ. 31(2):199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson M, Abraham C, Bond R. 2012. Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 138(2):353–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson P, Morton L, Haran H, Manton R. 2017. Mock OSCEs improve medical students’ confidence and reduce anxiety related to summative examinations. EIMJ. 9(2):41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan DA, Donnelly MB, Schwartz RW, Strodel WE. 1995. The objective structured clinical examination. The new gold standard for evaluating postgraduate clinical performance. Ann Surg. 222(6):735–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternszus R, Cruess S, Cruess R, Young M, Steinert Y. 2012. Residents as role models: impact on undergraduate trainees. Acad Med. 87(9):1282–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend AH, McLlvenny S, Miller CJ, Dunn EV. 2001. The use of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for formative and summative assessment in a general practice clinical attachment and its relationship to final medical school examination performance. Med Educ. 35(9):841–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CP, van Luyk SJ, van Ballegooijen AM, Swanson DB. 1989. Training and experience of examiners. Med Educ. 23(3):290–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace J, Rao R, Haslam R. 2002. Simulated patients and objective structured clinical examinations: review of their use in medical education. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 8(5):342–348.
   Google Scholar
• Walters K, Osborn D, Raven P. 2005. The development, validity and reliability of a multimodality objective structured clinical examination in psychiatry. Med Educ. 39(3):292–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman MJ, Yorke VC, Hallam JL. 2018. Evaluation of a multi-methods approach to the collection and dissemination of feedback on OSCE performance in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ. 22(2):e203–e211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young I, Montgomery K, Kearns P, Hayward S, Mellanby E. 2014. The benefits of a peer-assisted mock OSCE. Clin Teach. 11(3):214–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yune SJ, Lee SY, Im SJ, Kam BS, Baek SY. 2018. Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students. BMC Med Educ. 18(1):124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zayyan M. 2011. Objective structured clinical examination: the assessment of choice. Oman Med J. 26(4):219–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar