Critiques of socio-economic school compositional effects: are they valid?

References

• Allison, P. D. 2011. Fixed Effects Regression Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Armor, D. J., G. N. Marks, and A. Malatinszky. 2018. “The Impact of School SES on Student Achievement: Evidence from US Statewide Achievement Data.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 40 (4): 613–630. doi:10.3102/0162373718787917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., M. Fairbrother, and K. Jones. 2018. “Fixed and Random Effects Models: Making an Informed Choice.” Quality & Quantity 53 (2): 1051–1074. doi:10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A., and M. T. Moore. 2012. “Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” In Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, edited by R. H. Hoyle, 361–379. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Schilo, L., and K. J. Grimm. 2018. “Using Residualized Change versus Difference Scores for Longitudinal Research.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 35 (1): 32–58. doi:10.1177/0265407517718387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., and L. Khoo. 2005. “Effects of Resources, Inequality, and Privilege Bias on Achievement: Country, School, and Student Level Analyses.” American Educational Research Journal 42 (4): 575–603. doi:10.3102/00028312042004575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S., E. Campbell, C. Hobson, J. McPartland, A. Mood, F. Weinfeld, and R. York. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity OE-38001. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Domina, T., N. Pharris-Ciurej, A. M. Penner, E. K. Penner, Q. Brummet, S. R. Porter, and T. Sanabria. 2018. “Is Free and Reduced-Price Lunch a Valid Measure of Educational Disadvantage?” Educational Researcher 47 (9): 539–555. doi:10.3102/0013189X18797609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunteman, G. H. 1989. Principal Components Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, M., O. Christ, and G. Lemmer. 2014. “Individual Differences Make a Difference: On the Use and the Psychometric Properties of Difference Scores in Social Psychology.” European Journal of Social Psychology 44 (7): 673–682. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonski, D., K. Boston, K. Greiner, C. Lawrence, B. Scales, and P. Tannock. 2011. Review of Funding for Schooling: Final Report. Canberra: Federal Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/review-of-funding-for-schooling-final-report-dec-2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grilli, L., and C. C. Rampichini. 2011. “The Role of Sample Cluster Means in Multilevel Models: A View on Endogeneity and Measurement Error Issues.” Methodology 7 (4): 121–133. doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker, R., and P. Tymms. 2004. “The Effects of Student Composition on School Outcomes.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 15 (2): 177–199. doi:10.1076/sesi.15.2.177.30432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honaker, J., G. King, and M. Blackwell. 2011. “Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data.” Journal of Statistical Software 45 (7): 1–47. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., and S. E. Mayer. 1990. “The Social Consequences of Growing up in a Poor Neighborhood.” In Inner-City Poverty in the United States, edited by L. E. LynnJr. and M. G. H. McGeary, 111–186. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlenberg, R. D. 2007. “Socioeconomic School Integration.” North Carolina Law Review 85 (5): 1545–1594.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, S., and S. Fullarton. 2002. “Classroom and School Factors Affecting Mathematics Achievement: A Comparative Study of Australia and the United States Using TIMSS.” Australian Journal of Education 46 (2): 154–171. doi:10.1177/000494410204600205.
   Google Scholar
• Leckie, G., and H. Goldstein. 2009. “The Limitations of Using School League Tables to Inform School Choice.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 172 (4): 835–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L., and K. Rickard. 2014. Value Added Models for NSW Government Schools. Sydney: NSW Government Office of Education. https://www.cese.nsw.gov.au//images/stories/PDF/VAPaper_v3-1Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, L., and K. Rickard. 2016. Mobility of Students in NSW Government Schools. Sydney: NSW Government Office of Education. https://www.cese.nsw.gov.au/images/stories/PDF/student_mobility_report_feb16_AA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, O., H. W. Marsh, A. Robitzsch, U. Trautwein, T. Asparouhov, and B. Muthén. 2008. “The Multilevel Latent Covariate Model: A New, More Reliable Approach to Group-Level Effects in Contextual Studies.” Psychological Methods 13 (3): 203–229. doi:10.1037/a0012869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N. 2010. “What Aspects of Schooling Are Important? School Effects on Tertiary Entrance Performance.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (3): 267–287. doi:10.1080/09243451003694364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N. 2014. “Demographic and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Student Achievement over the School Career.” Australian Journal of Education 58 (3): 223–247. doi:10.1177/0004944114537052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N. 2015. “Are School-SES Effects Statistical Artefacts? Evidence from Longitudinal Population Data.” Oxford Review of Education 41 (1): 122–144. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1006613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N. 2016. “The Relative Effects of Socio-Economic, Demographic, Non-Cognitive and Cognitive Influences on Student Achievement in Australia.” Learning and Individual Differences 49: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N. 2017. “Is SES Really That Important for Educational Outcomes in Australia? A Review and Some Recent Evidence.” The Australian Educational Researcher 44 (2): 191–211. doi:10.1007/s13384-016-0219-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., O. Lüdtke, A. Robitzsch, U. Trautwein, T. Asparouhov, B. Muthén, and B. Nagengast. 2009. “Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 44 (6): 764–802. doi:10.1080/00273170903333665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConney, A., and L. B. Perry. 2010. “Science and Mathematics Achievement in Australia: The Role of School Socioeconomic Composition in Educational Equity and Effectiveness.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 8 (3): 429–452. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9197-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendolia, S., and P. Siminski. 2015. The Role of Education in Intergenerational Economic Mobility in Australia: Final Report. Sydney: NSW Government Office of Education. https://www.cese.nsw.gov.au/publications-filter/report-the-role-of-education-in-intergenerational-economic-mobility-in-australia.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 2017. Mplus User’s Guide: 8th Edition. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. http://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M. C., and J. Van Damme. 2001. “Relationship between School Composition and Characteristics of School Process and Their Effect on Mathematics Achievement.” British Educational Research Journal 27 (4): 407–432. doi:10.1080/01411920120071434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through Equity (Volume II): Giving Every Student the Chance to Succeed. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/19963777.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2016. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264266490-en.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2017. PISA 2015 Technical Report. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015-technical-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Palardy, G. J. 2008. “Differential School Effects among Low, Middle, and High Social Class Composition Schools: A Multiple Group, Multilevel Latent Growth Curve Analysis.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 19 (1): 21–49. doi:10.1080/09243450801936845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palardy, G. J. 2013. “High School Socioeconomic Segregation and Student Attainment.” American Educational Research Journal 50 (4): 714–754. doi:10.3102/0002831213481240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokropek, A. 2015. “Phantom Effects in Multilevel Compositional Analysis: Problems and Solutions.” Sociological Methods & Research 44 (4): 677–705. doi:10.1177/0049124114553801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: n.p. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., and J. Willms. 1995. “The Estimation of School Effects.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 20 (4): 307–335. doi:10.2307/1165304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A. J., C. C. Chen, and J. E. Herbers. 2009. “School Mobility and Educational Success: A Research Synthesis and Evidence on Prevention.” Paper presented at the Workshop on the Impact of Mobility and Change on the Lives of Young Children, Schools, and Neighborhoods for the National Research Council, Washington, June 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rumberger, R. W., and G. J. Palardy. 2005. “Does Segregation Still Matter? The Impact of Student Composition on Academic Achievement in High School.” Teachers College Record 107 (9): 1999–2045. https://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=12152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schochet, P. Z., and H. S. Chiang. 2010. Error Rates in Measuring Teacher and School Performance Based on Student Test Score Gains. NCEE Report 2010-4004. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20104004/pdf/20104004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. 2005. “Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research.” Review of Educational Research 75 (3): 417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Televantou, I., H. W. Marsh, L. Kyriakides, B. Nagengast, J. Fletcher, and L. E. Malmberg. 2015. “Phantom Effects in School Composition Research: Consequences of Failure to Control Biases Due to Measurement Error in Traditional Multilevel Models.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (1): 75–101. doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.871302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M., H. Lauder, and T. Robinson. 2002. “School Composition and Peer Effects.” International Journal of Educational Research 37 (5): 483–504. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00016-8.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ewijk, R., and P. Sleegers. 2010. “The Effect of Peer Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Research Review 5 (2): 134–150. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D. 2010. “School Composition and Contextual Effects on Student Outcomes.” Teachers College Record 112 (4): 1008–1037. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=15658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar