Performance of precipitation products obtained from combinations of satellite and surface observations

References

• Aonashi, K., J. Awaka, M. Hirose, T. Kozu, T. Kubota, G. Liu, S. Shige, et al. 2009. “GSMaP Passive Microwave Precipitation Retrieval Algorithm : Algorithm Description and Validation.” Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 87A :119–136. doi:10.2151/jmsj.87A.119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahm, M., D. Vila, S. Martinez Saenz, and D. Osgood. 2019. “Can Disaster Events Reporting Be Used to Drive Remote Sensing Applications? A Latin America Weather Index Insurance Case Study.” Meteorological Applications. doi:10.1002/met.1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell, A., L. J. Renzullo, T. H. Raupach, and M. Haylock. 2013. “Evaluating Geostatistical Methods of Blending Satellite and Gauge Data to Estimate near Real-Time Daily Rainfall for Australia.” Journal of Hydrology 493 (June): 105–114. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., P. Xie, J. E. Janowiak, and P. A. Arkin. 2002. “Global Land Precipitation: A 50-Yr Monthly Analysis Based on Gauge Observations.” Journal of Hydrometeorology 3 (3): 249–266. doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0249:GLPAYM>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., W. Shi, P. Xie, V. B. S. Silva, V. E. Kousky, R. Wayne Higgins, and J. E. Janowiak. 2008. “Assessing Objective Techniques for Gauge-Based Analyses of Global Daily Precipitation.” Journal of Geophysical Research 113: D4. doi:10.1029/2007JD009132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinku, T., K. Hailemariam, R. Maidment, E. Tarnavsky, and S. Connor. 2014. “Combined Use of Satellite Estimates AND Rain Gauge Observations to Generate High-Quality Historical Rainfall Time Series over Ethiopia: Combining Satellite and Ground Observations.” International Journal of Climatology 34 (7): 2489–2504. doi:10.1002/joc.3855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follansbee, W. A. 1973. “Estimation of Average Daily Rainfall from Satellite Cloud Photographs.” NOAA Technical Memorandum NESS; 44. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., K.-L. Hsu, S. Sorooshian, and X. Gao. 2004. “Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Imagery Using an Artificial Neural Network Cloud Classification System.” Journal of Applied Meteorology 43 (12): 1834–1853. doi:10.1175/JAM2173.1.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, G. J., D. T. Bolvin, E. J. Nelkin, D. B. Wolff, R. F. Adler, G. Guojun, Y. Hong, K. P. Bowman, and E. F. Stocker. 2007. “The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales.” Journal of Hydrometeorology 8 (1): 38–55. doi:10.1175/JHM560.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, G. J., R. F. Adler, P. Arkin, A. Chang, R. Ferraro, A. Gruber, J. Janowiak, A. McNab, B. Rudolf, and U. Schneider. 1997. “The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Combined Precipitation Dataset.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 78 (1): 5–20. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0005:TGPCPG>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, G. J., D. T. Dan Braithwaite, R. Bolvin, J. K. Hsu, and P. Xie. 2015. “Nasa Global Precipitation Measurement (Gpm) Integrated Multi-satellite retrievals for Gpm (Imerg).” In algorithm Theor Basis Document (Atbd) Version, 2015. Nasa, Greenbelt, Maryland
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, R. J., J. E. Janowiak, P. A. Arkin, and P. Xie. 2004. “CMORPH: A Method that Produces Global Precipitation Estimates from Passive Microwave and Infrared Data at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution.” Journal of Hydrometeorology 5 (3): 487–503. doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:CAMTPG>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., and Q. Shao. 2010. “An Improved Statistical Approach to Merge Satellite Rainfall Estimates and Raingauge Data.” Journal of Hydrology 385 (1–4): 51–64. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, E. S. P. R., E. D. Nys, C. Molejón, B. Biazeto, R. F. V. S. Silva, and N. B. M. Engle. 2015. Monitor de Secas do Nordeste, em busca de um novo paradigma para a gestão de secas. 1ª Edição. Brasília. ISBN: 124p.; ISBN 978-85-88192-16-4.
   Google Scholar
• Mesinger, F. 2008. “Bias Adjusted Precipitation Threat Scores.” Advances in Geosciences 16 (April): 137–142. doi:10.5194/adgeo-16-137-2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, A. K., I. M. Momin, E. N. Rajagopal, S. Basu, M. N. Rajeevan, and T. N. Krishnamurti. 2013. “Gridded Daily Indian Monsoon Rainfall for 14 Seasons: Merged TRMM and IMD Gauge Analyzed Values.” Journal of Earth System Science 122 (5): 1173–1182. doi:10.1007/s12040-013-0338-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, S., A. Seshadri, J. Srinivasan, and D. S. Pai. 2019. “A New Parameter to Assess Impact of Rain Gauge Density on Uncertainty in the Estimate of Monthly Rainfall over India.” Journal of Hydrometeorolog 20: 821–832. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-18-0161.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, S., A. K. Mitra, D. S. Pai, and A. Amir. 2016. “From TRMM to GPM: How Well Can Heavy Rainfall Be Detected from Space?” Advances in Water Resources 88 (February): 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzullo, L.J., Chappell, A., Raupach, T., Dyce, P., Li, M., Shao, Q. 2011: An Assessment of Statistically Blended Satellite-Gauge Precipitation Data for Daily Rainfall Analysis in Australia, in proceedings of the 34th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of  Environment, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Roebber, P. J. 2009. “Visualizing Multiple Measures of Forecast Quality.” Weather and Forecasting 24 (2): 601–608. doi:10.1175/2008WAF2222159.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozante, J., D. Vila, J. B. Chiquetto, A. Fernandes, and D. S. Alvim. 2018. “Evaluation of TRMM/GPM Blended Daily Products over Brazil.” Remote Sensing 10 (6): 882. doi:10.3390/rs10060882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozante, J. R., D. S. Moreira, L. G. G. de Goncalves, and D. A. Vila. 2010. “Combining TRMM and Surface Observations of Precipitation: Technique and Validation over South America.” Weather and Forecasting 25 (3): 885–894. doi:10.1175/2010WAF2222325.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, G., M. Yingzhao, D. Long, L. Zhong, and Y. Hong. 2016. “Evaluation of GPM Day-1 IMERG and TMPA Version-7 Legacy Products over Mainland China at Multiple Spatiotemporal Scales.” Journal of Hydrology 533 (February): 152–167. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila, D. A., L. G. G. de Goncalves, D. L. Toll, and J. R. Rozante. 2009. “Statistical Evaluation of Combined Daily Gauge Observations and Rainfall Satellite Estimates over Continental South America.” Journal of Hydrometeorology 10 (2): 533–543. doi:10.1175/2008JHM1048.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2009. Manual on Codes. Volumes I.2 & 1.2 Volumes I.2 & 1.2. Geneva, Switzerland: Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Woldemeskel, F. M., B. Sivakumar, and A. Sharma. 2013. “Merging Gauge and Satellite Rainfall with Specification of Associated Uncertainty across Australia.” Journal of Hydrology 499 (August): 167–176. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., Y. Zhang, Z. Sun, Q. Lin, and H. Hai. 2018. “Improvement of a Combination of TMPA (Or IMERG) and Ground-Based Precipitation and Application to a Typical Region of the East China Plain.” Science of the Total Environment 640–641 (November): 1165–1175. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, P., and P. A. Arkin. 1997. “Global Precipitation: A 17-Year Monthly Analysis Based on Gauge Observations, Satellite Estimates, and Numerical Model Outputs.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 78 (11): 2539–2558. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<2539:GPAYMA>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Q., Y. Wang, L. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Zhu, and Li, B. 2018. “Inter-comparison and Evaluation of Remote Sensing Precipitation Products over China from 2005 to 2013.” Remote Sensing 10 (3): 168. doi: 10.3390/rs10020168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar