515
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Contested periurban amenity landscapes: changing waterfront ‘countryside ideals’ in central Canada

References

  • Amory, C. (1952). The last resorts. New York, NY: Harper.
  • Ascher, F. (1995). Métapolis ou l’avenir des villes [Metapolis or the future of cities]. Paris: Éditions Jacob.
  • Aubin-Des Roches, C. (2006). Retrouver la ville à la campagne: la villégiature à Montréal au tournant du XXe siècle [Finding the city in the countryside: holiday settings in Montréal at the turn of the 20th century]. Urban History Review, 34, 17–29.10.7202/1016010ar
  • Blum, A., Cadieux, V., Luka, N., & Taylor, L. (2004). ‘Deeply connected’ to the ‘natural landscape’: Exploring the places and cultural landscapes of exurbia. In D. Ramsey & C. Bryant (Eds.), The structure and dynamics of rural territories: Geographical perspectives (pp. 104–112). Brandon: Brandon University Press.
  • Bordo, J. (1993). Jack Pine: Wilderness sublime or the erasure of the aboriginal presence from the landscape. Journal of Canadian Studies, 27, 98–128.
  • Bourne, L. S., Bunce, M. F., Taylor, L., Luka, N., & Maurer, J. (2003). Contested ground: The dynamics of peri-urban growth in the Toronto region. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 26, 251–270.
  • Bryant, C., Russwurm, L. H., & McLellan, A. G. (1982). The city’s countryside: Land and its management in the urban-rural fringe. London: Longman.
  • Bunce, M. F. (1994). The countryside ideal: Anglo-American images of landscape. London: Routledge.
  • Bunce, M. F. (2003). Reproducing rural idylls. In P. J. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 14–30). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Bureau, L. (1984). Entre l’Éden et l’Utopie. Les fondements imaginaires de l’espace québécois [Between Eden and Utopia: The fundamental imaginaries of Québécois space]. Montréal: Québec/Amérique.
  • Cadieux, K. V. (2005). Engagement with the land: Redemption of the rural residence fantasy? In S. J. Essex, A. W. Gilg, & R. Yarwood (Eds.), Rural change and sustainability: Agriculture, the environment, and communities (pp. 215–229). Wallingford: CABI.
  • Cadieux, K. V. (2011). Competing discourses of nature in exurbia. GeoJournal, 76, 341–363.10.1007/s10708-009-9299-0
  • Cadieux, K. V. (2013). The mortality of trees: Conservation as deferment in pastoral modernity. In K. V. Cadieux & L. Taylor (Eds.), Landscape and the ideology of nature in exurbia: Green sprawl (pp. 252–294). London: Routledge.
  • Cadieux, K. V., & Taylor, L. (Eds.). (2013). Landscape and the ideology of nature in exurbia: Green sprawl. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cadieux, K. V., Taylor, L. E., & Bunce, M. F. (2013). Landscape ideology in the Greater Golden Horseshoe Greenbelt Plan: Negotiating material landscapes and abstract ideals in the city’s countryside. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 307–319.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.07.005
  • Campbell, C. E. (2004). Shaped by the west wind: Nature and history in Georgian Bay. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Careless, J. M. S. (1984). Toronto to 1918: An illustrated history. Toronto: Lorimer.
  • Castree, N., & Braun, B. (1998). The construction of nature and the nature of construction: Analytical and political tools for building survivable futures. In B. Braun & N. Castree (Eds.), Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium (pp. 3–42). London: Routledge.
  • Chassay, J.-F. (1991). Entre la nature et le livre, la ville. Le paysage montréalais, à la lecture de quelques romans québécois francophones [Between nature and the book, the city: The Montréal landscape in French-language Québécois novels]. International Journal of Canadian Studies, 4, 111–125.
  • Cloke, P. J. (2003). Knowing ruralities? In P. J. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 1–13). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Clout, H. D. (1974). The growth of second-home ownership: An example of seasonal suburbanization. In J. H. Johnson (Ed.), Suburban growth: Geographical processes at the edge of the western city (pp. 101–127). London: Wiley.
  • Collin, J.-P. (2003). Montréal, tableaux d’une métropole moyenne [Montréal, portraits of a middling metropolis]. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 12, 8–15.
  • Cronon, W. (1991). Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Cupers, K., & Miessen, M. (2002). Spaces of uncertainty. (W. James, Trans.). Wuppertal: Müller & Busmann.
  • Dagenais, M. (2005). ‘Returning to nature’: Vacation and lifestyle in the Montréal region. In D. Schott, B. Luckin, & G. Massard Guilbaud (Eds.), Resources of the city: Contributions to an environmental history of modern Europe (pp. 63–79). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Dahms, F. (1996). The greying of South Georgian Bay. Canadian Geographer, 40, 148–163.10.1111/cag.1996.40.issue-2
  • Daniels, T. L., & Lapping, M. B. (1996). The two rural Americas need more, not less planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 285–288.10.1080/01944369608975694
  • de la Soudière, M. (1998). L’appel des lieux: une géographie sentimentale [The call of places: A sentimental geography]. In F. Dubost (Ed.), L’autre maison: la « résidence secondaire », refuge des générations [The other house: The ‘second home’, a retreat for generations] (pp. 102–137). Paris: Éditions Autrement.
  • Dean, J. (2005). “Said tree is a veritable nuisance”: Ottawa’s street trees 1869–1939. Urban History Review, 34, 46–57.10.7202/1016046ar
  • Demeritt, D. (2002). What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography, 26, 767–790.10.1191/0309132502ph402oa
  • Doyon, M., Bryant, C., Klein, J.-L., Veillette, L., & Yorn, C. (2011). Les mouvements migratoires vers les milieux ruraux québécois sous influence urbaine: le cas de Val-David [Migratory movements into rural Québec settings influenced by the urban: the case of Val-David]. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 34, 165–175.
  • Duncan, J. S., & Duncan, N. G. (2001). The aestheticization of the politics of landscape preservation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91, 387–409.10.1111/0004-5608.00250
  • Duncan, J. S., & Duncan, N. G. (2004). Landscapes of privilege: The politics of the aesthetic in an American suburb. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Farstad, M., & Rye, J. F. (2013). Second home owners, locals and their perspectives on rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 30, 41–51.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.11.007
  • Fortin, A., & Després, C. (2011). Le rapport à la nature et le choix du périurbain: un mode de vie ou un milieu de vie? [Rapports with nature and the choice of periurban space: a lifestyle or a life-space?]. In A. Fortin, C. Després, & G. Vachon (Eds.), La banlieue s’étale [The suburbs spread] (pp. 229–247). Québec City: Nota bene.
  • Friedmann, J., & Miller, J. (1965). The urban field. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31, 312–320.10.1080/01944366508978185
  • Gagnon, S. (2003). L’échiquier touristique québécois [The chessboard of tourism in Québec]. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
  • Gallent, N., Mace, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2005). Second homes: European perspectives and UK policies. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Gallent, N., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2000). Rural second homes in Europe: Examining housing supply and planning control. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Gannon, M. J., & Pillai, R. (2010). The Swedish stuga. In Understanding global cultures: Metaphorical journeys through 29 nations, clusters of nations, continents, and diversity (4th ed., pp. 139–151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Garreau, J. (1991). Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York, NY: Anchor.
  • Gill, B., & Witney, D. (1978). Summer places. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
  • Gordon, C. (1989). At the cottage: A fearless look at Canada’s summer obsession. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
  • Gordon, D. L. A., & Janzen, M. (2013). Suburban nation? Estimating the size of Canada’s suburban population. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 30, 197–220.
  • Greider, T., & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology, 59(1), 1–24.
  • Hague, J. (1893). Aspects of Lake Ontario. Canadian Magazine, 1, p. 263.
  • Hall, C. M., & Boyd, S. W. (2005). Nature-based tourism in peripheral areas: Introduction. In C. M. Hall & S. W. Boyd (Eds.), Nature-based tourism in peripheral areas: Development or disaster? (pp. 3–17). Clevedon: Channel View.
  • Halseth, G. (1993). Communities within communities: Changing ‘residential’ areas at Cultus Lake, British Columbia. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, 175–187.10.1016/0743-0167(93)90030-N
  • Halseth, G. (1998). Cottage country in transition: A social geography of change and contention in the rural-recreational countryside. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Halseth, G. (2004). The ‘cottage’ privilege: Increasingly elite landscapes of second homes in Canada. In C. M. Hall & D. K. Müller (Eds.), Tourism, mobility, and second homes: Between elite landscape and common ground (pp. 35–54). Clevedon: Channel View.
  • Halseth, G., & Rosenberg, M. W. (1990). Conversion of recreational residences: A case study of its measurement and management. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 99–115.
  • Halseth, G., & Rosenberg, M. W. (1995). Cottagers in an urban field. The Professional Geographer, 47, 148–159.10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.00148.x
  • Harrill, R. (2004). Residents’ attitudes toward tourism development: A literature review with implications for tourism planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 18, 251–266.10.1177/0885412203260306
  • Harris, R. (2004). Creeping conformity: How Canada became suburban, 1900–1960. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Hermer, J. (2002). Regulating Eden: The nature of order in North American parks. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442679160
  • Hodge, G. (1974). The city in the periphery. In L. S. Bourne, R. D. MacKinnon, J. Siegel, & J. W. Simmons (Eds.), Urban futures for central Canada: Perspectives on forecasting urban growth and form (pp. 281–301). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Hoggart, K. (1990). Let’s do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 6, 245–257.10.1016/0743-0167(90)90079-N
  • Holden, A. (2000). Environment and tourism. London: Routledge.
  • Hopkins, J. (1998). Signs of the post-rural: Marketing myths of a symbolic countryside. Geografiska Annaler B, 80, 65–81.10.1111/geob.1998.80.issue-2
  • Jaakson, R. (1986). Second-home domestic tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 13, 367–391.10.1016/0160-7383(86)90026-5
  • Jasen, P. (1995). Wild things: Nature, culture, and tourism in Ontario, 1790–1914. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442683495
  • Johnston, M. E. (1991). The Canadian wilderness landscape as culture and commodity. International Journal of Canadian Studies, 4, 127–144.
  • Joseph, A. E., & Smit, B. (1985). Rural residential development and municipal service provision: A Canadian case study. Journal of Rural Studies, 1, 321–337.10.1016/0743-0167(85)90045-2
  • Kaltenborn, B. P. (1998). The alternative home: Motives of recreation home use. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 52, 121–134.10.1080/00291959808552393
  • Kaltenborn, B. P., Andersen, O., & Nellemann, C. (2009). Amenity development in the Norwegian mountains: Effects of second home owner environmental attitudes on preferences for alternative development options. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 195–201.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.001
  • Killan, G. (1993). Protected places: A history of Ontario’s provincial parks system. Toronto: Dundurn.
  • Krueckeberg, D. (1995). The difficult character of property: To whom do things belong? Journal of the American Planning Association, 61, 301–309.10.1080/01944369508975644
  • Lagerqvist, M. (2014). The importance of an old rural cottage: Media representation and the construction of a national idyll in post-war Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 33–41.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.006
  • Langdalen, E. (1980). Second homes in Norway: A controversial planning problem. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 34, 139–144.10.1080/00291958008552059
  • Law, A. (2001). Industry of last resort: Negotiating admissible identities in “Leisurescape”. Society and Leisure, 24, 283–310.
  • Lees, D. (2001, March). Subdivide and conquer. Cottage Life, pp. 40–46, 108–113.
  • Lister, N.-M. (2015). Resilience: Designing the new sustainability. Topos, 90, 14–21.
  • Lofgren, O. (1999). On holiday: A history of vacationing. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520217676.001.0001
  • Luka, N. (2006). From summer cottage colony to metropolitan suburb: Toronto’s Beach District, 1889–1929. Urban History Review, 35, 18–31.10.7202/1015991ar
  • Luka, N. (2008a). Waterfront second homes in the central Canada woodlands: Images, social practice, and attachment to multiple residency. Ethnologia Europaea, 37, 71–87.
  • Luka, N. (2008b). Le « cottage » comme pratique intergénérationnelle: narrations de la vie familiale dans les résidences secondaires du centre de l’Ontario [The cottage as intergenerational practice: narratives of family life in the second homes of central Ontario]. Enfances, Familles, Générations, 8. Online. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/Luka-EFG-2008
  • Luka, N. (2010). Of timeshare cottages, zebra mussels, and McMansions: Dispatches from the second-home settings of central Ontario. In K. B. Beesley (Ed.), The rural-urban fringe in Canada: Conflict and controversy (pp. 199–219). Brandon: Brandon University Press.
  • Luka, N. (2012). Finding opportunities for urban sustainability in cottage life. In A. Dale, W. T. Dushenko, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Urban sustainability: Reconnecting space and place (pp. 171–210). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Luka, N. (2013). Sojourning in nature: The second-home exurban landscapes of Ontario’s Near North. In K. V. Cadieux & L. Taylor (Eds.), Landscape and the ideology of nature in exurbia: Green sprawl (pp. 121–158). London: Routledge.
  • Luka, N., & Lister, N.-M. (2012). Georgian Bay, Muskoka, and Haliburton: More than cottage country. In G. Nelson (Ed.), Beyond the global city: Understanding and planning for the diverse georegions of Ontario (pp. 169–199). Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Luka, N., Gendron, P.-É., Cudmore, J., & Mikadze, V. (2015). Pour un urbanisme des possibles dans le Quartier des spectacles [For an urbanism of possibility in the Quartier des spectacles]. In S. Harel, L. Lussier, & J. Thibert (Eds.), Le Quartier des spectacles et le chantier de l’imaginaire montréalais [The Quartier des spectacles and the construction site of the Montréal imaginary] (pp. 185–201). Québec City: Presses de l’Université Laval.
  • Luka, N., & Trottier, L. (2002). In the burbs: It’s time to recognise that suburbia is a real place too. Alternatives, 28, 37–38.
  • MacGregor, R. (2002). Escape: In search of the natural soul of Canada. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
  • McDonald, C. A., Enns, H., & Prangnell, P. (2005). Cabin, cottage and camp: New designs on the Canadian landscape. Vancouver: Blueimprint.
  • Mitchell, C. J. A. (1998). Entrepreneurialism, commodification and creative destruction: A model of post-modern community development. Journal of Rural Studies, 14, 273–286.10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00013-8
  • Mitchell, C. J. A. (2004). Making sense of counterurbanization. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 15–34.10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00031-7
  • Mitchell, D. (2003). Cultural landscapes: Just landscapes or landscapes of justice? Progress in Human Geography, 27, 787–796.10.1191/0309132503ph464pr
  • Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and actor-networks: Rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass, 9, 27–41.10.1111/gec3.12192
  • Murdoch, J. (2003). Co-constructing the countryside: Hybrid networks and the extensive self. In P. J. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 263–282). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Periäinen, K. (2006). The summer cottage: A dream in the Finnish forest. In N. McIntyre, D. Williams, & K. McHugh (Eds.), Multiple dwelling and tourism: Negotiating place, home, and identity (pp. 103–113). Cambridge, MA: CABI.10.1079/9780845931202.0000
  • Plumwood, V. (2006). The concept of a cultural landscape: Nature, culture and agency in the land. Ethics & the Environment, 11, 115–150.10.2979/ete.2006.11.issue-2
  • Quayle, M. (2003). Campagne urbaine—métropole rurale [Urban countryside—rural metropolis]. In P. Poullaouec-Gonidec, S. Paquette, & G. Domon (Eds.), Les temps du paysage [The times of landscape] (pp. 125–142). Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
  • Qviström, M. (2007). Landscapes out of order: Studying the inner urban fringe beyond the rural ? urban divide. Geografiska Annaler B, 89, 269–282.10.1111/geob.2007.89.issue-3
  • Qviström, M. (2012). Contested landscapes of urban sprawl: Landscape protection and regional planning in Scania, Sweden, 1932–1947. Landscape Research, 37, 399–415.10.1080/01426397.2012.687445
  • Qviström, M. (2013). Searching for an open future: Planning history as a means of peri-urban landscape analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56, 1549–1569.10.1080/09640568.2012.734251
  • Rapoport, A. (1990). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach (Revised ed.). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Relph, E. (1981). Rational landscapes and humanistic geography. London: Croom Helm.
  • Robinson, J. (2013). The architecture of holiday settings on Lake Memphrémagog, 1860–1890. Journal of Eastern Townships Studies, 41, 55–79.
  • Royal-LePage. (2010). Recreational property report. Toronto: Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
  • Saint-Amour, J.-P. (1979). La villégiature au Québec: problématique de l’aménagement du territoire [Holiday settings in Québec: A regional planning challenge]. Hull: Éditions Asticou.
  • Sandwell, B. K. (1946). Us amphibious Canadians. In J. D. Robins (Ed.), A pocketful of Canada (pp. 174–178). Toronto: Collins.
  • Schön, D. A. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 137–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865
  • Scott, A. J., Carter, C., Reed, M. R., Larkham, P., Adams, D., Morton, N., … Coles, R. (2013). Disintegrated development at the rural–urban fringe: Re-connecting spatial planning theory and practice. Progress in Planning, 83, 1–52.10.1016/j.progress.2012.09.001
  • Smith, A. (1990). Farms, forests and cities: The image of the land and the rise of the metropolis in Ontario. In D. Keane & C. Reade (Eds.), Old Ontario: Essays in honour of JMS careless (pp. 71–94). Toronto: Dundurn.
  • Spectorsky, A. C. (1955). The exurbanites. New York, NY: Lippincott.
  • Statistics Canada. (2010). Survey of household spending (SHS), household spending, by province and territory, annual (CANSIM table 203-0003). Ottawa: Government of Canada. Online. Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=2030003
  • Statistics Canada. (2015). Population of census metropolitan areas based on CANSIM table 051-0056. Ottawa: Government of Canada. Online. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo05a-eng.htm
  • Stevens, P. A. (2013). “Roughing it in comfort”: Family cottaging and consumer culture in postwar Ontario. Canadian Historical Review, 94, 234–262.10.3138/chr.600
  • Struyk, R., & Angelici, K. (1996). The Russian dacha phenomenon. Housing Studies, 11, 233–250.10.1080/02673039608720854
  • Taylor, L. (2011). No boundaries: Exurbia and the study of contemporary urban dispersion. GeoJournal, 76, 323–339.10.1007/s10708-009-9300-y
  • Thorsnes, P., Alexander, R., & Kidson, D. (2015). Low-income housing in high-amenity areas: Long-run effects on residential development. Urban Studies, 52, 261–278.10.1177/0042098014528999
  • Thrift, N. (2003). Still life in nearly present time: The object of nature. In P. J. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 308–311). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Tilt, J. H., & Cerveny, L. (2013). Master-planned in exurbia: Examining the drivers and impacts of master-planned communities at the urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 114, 102–112.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.03.003
  • Urbain, J.-D. (2002). Paradis verts: désirs de campagne et passions résidentielles [Green paradises: Countryside desires and residential passions]. Lausanne: Payot.
  • Vachon, G., Després, C., Rivard, É., Lacroix, D., & Moretti, G. (2011). De territoires et de paysages: le périurbain de la région métropolitaine de Québec [Of territories and landscapes: Periurban space in Québec City’s metropolitan region]. In A. Fortin, C. Després, & G. Vachon (Eds.), La banlieue s’étale [The suburbs spread] (pp. 35–82). Québec City: Nota bene.
  • Valentine, G. (1997). A safe place to grow up? Parenting, perceptions of children’s safety and the rural idyll. Journal of Rural Studies, 13, 137–148.10.1016/S0743-0167(97)83094-X
  • Varley, W. B. (1900). Tourist attractions in Ontario. Canadian Magazine, 15, p. 29.
  • Vepsäläinen, M., & Pitkänen, K. (2009). Second home countryside. Representations of the rural in Finnish popular discourses. Journal of Rural Studies, 26, 194–204.
  • Wapner, P. (2014). The changing nature of nature: Environmental politics in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Politics, 14, 36–54.10.1162/GLEP_a_00256
  • Warner, M. E. (2011). Club goods and local government: Questions for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77, 155–166.10.1080/01944363.2011.567898
  • Watkins, M. G. (2002). The cemetery and cultural memory: Montreal, 1860–1900. Urban History Review, 31, 52–62.10.7202/1015882ar
  • Williams, R. (1973). The country and the city. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Wolfe, R. I. (1951). Summer cottagers in Ontario. Economic Geography, 27, 10–32.10.2307/141807
  • Wolfe, R. I. (1962). The summer resorts of Ontario in the nineteenth century. Ontario History, 54, 149–161.
  • Wolfe, R. I. (1965). About cottages and cottagers. Landscape, 15, 6–8.
  • Wolfe, R. I. (1977). Summer cottages in Ontario: Purpose-built for an inessential purpose. In J. T. Coppock (Ed.), Second homes: Curse or blessing? (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Zanghi, F. (2014). Zone indécise: Périphéries urbaines et voyage de proximité dans la littérature contemporaine [Zone of unsettlement: Urban peripheries and nearby travels in contemporary literature]. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.