Effects of tangential air passages to piston bowl on the performance of a DI diesel engine

References

• Cowland, C., P. Gutmann, and P. L. Herzog. 2004. “Passenger Vehicle Diesel Engines for the U.S.” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-1452.
   Google Scholar
• Dhinesh, B., M. Annamalai, I. J. R. Lalvani, and K. Annamalai. 2017. “Studies on the Influence of Combustion Bowl Modification for the Operation of Cymbopogon Flexuosus Biofuel Based Diesel Blends in a DI Diesel Engine.” Applied Thermal Engineering 112: 627–637. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergusson, C. R. 1986. Internal Combustion Engines. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesan, V. 2005. Internal Combustion Engines. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, H. W., Y. Shi, R. D. Reitz, and W. Willems. 2010. “Optimization of a High-Speed Direct-Injection Diesel Engine at Low-Load Operation Using Computational Fluid Dynamics with Detailed Chemistry and a Multi Objective Genetic Algorithm.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 224 (4): 547–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanamoorthi, V., M. M. Navin, and G. Devaradjane. 2016. “Effect of Combustion Chamber Geometry on Performance, Combustion, and Emission of Direct Injection Diesel Engine with Ethanol-Diesel Blend.” Thermal Science 20 (4): 937–946. doi: 10.2298/TSCI16S4937G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunabalan, A., and R. Ramaprabhu. 2009. “Effect of Piston Bowl Geometry on Flow, Combustion and Emission in DI Diesel Engine – A CFD Approach.” International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 4 (11): 2181–2188.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, J. B. 1984. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Jaichandar, S., and K. Annamalai. 2012. “Influences of Re-Entrant Combustion Chamber Geometry on the Performance of Pongamia Biodiesel in a DI Diesel Engine.” Energy 44: 633–640. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaichandar, S., and K. Annamalai. 2013. “Combined Impact of Injection Pressure and Combustion Chamber Geometry on the Performance of a Biodiesel Fueled Diesel Engine.” Energy 55: 330–339. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaichandar, S., and K. Annamalai. 2016. “The Influence of Piston Bowl Geometries on In-Cylinder Air Flow in a Direct-Injection (DI) Diesel Engine for Biodiesel Operation.” Journal of Mechanical Engineering 13 (2): 77–97.
   Google Scholar
• Jaichandar, S., P. S. Kumar, and K. Annamalai. 2012. “Combined Effect of Injection Timing and Combustion Chamber Geometry on the Performance of a Biodiesel Fueled Diesel Engine.” Energy 47: 388–394. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminaga, T., and J. Kusaka. 2006. “Improvement of Combustion and Exhaust Gas Emissions in a Passenger Car Diesel Engine by Modification of Combustion Chamber Design.” SAE Paper No. 2006-01-3435.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., S. H. Park, and C. S. Lee. 2016. “Impact of Fuel Spray Angles and Injection Timing on the Combustion and Emission Characteristics of a High-Speed Diesel Engine.” Energy 107: 572–579. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., J. Jeon, and S. Park. 2016. “Optimization of Combustion Chamber Geometry and Operating Conditions for Compression Ignition Engine Fueled with Pre-Blended Gasoline-Diesel Fuel.” Energy Conversion and Management 126: 638–648. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., H. Gao, L. Zhao, Z. Zhang, X. He, and F. Liu. 2016. “Combustion and Emission Performance of a Split Injection Diesel Engine in a Double Swirl Combustion System.” Energy 114: 1135–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamilla, V. R., M. V. Mallikarjun, and G. L. N. Rao. 2013. “Effect of Combustion Chamber Design on a DI Diesel Engine Fuelled with Jatropha Methyl Esters Blends with Diesel.” Procedia Engineering 64: 479–490. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.122
   Google Scholar
• Montajir, R., H. Tsunemoto, H. Ishitani, and T. Minami. 2000. “Fuel Spray Behavior in a Small DI Diesel Engine: Effect of Combustion Chamber Geometry.” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0946.
   Google Scholar
• Pischinger, F. F. 1998. “The Diesel Engine for Cars—Is There a Future?” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 120 (3): 641–647. doi: 10.1115/1.2818194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, B. V. V. S. U., C. S. Sharma, T. N. C. Anand, and R. V. Ravikrishna. 2011. “High Swirl-Inducing Piston Bowls in Small Diesel Engines for Emission Reduction.” Applied Energy 88 (7): 2355–2367. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, S. M. A., H. H. Masjuki, M. A. Kalam, A. Sanjid, and M. J. Abedin. 2014. “Assessment of Emission and Performance of Compression Ignition Engine with Varying Injection Timing.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 35: 221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajashekhar, C. R., T. K. Chandrashekar, C. Umashankar, and R. H. Kumar. 2012. “Studies on Effects of Combustion Chamber Geometry and Injection Pressure on Biodiesel Combustion.” Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering 36 (4): 429–438. doi: 10.1139/tcsme-2012-0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh Bapu, B. R., L. Saravanakumar, and B. Durga Prasad. 2017. “Effects of Combustion Chamber Geometry on Combustion Characteristics of a DI Diesel Engine Fueled with Calophyllum Inophyllum Methyl Ester.” Journal of the Energy Institute 90: 82–100. doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risi, A. D., T. Donateo, and D. Laforga. 2003. “Optimisation of Combustion Chamber of Direct Injection Diesel Engines.” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-1064.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, T., Y. Daisho, N. Uchida, and N. Ikeya. 1986. “Effects of Combustion Chamber Geometry on Diesel Combustion.” SAE Paper No. 861186.
   Google Scholar
• Salvador, F. J., J. D. L. Morena, J. M. Lopez, and D. Jaramilloa. 2017. “Assessment of Compressibility Effects on Internal Nozzle Flow in Diesel Injectors at Very High Injection Pressures.” Energy Conversion and Management 132: 221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.11.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varun, P., S. Singh, K. Tiwari, R. Singh, and N. Kumar. 2017. “Modification in Combustion Chamber Geometry of CI Engines for Suitability of Biodiesel: A Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79: 1016–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkateswaran, S. P., and G. Nagarajan. 2010. “Effects of the Re-Entrant Bowl Geometry on a DI Turbocharged Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions—A CFD Approach.” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 132 (12): 122803–122813. doi: 10.1115/1.4001294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamankar, A. K., and S. Murugan. 2015. “Combustion, Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Diesel Engine with Internal Jet Piston Using Carbon Black- Water- Diesel Emulsion.” Energy 91: 1030–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamankar, A. K., A. K. Satapathy, and S. Murugan. 2015. “Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Compression Ratio, Injection Timing & Pressure in a DI (Direct Injection) Diesel Engine Running on Carbon Black-Water-Diesel Emulsion.” Energy 93: 511–520. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, S., F. Wang, X. Leng, X. Liu, and K. Ji. 2013. “Numerical Analysis on the Effect of Swirl Ratios on Swirl Chamber Combustion System of DI Diesel Engines.” Energy Conversion and Management 75: 184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaliwal, V. S., N. R. Banapurmath, N. M. Gireesh, R. S. Hosmath, T. Donateo, and P. G. Tewari. 2016. “Effect of Nozzle and Combustion Chamber Geometry on the Performance of a Diesel Engine Operated on Dual Fuel Mode Using Renewable Fuels.” Renewable Energy 93: 483–501. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar