Applying activity theory to undergraduate medical curriculum reform: Lessons in contradictions from multiple stakeholders’ perspectives

References

• Baker L, Shing LK, Wright S, Mylopoulos M, Kulasegaram K, Ng S. 2019. Aligning and applying the paradigms and practices of education. Acad Med. 94(7):1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista A. 2017. An activity theory perspective of how scenario-based simulations support learning: a descriptive analysis. Adv Simul. 2:23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett D, O’Flynn S, Kelly M. 2015. Peer assisted learning in the clinical setting: an activity systems analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 20(3):595–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland CJ, Starnaman S, Wersal L, Moorehead-Rosenberg L, Zonia S, Henry R. 2000. Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed. Acad Med. 75(6):575–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleakley A. 2021. Embracing ambiguity: curriculum design and activity theory. Med Teach. 43(1):14–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke R, McGee A. 2012. The challenge of change: using activity theory to understand a cultural innovation. J Educ Change. 13(2):217–233.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess H. 2004. Redesigning the curriculum for social work education: complexity, conformity, chaos, creativity, collaboration? Soc Work Educ. 23(2):163–183.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Walker KG, Gale M, Nicol LG. 2016. Simulation-based education: understanding the socio-cultural complexity of a surgical training ‘boot camp’. Med Educ. 50(8):829–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornan T, Kearney GP, Pyörälä E. 2021. Destabilising institutions to make healthcare more equitable: clinicians, educators, and researchers co-producing change. Med Teach. 43(1):4–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer SC, Buckle JL. 2009. The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 8(1):54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Elmberger A, Björck E, Liljedahl M, Nieminen J, Bolander Laksov K. 2019. Contradictions in clinical teachers' engagement in educational development: an activity theory analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 24(1):125–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström Y, Miettinen R, Punamäki R-L, editors. 1999. Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström Y. 1996. Developmental work research as educational research: looking ten years back and into the zone of proximal development. Nord Pedagog. 16:131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström Y. 2014. Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. 2nd ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström Y, Pyörälä E. 2021. Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning. Med Teach. 43(1):7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engestrom Y. 2000. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics. 43(7):960–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot K, Groleau C. 2011. Contradictions, transitions, and materiality in organizing processes: an activity theory perspective. First Monday. 16(6):479.
   Google Scholar
• Frank J, Snell L, Sherbino J, Can MEDS. 2015. Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/documents/canmeds/canmeds-full-framework-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman RE, Wicks AC, Parmar B. 2004. Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organ Sci. 15(3):364–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, et al. 2010. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 376(9756):1923–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Wicks AC. 2013. Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Bus Ethics Q. 23(1):97–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawick L, Cleland J, Kitto S. 2017. Getting off the carousel: exploring the wicked problem of curriculum reform. Perspect Med Educ. 6(5):337–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh Å, Segolsson M. 2019. Enabling teacher-driven school-development and collaborative learning: an activity theory-based study of leadership as an overarching practice. Educ Manag Adm Leadersh. 47(3):400–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston J, Dornan T. 2015. Activity theory: mediating research in medical education. In: Cleland J, Durning SJ, editors. Researching medical education. Chichester (UK): Wiley; p. 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur M. 2016. Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educ Psychol. 51(2):289–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram KM, Martimianakis MA, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead CR, Woods NN. 2013. Cognition before curriculum: rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning. Acad Med. 88(10):1578–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram K, Mylopoulos M, Tonin P, Bernstein S, Bryden P, Law M, Lazor J, Pittini R, Sockalingam S, Tait GR, et al. 2018. The alignment imperative in curriculum renewal. Med Teach. 40(5):443–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen DP, Wesevich A, Lichtenfeld J, Artino AR, Brydges R, Varpio L. 2017. Tying knots: an activity theory analysis of student learning goals in clinical education. Med Educ. 51(7):687–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucey CR. 2013. Medical education: part of the problem and part of the solution. JAMA Intern Med. 173(17):1639–1643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martimianakis MA, Michalec B, Lam J, Cartmill C, Taylor JS, Hafferty FW. 2015. Humanism, the hidden curriculum, and educational reform: a scoping review and thematic analysis. Acad Med. 90(11 Suppl):S5–S13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennin S. 2010. Self-organisation, integration and curriculum in the complex world of medical education. Med Educ. 44(1):20–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. 2009. How student models of expertise and innovation impact the development of adaptive expertise in medicine. Med Educ. 43(2):127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. 2017. NVivo 11. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysissoftware/home.
   Google Scholar
• Raisio H. 2009. Health care reform planners and wicked problems: is the wickedness of the problems taken seriously or is it even noticed at all? J Health Organ Manag. 23(5):477–493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid AM, Ledger A, Kilminster S, Fuller R. 2015. Can the tools of activity theory help us in advancing understanding and organisational change in undergraduate medical education? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 20(3):655–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London (UK): Routledge; p. 73–94.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks C. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 52(4):1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer F, Geithner S. 2018. Power relations in organizational change: an activity-theoretic perspective. J Account Organ Chang. 14(1):9–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuwirth LWT, Van Der Vleuten CPM. 2011. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 33(6):478–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Thomson SB. 2009. Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. JOAAG. 4(2):72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg K, Josephson A, Reeves S, Nordquist J. 2017. Power and resistance: leading change in medical education. Stud High Educ. 42(3):445–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonin P, Bernstein S, Bryden P, Kulasegaram K, Law M, Mylopoulos M, Pittini R, Tait GR, Houston P. 2020. University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine. Acad Med. 95(9S):S579–S582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velthuis F, Varpio L, Helmich E, Dekker H, Jaarsma ADC. 2018. Navigating the complexities of undergraduate medical curriculum change: change Leaders’ Perspectives. Acad Med. 93(10):1503–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead CR, Hodges BD, Austin Z. 2013. Captive on a carousel: discourses of ‘new’ in medical education 1910-2010. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 18(4):755–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar