Communication content during debriefing in simulation-based medical education: An analytic framework and mixed-methods analysis

References

• Abegglen S, Krieg A, Eigenmann H, Greif R. 2020. Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) in simulation-based medical education: translation and validation of the German version. PLoS One. 15(12):e0244816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger-Estilita JM, Greif R, Berendonk C, Stricker D, Schnabel KP. 2020. Simulated patient-based teaching of medical students improves pre-anaesthetic assessment: a rater-blinded randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 37(5):387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boet S, Bould MD, Fung L, Qosa H, Perrier L, Tavares W, Reeves S, Tricco AC. 2014. Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth. 61(6):571–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D, Walker D, Keogh R. 1996. Promoting reflection in learning: a model. In: Boud D, Walker D, Keogh R, editors. Reflection: turning experience into learning. London (England): Routledge Falmer; p. 32–56.
   Google Scholar
• Brockbank A, McGill I. 2007. Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. London (UK): McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, Sherbino J, Zendejas B, Cook DA. 2014. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 48(7):657–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng A, Palaganas J, Eppich W, Rudolph J, Robinson T, Grant V. 2015. Co-debriefing for simulation-based education: a primer for facilitators. Simul Healthc. 10(2):69–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conville RL, Cronen VE. 1974. The effects of negative affect conditions and concept involvement on language redundancy. J Psychol. 86(1):93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hamstra SJ. 2011. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 306(9):978–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell J. 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4 ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dieckmann P, Birkvad Rasmussen M, Issenberg SB, Soreide E, Ostergaard D, Ringsted C. 2018. Long-term experiences of being a simulation-educator: a multinational interview study. Med Teach. 40(7):713–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieckmann P, Friis S, Lippert A, Østergaard D. 2012. Goals, success factors, and barriers for simulation-based learning: a qualitative interview study in health care. Simul Gaming. 43(5):627–647.
   Google Scholar
• Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M. 2007. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc. 2(3):183–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dieckmann P, Krage R. 2013. Simulation and psychology: creating, recognizing and using learning opportunities. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 26(6):714–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieckmann P, Molin Friis S, Lippert A, Ostergaard D. 2009. The art and science of debriefing in simulation: ideal and practice. Med Teach. 31(7):e287–e294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doumouras AG, Keshet I, Nathens AB, Ahmed N, Hicks CM. 2012. A crisis of faith? A review of simulation in teaching team-based, crisis management skills to surgical trainees. J Surg Educ. 69(3):274–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppich W, Cheng A. 2015. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc. 10(2):106–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• eusim.org. 2015. EuSim group. https://eusim.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Fanning RM, Gaba DM. 2007. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2(2):115–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleiss JL, Cohen J. 1973. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 33(3):613–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garden AL, Le Fevre DM, Waddington HL, Weller JM. 2015. Debriefing after simulation-based non-technical skill training in healthcare: a systematic review of effective practice. Anaesth Intensive Care. 43(3):300–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husebo S, Dieckmann P, Rystedt H, Soreide E, Friberg F. 2013. The relationship between facilitators' questions and the level of reflection in postsimulation debriefing. Simul Healthc. 8(3):135–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kihlgren P, Spanager L, Dieckmann P. 2015. Investigating novice doctors' reflections in debriefings after simulation scenarios. Med Teach. 37(5):437–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick D, Kirkpatrick J. 2006. Evaluating training programs. San Francisco (CA): Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kolbe M, Eppich W, Rudolph J, Meguerdichian M, Catena H, Cripps A, Grant V, Cheng A. 2020. Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act. BMJ Stel. 6(3):164–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolbe M, Grande B, Spahn D. 2015. Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: content, structure, attitude and setting. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 29(1):87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolbe M, Marty A, Seelandt J, Grande B. 2016. How to debrief teamwork interactions: using circular questions to explore and change team interaction patterns. Adv Simul (Lond). 1:29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolbe M, Weiss M, Grote G, Knauth A, Dambach M, Spahn D, Grande B. 2013. TeamGAINS: a tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings. BMJ Qual Saf. 22(7):541–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz U. 2018. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Weinheim: Beltz Verlagsgruppe. http://www.beltz.de/de/nc/verlagsgruppe-beltz/gesamtprogramm.html?isbn=978-3-7799-3682-4
   Google Scholar
• Lyons R, Lazzara EH, Benishek LE, Zajac S, Gregory M, Sonesh SC, Salas E. 2015. Enhancing the effectiveness of team debriefings in medical simulation: more best practices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 41(3):115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney S, Haines T. 2016. Issues of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness for simulation in health professions education. Adv Simul (Lond). 1:13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. 2011. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 86(6):706–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre MS, Breuer G. 2013. Simulation in der Medizin. Berlin Heidelberg (Germany): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pike GR. 2011. Using college students' self‐reported learning outcomes in scholarly research. New Dir Inst Res. 2011(150):41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson OC. 2014. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 11(1):25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. 2014. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 9(6):339–349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. 2006. There's no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc. 1(1):49–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. 2007. Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin. 25(2):361–376.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R, Hamstra SJ. 2006. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management: oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. Anesthesiology. 105(2):279–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A. 2016. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc. 11(3):209–217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seelandt J, Grande B, Kriech S, Kolbe M. 2018. DE-CODE: a coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions. Bmj Stel. 4(2):51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer JA, Jordan RK. 1999. Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ. 318(7193):1280–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum S, Cerasoli C. 2013. Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Hum Factors. 55(1):231–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum SI, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN. 2013. Medical team debriefs: simple, powerful, underutilized. In: Salas E, Frush K, Baker DP, Battles JB, King HB, Wears RL, editors. Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training. Oxford University Press; p. 249–253.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DC, Hamdy H. 2013. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 35(11):e1561–e1572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosper H, Hignett S, Bowie P. 2018. Twelve tips for embedding human factors and ergonomics principles in healthcare education. Med Teach. 40(4):357–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zendejas B, Wang AT, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA. 2013. Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review. Surgery. 153(2):160–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar