Research assessment, emotional practices, and the social hierarchy: what can you afford to feel?

References

• Aagaard, Kaare, and Jesper W. Schneider. 2016. “Research Funding and National Academic Performance: Examination of a Danish Success Story.” Science and Public Policy 43 (4): 518–531. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackroyd, Stephen, and Paul Thompson. 1999. Organizational Misbehaviour. London ; Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Addison, Michelle. 2017. “Overcoming Arlie Hochschild’s Concepts of the ‘Real’ and ‘False’ Self by Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s Concept Ofhabitus.” Emotion, Space and Society 23: 9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2017.01.003.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Louise. 2008. “The New Neoliberal Subjects? Young/Er Academics’ Constructions of Professional Identity.” Journal of Education Policy 23 (3): 265–285. doi: 10.1080/02680930701754047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, Lawrence D., Edward H. Huijbens, and Henrik Gutzon Larsen. 2016. “Producing Anxiety in the Neoliberal University: Producing Anxiety.” The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien 60 (2): 168–180. doi: 10.1111/cag.12261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, Jill. 2010. “Research Assessment: A Calculative Technology Governing Quality, Accountability and Equity.” In Re-Positioning University Governance and Academic Work, edited by Jill Blackmore, Marie Brennan, and Lew Zipin, 67–83. BRILL. Leiden, The Netherlands. doi: 10.1163/9789460911743
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, Ivar. 2012. “Collegiality and Hierarchy: Coordinating Principles in Higher Education.” In The Global University: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives, edited by Adam R. Nelson and Ian P. Wei. Historical Studies in Education, 85–104. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason.” Social Science Information 14 (6): 19–47. doi: 10.1177/053901847501400602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990a. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Oxford, UK: Polity Press: B. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990b. Homo Academicus. Paperback ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998a. State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. 7. print. Standford: Standford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998b. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press [u.a.].
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2011. “The Forms of Capital.” In The Sociology of Economic Life, edited by Mark S. Granovetter and Richard Swedberg. 3rd ed. 78–92. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, and Jean Claude Passeron. 1990. Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. 1990 ed. Theory, Culture & Society. London; Newbury Park, Calif: Sage in association with Theory, Culture & Society, Dept. of Administrative and Social Studies, Teesside Polytechnic.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, Frederik Voetmann. 2016. “Stillingsstrukturens Betydning for Samspillet Mellem Forskning Og Undervisning.” Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift 11 (21): 31–43. doi: 10.7146/dut.v11i21.23910
   Google Scholar
• Cottingham, Marci D. 2016. “Theorizing Emotional Capital.” Theory and Society 45 (5): 451–470. doi: 10.1007/s11186-016-9278-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1997. Essays Critical and Clinical. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. Mutual Learning Exercise Performance-Based Funding of University Research: Horizon 2020 Policy Support Facility, Summary Report.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, Stephen. 2003. Understanding Emotion at Work. London ; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frølich, Nicoline, Kaja Wendt, Ingvild Reymert, Silje Maria Tellmann, Mari Elken, Svein Kyvik, Agnete Vabø, and Even Larsen. 2018. Academic Career Structures in Europe; Perspectives from Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands, Austria and the UK. 2018:4. Oslo: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU). https://nifu.brage.unit.no/nifu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2487666/NIFUreport2018-4.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Primo, and Cynthia Hardy. 2007. “Positioning, Similarity and Difference: Narratives of Individual and Organizational Identities in an Australian University.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 23 (4): 363–383. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna, Aldo, and Matteo Piolatto. 2016. “Research Assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and Difficult, but Probably Worth It (at Least for a While).” Research Policy 45 (1): 260–271. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, Diana. 2012. “Performance-Based University Research Funding Systems.” Research Policy 41 (2): 251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, Charlotte, Francesca Lorenzi, and Tony Hall. 2016. “Performance Anxiety in Academia: Tensions within Research Assessment Exercises in an Age of Austerity.” Policy Futures in Education 14 (8): 1101–1116. doi: 10.1177/1478210316664263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingwersen, Peter, and Birger Larsen. 2014. “Influence of a Performance Indicator on Danish Research Production and Citation Impact 2000–12.” Scientometrics 101 (2): 1325–1344. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1291-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, Sara. 2017. “Evaluation as a Travelling Idea: Assessing the Consequences of Research Assessment Exercises.” Research Evaluation 26 (2): 55–65. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvx001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, Lisa. 2006. The Research Game in Academic Life. Maidenhead, England, New York: Open University Press ; Society for Research in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, Lisa. 2017. “Evaluating Academic Research: Ambivalence, Anxiety and Audit in the Risk University.” In Death of the Public University? Uncertain Futures for Higher Education in the Knowledge Economy, edited by Susan Wright and Cris Shore. “Higher Education in Critical Perspective: Practices and Policies Ser.” 213–228. New York, NY: Berghahn Books, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, Simon. 2008. “Global Field and Global Imagining: Bourdieu and Worldwide Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 29 (3): 303–315. doi: 10.1080/01425690801966386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, Marcelo, Justin J. W. Powell, Mike Zapp, and Gert Biesta. 2017. “How Does Research Evaluation Impact Educational Research? Exploring Intended and Unintended Consequences of Research Assessment in the United Kingdom, 1986–2014.” European Educational Research Journal 16 (6): 820–842. doi: 10.1177/1474904117730159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822383574.
