Ideas, power and agency: policy actors and the formulation of language-in-education policy for multilingualism

References

• Ayres-Bennett, W. 2018. “Collaboration, Connectedness, Champions: Approaches Within Government.” In Languages After Brexit, edited by M. Kelly, 231–239. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Badwan, K. 2021. “Agency in Educational Language Planning: Perspectives from Higher Education in Tunisia.” Current Issues in Language Planning 22 (1–2): 99–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1700056.
   Google Scholar
• Barakos, E., and J. W. Unger, eds. (2016). Discursive Approaches to Language Policy. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., and R. Duvall. (2005). Power in International Politics, International Organization 59(4): 39–75.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., and R. H. Cox, eds. (2011). Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, J., and G. P. Glasgow. 2019. “Agency in Language Policy and Planning: A Theoretical Model.” In Agency in Language Policy and Planning: Critical Inquiries, edited by J. Bouchard, and G. P. Glasgow, 22–76. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruen, J. 2013. “Towards a National Policy for Languages in Education. The Case of Ireland.” European Journal of Language Policy 5 (1): 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Bruen, J. 2021. “The Place of Foreign Languages in the Irish Education System.” In Language Learning in Anglophone Countries: Challenges, Policies, Ways Forward, edited by U. Lanvers, A. Thompson, and M. East, 37–52. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. 2002. “Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., and V. A. Schmidt. 2016. “Power Through, Over and in Ideas: Conceptualizing Ideational Power in Discursive Institutionalism.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 318–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, T. H. 2019. “Structure, Agency and the “Teaching English in English” Policy: The Case of South Korea.” In Agency in Language Policy and Planning: Critical Inquiries, edited by J. Bouchard, and G. P. Glasgow, 214–236. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. 1983. The Terms of Political Discourse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. L. 1989. Language Planning and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. 2009. Draft Policy on Languages in Education. Internal document: unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. 2014. Framework for consultation on a foreign languages in education strategy for Ireland. Accessed January 22, 2021. https://www.gov.ie/pdf/?file = https://assets.gov.ie/46971/5a19ea1c6b65460b9ff2313effc4d80c.pdf#page = null.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. 2017a. Languages Connect. Ireland’s strategy for foreign languages in education 2017–2026. Accessed January 22, 2021. https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/dd328-languages-connect-irelands-strategy-for-foreign-languages-in-education-2017-2026/.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. 2017b. Languages Connect. A consultation report on Ireland’s strategy for foreign languages in education 2017–2026. Accessed January 22, 2021. https://www.gov.ie/pdf/?file = https://assets.gov.ie/47796/a4104bd5c6e84669ac84884ceab99dfa.pdf#page = null.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills, and Council of Europe. 2006. Language Education Policy Profile. Ireland. Accessed January 22, 2021. https://rm.coe.int/language-education-policy-profile-ireland/16807b3c2f.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media. 2010. 20-Year Strategy for the Irish Language. Accessed January 22, 2021. from https://www.gov.ie/en/policy-information/2ea63-20-year-strategy-for-the-irish-language/.
   Google Scholar
• Erdocia, I. 2020a. “Language Rights and Groups of Immigrant Origin.” Language Problems and Language Planning 44 (2): 146–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdocia, I. 2020b. “The Politics of Plurilingualism: Immersion, Translanguaging, and School Autonomy in Catalonia.” Linguistics and Education 60: 100865. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdocia, I. 2021. “Participation and Deliberation in Language Policy: The Case of Gender-Neutral Language.” Current Issues in Language Planning 4: 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.2005385.
   Google Scholar
• Erdocia, I., S. Nocchi, and M. Ruane. 2020. “Language Policy-Making in Ireland: A Preliminary Study of the Consultation Process of Languages Connect.” TEANGA, the Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics 27: 98–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.35903/teanga.v27i.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, L., and G. C. Kimura. 2020. “What is a Language Management Approach to Language Problems and why do we Need it?” In A Language Management Approach to Language Problems: Integrating Macro and Micro Dimensions, edited by G. C. Kimura, and L. Fairbrother, 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., and N. Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and H. Gottweis, eds. (2012). The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gusfield, J. R. 1989. “Constructing the Ownership of Social Problems: Fun and Profit in the Welfare State.” Social Problems 36 (5): 431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2006. “Constructivist Institutionalism.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes, S. Binder, and Bs. Rockman, 56–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2011. “Ideas and the Construction of Interests.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by D. Béland, and R. H. Cox, 65–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L., and J. Carruthers. 2021. “Socio-economic Factors, School Type and the Uptake of Languages: Northern Ireland in the Wider UK Context.” The Language Learning Journal, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2021.1888151.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, F. M. 2010. “Analysis of Language Policy Discourses Across the Scales of Space and Time.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 202: 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. 2018. “Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning.” In Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning, edited by J. Tollefson, and M. Pérez-Milans, 51–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. 2021. “[Review of the Book Agency in Language Policy and Planning: Critical Inquiries, by J. Bouchard and G. P. Glasgow (Eds.)].” Current Issues in Language Planning 22 (1–2): 264–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C., and E. J. Johnson. 2015. “Power and Agency in Language Policy Appropriation.” Language Policy 14 (3): 221–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C., and T. Ricento. 2013. “Conceptual and Theoretical Perspectives in Language Planning and Policy: Situating the Ethnography of Language Policy.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2013 (219): 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Källkvist, M., and F. M. Hult. 2016. “Discursive Mechanisms and Human Agency in Language Policy Formation: Negotiating Bilingualism and Parallel Language use at a Swedish University.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J. 2019. “Constraints on Agency in Micro-Language Policy and Planning in Schools.” In Agency in Language Policy and Planning: Critical Inquiries, edited by J. Bouchard & G. P. Glasgow, 149–170. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J., and K. Taylor-Leech. 2021. “Agency in Language Planning and Policy.” Current Issues in Language Planning 22 (1–2): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, D. 2003. Languages in the post-primary curriculum: a discussion paper. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. Accessed January 22, 2021. https://ncca.ie/media/1808/languages_in_the_post-primary_curriculum_a_discussion_paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Bianco, J. 2013. “Role of Deliberation in Language Policy and Planning.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, edited by C. Chapelle, 5004–5008. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Bianco, J. 2019. “Language Planning and Policies for Bilingualism.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism, edited by A. De Houwer, and L. Ortega, 152–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 1989. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. 2011. “The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics: From “Whether” to “how”.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by D. Béland, and R. H. Cox, 23–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, M. 2015. Globalizing Language Policy and Planning: An Irish Language Perspective. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. 2007. How to map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poudel, P. P., and T. H. Choi. 2021. “Policymakers’ Agency and the Structure: The Case of Medium of Instruction Policy in Multilingual Nepal.” Current Issues in Language Planning 22 (1–2): 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricento, T. 2000. “Historical and Theoretical Perspectives in Language Policy and Planning.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (2): 196–213.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Irish Academy. 2011. National languages strategy, RIA National Committee for Language, Literary and Cultural Studies. Accessed January 22, 2021. http://www.onevoiceforlanguages.com/uploads/2/4/6/7/24671559/ria-national-languages-strategy.pdf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., and H. C. Jenkins-Smith, eds. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘new Institutionalism’.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroedler, T. 2018. The Value of Foreign Language Learning: A Study on Linguistic Capital and the Economic Value of Language Skills. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. 2021. “Whither the Irish Language Act? Language Policies in Northern Ireland.” Current Issues in Language Planning 22 (3): 308–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. 2006. Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and new Approaches. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B. 2009. Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B. 2021. Rethinking Language Policy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. 2012. “Language Policy and Language Governance: A Case-Study of Irish Language Legislation.” Language Policy 11 (4): 323–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., and R. B. Baldauf. 2012. “Individual Agency in Language Planning: Chinese Script Reform as a Case Study.” Language Problems and Language Planning 36 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P. 2014. The Political Process of Policymaking: A Pragmatic Approach to Public Policy. Basingstoke: Springer.
   Google Scholar