400
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Concurrent versus terminal feedback: The effect of feedback delivery on lumbar puncture skills in simulation training

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all

References

  • Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, Etchells E, Ghali WA, Hébert P, Majumdar SR, et al. 2004. The Canadian adverse events study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ. 170(11):1678–1686.
  • Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Caprio T, McGaghie WC, Simuni T, Wayne DB. 2012. Simulation-based education with mastery learning improves residents’ lumbar puncture skills. Neurology. 79(2):132–137.
  • Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. 1996. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature. 382(6588):252–255.
  • Braun C, Kessler DO, Auerbach M, Mehta R, Scalzo AJ, Gerard JM. 2017. Can residents assess other providers’ infant lumbar puncture skills: validity evidence for a global rating scale and subcomponent skills checklist. Pediatr Emergency Care. 33(2):80–85.
  • Castro MAB, de Almeida RLM, Lucchetti ALG, Tibiriçá SHC, da Silva Ezequiel O, Lucchetti G. 2021. The use of feedback in improving the knowledge, attitudes and skills of medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. MedSciEduc. 31(6):2093–2104.
  • Chang JY, Chang GL, Chang Chien CJ, Chung KC, Hsu AT. 2007. Effectiveness of two forms of feedback on training of a joint mobilization skill by using a joint translation simulator. Phys Ther. 87(4):418–430.
  • Fraser K, Ma I, Teteris E, Baxter H, Wright B, McLaughlin K. 2012. Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training. Med Educ. 46(11):1055–1062.
  • Gerard JM, Kessler DO, Braun C, Mehta R, Scalzo AJ, Auerbach M. 2013. Validation of global rating scale and checklist instruments for the infant lumbar puncture procedure. Simul Healthc. 8(3):148–154.
  • Hatala R, Cook D, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R. 2014. Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 19(2):251–272.
  • Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. 2005. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systemic review. Med Teach. 27(1):10–28.
  • Klepsch M, Schmitz F, Seufert T. 2017. Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Front Psychol. 8:1–18.
  • Lammers RL, Temple KJ, Wagner MJ, Ray D. 2005. Competence of new emergency medicine residents in the performance of lumbar punctures. Acad Emerg Med. 12(7):622–628.
  • Lean LL, Hong RYS, Ti LK. 2017. End-task versus in-task feedback to increase procedural learning retention during spinal anaesthesia training of novices. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 22(3):713–721.
  • Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, Hebert L, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, Hiatt H. 1991. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 324(6):377–384.
  • Leppink J, van den Heuvel A. 2015. The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 4(3):119–127.
  • Ma IWY, Brindle ME, Ronksley PE, Lorenzetti DL, Sauve RS, Ghali WA. 2011. Use of simulation-based education to improve outcomes of central venous catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 86(9):1137–1147.
  • Marteau TM, Bekker H. 1992. The development of a six‐item short‐form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 31(3):301–306.
  • Matlow AG, Baker GR, Flintoft V, Cochrane D, Coffey M, Cohen E, Cronin CM, Damignani R, Dubé R, Galbraith R, et al. 2012. Adverse events among children in Canadian hospitals: the Canadian paediatric adverse events study. CMAJ. 184(13):E709–E718.
  • McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. 2010. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 44(1):50–63.
  • McMillan H, Writer H, Moreau K, Eady K, Sell E, Lobos A, Grabowski J, Doja A. 2016. Lumbar puncture simulation in pediatric residency training: improving procedural competence and decreasing anxiety. BMC Med Educ. 16(1):198.
  • Moran TP. 2016. Anxiety and working memory capacity: a meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychol Bull. 142(8):831–864.
  • O’Connor A, Schwaitzberg SD, Cao CGL. 2008. How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture? Surg Endosc. 22(7):1614–1619.
  • Ouwehand K, Kroef A v d, Wong J, Paas F. 2021. Measuring cognitive load: are there more valid alternatives to likert rating scales? Front Educ. 6:1–13.
  • Paas FG. 1992. Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. J Educ Psychol. 84(4):429–434.
  • Sattelmayer M, Elsig S, Hilfiker R, Baer G. 2016. A systematic review and meta-analysis of selected motor learning principles in physiotherapy and medical education. BMC Med Educ. 16(1):15.
  • Sweller J, van Merriënboer JJG, Paas F. 2019. Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educ Psychol Rev. 31(2):261–292.
  • Tluczek A, Henriques JB, Brown RL. 2009. Support for the reliability and validity of a six-item state anxiety scale derived from the state-trait anxiety inventory. J Nurs Meas. 17(1):19–28.
  • Walsh CM, Ling SC, Wang CS, Carnahan H. 2009. Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med. 84(10):S54–S57.
  • Xeroulis GJ, Park J, Moulton CA, Reznick RK, LeBlanc V, Dubrowski A. 2007. Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback. Surgery. 141(4):442–449.
  • Young J, Merrienboer J, Durning S, Cate O. 2014. Cognitive load theory: implications for medical education: {AMEE} guide No. 86. Med Teach. 36(5):371–384.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.