   Google Scholar
• Matthäus, Sandra. 2017. “Towards the Role of Self, Worth, and Feelings in (Re-)Producing Social Dominance. Explicating Pierre Bourdieu’s Implicit Theory of Affect.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 42 (4 (162)). GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences: 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Higher Education and Science. 2020. “BFI Rules and Regulations.” Ministry of Higher Education and Science. https://ufm.dk/en/research-and-innovation/statistics-and-analyses/bibliometric-research-indicator/bfi-rules-and-regulations.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, Poul Erik, Niels Opstrup, and Pernille Bak Pedersen. 2018. En Fremmed Kommer Til Byen, Ti År Med Den Bibliometriske Forskningsindikator. University of Southern Denmark Studies in History and Social Sciences 562. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, Lorelli S., Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, and Nancy J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 160940691773384. doi: 10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oancea, Alis. 2019. “Research Governance and the Future(s) of Research Assessment.” Palgrave Communications 5 (1): 27. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0213-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orum, Anthony M. Joe R. Feagin, and Gideon Sjoberg. 1991. “Introduction: The Nature of the Case Study.” In A Case for the Case Study, edited by Anthony M. Orum, Joe R. Feagin, and Gideon Sjoberg, 1–26. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penz, Otto, and Birgit Sauer. 2020. Governing Affects: Neo-Liberalism, Neo-Bureaucracies, and Service Work. Routledge Studies in the Sociology of Emotions. London ; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, Rómulo, Lars Geschwind, Hanne Foss Hansen, and Kirsi Pulkkinen, eds. 2019. Reforms, Organizational Change and Performance in Higher Education: A Comparative Account from the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11738-2
   Google Scholar
• Reay, Diane. 2015. “Habitus and the Psychosocial: Bourdieu with Feelings.” Cambridge Journal of Education 45 (1): 9–23. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2014.990420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, Julie. 2013. “Academic Boards: Less Intellectual and More Academic Capital in Higher Education Governance?” Studies in Higher Education 38 (9): 1274–1289. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.619655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, Julie. 2017a. “University Governance Within an International Context.” In Academic Governance in the Contemporary University: Perspectives from Anglophone Nations, edited by Julie Rowlands, 25–45. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2688-1_2
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, Julie. 2017b. Academic Governance in the Contemporary University. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2688-1_3
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, Julie. 2018. “Deepening Understandings of Bourdieu’s Academic and Intellectual Capital through a Study of Academic Voice within Academic Governance.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (11): 1823–1836. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1284192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, Julie, and Shaun Rawolle. 2019. “The Challenge of Bourdieu’s Relational Ontology for International Comparative Research in Academic Governance Practice.” In Practice Methodologies for Education Research, Routledge, edited by T. Gale, S. Parker, and J. Rowlands. Abington UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, Julie, and Susan Wright. 2021. “Hunting for Points: The Effects of Research Assessment on Research Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (9): 1801–1815. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1706077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, Julie, and Susan Wright. 2022. “The Role of Bibliometric Research Assessment in a Global Order of Epistemic Injustice: A Case Study of Humanities Research in Denmark.” Critical Studies in Education 63 (5): 572–588. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2020.1792523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer, Monique. 2012. “Are Emotions a Kind of Practice (and Is That What Makes Them Have a History)? A Bourdieuian Aapraoch to Understanding Emotion.” History and Theory 51 (2): 193–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright. 2015. “Governing by Numbers: Audit Culture, Rankings and the New World Order: GOVERNING BY NUMBERS.” Social Anthropology 23 (1): 22–28. doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12098
   Google Scholar
• Söderlind, Johan, Laila Nordstrand Berg, Jonas Krog Lind, and Kirsi Pulkkinen. 2019. “National Performance-Based Research Funding Systems: Constructing Local Perceptions of Research?.” In Reforms, Organizational Change and Performance in Higher Education, edited by Rómulo Pinheiro, Lars Geschwind, Hanne Foss Hansen, and Kirsi Pulkkinen, 111–144. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11738-2_4
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Duncan A., Maria Nedeva, Mayra M. Tirado, and Merle Jacob. 2020. “Changing Research on Research Evaluation: A Critical Literature Review to Revisit the Agenda.” Research Evaluation 29 (3): 275–288. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvaa008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tight, Malcolm. 2010. “The Golden Age of Academe: Myth or Memory?” British Journal of Educational Studies 58 (1): 105–116. doi: 10.1080/00071000903516502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, Richard, and Jennifer Chubb. 2019. “Evaluating ‘Impact’ in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF): Liminality, Looseness and New Modalities of Scholarly Distinction.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (9): 1554–1566. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1455082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, Margaret. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. Los Angeles; London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Kate. 2020. “Playing the Fields: Theorizing Research Impact and Its Assessment.” Research Evaluation 29 (2): 191–202. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvaa001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Susan. 2014. “Knowledge That Counts.” In Under New Public Management: Institutional Ethnographies of Changing Front-Line Work, edited by Alison I Griffith and Dorothy E Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series. v. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ylijoki, Oili-Helena. 2005. “Academic Nostalgia: A Narrative Approach to Academic Work.” Human Relations 58 (5): 555–576. doi: 10.1177/0018726705055963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar