The potential of landscape labelling approaches for integrated landscape management in Europe

References

• Barham, E. (2003). Translating terroir: The global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 127–138.10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, S. (2010). Embedding local places in global spaces: Geographical indications as a territorial development strategy. Rural Sociology, 75, 209–243.10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, M., & Angelsen, A. (2012). Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: A political economy framework. In A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, & L. V. Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices (pp. 15–30). Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, F., & van der Heide, C. M. (2012). Multifunctional rural land management: Economics and policies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Kothari, A., & Brown, J. (2011). Traditional agricultural landscapes and community conserved areas: An overview. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 22, 139–153.10.1108/14777831111113347
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L. G., & Sandström, A. C. (2008). Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2, 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.10.1126/science.1091015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domon, G. (2011). Landscape as resource: Consequences, challenges and opportunities for rural development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 338–340.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esty, D. C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & De Sherbinin, A. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazoul, J., Garcia, C., & Kushalappa, C. G. (2009). Landscape labelling: A concept for next-generation payment for ecosystem service schemes. Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 1889–1895.10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, P. A. (2011). Preserving the future, projecting the past. What is a cultural park? Division of Archaeology, University of Cambridge. [Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from http://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/126390
   Google Scholar
• Görg, C. (2007). Landscape governance: The ‘politics of scale’ and the ‘natural’ conditions of places. Geoforum, 38, 954–966.10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, A., Planicka, C., Gross, L., & Buck, L. E.. (2014). Landscape labeling: A marketing approach to support integrated landscape management. [Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from http://peoplefoodandnature.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/landscape-labeling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Helmsing, A. H. J., & Vellema, S. (2011). Value chains, inclusion and endogenous development contrasting theories and realities. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ilbery, B., Morris, C., Buller, H., Maye, D., & Kneafsey, M. (2005). Product, process and place: An examination of food marketing and labelling schemes in Europe and North America. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12, 116–132.10.1177/0969776405048499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Russel, D. (2014). Embedding the concept of ecosystem services? The utilisation of ecological knowledge in different policy venues. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 192–207.10.1068/c3202ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103, 390–400.10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., Hall, A., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: Are innovation brokers the answer? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 8, 409–438.10.1504/IJARGE.2009.032643
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lansing, J. S. (2003). Complex adaptive systems. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 183–204.10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh Star, S. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science Technology Human Values, 35, 601–617.10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A.-G. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Loft, L., Mann, C., & Hansjürgens, B. (2015). Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities. Ecosystem Services, 16, 150–157.10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menapace, L., Colson, G., Grebitus, C., & Facendola, M. (2011). Consumers’ preferences for geographical origin labels: Evidence from the Canadian olive oil market. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38, 193–212. jbq051. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbq051
   Google Scholar
• Milder, J. C., Hart, A. K., Dobie, P., Minai, J., & Zaleski, C. (2014). Integrated landscape initiatives for African agriculture, development, and conservation: A region-wide assessment. World Development, 54, 68–80.10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendra, H., & Ostrom, E. (2012). Polycentric governance of multifunctional forested landscapes. International Journal of the Commons, 6, 104–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Cinnéide, M. S. (1999). Using an area based mark of environmental quality as a means of promoting bottom-up sustainable development. European Environment, 9, 101–108.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0976
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., Folke, C., Galaz, V., Hahn, T., & Schultz, L. (2007). Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: Creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike biosphere reserve, Sweden. Ecology and Society, 12, 28. [Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art28/10.5751/ES-01976-120128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, S. & Herlin, I. S. (2009). A sustainable development framework for a landscape of dispersed historic settlement. Landscape Research, 34, 33–54.10.1080/01426390802448190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger, T., Kizos, T., Bieling, C., Le Dû-Blayo, L., Budniok, M. A., Bürgi, M., … Kuemmerle, T. (2015). Exploring ecosystem-change and society through a landscape lens: Recent progress in European landscape research. Ecology and Society, 20, 5. [Adobe Digital Editions version]. doi:10.5751/ES-07443-20020510.5751/ES-07443-200205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K., & Munzer, S. R. (2007). The global struggle over geographic indications. European Journal of International Law, 18, 337–365.10.1093/ejil/chm016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rival, L., & Muradian, R. (2013). Introduction: Governing the provision of ecosystem services. In R. Muradian & L. Rival (Eds.), Governing the provision of ecosystem services (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, A., Verutes, G., McKenzie, E., Arkema, K. K., Bhagabati, N., Bremer, L. L., … Vogl, A. L. (2015). Process matters: A framework for conducting decision-relevant assessments of ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 11, 190–204.10.1080/21513732.2014.966149
   Google Scholar
• Ros-Tonen, M. A. F., Van Leynseele, Y.-P. B., Laven, A., & Sunderland, T. (2015). Landscapes of social inclusion: Inclusive value-chain collaboration through the lenses of food sovereignty and landscape governance. The European Journal of Development Research, 27, 523–540.10.1057/ejdr.2015.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabaté, J. (2004). Paisajes culturales: el patrimonio como recurso básico para un nuevo tipo de desarrollo [Cultural landscapes: Heritage as a basic resource for a new type of development]. Urban, 9, 8–29.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J. L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., … van Oosten, C. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 8349–8356.10.1073/pnas.1210595110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman, P. H. (2012). Sustainable landscape planning: The reconnection agenda. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stenseke, M. (2016). Integrated landscape management and the complicating issue of temporality. Landscape Research, 41, 199–211.10.1080/01426397.2015.1135316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2007). Deliberate futures: Precaution and progress in social choice of sustainable technology. Sustainable Development, 15, 286–295.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tacconi, L. (2012). Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 73, 29–36.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. L. (2005). In the market but not of it: Fair trade coffee and forest stewardship council certification as market-based social change. World Development, 33, 129–147.10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theesfeld, I., Schleyer, C., & Aznar, O. (2010). The procedure for institutional compatibility assessment: Ex-ante policy assessment from an institutional perspective. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6, 377–399.10.1017/S1744137410000056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unseld, L., Hill, N., Clement, P., Somocuricio, M., Fiselius, B., Koczy, N., … Leen van den Bergh, V. (2007). Branding the landscape – A guide. Tilburg: ECNC-European Center for Nature Conservation. [Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from http://www.lpv.de/uploads/tx_ttproducts/datasheet/branding_the_landscape.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. D. (2009). The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London: Routledge/Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, J., Huntsinger, L., & Starrs, P. F. (2013). Raising livestock in Oak Woodlands. In P. Campos, L. Huntsinger, J. L. Oviedo, P. F. Starrs, M. Diaz, R. B. Standiford, & G. Montero (Eds.), Mediterranean Oak Woodland working landscapes (pp. 273–310 Landscape series). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-6707-2
   Google Scholar
• Willer, H., & Lernoud, J. (2016). The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2016. [Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from https://shop.fibl.org/fileadmin/documents/shop/1698-organic-world-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. S., Baresel, J. P., Desclaux, D., Goldringer, I., Hoad, S., Kovacs, G., … Van Bueren, E. L. (2008). Developments in breeding cereals for organic agriculture. Euphytica, 163, 323–346.10.1007/s10681-008-9690-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. G. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28, 999–1023.10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne-Jones, S. (2013). Connecting payments for ecosystem services and agri-environment regulation: An analysis of the Welsh Glastir scheme. Journal of Rural Studies, 31, 77–86.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar