764
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Balancing the effectiveness and cost of online education: A preliminary realist economic evaluation

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Anderson R, Hardwick R. 2016. Realism and resources: towards more explanatory economic evaluation. Evaluation. 22(3):323–341.
  • Anderson R, Hardwick R, Pearson M, Byng R. 2018. Using realist approaches to explain the costs and cost-effectiveness of programmes. In: Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editors. Doing realist research. London: Sage Publications; p. 107–130.
  • Brown S, Dalkin SM, Bate A, Bradford R, Allen C, Brittain K, Clarke A, Hand A. 2020. Exploring and understanding the scope and value of the Parkinson's nurse in the UK (The USP Project): a realist economic evaluation protocol. BMJ Open. 10(10):e037224.
  • Cook DA. 2014a. Faculty development online. In: Steinert Y, editor. Faculty development in the health professions: a focus on research and practice, innovation and change in professional education 11. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media; p. 217–241.
  • Cook DA. 2014b. The value of online learning and MRI: finding a niche for expensive technologies. Med Teach. 36(11):965–972.
  • Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S. 2010a. Time and learning efficiency in Internet-based learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 15(5):755–770.
  • Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. 2008. Internet-based learning in the health professions. JAMA. 300(10):1181–1196.
  • Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. 2010b. Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 85:909–922.
  • Cook DA, Steinert Y. 2013. Online learning for faculty development: a review of the literature. Med Teach. 35(11):930–937.
  • Cox C, Cheon J, Crooks S, Lee J, Curtis J. 2017. Use of entertainment elements in an online video mini-series to train pharmacy preceptors. Am J Pharm Educ. 81(1):12.
  • Delgaty L. 2013. A critical examination of the time and workload involved in the design and delivery of an e-module in postgraduate clinical education. Med Teach. 35(5):e1173–e1180.
  • Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. 2020. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open. 10(11):e042378.
  • Foo J, Cook DA, Tolsgaard M, Rivers G, Cleland J, Walsh K, Abdalla ME, You Y, Ilic D, Golub R, et al. 2021. How to conduct cost and value analyses in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 139. Med Teach. 43(9):984–998.
  • Greenhalgh T, Pawson R, Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J. 2017a. What is a mechanism? What is a programme mechanism? The RAMESES II Project; [accessed 2022 Jan 13]. http://ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_What_is_a_mechanism.pdf.
  • Greenhalgh T, Pawson R, Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J. 2017b. What realists mean by context; or, why nothing works everywhere or for everyone. The RAMESES II Project; [accessed 2022 Jan 13]. http://ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_What_is_a_mechanism.pdf.
  • He L, Yang N, Xu L, Ping F, Li W, Sun Q, Li Y, Zhu H, Zhang H. 2021. Synchronous distance education vs traditional education for health science students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 55(3):293–308.
  • Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E. 2013. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. BMJ. 346(mar25 1):f1049–f1049. DOI:10.1136/bmj.f1049.
  • Ismail II, Abdelkarim A, Al-Hashel JY. 2021. Physicians’ attitude towards webinars and online education amid COVID-19 pandemic: when less is more. PLOS One. 16(4):e0250241.
  • Jung I, Lee S. 2012. Cost-effectiveness of online education. In: Moore MG, editor. Handbook of distance education. Routledge Handbooks Online; p. 521–532.
  • Manzano A. 2016. The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation. 22(3):342–360.
  • Marchal B, Kegels G, Van Belle S. 2018. Theory and realist methods. In: Emmel N, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Monaghan M, Dalkin S, editors. Doing realist research. London: Sage; p. 79–89.
  • Meyer KA. 2014. An analysis of the cost and cost-effectiveness of faculty development for online teaching. J Asynch Learn Netw. 18(1).
  • Mukumbang FC, Marchal B, Van Belle S, van Wyk B. 2020. Using the realist interview approach to maintain theoretical awareness in realist studies. Qual Res. 20(4):485–515.
  • Nguyen VNB, Rees CE, Ottrey E, Davis C, Pope K, Lee S, Waller S, Palermo C. in press. What really matters for supervision workshops? A realist evaluation. Acad Med.
  • Palermo C. 2021. Time to challenge our approaches to education. Med Educ. 55(3):281–290.
  • Palinkas L, Horwitz S, Green C, Wisdom J, Duan N, Hoagwood K. 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 42(5):533–544.
  • Pawson R, Tilley N. 1997. Realistic evaluation. London: SAGE.
  • Pawson R. 2013. The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. London: SAGE.
  • Rees CE, Lee SL, Huang E, Denniston C, Edouard V, Pope K, Sutton K, Waller S, Ward B, Palermo C. 2020. Supervision training in healthcare: a realist synthesis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 25(3):523–561.
  • Rees CE, Nguyen VNB, Ottrey E, Davis C, Pope K, Lee S, Waller S, Palermo C. 2021. The effectiveness of extended-duration supervision training for nurses and allied health professionals: a realist evaluation. Nurse Educ Today. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105225.
  • Rees CE, Foo J, Nguyen VNB, Edouard V, Maloney S, Ottrey E, Palermo C. 2022. Unpacking economic programme theory for supervision training: preliminary steps towards realist economic evaluation. Med Educ. 56(4):407–417.
  • Richmond H, Copsey B, Hall AM, Davies D, Lamb SE. 2017. A systematic review and meta-analysis of online versus alternative methods for training licensed health care professionals to deliver clinical interventions . BMC Med Educ. 17(1):227.
  • Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, DeCorby K, Bucknall TK, Kent B, Schultz A, Snelgrove-Clarke E, Stetler CB, Titler M, et al. 2012. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci. 7:33.
  • Sinclair PM, Kable A, Levett-Jones T, Booth D. 2016. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behaviour and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 57:70–81.
  • Smith DE, Mitry DJ. 2008. Investigation of higher education: the real costs and quality of online programs. J Educ Bus. 83(3):147–152.
  • Taylor S, Best D, Marriott J, Dalton L, Bull R, Leversha A, Galbraith K, Howarth H, Simpson M, Rose M. 2007. Participant views of an on-line program supporting rural pharmacy preceptors. Focus Health Prof Educ. 9(3):44–56.
  • Victorian Hospitals Industrial Association. 2020. Allied health professionals (Victorian Public Sector) (single interest employers) enterprise agreement 2020-2021; [accessed 2021 Aug 21]. https://www.vhia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/Bul-2630-Attachment-C.pdf.
  • Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. 2010. Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ. 10:12.
  • Wong G, Westhorp G, Manzano A, Greenhalgh J, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. 2016. RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. BMC Med. 14:96. DOI:10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1.
  • Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. 2013. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med. 11:21.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.