New interaction paths in the energy landscape: the role of local energy initiatives

References

• Alanne, K., & Saari, A. (2006). Distributed energy generation and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10(6), 539–558.10.1016/j.rser.2004.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentsen, M., & Bellekom, S. (2014). Power to the people: Local energy initiatives as seedbeds of innovation? Energy, Sustainability and Society, 4(1), 2.10.1186/2192-0567-4-2
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches*. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152.10.1111/jors.2012.52.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolliger, J., Bättig, M., Gallati, J., Kläy, A., Stauffacher, M., & Kienast, F. (2011). Landscape multifunctionality: A powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change. Regional Environmental Change, 11(1), 203–206.10.1007/s10113-010-0185-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryngelson, J. D., Onuchic, J. N., Socci, N. D., & Wolynes, P. G. (1995). Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 21(3), 167–195.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffington, D. E. (1979). Economics of landscaping features for conserving energy in residences. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 1, 216–220.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., & Olsson, P. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2000). European Landscape Convention, Florence.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, J., & Zuidema, C. (2015a). Local energy initiatives from a decentralised energy landscape perspective. Groningen: DELaND Interreg Project.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, J., & Zuidema, C. (2015b). Towards an integrated energy landscape. Urban Design and Planning, 168(5), 231–240.10.1680/udap.14.00041
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. 2014(27/06).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016). Share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption, EU-28 2004-14. Retrieved September 20, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?_EU-28_2004-14.JPG&oldid=297375
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W., 2005. Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis, Cheltenham [etc.]: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781845424596
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40.10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Gilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2006). Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35(1), 1–23.10.1016/j.respol.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görg, C. (2007). Landscape governance. Geoforum, 38(5), 954–966.10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2014). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlin, S., Stanley, H. E., Bashan, A., Gao, J., & Kenett, D. Y. (2015). Percolation of interdependent network of networks. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 72, 4–19.10.1016/j.chaos.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2011). Community Innovation for Sustainable Energy. Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, T., Bressers, J. T. A., & Lulofs, K. R. D. (2015). Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives: Lessons from the Best Practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands). Sustainability, 7(12), 1900–1931.10.3390/su7021900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospers, G.-J. (2005). Best practices’ and the dilemma of regional cluster policy in Europe. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(4), 452–457.10.1111/tesg.2005.96.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198.10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., Verhees, B., Raven, R., & Smith, A. (2015). Empowering sustainable niches: Comparing UK and Dutch offshore wind developments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 344–355.
   Google Scholar
• Leibenath, M., & Otto, A. (2013). Local debates about ‘landscape’ as viewed by German regional planners: Results of a representative survey in a discourse-analytical framework. Land Use Policy, 32, 366–374.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlemiss, L., & Parrish, B. D. (2010). Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7559–7566.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2001). The lure of the local: Landscape studies at the end of a troubled century. Progress in Human Geography, 25(2), 269–281.10.1191/030913201678580520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadaï, A., & van der Horst, D. (2010). Introduction: Landscapes of Energies. Landscape Research, 35(2), 143–155.10.1080/01426390903557543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveh, Z. (2001). Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(3-4), 269–284.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00209-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111–122.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B., & Gilsing, V. A. (2004). Density and Strength of Ties in Innovation Networks: A Competence and Governance View. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2004-005-ORG.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R. B. (1984). Coevolutionary development potential. Land Economics, 60(2), 160–173.10.2307/3145970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olwig, K. R. (2007). The practice of landscape ‘Conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 32(5), 579–594.10.1080/01426390701552738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2011). From region to space part II. The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Human Geography, 161–175.10.1002/9781444395839
   Google Scholar
• Pasqualetti, M. J. (2013). Reading the changing energy landscape. In S. Stremke & A. Van den Dobbelsteen (Eds.), Sustainable energy landscapes: Designing, planning, and development (pp. 11–44). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2012). Resilience and the cultural landscape : Understanding and managing change in human-shaped environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139107778
   Google Scholar
• Prell, C. (2012). Social network analysis: History, theory and methodology. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, W., Moi, M., & Varlemann, T. (2009). Artefact-Actor-Networks as tie between social networks and artefact networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International ICST Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications, Worksharing. Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., Turcu, C., Guy, S., & Austin, P. (2013). Mapping the coevolution of urban energy systems: Pathways of change. Environment and Planning A, 45(3), 634–649.10.1068/a45199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554.10.1080/09537320802292651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., Hoogma, R., & Elzen, B. (1994). Strategies for shifting technological systems. Futures, 26(10), 1060–1076.10.1016/0016-3287(94)90073-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., & Raven, R. (2015). Toward a spatial perspective on niche development: The case of Bus Rapid Transit. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing grassroots innovations: Exploring the Role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and Planning-Part C, 30(3), 381.10.1068/c10222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., Park, J. J., & Smith, A. (2013). A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy, 61, 977–989.10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smil, V. (2010). Energy transitions: History, requirements, prospects. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036.10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spijkerboer, R., Trell, E., & Zuidema, C. (2016). Rural resilience and renewable energy in North-East Groningen, the Netherlands: In search of synergies. In U. Grabski-Kieron, I. Most, A. Reichert-Schick, & A. Steinführer (Eds.), European rural peripheries revalued. Governance, actors, impact (pp. 313–341). Berlin: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeglehner, G., Neugebauer, G., Erker, S., & Narodoslawsky, M. (2016). Integrated Spatial and Energy Planning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-31870-7
   Google Scholar
• Stremke, S., & Van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2014). Sustainable energy landscapes : Designing, planning, and development. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.10.1201/CRCAPPECOENV
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, R. L., & Freeman, C. M. (1987). Altamont: Public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 379–398.10.1016/0169-2046(87)90051-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, D., & Vermeylen, S. (2011). Rights to landscape and the global moral economy of carbon. Landscape Research, 36(4), 455–470.10.1080/01426397.2011.582941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbong, G., & Geels, F.. (2008). Barriers and options for future energy transitions: Lessons from a historical analysis of the Dutch electricity system. Managing the transition to renewable energy: Theory and practice from local, regional and macro perspectives/Ed.JCJM van den Bergh, FR Bruinsma, p. 177.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G., Hunter, S., Devine-Wright, P., Evans, B., & Fay, H. (2007). Harnessing community energies: Explaining and evaluating community-based localism in renewable energy policy in the UK. Global Environmental Politics, 7(2), 64–82.10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersma, B., & Devine-Wright, P. (2014). Decentralising energy: Comparing the drivers and influencers of projects led by public, private, community and third sector actors. Contemporary Social Science, 9(4), 456–470.10.1080/21582041.2014.981757
   Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2010). Near-shore wind power—Protected seascapes, environmentalists’ attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 195–203.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2012). The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 822–835.10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683–2691.10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar