1,408
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
AMEE Guide

Robust, defensible, and fair: The AMEE guide to selection into medical school: AMEE Guide No. 153

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Alexander K, Cleland JA. 2018. Social inclusion or social engineering? The politics and reality of widening access to medicine in the UK. In: ShahM, McKay J, editors. Achieving equity and academic excellence in higher education: global perspectives in an era of widening participation. Cham (Switzerland): Palgrave-McMillan.
  • Australian Medical Council. 2012. Standards for Assessment and Accreditation of Primary Medical programmes. [Accessed 4 May 2022] https://www.amc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Standards-for-Assessment-and-Accreditation-of-Primary-Medical-Programs-by-the-Australian-Medical-Council-2012.pdf.
  • Biggs J. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ. 32(3):347–364.
  • Brown C, Ross S, Cleland J, Walsh K. 2015. Money makes the (medical assessment) world go round: the cost of components of a summative final year objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Teach. 37(7):653–659.
  • Burgess A, Roberts C, Clark T, Mossman K. 2014. The social validity of a national assessment centre for selection into general practice training. BMC Med Educ. 14:261.
  • Busche K, Elks ML, Hanson JT, Jackson-Williams L, Manuel RS, Parsons WL, Wofsy D, Yuan K. 2020. The validity of scores From the New MCAT Exam in predicting student performance: results from a multisite study. Acad Med. 95(3):387–395.
  • Chesser A, Cameron H, Evans P, Cleland J, Boursicot K, Mires G. 2009. Mires G. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools. Med Educ. 43(6):526–532.
  • Chowdry H, Goodman A. 2013. Widening participation in higher education: analysis. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. 176:1–26.
  • Cleland JA. 2018. The medical school admissions process and meeting the public’s health care needs: never the twain shall meet? Acad Med. 93(7):972–974.
  • Cleland J, Chu J, Lim S, Low J, Low-Beer N, Kwek TK. 2020. COVID 19: designing and conducting an online mini-multiple interview (MMI) in a dynamic landscape. Medical Teacher. 42(7):776–780.
  • Cleland JA, Kelly N, Moffat M, Nicholson S. 2015. Taking context seriously: explaining widening access policy enactments in UK medical schools. Med Educ. 49(1):25–35.
  • Cleland JA, Patterson F, Hanson MD. 2018. Thinking of selection and widening access as complex and wicked problems. Med Educ. 52(12):1228–1239.
  • Coyle M, Sandover S, Poobalan A, Bullen J, Cleland J. 2021. Meritocratic and fair? The discourse of UK and Australia’s widening participation policies. Med Educ. 55(7):825–839.
  • Davies DJ, Sam AH, Murphy KG, Khan SA, Choe R, Cleland J. 2022. BMAT’s predictive validity for medical school performance: a retrospective cohort study. Med Educ. 56(9):936–948.
  • Downing SM. 2003. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 37(9):830–837.
  • Ellis R, Brennan PA, Scrimgeour DSG, Lee AJ, Cleland J. 2022. Performance at medical school selection correlates with success in Part A of the intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination. Postgrad Med J. 98(1161):e19.
  • Fielding S, Tiffin PA, Greatrix R, Lee AJ, Patterson F, Nicholson S, Cleland JA. 2018. Do changing medical admissions practices in the UK impact on who is admitted? An interrupted time series analysis. BMJ Open. 8(10):e023274.
  • Foo J, Rivers G, Allen L, Ilic D, Maloney S, Hay M. 2020. The economic costs of selecting medical students: an Australian case study. Med Educ. 54(7):643–651.
  • Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
  • Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, et al. 2010. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 376(9756):1923–1958.
  • Fyfe M, Horsburgh J, Blitz J, Chiavaroli N, Kumar S, Cleland J.. 2022. The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools. Perspect Med Educ. 11(1):1–14.
  • (GMC) General Medical Council. 2018. Outcomes for graduates. [Accessed 4 May 2022] https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/standards-and-outcomes/outcomes-for-graduates.
  • Gingerich A, Kogan J, Yeates P, Govaerts M, Holmboe E. 2014. Seeing the ‘Black Box’ differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives. Med Educ. 48(11):1055–1068.
  • Girotti JA, Chanatry JA, Clinchot DM, McClure SC, Sein A, Walker IW, Searcy CA. 2020. Investigating group differences in examinees. Acad Med. 95(3):365–374.
  • Gorman D. 2018. Matching the production of doctors with national needs. Med Educ. 52(1):103–113.
  • Griffin B. 2018. Selecting medical students: considering qualities other than academic ability. Med Educ. 52(1):9–11.
  • Grima-Murcia MD, Sanchez-Ferrer F, Ramos-Rincón JM, Fernández E. 2020. Use of eye-tracking technology by medical students taking the objective structured clinical examination: descriptive Study. J Med Internet Res. 22(8):e17719.
  • Haffery FW. 1998. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 73(4):403–407.
  • Hodges B. 2013. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: learning to love the subjective and collective. Med Teach. 35(7):564–568.
  • Kerrin M, Mossop L, Morley E, Fleming G, Flaxman C. 2018. Role analysis: the foundation for selection systems. In: Patterson F, Zibarras L, editors. Selection and Recruitment in the Healthcare Professions Research, Theory and Practice. Cham (Switzerland): Palgrave Macmillan; p. 139–166.
  • Kumwenda B, Cleland JA, Walker K, Lee AJ, Greatrix R. 2017. The relationship between school type and academic performance at medical school: a national, multi-cohort study. BMJ Open. 7(8):e016291.
  • Lievens F, Ones DS, Dilchert S. 2009. Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. J Appl Psychol. 94(6):1514–1535.
  • Lievens F, Patterson F, Corstjens J, Martin S, Nicholson S. 2016. Widening access in selection using situational judgement tests: evidence from the UKCAT. Med Educ. 50(6):624–636.
  • Lievens F, Sackett PR, De Corte W. 2022. Weighting admission scores to balance predictiveness-diversity: the Pareto-optimization approach. Med Educ. 56(2):151–158.
  • Lourinho I, Ferreira MA, Severo M. 2017. Personality and achievement along medical training: evidence from a cross-lagged analysis. PLoS ONE. 12(10):e0185860.
  • Marbin J, Hutchinson Y, Schaeffer S. 2021. Avoiding the virtual pitfall: identifying and mitigating biases in graduate medical education videoconference interviews. Acad Med. 96(8):1120–1124.
  • McManus ICC, Dewberry C, Nicholson S, Dowell JS, Woolf K, Potts HWW. 2013. Construct-level predictive validity of educational attainment and intellectual aptitude tests in medical student selection: meta-regression of six UK longitudinal studies. BMC Med. 11(1):1–21.
  • McManus I, Dewberry C, Nicholson S, Dowell J. 2013. The UKCAT-12 Study: education attainment, aptitude test performance, demographic and socioeconomic contextual factors as predictors of first year outcome in a collaborative study of twelve UK medical schools. BMC Med. 11(1):244.
  • McGirr J, Seal A, Barnard A, Cheek C, Garne D, Greenhill J, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, Luscombe GM, May J, McLeod J, et al. 2019. The Australian rural clinical school (RCS) program supports rural medical workforce: evidence from a cross-sectional study of 12 RCSs. Rural and Remote Health. 19(1):4971–4980.
  • MOE & MOH 2012. Ministry of education and ministry of health’s opinions on implementation of pilot programs for cultivating excellent doctors. Beijing, China. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/moe_740/s7952/201205/t20120507_166950.html.
  • Molenda M. 2003. In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Perf Improv. 42(5):34–36.
  • Mountford-Zimdars A, Moore J, Graham J. 2016. Is contextualised admission the answer to the access challenge? Perspectives. Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 20(4):143–150.
  • Nicholson S, Cleland JA. 2015. Reframing research on widening participation in medical education: using theory to inform practice. In Cleland JA and Durning S. 2015. Researching Medical Education (Edition 1). Wiley: Oxford, p. 231–243.
  • Nicholson S, Alexander K, Coyle M, Cleland J. 2022. Widening access to medicine: using mid-range theory to extend knowledge and understanding. In Cleland JA and Durning S. 2015. Researching Medical Education (Edition 2). Wiley: Oxford, p. xxx-xxx.
  • Patterson F, Roberts C, Hanson MD, Hampe W, Eva K, Ponnamperuma G, Magzoub M, Tekian A, Cleland J,. 2018. Ottawa consensus statement: selection and recruitment to the healthcare professions. Med Teach. 40(11):1091–1101.
  • Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland J. 2016. How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Med Educ. 50(1):36–60.
  • Prideaux D, Roberts C, Eva K, Centeno A, McCrorie P, McManus C, Patterson F, Powis D, Tekian A, Wilkinson D. 2011. Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 33(3):215–223.
  • Raffoul M, Bartlett-Esquilant G, Phillips RL. Jr. 2019. Recruiting and training a health professions workforce to meet the needs of tomorrow’s health care system. Acad Med. 94(5):651–655.
  • Reinbold S. 2013. Using the ADDIE model in designing library instruction. Med Ref Serv Q. 32(3):244–256.
  • Reiter H, Eva K. 2018. Vive la difference: the freedom and inherent responsibilities when designing and implementing multiple miniinterviews. Acad Med. 93(7):969–971.
  • Roberts C, Khanna P, Rigby L, Bartle E, Llewellyn A, Gustavs J, Newton L, Newcombe JP, Davies M, Thistlethwaite J, et al. 2018. Utility of selection methods for specialist medical training: a BEME (best evidence medical education) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 45. Med Teach. 40(1):3–19.
  • Robinett K, Kareem R, Reavis K, Quezada S. 2021. A multi‐pronged, antiracist approach to optimize equity in medical school admissions. Med Educ. 55(12):1376–1382.
  • Sacker A, Schoon I, Bartley M. 2002. Social inequality in educational achievement and psychosocial adjustment throughout childhood: magnitude and mechanisms. Soc Sci Med. 55(5):863–880.
  • Saha S, Guiton G, Wimmers PF, Wilkerson L. 2008. Student body racial and ethnic composition and diversity-related outcomes in US medical schools. JAMA. 300(10):1135–1145.
  • Schreurs S. 2020. Selection for medical school: the quest for validity. Maastricht University. https://books.ipskampprinting.nl/thesis/540443-schreurs/.
  • Schreurs S, Cleland J, Muijtjens AMM, Oude Egbrink MGA, Cleutjens K. 2018. Does selection pay off? A cost–benefit comparison of medical school selection and lottery systems. Med Educ. 52(12):1240–1248.
  • Schreurs S, Cleutjens K, Cleland J, Muijtjens AMM, Oude Egbrink MGA. 2018. Selection into medicine: the predictive validity of an outcome-based procedure. BMC Med Educ. 18(1):214.
  • Schreurs S, Cleutjens K, Cleland J, Oude Egbrink MGA. 2020. Outcomes-based selection into medical school: predicting excellence in multiple competencies during the clinical years. Acad Med. 95(9):1411–1420.
  • Schreurs S, Cleutjens K, Collares CF, Cleland J, Oude Egbrink MGA. 2020. Opening the black box of selection. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 25(2):363–382.
  • Scott I, Yeld N, McMillan J, Hall M. 2005. Equity and excellence in higher education: the case of the University of Cape Town. In: Bowen W. Kurzweil M., Tobin E, editors, Equity and excellence in American higher education. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, VA, p. 261–284.
  • Stegers-Jager KM. 2018. Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school. Med Educ. 52(1):86–95.
  • Stegers-Jager KM, Steyerberg EW, Lucieer SM, Themmen AP. 2015. Ethnic and social disparities in performance on medical school selection criteria. Med Educ. 9(1):124–133.
  • Siu E, Reiter HI. 2009. Overview: what’s worked and what hasn’t as a guide towards predictive admissions tool development. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 14(5):759–775.
  • Ten Cate O. 2021. Rationales for a lottery among the qualified to select medical trainees: decades of Dutch experience. J Grad Med Educ. 13(5):612–615.
  • Terregino CA, Saguil A, Price-Johnson T, Anachebe NF, Goodell K. 2020. The diversity and success of medical school applicants with scores in the middle third of the MCAT score scale. Acad Med. 95(3):344–350.
  • Tiffin PA, Dowell JS, McLachlan JC. 2012. Widening access to UK medical education for under-represented socioeconomic groups: modelling the impact of the UKCAT in the 2009 cohort. BMJ. 344(apr17 2):e1805–e1805.
  • Tiffin PA, Mwandigha LM, Paton LW, Hesselgreaves H, McLachlan JC, Finn GM, Kasim AS. 2016. Predictive validity of the UKCAT for medical school undergraduate performance: a national prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 14(1):140.
  • Ungtrakul T, Lamlertthon W, Boonchoo B, Auewarakul C. 2020. Virtual multiple mini‐interview during a COVID-19 pandemic. Med Educ. 54(8):764–765.
  • van der Merwe L, van Zyl G, St Clair Gibson A, Viljoen M, Iputo J, Mammen M, Chitha W, Perez A, Hartman N, Fonn S, et al. 2015. South African medical schools: current state of selection criteria and medical students’ demographic profile. S Afr Med J. 106(1):76–81.
  • Webster ES, Paton LW, Crampton PES, Tiffin PA. 2020. Situational judgement test validity for selection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 54(10):888–902.
  • Witzburg RA, Sondheimer HM. 2013. Holistic review—Shaping the medical profession one applicant at a time. N Engl J Med. 368(17):1565–1567.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.