Critical thinking in the higher education classroom: knowledge, power, control and identities

References

• Allais, S. 2012. “‘Economics Imperialism’, Education Policy and Educational Theory.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (2): 253–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.602428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. 2013. Knowledge, Power and Education: The Selected Works of Michael W. Apple. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailin, S., and M. Battersby. 2020. “Is There a Role for Adversariality in Teaching Critical Thinking?” Topoi 40 (5): 951–961. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-020-09713-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. 1997. Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. 2009. “Knowing and Becoming in the Higher Education Curriculum.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (4): 429–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902771978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J. 2010. “Promoting Official Pedagogic Identities: The Sacred and the Profane.” In Social Realism, Knowledge and the Sociology of Education: Coalitions of the Mind, edited by K. Maton and R. Moore, 81–92. London: Continum.
   Google Scholar
• Bensley, D., D. Crowe, P. Bernhardt, C. Buckner, and A. Allman. 2010. “Teaching and Assessing Critical Thinking Skills for Argument Analysis in Psychology.” Teaching of Psychology 37 (2): 91–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00986281003626656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Revised ed. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2003. Class, Codes and Control, Volume 4: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bodewig, C., R. Badiani-Magnusson, K. Macdonald, D. Newhouse, and J. Rutkowski. 2014. Skilling up Vietnam: Preparing the Workforce for a Modern Market Economy. Washington DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 2002. “Schooling in Capitalist America Revisited.” Sociology of Education 75 (1): 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3090251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, B. H. 2010. “Disrupting Hegemonic Liberalism in East Asia.” Boundary 2, 37 (2): 199–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-2010-009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dang, A. Q. 2009. “Recent Higher Education Reforms in Vietnam: The Role of the World Bank.” Education, Policy and Organisation in the Knowledge Economy (EPOKE), Working Paper 13. Department of Education, Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. W. 2013. “Critical Thinking and the Disciplines Reconsidered.” Higher Education Research & Development 32 (4): 529–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.697878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Đỗ, H. M., and Q. T. N. Đỗ. 2014. “Higher and Tertiary Education in Vietnam.” In Higher Education in Vietnam: Flexibility, Mobility and Practicality in the Global Knowledge Economy, co-authored by L. T. Trần, S. Marginson, H. M. Đỗ, Q. T. N. Đỗ, T. T. T. Lê, N. T. Nguyễn, T. T. P. Vũ, T. N. Phạm, H. T. L. Nguyễn, and T. H. T. Hồ, 29–53. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. 2018. “Critical Thinking across the Curriculum: A Vision.” Topoi 37 (1): 165–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, G. M., and M. Erikson. 2019. “Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking - Good Intentions in Conflict.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (12): 2293–2303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1486813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facione, P. A. 1990. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Newark, DE: American Philosophical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsborough, M. 2010. “Present but Not Powerful: Neoliberalism, the State and Development in Vietnam.” Globalisations 7 (4): 447–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. E. 2010. “Bare Pedagogy and the Scourge of Neoliberalism: Rethinking Higher Education as a Democratic Public Sphere.” The Educational Forum 74 (3): 184–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2010.483897.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. 2001. “Assessing Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction.” The Journal of General Education 50 (4): 270–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2001.0024.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G., M. Hayden, and N. T. Pham. 2010. “Higher Education in Vietnam: Reform, Challenges and Priorities.” In Reforming Higher Education in Vietnam: Challenges and Priorities, edited by G. Harman, M. Hayden, and N. T. Pham, 1–13. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, D. 2006. “Stand-Alone versus Integrated Critical Thinking Courses.” The Journal of General Education 55 (3): 247–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2007.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, M., and T. Q. Lam. 2010. “Vietnam’s Higher Education System.” In Reforming Higher Education in Vietnam: Challenges and Priorities, edited by G. Harman, M. Hayden, and N. T. Pham, 15–30. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, E. R. 2011. “Critical Thinking: A Literature Review.” Pearson’s Research Reports 6: 40–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L. 2016. Knowledge, Control and Critical Thinking in Singapore: State Ideology and the Politics of Pedagogic Recontextualization. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McPeck, J. E. 1981. Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• MOET (Ministry of Education and Training). 2004. Quyết Định Số: 36/2004/QĐ-BGD&ĐT, Ngày 25 Tháng 10 Năm 2004, về Việc Ban Hành bộ Chương Trình Khung Giáo Dục Đại Học Khối Ngành Ngoại Ngữ Trình độ Đại Học [Decision No. 36/2004/QĐ-BGD&ĐT, Dated 25 October 2004 on the Issue of the Set of Undergraduate Curriculum Frameworks in the Foreign Languages Disciplines]. Hà Nội: The Ministry of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• MOET (Ministry of Education and Training). 2017. Thông tư số: 12/TT-BGDĐT, Ngày 19 Tháng 5 Năm 2017, Ban Hành Quy Định về Kiểm Định Chất Lượng cơ sở Giáo Dục Đại Học [Circular No. 12/2017/TT- BGDĐT, Dated 19 May 2017 on the Issue of the Regulation on Quality Assurance at Higher Education Institutions]. Hà Nội: The Ministry of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. N. 2016. “Confucianism and Humane Education in Contemporary Vietnam.” Academy International Communication of Chinese Culture and Springer 3: 645–671.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N., and L. T. Tran. 2018. “Looking Inward or Outward? Vietnam Higher Education at the Superhighway of Globalisation: Culture, Values and Changes.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 11 (1): 28–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2017.1332457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, L., L. S. Behar-Horenstein, and C. W. Garvan. 2013. “Do Instructional Interventions Influence College Students’ Critical Thinking Skills? A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Research Review 9: 114–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2004. “Liberal Education and Global Community.” Liberal Education 90: 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., and L. Elder. 2006. Critical Thinking: Learn the Tools the Best Thinkers Use. Concise ed. Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, T. H. T. 2011. “Doi Moi (Renovation) and Higher Education Reform in Vietnam.” International Journal of Educational Reform 20 (3): 210–225.
   Google Scholar
• Phan, N. 1998. Bản Sắc Văn Hóa Việt Nam [Vietnamese Cultural Identity]. Hà Nội: Literature Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Pithers, R. T., and R. Soden. 2000. “Critical Thinking in Education: A Review.” Educational Research 42 (3): 237–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800440579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. 2010. “Critical Thinking.” International Encyclopedia of Education 6: 141–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00582-0.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P. 2002. “Pedagogising Knowledge: Bernstein’s Theory of the Pedagogic Device.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 23 (4): 571–582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569022000038422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. 2004. The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank Group and Vietnamese Government. 2016. Vietnam 2035: Towards Prosperity, Creativity, Equity and Democracy. Hà Nội: The Ministry of Planning and Investment of Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Trần, N. T. 2001. Tìm Về Bản Sắc Văn Hóa Việt Nam [Discovering Vietnamese Cultural Identities]. 2nd ed. Hồ Chí Minh City: Ho Chi Min City Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Trần, T. L., T. T. T. Lê, and T. N. Nguyễn, 2014. “Curriculum and Pedagogy.” In Higher Education in Vietnam: Flexibility, Mobility and Practicality in the Global Knowledge Economy, co-authored by L. T. Trần, S. Marginson, H. M. Đỗ, Q. T. N. Đỗ, T. T. T. Lê, N. T. Nguyễn, T. T. P. Vũ, T. N. Phạm, H. T. L. Nguyễn, and T. H. T. Hồ, 86–107. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, T. T. 2014. “Is Graduate Employability the ‘Whole of-Higher-Education-Issue?” Journal of Education and Work 28 (3): 207–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.900167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vietnamese Government. 2012. Quyết Định số: 711/QĐ-TTg, Ngày 13 Tháng 06 Năm 2012, Chiến Lược Phát Triển Giáo Dục 2011–2020 [Decision 711/QD-TTg, Dated 13th June 2012, on Educational Development Strategy 2011–2020]. Hà Nội: Vietnamese Government.
   Google Scholar
• Westheimer, J. 2008. “No Child Left Thinking: Democracy at-Risk in American Schools.” Colleagues 3 (2): 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L. 2010. “Competency-Based Training, Powerful Knowledge and the Working Class.” In Social Realism, Knowledge and the Sociology of Education, edited by K. Maton and R. Moore, 93–109. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., and J. Muller. 2010. “Three Educational Scenarios for the Future: Lessons from the Sociology of Knowledge.” European Journal of Education 45 (1): 11–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01413.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar