Interprofessional bedside rounding improves quality of feedback to resident physicians

References

• ACGME Common Program Requirements. 2020. Chicago (IL): ACGME; [accessed]. https://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Common-Program-Requirements.
   Google Scholar
• Akl EA, Maroun N, Klocke RA, Schunemann HJ. 2004. A survey of internal medicine residents and faculty about the duration of attendings' inpatient rotations. J Gen Intern Med. 19(11):1133–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmION. 1999. Version 2020. Newton (MA): Spiral Software.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson PA. 2012. Giving feedback on clinical skills: are we starving our young? J Grad Med Educ. 4(2):154–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartels J, Mooney CJ, Stone RT. 2017. Numerical versus narrative: a comparison between methods to measure medical student performance during clinical clerkships. Med Teach. 39(11):1154–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates J, Konkin J, Suddards C, Dobson S, Pratt D. 2013. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Educ. 47(4):362–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You R, Hayes V, Varaklis K, Trowbridge R, Kemp H, McKelvy D. 2017. Feedback for learners in medical education: what is known? A scoping review. Acad Med. 92(9):1346–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You RG, Paterson J, Levine MA. 1997. Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Medical Teacher. 19(1):40–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You RG, Ramesh S, Hayes V, Varaklis K, Ward D, Blanco M. 2018. Trainees' perceptions of feedback: validity evidence for two FEEDME (feedback in medical education) instruments. Teach Learn Med. 30(2):162–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You RG, Trowbridge RL. 2009. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA. 302(12):1330–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JL, Quincy C, Osserman J, Pedersen OK. 2013. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews. Sociol Methods Res. 42(3):294–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canavan C, Holtman MC, Richmond M, Katsufrakis PJ. 2010. The quality of written comments on professional behaviors in a developmental multisource feedback program. Acad Med. 85(10 Suppl):S106–S109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crumlish CM, Yialamas MA, McMahon GT. 2009. Quantification of bedside teaching by an academic hospitalist group. J Hosp Med. 4(5):304–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ende J. 1983. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 250(6):777–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CP, Eva KW, Lingard L. 2017. Cracking the code: residents' interpretations of written assessment comments. Med Educ. 51(4):401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittell J. 2009. High performance healthcare: using the power of relationships to achieve quality, efficiency and resilience. 1st ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill. Chapter 2, What is relational coordination?
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalo JD, Himes J, McGillen B, Shifflet V, Lehman E. 2016. Interprofessional collaborative care characteristics and the occurrence of bedside interprofessional rounds: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 16(1):459–467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gulbas L, Guerin W, Ryder HF. 2016. Does what we write matter? Determining the features of high- and low-quality summative written comments of students on the internal medicine clerkship using pile-sort and consensus analysis: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ. 16:145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallen S, Van der Kloot T, McCormack C, Han PKJ, Lucas FL, Wierda L, Meyer D, Varaklis K, Bing-You R. 2020. Redesigning the clinical learning environment to improve interprofessional care and education: multi-method program evaluation of the iPACE pilot unit. J Grad Med Educ. 12(5):598–610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanson JL, Rosenberg AA, Lane JL. 2013. Narrative descriptions should replace grades and numerical ratings for clinical performance in medical education in the United States. Front Psychol. 4:668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Dannefer EF, Schuwirth LWT, Wass V, van der Vleuten CPM. 2016. Factors influencing students' receptivity to formative feedback emerging from different assessment cultures. Perspect Med Educ. 5(5):276–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES. 2004. Faculty and the observation of trainees' clinical skills: problems and opportunities. Acad Med. 79(1):16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES, Fiebach NH, Galaty LA, Huot S. 2001. Effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluations from faculty a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 16(7):427–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR. 2010. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 32(8):676–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine 2003. Current educational activities in the core competencies. In: Greiner AC, Knebel E, editors. Health professions education: a bridge to quality. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; p. 75–91. [accessed 2022 Jan]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221517/.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson JL, Kay C, Jackson WC, Frank M. 2015. The quality of written feedback by attendings of internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med. 30(7):973–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Conforti L, Bernabeo E, Iobst W, Holmboe E. 2011. Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via observation: a conceptual model. Med Educ. 45(10):1048–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Hatala R, Hauer KE, Holmboe E. 2017. Guidelines: the do's, don'ts and don't knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 6(5):286–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. 2009. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA. 302(12):1316–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lye PS, Biernat KA, Bragg DS, Simpson DE. 2001. A pleasure to work with – an analysis of written comments on student evaluations. Ambul Pediatr. 1(3):128–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marcotte L, Egan R, Soleas E, Dalgarno N, Norris M, Smith C. 2019. Assessing the quality of feedback to general internal medicine residents in a competency-based environment. Can Med Ed J. 10(4):e32–e47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MAXQDA Pro 2020. 1995. Version 2020. Berlin: VERBI Software GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal V, Krieger E, Lee BC, Kind T, McCavit T, Campbell J, Ottolini MC, Flores G. 2013. Pediatrics residents' perspectives on family-centered rounds: a qualitative study at 2 children's hospitals. J Grad Med Educ. 5(1):81–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• New Innovations. 1995. Version 2020. Uniontown (OH): New Innovations.
   Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V, et al. 2011. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 conference. Med Teach. 33(3):206–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman NY, Walling JL, Mitchell VG, Alexander EK. 2015. Length of attending-student and resident-student interactions in the inpatient medicine clerkship. Teach Learn Med. 27(2):130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Products MO. 2018. Version 2016. Redmond (WA): Microsoft Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Raaum SE, Lappe K, Colbert-Getz JM, Milne CK. 2019. Milestone implementation's impact on narrative comments and perception of feedback for internal medicine residents: a mixed methods study. J Gen Intern Med. 34(6):929–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz R, Farnan J, Hulland O, Kearns L, Long M, Monash B, Bhansali P, Fromme HB. 2016. Rounds today: a qualitative study of internal medicine and pediatrics resident perceptions. J Grad Med Educ. 8(4):523–531.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricotta DN, Freed JA, Hale AJ. 2020. Things we do for no Reason™: card flipping rounds. J Hosp Med. 15(8):498–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute VJ. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 78(1):153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekian A, Park YS, Tilton S, Prunty PF, Abasolo E, Zar F, Cook DA. 2019. Competencies and feedback on internal medicine residents' end-of-rotation assessments over time: qualitative and quantitative analyses. Acad Med. 94(12):1961–1969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. 2015. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 90(5):609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. 2016. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 50(9):933–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer S, Cuncic C, Butler DL, MacNeil K, Watling C, Hatala R. 2016. Investigating conditions for meaningful feedback in the context of an evidence-based feedback programme. Med Educ. 50(9):943–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Kenyon CF, Zibrowski EM, Schulz V, Goldszmidt MA, Singh I, Maddocks HL, Lingard L. 2008. Rules of engagement: residents' perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Acad Med. 83(10 Suppl):S97–S100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein DF. 2015. Feedback in clinical education: untying the Gordian knot. Acad Med. 90(5):559–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar