Changes in French family medicine residents’ perspectives about patient partners’ participation in teaching: A qualitative study in co-facilitated practice exchange groups

References

• Aires MJ, Gagnayre R, Gross O, Khau C-A, Haghighi S, Mercier A, Ruelle Y, Marchand C. 2019. The patient teacher in general practice training: perspectives of residents. J Patient Exp. 6(4):287–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beyer M, Gerlach FM, Flies U, Grol R, Król Z, Munck A, Olesen F, O'Riordan M, Seuntjens L, Szecsenyi J. 2003. The development of quality circles/peer review groups as a method of quality improvement in Europe.: Results of a survey in 26 European countries. Fam Pract. 20(4):443–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ. 32(3):347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleakley A, Bligh J. 2008. Students learning from patients: let’s get real in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 13(1):89–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabant Y, Viltet A, Buhagiar M, Blanchard C, Andrieux M, Parthenay P, Gomes J. 2019. Effectiveness of practice exchange groups in the training of medical postgraduate students: a review of the literature (French). Exercer. 155:328–334.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng PTM, Towle A. 2017. How patient educators help students to learn: an exploratory study. Med Teach. 39(3):308–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codsi M-P, Karazivan P, Rouly G, Leclaire M, Boivin A. 2021. Changing relationships: how does patient involvement transform professional identity? An ethnographic study. BMJ Open. 11(7):e045520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijk SW, Duijzer EJ, Wienold M. 2020. Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 10(7):e037217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiquet L, Dupard M, Fortier H, Pancher M, Annezo F, Renaut P, Allory E. 2022. Perspectives of patient educators about their participation in an interprofessional program for healthcare students and postgraduate medical students. J Interprofessional Care. 0(0):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardien È. 2019. Les savoirs expérientiels : entre objectivité des faits, subjectivité de l’expérience et pertinence validée par les pairs. Vie Sociale. n°25-26(1):95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon M, Gupta S, Thornton D, Reid M, Mallen E, Melling A. 2020. Patient/service user involvement in medical education: a best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 58. Med Teach. 42(1):4–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross O, Ruelle Y, Sannié T, Khau C-A, Marchand C, Mercier A, Cartier T, Gagnayre R. 2017. Un département universitaire de médecine générale au défi de la démocratie en santé : la formation d’internes de médecine générale par des patients-enseignants. Revue Francaise Des Affaires Sociales. (1):61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Jha V, Quinton ND, Bekker HL, Roberts TE. 2009. What educators and students really think about using patients as teachers in medical education: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 43(5):449–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio H, Pietilä A-M, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. 2016. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 72(12):2954–2965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karazivan P, Dumez V, Flora L, Pomey M-P, Del Grande C, Ghadiri DP, Fernandez N, Jouet E, Las Vergnas O, Lebel P. 2015. The patient-as-partner approach in health care: a conceptual framework for a necessary transition. Acad Med. 90(4):437–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiger ME, Varpio L. 2020. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 42(8):846–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalani M, Baines R, Bryce M, Marshall M, Mead S, Barasi S, Archer J, Regan de Bere S. 2019. Patient and public involvement in medical performance processes: A systematic review. Health Expect. 22(2):149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. Health for the people, by the people: building people-centred health systems. OECD Health Policy Studies, Éditions OCDE, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget J. 1971. Inconscient affectif et inconscient cognitif. Raipr. 19(1):11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Renard É, Roussiau N. 2007. Transformation des représentations sociales et persuasion (modèle ELM) : les effets de la crédibilité de la source. Bulletin De Psychologie. 489(3):211–224.
   Google Scholar
• Renedo A, Komporozos-Athanasiou A, Marston C. 2018. Experience as Evidence: the Dialogic Construction of Health Professional Knowledge through Patient Involvement. Sociology. 52(4):778–795.
   Google Scholar
• Romme S, Bosveld MH, Van Bokhoven MA, De Nooijer J, Van den Besselaar H, Van Dongen JJJ. 2020. Patient involvement in interprofessional education: A qualitative study yielding recommendations on incorporating the patient’s perspective. Health Expect. 23(4):943–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. 2007. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towle A, Bainbridge L, Godolphin W, Katz A, Kline C, Lown B, Madularu I, Solomon P, Thistlethwaite J. 2010. Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals: Active patient involvement in education. Med Educ. 44(1):64–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viau R, Joly J, Bédard D. 2005. La motivation des étudiants en formation des maîtres à l’égard d’activités pédagogiques innovatrices. rse. 30(1):163–176.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization 2021. Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), also known as chronic diseases. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
   Google Scholar