Wetland Restoration and the Involvement of Stakeholders: An Analysis Based on Value-Perspectives

References

• Amérigo, M., Aragonés, J. I., De Frutos, B., Sevillano, V., & Cortés, B. (2007). Underlying dimensions of ecocentric and anthropocentric environmental beliefs. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerke, T., & Kaltenborn, P. B. (1999). The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 415–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, L. F. C., & Lay, E. G. E. (2008). Personal values and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Business Research, 61, 678–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs, A. E. (2009). Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents’ support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2680–2689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs, A. E., Elands, B. H. M., & Langers, F. (2009). No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, B., Paradice, D., Courtney, J. F., & Cagle, J. C. (2005). Incorporating an ethical perspective into problem formulation: implications for decision support systems design. Decision support systems, 40, 197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, M. (2012). Exploring the relationship between public environmental ethics and river flood policies in western Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 93, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E. (2008). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R. (2003). Bioethics: Are our priorities right? Bioscience, 53, 1207–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekologgruppen. (2003). Dammar som reningsverk – mätningar av näringsämnesreduktionen i nylagda dammar 1993–2002. Höje å projektet & Kävlingeå-projektet [in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Ekologgruppen. (2004). Kävlingeå-projektet – Etapp II – slutrapport. Landskrona, Sweden: Ekologgruppen i Landskrona [in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Ekologgruppen. (2007). HÖJE Å Landskapsvårdsplan 2007 – Uppdatering och utveckling av 1990 års plan. Landskrona, Sweden: Ekologgruppen i Landskrona [in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Failing, L., Horn, G., & Higgins, P. (2004). Using expert judgement and stakeholder values to evaluate adaptive management options. Ecology and Society, 9, 13–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, M. S. (1996). Guidelines/codes of ethics: merging process and content. The Science of the Total Environment, 184, 13–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, C. J. J., Rossing, A. H. W., Jellema, A., Stobbelaar, J. D., Renting, H., & Van Ittersum, K. M. (2007). Exploring multi-scale trade-offs between nature conservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality—A methodology to support discussions on land-use perspectives. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 120, 58–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenborn, B. P., & Bjerke, T. (2002). Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortenkamp, K. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 261–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, T., & Söderqvist, T. (2004). Building a catchment-based environmental programme: A stakeholder analysis of wetland creation in Scania. Regional Environmental Change, 4, 132–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, F., & Frantz, C. (2005). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals? Feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organisations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 351–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. R., Minteer, B. A., & Malan, L.-C. (2011). The new conservation debate: The view from practical ethics. Biological Conservation, 144, 948–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 740–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primmer, E., & Karppinen, H. (2010). Professional judgment in non-industrial private forestry: Forester attitudes and social norms influencing biodiversity conservation. Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417–2431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., & … Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933–1949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schusler, T., Decker, D., & Pfeffer, M. (2003). Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderqvist, T. (2002). Constructed wetlands as nitrogen sinks in southern Sweden: An empirical analysis of cost determinants. Ecological Engineering, 19, 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderqvist, T. (2003). Are farmers prosocial? Determinants of the willingness to participate in a Swedish catchment-based wetland creation programme. Ecological Economics, 47, 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. (2000). Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: The case of wetland re-creation. Ecological Economics, 34, 195–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, C. P., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, A. G., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., & James, D. (2006). Reinventing grounded theory: Some questions about theory, ground and discovery. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 767–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, K. R., Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Brouwer, R. (2003). Managing wetlands: An ecological economics approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Windt, H. J., Swart, J. A. A., & Keulartz, J. (2007). Nature and landscape planning: Exploring the dynamics of valuation, the case of the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79, 218–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vugteveen, P., Lenders, H. J. R., Devilee, L. A. J., Leuven, S. E. W. R., Van Der Veeren, J. H. M. R., Wiering, A. M., & Hendriks, A. J. (2010). Stakeholder value orientations in water management. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal of the Commons, 23, 805–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar