The effects of managerialism in higher education on doctoral theorising: time to think?

References

• Adkins, B. 2009. “PhD Pedagogy and the Changing Knowledge Landscapes of Universities.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (2): 165–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360902725041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armsby, P., C. Costley, and S. Cranfield. 2018. “The Design of Doctorate Curricula for Practising Professionals.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (12): 2226–2237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1318365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W. 2017. “Content and Context in Knowledge Production: A Critical Review of Doctoral Supervision Literature.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (7): 1145–1157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1079702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. 1990. The Structure of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. 1999. “Vertical and Horizontal Discourse: An Essay.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 20 (2): 157–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Rev. ed. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. 2003. Class, Codes and Control. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. Vol. IV. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B., and J. Solomon. 1999. “‘Pedagogy, Identity and the Construction of a Theory of Symbolic Control’: Basil Bernstein Questioned by Joseph Solomon.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 20 (2): 265–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association. 2018. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th ed. London: BERA.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, G., and I. Lunt. 2014. “The Concept of ‘Originality’ in the Ph.D.: How is It Interpreted by Examiners?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (7): 803–820. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.870970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costley, C. 2013. “Evaluation of the Current Status and Knowledge Contributions of Professional Doctorates.” Quality in Higher Education 19 (1): 7–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2013.772465.
   Google Scholar
• Crossouard, B. 2013. “Conceptualising Doctoral Researcher Training through Bernstein’s Theoretical Frameworks.” International Journal for Researcher Development 4 (2): 72–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRD-05-2013-0007.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R. 1998. “New Managerialism’ and Higher Education: The Management of Performances and Cultures in Universities in the United Kingdom.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 8 (1): 47–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021980020014.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., and K. J. Brehony. 2005. “Management as Ideology: The Case of ‘New Managerialism’ in Higher Education.” Oxford Review of Education 31 (2): 217–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980500117827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuchar, R. 2008. “Facilitator, Director or Critical Friend?: Contradiction and Congruence in Doctoral Supervision Styles.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (4): 489–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802193905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenge, L. 2012. “Enhancing the Doctoral Journey: The Role of Group Supervision in Supporting Collaborative Learning and Creativity.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (4): 401–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.520697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, A., and B. Arvidsson. 2011. “Research Supervisors’ Different Ways of Experiencing Supervision of Doctoral Students.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (1): 7–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903402151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C. 2011. “Becoming a Supervisor’: The Impact of Doctoral Supervision on Supervisors’ Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (5): 557–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and J. Malfroy. 2010. “Retheorizing Doctoral Supervision as Professional Work.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 79–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902906798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, D., and S. Yerrabati. 2018. “A Systematic Review of Research on Professional Doctorates.” London Review of Education 16 (1): 10–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.1.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. 2015. “I Didn’t Have a Clue What They Were Talking About’: PhD Candidates and Theory.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 52–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., and G. Wisker. 2009. “Threshold Concepts in Research Education and Evidence of Threshold Crossing.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (4): 431–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kot, F. C., and D. D. Hendel. 2012. “Emergence and Growth of Professional Doctorates in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia: A Comparative Analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (3): 345–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.516356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. 2011. Apprenticeship in Critical Ethnographic Practice. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2008. “How Are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 2014. “New Managerialism: The Impact on Education.” Concept 5 (3): 11.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 2015. “Control by Numbers: New Managerialism and Ranking in Higher Education.” Critical Studies in Education 56 (2): 190–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.949811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloch, M. 2016. “Trends in Doctoral Education in Australia.” In International Perspectives on Designing Professional Practice Doctorates: Applying the Critical Friends Approach to the EdD and Beyond, edited by V. A. Storey, 63–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. 2016. “High Participation Systems of Higher Education.” The Journal of Higher Education 87 (2): 243– 271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2002. Researching Your Own Practice. The Discipline of Noticing. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., and S. Nayar. 2012. “Postgraduate Research Supervision: A Critical Review of Current Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (1): 63–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellors-Bourne, R., C. Robinson, and J. Metcalfe. 2016. Provision of Professional Doctorates in English HE Institutions. Cambridge: Careers Research & Advisory Centre (CRAC) Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morrish, L. 2019. Pressure Vessels: The Epidemic of Poor Mental Health among Higher Education Staff. Oxford, UK: Higher Education Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Independent Adjudicator. 2018. Annual Report 2018. Reading, UK: Office of the Independent Adjudicator. https://www.oiahe.org.uk/media/2315/annual-report-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, N., M. Tedder, R. Boyask, and P. Kelly. 2015. “Pedagogic Relations and Professional Change: A Sociocultural Analysis of Students’ Learning in a Professional Doctorate.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (1): 43–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, N., and J. Shaughnessy. 2018. “Supervision of Professional Doctoral Students: Investigating Pedagogy for Supporting Critical Voice and Theorisation.” Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE). http://www.srhe.ac.uk/downloads/reports-2016/Pratt-Shaughnessy-Research-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• QAA. 2014. UK Quality Code for Higher Education. The Frameworks for Higher Education Qualifications of UK Degree-Awarding Bodies. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. 2018. “The Landscape of Professional Doctorate Provision in English Higher Education Institutions: Inconsistencies, Tensions and Unsustainability.” London Review of Education 16 (1): 90–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.1.09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., A. Brown, I. Lunt, and L. Thorne. 2004. Professional Doctorates, Society for Research into Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shahjahan, R. A. 2020. “On ‘Being for Others’: Time and Shame in the Neoliberal Academy.” Journal of Education Policy 35 (6): 785–811. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1629027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. 2018. “Managerialism: An Ideal Type.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (9): 1668–1678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1281239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P. 2002. “Pedagogising Knowledge: Bernstein’s Theory of the Pedagogic Device.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 23 (4): 571–582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569022000038422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P. 2017. “Pedagogic Governance: Theorising with/after Bernstein.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 38 (2): 144–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1081052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P., B. Atweh, and P. Shield. 2002. “Designing Postgraduate Pedagogies Connecting Internal and External Learners.” In Australian Association for Research in Education Conference. ‘Creative Dissent: Constructive Solutions.’ Parramatta, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2012. “Theorizing in Sociology and Social Science: Turning to the Context of Discovery.” Theory and Society 41 (1): 1–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9161-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2015. The Art of Social Theory. Woodstock, UK: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2016. “Before Theory Comes Theorizing or How to Make Social Science More Interesting.” The British Journal of Sociology 67 (1): 5–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, J. H. 2009. “From Professional to PhD Student: Challenges of Status Transition.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (6): 687–691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903315357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. 2015. “Developing Doctoral Authors: Engaging with Theoretical Perspectives through the Literature Review.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 64–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar