Using a boundary crossing lens to understand basic science educator and clinical educator collaboration in instructional design

References

• Akkerman S, Bakker A. 2011. Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Rev Educ Res. 81(2):132–169. doi: 10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman S, Bruining T. 2016. Multilevel boundary crossing in a professional development school partnership. J Learn Sci. 25(2):240–284. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2016.1147448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer DF, Rosenblatt S, Boyer D. 2021. Navigating landscapes of practice: a longitudinal qualitative study of physicians in medical education. Med Educ. 55(10):1205–1213. doi: 10.1111/medu.14572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandiera G, Kuper A, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead C, Ruetalo M, Kulasegaram K, Woods NN. 2018. Back from basics: integration of science and practice in medical education. Med Educ. 52(1):78–85. doi: 10.1111/medu.13386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry M, Kuijer-Siebelink W, Niewenhuis LAFM, Scherpbier N. 2020. Professional development arising from multiple-site workplace learning: boundary crossing between the education and clinical contexts. BMC Med Educ. 20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02225-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. 2015. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Med Teach. 37(4):312–322. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.970998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks JV, Dickinson BL, Quesnelle KM, Bonaminio GA, Chalk-Wilayto J, Dahlman KB, Fulton TB, Hyland KM, Kruidering M, Osheroff N, et al. 2023. Professional identity formation of basic science medical educators: a qualitative study of identity supports and threats. Acad Med. 98(11S):S14–S23. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burk-Rafel J, Harris KB, Heath J, Milliron A, Savage DJ, Skochelak SE. 2020. Students as catalysts for curricular innovation: a change management framework. Med Teach. 42(5):572–577. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1718070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo J-M, Park YS, Harris I, Cheung JJH, Sood L, Clark MD, Kulasegaram K, Brydges R, Norman G, Woods N. 2018. A critical narrative review of transfer of basic science knowledge in health professions education. Med Educ. 52(6):592–604. doi: 10.1111/medu.13519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM, Woods NN, Moulton C, Ringsted CV, Brydges R. 2018. Knowing how and knowing why: testing the effect of instruction designed for cognitive integration on procedural skills transfer. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 23(1):61–74. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9774-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlman KB, Weinger MB, Lomis KD, Nanney L, Osheroff N, Moore DE, Estrada L, Cutrer WB. 2018. Integrating foundational sciences in a clinical context in the post-clerkship curriculum. MedSciEduc. 28(1):145–154. doi: 10.1007/s40670-017-0522-1.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel M, Morrison G, Hauer KE, Pock A, Seibert C, Amiel J, Poag M, Ismail N, Dalrymple JL, Esposito K, et al. 2021. Strategies from 11 U.S. Medical Schools for integrating basic science into core clerkships. Acad Med. 96(8):1125–1130. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Nooijer J, Dolmans DHJM, Stalmeijer RE. 2022. Applying landscapes of practice principles to the design of interprofessional education. Teach Learn Med. 34(2):209–214. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1904937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez I, Zumwalt AC. 2020. Integrating the basic sciences in medical curricula: focus on the basic scientists. Adv Physiol Educ. 44(2):119–123. doi: 10.1152/advan.00172.2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström Y. 2001. Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. J Educ Work. 14(1):133–156. doi: 10.1080/13639080020028747.
   Google Scholar
• Fall LH, Wilson-Delfosse AL, editors. 2018. Aquifer Sciences curriculum. [accessed 2021 Jun 21]. Retrieved from https://www.aquifersciences.org
   Google Scholar
• Fall LH, English R, Fulton TB, Harris DM, Ngo K, Nixon J, Hembrook-Short J, Wilson-Delfosse A. 2021. Thinking slow more quickly: development of integrated illness scripts to support cognitively integrated learning and improve clinical decision-making. Med Sci Educ. 31(3):1005–1007. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01293-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fulton TB, Collins S, van der Schaaf M, O'Brien BC. 2023. Connecting biochemistry knowledge to patient care in the clinical workplace: senior medical students’ perceptions about facilitators and barriers. Teach Learn Med. 35(4):398–410. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2084400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman E, Schroth WS. 2012. Perspective: deconstructing integration: a framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy. Acad Med. 87(6):729–734. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253cad4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haramati A. 2015. Educating the educators: a key to curricular integration. Acad Med. 90(2):133–135. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM. 2000. The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ. 34(7):551–557. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00697.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris DM. 2020. Letter to the Editor: it takes two to build a relationship for optimal integration of basic sciences in medical curricula. Adv Physiol Educ. 44(3):400–401. doi: 10.1152/advan.00107.2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck AJ, Chase AJ. 2021. A tool for evaluating session-level integration in medical education. Med Sci Educ. 31(2):647–654. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01241-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopkins R, Pratt D, Bowen JL, Regehr G. 2015. Integrating basic science without integrating basic scientists: reconsidering the place of individual teachers in curriculum reform. Acad Med. 90(2):149–153. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB. 2007. The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: a meta-analytic review of team demography. J Manag. 33(6):987–1015. doi: 10.1177/0149206307308587.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kercheval JB, Mott NM, Kim EK, Boscardin CK, Klein BA, Hauer KE, Daniel M. 2023. Students’ perspectives on basic and clinical science integration when step 1 is administered after the core clerkships. Teach Learn Med. 35(2):117–127. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2030235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Willett LR, Pan WJ, Afran J, Walker JA, Shea JA. 2018. Impact of required versus self-directed use of virtual patient cases on clerkship performance: a mixed-methods study. Acad Med. 93(5):742–749. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluijtmans M, de Haan E, Akkerman S, van Tartwijk J. 2017. Professional identity in clinician-scientists: brokers between care and science. Med Educ. 51(6):645–655. doi: 10.1111/medu.13241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram KM, Martimianakis MA, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead CR, Woods NN. 2013. Cognition before curriculum: rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning. Acad Med. 88(10):1578–1585. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a45def.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegaram K, Manzone JC, Ku C, Skye A, Wadey V, Woods NN. 2015. Cause and effect: testing a mechanism and method for the cognitive integration of basic science. Acad Med. 90(11 Suppl):S63–S69. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik AS, Malik RH. 2011. Twelve tips for developing an integrated curriculum. Med Teach. 33(2):99–104. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.507711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuwissen SNE, Gijselaers WH, van Oorschot TD, Wolfhagen IHAP, Oude Egbrink MGA. 2021. Enhancing team learning through leader inclusiveness: a one-year ethnographic case study of an interdisciplinary teacher team. Teach Learn Med. 33(5):498–508. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1887738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuwissen SNE, Gijselaers WH, Wolfhagen IHAP, Oude Egbrink MGA. 2020. How teachers meet in interdisciplinary teams: hangouts, distribution centers, and melting pots. Acad Med. 95(8):1265–1273. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuwissen SNE, Gijselaers WH, Wolfhagen IHAP, Oude Egbrink MGA. 2021. Working beyond disciplines in teacher teams: teachers’ revelations on enablers and inhibitors. Perspect Med Educ. 10(1):33–40. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00644-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam SB, Tisdale EJ. 2016. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Miloslavsky EM, Besche HC, Calderwood SB, Chang BS, Dienstag JL, King RW, Mitchell RN, Schwartzstein RM, Thomas H, Hundert EM, et al. 2022. Advanced integrated science courses: building a skill set to engage with the interface of research and medicine. Acad Med. 97(10):1467–1473. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. 2014. Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qual Inquiry. 20(8):1045–1053. doi: 10.1177/1077800413513733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller JH, Jain S, Loeser H, Irby DM. 2008. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders. Med Educ. 42(8):778–785. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03110.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Gijselaers WH, Wolfhagen IHAP, Harendza S, Scherpbier AJJA. 2007. How interdisciplinary teams can create multi-disciplinary education: the interplay between team processes and educational quality. Med Educ. 41(11):1059–1066. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02898.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L. 2021. The wolf you feed: challenging intraprofessional workplace-based education norms. Med Educ. 55(8):894–902. doi: 10.1111/medu.14520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star SL, Griesemer JR. 1989. Institutional ecology, ′translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci. 19(3):387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhanthar S, Emery M, Keller K, DeMuth R, Wagner D, Borgeld M. 2020. Simulation 2.0: integrating basic scientists and clinicians in a simulation environment. Med Sci Educ. 30(4):1367–1372. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01042-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Duin TS, de Carvalho Filho MA, Pype PF, Borgmann S, Olovsson MH, Jaarsma ADC, Versluis MAC. 2022. Junior doctors’ experiences with interprofessional collaboration: wandering the landscape. Med Educ. 56(4):418–431. doi: 10.1111/medu.14711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM. 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner E. 2014. Learning in landscapes of practice: boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar