Mobile drawing methods in landscape research: collaborative drawing in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal

References

• Aggett, S. (2018). Turning the gaze: Challenges of involving biomedical researchers in community engagement with research in Patan, Nepal. Critical Public Health, 28(3), 306–317. doi:10.1080/09581596.2018.1443203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, C. (2013). Video diaries: Audio-visual research methods and the elusive body. Visual Studies, 28(1), 29–37. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2013.765203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (2003). An introduction to the arts and narrative research: Art as inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(4), 506–514. doi:10.1177/1077800403254394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boults, E., & Sullivan, C. (2020). Illustrated history of landscape design. New Jersey: Wiley Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, D., Fox, J., & Lyon, P. (2017). Practice-infused drawing research: 'Being present' and 'making present. Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice, 2(1), 129–142. doi:10.1386/drtp.2.1.129_1
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., Urry, J., & Witchger, K. (2010). Mobile methods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Causey, A. (2016). Drawn to see: Drawing as an ethnographic method. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Foster, K. (2012). Field drawing as dialogue and form of making knowledge. Tracey: Journal of Drawing and Visualisation Research, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., & Soria-Donlan, I. (2019). Participatory arts in international development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, J. (2018). Island making: Planning artistic collaboration. Landscape Research, 43(2), 211–221. doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1291922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. (2010). Walking in rhythms: Place, regulation, style and the flow of experience. Visual Studies, 25(1), 69–79. doi:10.1080/14725861003606902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. (2010). Global recovery and the culturally/socially engaged artist. In Peoples, D. (Ed.), Buddhism and ethics (pp. 309–320). Ayuthaya, Thailand: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, U. K. (2021). The bad and the beautiful: An artist’s encounter with the image of Port Arthur, Tasmania. Landscape Research, 46(3), 341–361. doi:10.1080/01426397.2020.1837090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/17450100500489189
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. (2021). Geography, art, research: Artistic research in the geohumanities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helguera, P. (2011). Education for socially engaged art: A materials and techniques handbook. New York: Jorge Pinto Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, B. (2018). Weathering: Perspectives on the Northumbrian landscape through sound art and musical improvisation. Landscape Research, 43(2), 237–247. doi:10.1080/01426397.2016.1267719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchisom, E. (2019). Drawing for landscape architecture sketch to screen to site. United Kingdom: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, A., Fava, M., & Brew, A. (2017). Drawing together research and pedagogy. Art Education, 70(3), 50–60. doi:10.1080/00043125.2017.1286863
   Google Scholar
• Knight, L. (2021). Inefficient mapping: A protocol for attuning to phenomena Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. doi:10.21983/P3.0336.1.00
   Google Scholar
• Latham, A., & McCormack, D. P. (2009). Thinking with images in non-representational cities: Vignettes from Berlin. Area, 41(3), 252–262. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00868.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurier, E., Lorimer, H., Brown, B., Jones, O., Juhlin, O., Noble, A., Perry, M., … Weilenmann, L. (2008). Driving and ‘passengering’: Notes on the ordinary organization of car travel. Mobilities, 3(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/17450100701797273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. (2018). Introduction to arts based research. In P. Leavy (Eds.) Handbook of arts-based research. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, P. (2020). Using drawing in visual research: Materializing the invisible. In L. Pauwels, & D. Mannay (Eds.), The sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 297–308 (2nd ed.)). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, H. (2010). Non-representational approaches to body-landscape relations. Geography Compass, 4(1), 1–13. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00276.x
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, H. (2016). Walking methods in landscape research: Moving bodies, spaces of disclosure and rapport. Landscape Research, 41(4), 425–432. doi:10.1080/01426397.2016.1156065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson, H., Fox, A., Street, S., Cull, J., Jenner, T., Lake, D., … Hart, S. (2016). Listening space: Lessons from artists with and without learning disabilities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(2), 371–389. doi:10.1177/0263775815613093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, M., & Kierans, C. (2007). Descriptions as data: Developing techniques to elicit descriptive materials in social research. Visual Studies, 22(2), 120–136. doi:10.1080/14725860701507057
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, P. (2014). Rethinking mobile methods. Mobilities, 9(2), 167–187. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.784540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., Theron, L., Stuart, J., Smith, A., & Campbell, Z. (2011). Drawings as research method. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith & J. Stuart (Eds.) Picturing research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, J., & Loxley, A. (2008). ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper: Introducing visual methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/420/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., & Riley, H. (2014). Drawing and emerging research: The acquisition of experiential knowledge through drawing as a methodological strategy. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 13(3), 292–302. doi:10.1177/1474022213514559
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. (2010). Drawing the spaces between us: Using drawing encounters to explore social interaction. In P. Martin (Ed.) Making space for creativity. Brighton: University of Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2015). Close encounters? Mobile methods, (post)phenomenology and affect. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 231–246. doi:10.1177/1474474014558988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torri, D. (2021). Sacred, alive, dangerous, and endangered: Humans, non-humans, and landscape in the Himalayas. In S. Riboli, A. Strathern, & D. Torri (Eds.) Dealing with disasters. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Heide, S. (1988). Traditional art in upheaval: The development of Modern Contemporary art in Nepal. Kailash—Journal of Himalayan Studies, 14(3), 227–239.http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/kailash/pdf/kailash_14_0304_04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vannini, P. (2015). Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. (2015). Geologic subjects: Nonhuman origins, geomorphic aesthetics and the art of becoming inhuman. Cultural Geographies, 22(3), 383–407. doi:10.1177/1474474014545301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zharkevich, I. (2019). Gender, marriage, and the dynamic of (im)mobility in the mid-Western hills of Nepal. Mobilities, 14(5), 681–695. doi:10.1080/17450101.2019.1611026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar