Peer assessment in medical communication skills training in programmatic assessment: A qualitative study examining faculty and student perceptions

References

• Beaudoin PL, Labbé M, Fanous A, Young M, Rappaport J, Park YS, Manoukian J, Nguyen LHP. 2019. Teaching communication skills to OTL-HNS residents: multisource feedback and simulated scenarios. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 48(1):8. doi:10.1186/s40463-019-0329-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biesma R, Kennedy M-C, Pawlikowska T, Brugha R, Conroy R, Doyle F. 2019. Peer assessment to improve medical student’s contributions to team-based projects: randomised controlled trial and qualitative follow-up. BMC Med Educ. 19(1):371. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1783-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Favier RP, Rietbroek NJ, Theyse LF, Brommer H, Haarhuis JC, van Beukelen P, van der Vleuten CP, Jaarsma DA, et al. 2013. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ. 13(1):123. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok HG, Jaarsma DA, Spruijt A, Van Beukelen P, van der Vleuten CP, Teunissen PW. 2016. Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships. Med Teach. 38(1):88–95. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1017448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3(2):77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• French JC, Colbert CY, Pien LC, Dannefer EF, Taylor CA. 2015. Targeted feedback in the milestones era: utilization of the Ask-Tell-Ask feedback model to promote reflection and self-assessment. J Surg Educ. 72(6):e274-9–e279. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardavella G, Aamli-Gaagnat A, Saad N, Rousalova I, Sreter KB. 2017. How to give and receive feedback effectively. Breathe (Sheff). 13(4):327–333. doi:10.1183/20734735.009917.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison CJ, Könings K, Dannefer EF, Schuwirth L, Wass V, van der Vleuten C. 2016. Factors influencing students’ receptivity to formative feedback emerging from different assessment cultures. Perspect Med Educ. 5(5):276–284. doi:10.1007/s40037-016-0297-x.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie J, Timperley H. 2007. The Power of Feedback. Rev Educ Res. 77(1):81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer KE, Ten Cate O, Boscardin C, Irby DM, Iobst W, O'Sullivan PS. 2013. Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 19(3):435–456. doi:10.1007/s10459-013-9474-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeneman S, Oudkerk Pool A, Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM, Driessen EW. 2015. The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice. Med Educ. 49(5):487–498. doi:10.1111/medu.12645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulsman RL, Peters JF, Fabriek M. 2013. Peer-assessment of medical communication skills: the impact of students’ personality, academic and social reputation on behavioural assessment, Patient. Patient Educ Couns. 92(3):346–354. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulsman RL, van der Vloodt J. 2015. Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students’ communication skills using a web-based video annotation system. Exploring content and specificity. Patient Educ Couns. 98(3):356–363. Mar doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling C, Tsimtsiou Z, Essers G, van Nuland M, Anvik T, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Hovey R, Joakimsen R, Perron NJ, Rosenbaum M, et al. 2017. General principles to consider when designing a clinical communication assessment program. Patient Educ Couns. 100(9):1762–1768. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. 2015. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 4(6):284–299. doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerchenfeldt S, Mi M, Eng M. 2019. The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 19(1):321. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina MS, Castleberry AN, Persky AM. 2017. Strategies for Improving Learner Metacognition in Health Professional Education. Am J Pharm Educ. 81(4):78. doi:10.5688/ajpe81478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley DW, Norcini JJ. 2014. How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85. Med Teach. 36(2):97–110. Feb doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.853119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Anderson MB, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Hays R, Palacios Mackay MF, Roberts T, Swanson D. 2018. Consensus framework for good assessment. Med Teach. 40(11):1102–1109. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raski B, Eissner A, Gummersbach E, Wilm S, Hempel L, Dederichs M, Rotthoff T. 2019. Implementation of online peer feedback for student self-reflection - first steps on the development of a feedback culture at a medical faculty. GMS J Med Educ. 36(4):Doc42. doi:10.3205/zma001250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten C, Durning SJ. 2017. What programmatic assessment in medical education can learn from healthcare. Perspect Med Educ. 6(4):211–215. doi:10.1007/s40037-017-0345-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schut S, Maggio LA, Heeneman S, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Driessen E. 2021. Where the rubber meets the road—An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education. Perspect Med Educ. 10(1):6–13. doi:10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsingos C, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Smith L. 2014. Reflective practice and its implications for pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 78(1):18. doi:10.5688/ajpe78118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson TJ, Tweed MJ. 2018. Deconstructing programmatic assessment. Adv Med Educ Pract. 9:191–197. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S144449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Govaerts MJB, Heeneman S. 2015. 12 Tips for programmatic assessment. Medical Teacher. 37(7):641–646. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten. 2016. A new holistic way of assessment: programmatic assessment.
   Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CPM, Heeneman S, Schuwirth LWT. 2017. In: Dent JA, Harden RM, Hunt D, editors. Programmatic assessment. A practical Guide for Medical Teachers. Edinburgh: Elsevier. p. 295–303.
   Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten C, van den Eertwegh V, Giroldi E. 2019. Assessment of communication skills, Patient Educ Couns. Patient Educ Couns. 102(11):2110–2113. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar