The role of emotions on tourists’ willingness to pay for the Alpine landscape: a latent class approach

References

• Adamowicz, W., Glenk, K., & Meyerhoff, J. (2014). Choice modelling research in environmental and resource economics. In Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter27, (pp. 661–674). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1–2), 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arana, J. E., & León, C. J. (2009). Understanding the use of non-compensatory decision rules in discrete choice experiments: The role of emotions. Ecological Economics, 68(8–9), 2316–2326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araña, J. E., León, C. J., & Hanemann, M. W. (2008). Emotions and decision rules in discrete choice experiments for valuing health care programmes for the elderly. Journal of Health Economics, 27(3), 753–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnberger, A., & Eder, R. (2011). Exploring the heterogeneity of rural landscape preferences: An image-based latent class approach. Landscape Research, 36(1), 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition & Emotion, 24(4), 561–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Gabriel, S., & Lineberger, M. (2000). Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11(4), 320–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Measuring emotion: Behavior, feeling, and physiology. Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 242–276). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabanac, M. (2002). What is emotion? Behavioural Processes, 60(2), 69–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., Hutchinson, W., & Scarpa, R. (2009). Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements. Environment and Planning A, 41, 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• ChoiceMetrics. (2012). Ngene 1.1.1 user manual & reference giude. Sydney: Choice Metrics Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, J. F., & Kanade, T. (2007). Use of automated facial image analysis for measurement of emotion expression. In The handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 222–238). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dachary-Bernard, J., & Rambonilaza, T. (2012). Choice experiment, multiple programmes contingent valuation and landscape preferences: How can we support the land use decision making process? Land Use Policy, 29(4), 846–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., … Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, R., Wilson, M., & Boumans, R. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921800902000897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, R., & Arnberger, A. (2016). How heterogeneous are adolescents’ preferences for natural and semi-natural riverscapes as recreational settings? Landscape Research, 41(5), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyhri, A., Jacobsen, J. K. S., & Tømmervik, H. (2009). Tourists’ landscape perceptions and preferences in a Scandinavian coastal region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(4), 202–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, G., Ruto, E., Willis, K., & Powe, N. (2012). Heterogeneity of preferences for the benefits of environmental stewardship: A latent-class approach. Ecological Economics, 76, 104–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giergiczny, M., Czajkowski, M., Żylicz, T., & Angelstam, P. (2015). Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes. Ecological Economics, 119, 8–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2009). Discrete choice modeling. In Mills T.C., Patterson K. (eds.), Palgrave handbook of econometrics (pp. 473–556). London:Palgrave Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(8), 681–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grêt-Regamey, A., Walz, A., & Bebi, P. (2008). Valuing ecosystem services for sustainable landscape planning in Alpine Regions. Mountain Research and Development, 28(2), 156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilli, G., Jonkisz, J., Ciolli, M., & Lesinski, J. (2016). Mixed forests and ecosystem services: Investigating stakeholders’ perceptions in a case study in the Polish Carpathians. Forest Policy and Economics, 66, 11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundersen, V. S., & Frivold, L. H. (2008). Public preferences for forest structures: A review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7(4), 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., Boyce, C., Czajkowski, M., Tucker, S., Noussair, C., & Townsend, M. (2016). Sad or happy? The effects of emotions on stated preferences for environmental goods. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1–26. doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henser, D. A., Rose, J., & Greene, W. (2005). Applied choice analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. (2006). How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21, 861–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., Nygren, T. E., & Ashby, F. G. (1988). Influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: It is just not worth the risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 710–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krinsky, I, & Robb, A. L. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 715–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings. Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., & Islam, T. (2008). A comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best–Worst scaling. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 903–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In Luce RD, Bush RR & Galanter E (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psycology (Vol. III), New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mariel, P., Meyerhoff, J., & Hess, S. (2015). Heterogeneous preferences toward landscape externalities of wind turbines - Combining choices and attitudes in a hybrid model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 647–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marley, A. A. J., & Louviere, J. J. (2005). Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–Worst choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49(6), 464–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss, I. B., & Robinson, M. D. (2009). Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition & Emotion, 23(2), 209–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEA, M. E. assessment. (2005). Ecosystem and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, E., Thiene, M., De Salvo, M., & Signorello, G. (2008). Using attitudinal data to identify latent classes that vary in their preference for landscape preservation. Ecological Economics, 68(1–2), 536–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notaro, S., & Paletto, A. (2011). Links between mountain communities and environmental services in the Italian Alps. Sociologia Ruralis, 51(2), 137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletto, A., Giacovelli, G., Grilli, G., Balest, J., & De Meo, I. (2014). Stakeholders’ preferences and the assessment of forest ecosystem services: A comparative analysis in Italy. Journal of Forest Science, 60(11), 472–483.
   Google Scholar
• PAT (Provincia Autonoma di Trento) (2014). Turismo in Trentino. Rapporto 2014. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Servizio Turismo, Trento
   Google Scholar
• Rambonilaza, M., & Dachary-Bernard, J. (2007). Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method? Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(4), 318–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rick, S., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2007). The role of emotion in economic behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.954862
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J. (2009). Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs. Transport Reviews, 29(5), 587–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., Gilbride, T. J., Campbell, D., & Hensher, D. A. (2009). Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36(2), 151–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., Notaro, S., Raffaelli, R., & Louviere, J. (2011). Exploring scale effects of best/worst rank ordered choice data to estimate visitors’ benefits from alpine transhumance, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93 (3), 813–828.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, D. J., & Burgess, L. (2007). The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: Theory and methods (Vol. 647). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Swait, J., Adamowicz, W., Hanemann, M., Diederich, A., Krosnick, J., Layton, D., … Tourangeau, R. (2002). Context dependence and aggregation in disaggregate choice analysis. Marketing Letters, 13(3), 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zanten, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Koetse, M. J., & Van Beukering, P. J. H. (2014). Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viazzo, P. P. (1989). Upland communities: Environment, population and social structure in the Alps since the sixteenth century (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, W., & Meekes, H. (1999). Trends in European cultural landscape development: Perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 46(1–3), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar