Applicability of European landscape typology in Turkey (Çakırlar Watershed case/Antalya)

References

• Antrop, M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape & Urban Planning, 67, 9–26. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atik, M. & Altan, T. (2004). Güney Antalya Bölgesindeki ekolojik açıdan önemli biyotoplar ve Avrupa Birliği NATURA 2000 habitatları ile karşılaştırılması. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 225–236. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/akdenizfderg/article/view/5000076722
   Google Scholar
• Atik, M., Bell, S., & ErdoĞan, R. (2013). Understanding cultural ınterfaces in the landscape: A case study of Ancient Lycia in the Turkish Mediterranean. Landscape Research, 38(2), 222–242. doi:10.1080/01426397.2011.642345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atmiş, E., Özden, S., & Lise, W. (2007). Urbanization pressures on the natural forests in Turkey: An overview. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 6, 83–92. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Brabyn, L. K. (1996). Landscape classification using GIS and national digital databases ( PhD thesis). Department of Geography, University of Canterbury, Christchurch .
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A., & Berglund, U. (2014). Landscape character assessment as an approach to understanding public ınterests within the European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 39(3), 219–236. doi:10.1080/01426397.2012.716404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çetin-Sönmez, G. (2014). Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesi ve Türkiye. Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesinin Uygulanmasına Yönelik ‘Sürdürülebilir Peyzajlar ve Ekonomi’ konulu 15. Avrupa Konseyi Uluslararası Çalışma Toplantısı 1‐2 October 2014, Nevşehir. Retrieved December 25, 2015, from https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016802faf1f
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2000). European Landscape Convention. CETS No. 176. Retrieved November 29, 2015, from https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680080621
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2006). Landscape and sustainable development: challenges of the European Landscape Convention. Challengesof the European Landscape Convention. Council of Europe Publishing, 213 S. Retrieved November 11, 2015, from https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublic CommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016802f24d2
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2008). Guidelines for the ımplementation of the European landscape convention. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommon SearchServices /DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016802f80c9
   Google Scholar
• Déjeant-Pons, M. (2006). The European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 31(4), 363–384. doi:10.1080/01426390601004343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eetwelde, V.V., & Antrop, M. (2009). A stepwise multi-scaled landscape typology and characterisation fortrans-regional integration, applied on the federal state of Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 160–170. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erol, O. (1983). Naturraumliche Gliderung der Türkei. Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients (TAVO) Number: 13, Reihe A (Naturwissenschaften), 258 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Güngöroğlu, C. (2010). Entwicklung eines Biotopkartierungsverfahrens für die Türkei mit Hilfe von GIS- und Fernerkundungstechnik (Fallbeispiel Nationalpark Köprülü Kanyon) [Development of a biotop mapping methodologie for Turkey (case study nationalpark Köprülü Kanyon)] ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fakultät für Forstwissenschaften und Waldökologie, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Güngöroğlu, C. (2011). Köprülü Kanyon Milli Parkı servi ormanının peyzaj yapısının saha, adet ve çeşitliliğe dayalı ölçümlerle analizi [Spatial Pattern Analysis of Cypress Forest in Köprülü Kanyon National Park Based on Area Density and Diversity Metrics]. Batı Akdeniz Ormancılık Araştırma Müdürlüğü Dergisi, 2(11), 47–64 . Retrived from http://baoram.ogm.gov.tr/Yayinlar/Dergiler/Ormanc%C4%B1l%C4%B1k%20Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rma%20Dergisi%20Say%C4%B1%2011%20Cilt%20I.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Güngöroğlu, C. (2012). CORINE arazi örtüsü sınıflandırmalarında ormanlık alanlara yönelik doğruluk değerlendirmeleri (Antalya-Çakırlar Orman İşletme Şefliği Örneği) [Assessments on the Accuracy of Forest Areas in CORINE Land Cover Classification (A Case Study for Antalya - Çakırlar Forest District)]. Batı Akdeniz Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Dergisi, 2(14), 35–50. Retrieved from http://baoram.ogm.gov.tr/Yayinlar/Dergiler/Dergisi%20Say%C4%B1%2014%20Cilt%20II.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jongman, R. H. G., Bunce, R. G. H., Metzger, M. J., Mücher, C. A., Howard, D. C., & Mateus, V. L. (2006). Objectives and applications of a statistical environmental stratification of Europe. Landsape Ecology, 21(3), 409–419. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-6428-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, A., Onder, M., & Ceyhan, E. (2012). The ımportance of bioconservation and biodiversity in Turkey. International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, 2(2), 95–99. Retrieved from http://www.ijbbb.org/papers/79-B125.pdf10.7763/IJBBB.2012.V2.79
   Google Scholar
• Kaska, E. (2012). Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesi (APS) ve Türkiye’deki uygulamaların irdelenmesi [The European Landscape Convention (ELC) and discussion on the implementations of the convention in Turkey] ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, Z., & Raynal, D.J. (2001). Biodiversity and conservation of Turkish forests. Biological Conservation, 97, 131–141. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00069-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindler, A. (2005). Geo-spatial cross-analysis of LANMAP and national approaches. In D. M. Wascher (Ed.), European landscape character areas—Typology, cartography and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes (pp. 46–87). Wageningen: Final ELCAI Project Report, Landscape Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Lioubimtseva, E., & Defourny, P. (1999). GIS based landscape classification and mapping of European Russia. Landscape Urban Planning, 44(2–3), 63–75.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00008-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, H. (1985). Landeskunde der Türkei: Vornehmlich aufgrund eigener Reisen (p. 268). Wiesbaden, Stuttgart: Steiner verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Macinnes, L. (2004). Historic landscape characterization. In K. Bishop & A. Phillips (Ed.), Countryside planning: New approaches to management and conservation (pp. 155–169). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meeus, J.H.A. (1995). Pan-European landscapes. Landscape & Urban Planning, 31, 57–79. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(94)01036-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mücher, C. A., Bunce, R. G. H., Jongman, R. H. G., Klijn, J. A., Koomen, A. J. M., Metzger, M. J., & Wascher, D. M. (2003). Identification and Characterisation of Environments and Landscapes in Europe (Alterra repport 832). Alterra: Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Mücher, C. A., Klijn, J. A., Wascher, D. M., & Schaminée, J. H. J. (2010). A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 10, 87–103.10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olwig, K. R. (2007). The practice of landscape ‘conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 32(5), 579–594. doi:10.1080/01431160512331316801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A., & Bullen, A. (2004). Special landscape areas: Landscape conservation or confusion in the town and country. The Town Planning Review, 75(2), 205–230.10.3828/tpr.75.2.5
   Google Scholar
• Selman, P. (2002). Multi-function landscape plans: A missing link in sustainability planning? Local Environment, 7(3), 283–294. doi:10.1080/1354983022000001651
   Google Scholar
• Sunar-Erbek, F., Ulubay, A., Maktav, D., & Yağiz, E. (2005). The use of satellite image maps for urban planning in Turkey. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(4), 775–784.10.1080/01431160512331316801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanwick, C. (2002). Landscape character assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland (Cheltenham and Edinburgh: Landscape character assessment guidance, countryside agency, Cheltenham and Scottish Natural Heritage). Retrieved January 8, 2016. http://www.heritagecouncil.ie/fileadmin/user_upload/Planning/LCA_CPD/LCA_CPD_Sep_2011/Reports/LCA_Guidance_for_England_and_Scotland.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick, C. (2004). The assessment of countryside and landscape character in England: An overview. In K. Bishop & A. Phillips (Eds.), Countryside planning: New approaches to management and conservation (pp. 109–124). Earthscan: London.
   Google Scholar
• Tağıl, Ş. (2006). Peyzaj Patern Metrikleriyle Balıkesir Ovası ve Yakınında Habitat Parçalılığında ve Kalitesinde Meydana Gelen Değişim (1975–2000). Ekoloji, 15(60), 24–36. Retrieved from https://www.ekoloji.com.tr/resimler/60-4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. (2006). Historic landscape characterisation: A landscape archaeology for research, management and planning. Landscape Research, 31(4), 385–398. doi:10.1080/01426390601004376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun, O., Dilek, F., Çetinkaya, G., Erduran, F., & Açiksöz, S. (2011). National and regional landscape classification and mapping of Turkey: Konya closed basin, SuğLa Lake and its surrounding area. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 6(3), 550–565. doi:10.5897/IJPS10.687
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. (2008). Mediterranean landscape archaeology: Marginality and the culture-nature ‘divide’. Landscape Research, 33(5), 547–564. doi:10.1080/01426390802323773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnock, S., & Griffiths, G. (2015). Landscape characterisation: The living landscapes approach in the UK. Landscape Research, 40(3), 261–278. doi:10.1080/01426397.2013.870541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wascher, D. M. (2005). Executive Summary. In D. M. Wascher (Ed.), European landscape character areas—Typologies, cartography and ındicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes (pp. viii–x). Wageningen: Final ELCAI Project Report, Landscape Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Wascher, D. M., Groom, G., Mücher, C. A., & Kindler, A. (2005). Recent developments in mapping Europe’s landscapes. In D. M. Wascher (Ed.), European landscape character areas—Typologies, cartography and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes (pp. 5–31). Wageningen: Final ELCAI Project Report, Landscape Europe.
   Google Scholar