Relationship between atmospheric corrections and training-site strategy with respect to accuracy of greenhouse detection process from very high resolution imagery

References

• Agüera, F., Aguilar, M.A. and Aguilar, F.J., 2006, Detecting greenhouse changes from QuickBird imagery on the Mediterranean coast. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, pp. 4751–4767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andalusian Government, 2005, Modelo digital del terreno de Andalucía. Relieve y orografía. Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain ( DVD).
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P.M. and Tatnal, R.L., 1997, Neural networks in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, pp. 699–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvajal, F., Agüera, F., Aguilar, F.J. and Aguilar, M.A., 2007, Influence of atmospheric correction on greenhouse detection from Quickbird images. In Proceedings of Annual Conference 2007 of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Society RSPSoc2007, ISPRS Workshops on Digital Cameras, High Resolution Data and Ocean Colour, Newcastle, UK .
   Google Scholar
• Carvajal, F., Crizanto, E., Aguilar, F.J., Agüera, F. and Aguilar, M.A., 2006, Greenhouses detection using an artificial neural network with a very high resolution satellite image. In International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vienna, Austria, vol. XXXVI, part 2, pp. 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez, P.S., 1996, Image-based atmospheric corrections – revisited and improved. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, pp. 1025–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cracknell, A.P. and Hayes, L., 2007, Introduction to Remote Sensing (London, UK: Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, J.R., 2006, IDRISI Andes. Guide to GIS and Image Processing (Worcester, MA: Clark University).
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J.R., 1996, Introductory Digital Image Processing. A Remote Sensing Perspective (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K., 2003, Radiance conversion of QuickBird Data. Technical note. Available online at: www.digitalglobe.com/ ( accessed 19 January 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Levin, N., Lugassi, R., Ramon, U., Braun, O. and Ben-Dor, E., 2007, Remote sensing as a tool for monitoring plasticulture in agricultural landscapes. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28, pp. 183–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, R.J. and Campbell, N.A., 1982, Variable selection techniques in discriminant analysis II: allocation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 35, pp. 30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, D.M., 1999, Fusion of HYDICE hyperspectral data with panchromatic imagery for cartographic feature extraction. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37, pp. 1261–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, P., Itten, K.I., Kellenberger, T., Sandmeier, S. and Sandmeier, R., 1993, Radiometric corrections of topographically induced effects on Landsat TM data in an alpine environment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 40, pp. 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolini, L., Grings, F., Sobrinos, J.A., Jimenez-Muñoz, J.C. and Karszenbaum, H., 2006, Radiometric correction effects in Landsat multi-date/multi-sensor change detection studies. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, pp. 685–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proschan, M.A., 1997, Conditional power with Fisher’s least significant difference procedure. Biometrika, 84, pp. 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, H., 2001, Influence of atmospheric correction on the estimation of biophysical parameters of crop canopy using satellite remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, pp. 1245–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. A., 2005, Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis (Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Richter, R., 1990, A fast atmospheric correction algorithm applied to LANDSAT TM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11, pp. 159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, R., 1996, A spatially adaptive fast atmospheric correction algorithm. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17, pp. 1201–1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, R., Schaläpfer, D. and Müller, A., 2006, An automatic atmospheric correction algorithm for visible/NIR imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, pp. 2077–2085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinove, C.J., 1982, Computation with physical values from Landsat digital data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 48, pp. 781– 784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Th., Behnert, I., Schaale, M., Fischer, J. and Doerffer, R., 2007, Atmospheric correction algorithm for MERIS above case-2 waters. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28, pp. 1469–1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S.S. and Wilk, M.B., 1965, An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52, pp. 591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. and Castellan Jr., N.J., 1988, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (Kogakusha, Tokyo: McGraw-Hill College).
   Google Scholar
• Toutin, T., 2003, Error tracking in Ikonos geometric processing using a 3D parametric model. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, pp. 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toutin, T. and Cheng, P., 2002, QuickBird – a milestone for high-resolution mapping. Earth Observation Magazine, 11, pp. 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Tuker, C.J., 1979, Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8, pp. 127–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Wang, D. and Bauer, M.E., 2005, Image-based atmospheric correction of QuickBird imagery of Minnesota cropland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 99, pp. 315–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar