https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-2726
References
- Bauer D, Lahner FM, Schmitz FM, Guttormsen S, Huwendiek S. 2020. An overview of and approach to selecting appropriate patient representations in teaching and summative assessment in medical education. Swiss Med Wkly. 150:w20382.
- Bokken L, Linssen T, Scherpbier A, van der Vleuten C, Rethans JJ. 2009. Feedback by simulated patients in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review of the literature. Med Educ. 43(3):202–210.
- Charmaz K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. London (UK): SAGE.
- Edmondson AC, Besieux T. 2021. Reflections: voice and silence in workplace conversations. J Change Manage. 21(3):269–286.
- Eppich W, Gormley G, Teunissen P, et al. 2019. In-depth interviews. In: Nestel D, Hui J, Kunkler K, editors. Healthcare simulation research: a practical guide. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 85–91.
- Eppich W, Olmos-Vega F, Watling C, et al. 2019. Grounded theory methodology: key principles. In: Nestel D, Hui J, Kunkler K, editors. Healthcare simulation research. Cham: Springer.
- George RE, Wells H, Cushing A. 2022. Experiences of simulated patients in providing feedback in communication skills teaching for undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ. 22(1):339.
- Gibbs A, et al. 2012. Chapter 168, focus groups and group interviews. In: Arthur J, Waring M, Coe R, editors. Research methods and methodologies in education. London: SAGE; p. 7.
- Kaplonyi J, Bowles KA, Nestel D, Kiegaldie D, Maloney S, Haines T, Williams C. 2017. Understanding the impact of simulated patients on health care learners’ communication skills: a systematic review. Med Educ. 51(12):1209–1219.
- Kolbe M, Eppich W, Rudolph J, Meguerdichian M, Catena H, Cripps A, Grant V, Cheng A. 2020. Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 6(3):164–171.
- Lewis KL, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, Holzer H, Lyman L, Smith C, Thompson TM, Wallace A, Gliva-McConvey G. 2017. The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP). Adv Simul. 2:10.
- Low MJW, Khoo KSM, Kuan WS, Ooi SBS. 2020. Cross-sectional study of perceptions of qualities of a good medical teacher among medical students from first to final year. Singapore Med J. 61(1):28–33.
- Marie JA. 2016. Student views on the value of feedback. J Educ Train Stud. 4(6):207–213.
- Mavis B, Turner J, Lovell K, Wagner D. 2006. DEVELOPMENTS: faculty, students, and actors as standardized patients: expanding opportunities for performance assessment. Teach Learn Med. 18(2):130–136.
- McLean M, Johnson P, Sargeant S, Green P. 2015. Simulated patients’ perspectives of and perceived role in medical students’ professional identity development. Simul Healthc. 10(2):85–91.
- Muckler VC. 2017. Exploring suspension of disbelief during simulation-based learning. Clin Simul Nurs. 13(1):3–9.
- Nestel D, Clark S, Tabak D, Ashwell V, Muir E, Paraskevas P, Higham J. 2010. Defining responsibilities of simulated patients in medical education. Simul Healthc. 5(3):161–168.
- Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. 2014. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 9(6):339–349.
- Starr SA, Plack MM, Lewis KL, Blatt B. 2021. How do standardized patients form their complex identities? The impact of interactions with medical students. Simul Healthc. 16(1):3–12.
- Sullivan C, Condron CM, O'Connor L, Pawlikowska T, Murray JM. 2021. Their OSCE, not your Oscar: simulated patients’ perspectives. Clin Teach. 18(6):596–601.
- Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, O'Brien BC, Rees CE. 2017. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 51(1):40–50.
- Viret F, Vadot S, Morend L, Christen A, Bonvin R. 2016. Working with actors and non-actors as simulated patients: an advantage? [version 1]. MedEdPublish. 5:61.