Planting in the pandemic: surveillance on social media

References

• Albrechtslund, A. 2013. “New Media and Changing Perceptions of Surveillance.” In A Companion to New Media Dynamic, edited by J. Hartley, J. Burgess, and A. Bruns, 311–321. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. 2004. “The Work of Watching One Another: Lateral Surveillance, Risk, and Governance.” Surveillance & Society 2 (4): 479–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i4.3359.
   Google Scholar
• Androutsopoulos, J. 2007. “Bilingualism in the Mass Media and on the Internet.” In Bilingualism. A Social Approach, edited by M. Heller, 207–230. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Belot, M., S. Choi, E. Tripodi, E. V. D. Broek-Altenburg, J. C. Jamison, and N. W. Papageorge. 2021. “Unequal Consequences of Covid 19: Representative Evidence from six Countries.” Review of Economics of the Household 19 (3): 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-021-09560-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, R. 2000. “Post-panopticism.” Economy and Society 29 (2): 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/030851400360505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2020. “Digital Hyperconnectivity and the Self.” Theory and Society 49 (5-6): 771–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09405-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabelli, G. 2021. “Plants, Vegetables, Lawn: Radical Solidarities in Pandemic Time. Corona A(e)ffects: Radical Affectivities of Dissent and Hope.” Lateral Journal of the Cultural Studies Association 10.2 (Fall 2021). https://doi.org/10.25158/L10.2.14.
   Google Scholar
• Carleton, A. 2021. “Are Your Houseplants Actually Good for the Planet?” Vox. Aug 16. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Chayko, M. 2014. “Techno-social Life: The Internet, Digital Technology, and Social Connectedness.” Sociology Compass 8 (7): 976–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12190
   Google Scholar
• Chayko, M. 2021. Superconnected: The Internet, Digital Media and Techno-Social Life. . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T. 2018. Why more millennials are buying into ‘plant parenthood’. Better by Today (NBC.news), November 20. Accessed February 14, 2022. https://www.nbcnews.com/better/health/why-more-millennials-are-buying-plant-parenthood-ncna935836.
   Google Scholar
• de la Bellacasa, M. P. 2012. “‘Nothing Comes Without Its World’: Thinking with Care.” The Sociological Review 60 (2): 197–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, B. E., and E. Hund. 2019. “Gendered Visibility on Social Media: Navigating Instagram’s Authenticity Bind.” International Journal of Communication 13: 4983–5002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnová, A., and E. Mohammadi. 2021. “Intimacy, Home, and Emotions in the Era of the Pandemic.” Sociology Compass 15 (4). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzhambov, A. M., P. Lercher, M. H. E. M. Browning, D. Stoyanov, N. Petrova, S. Novakov, and D. D. Dimitrova. 2021. “Does Greenery Experienced Indoors and Outdoors Provide an Escape and Support Mental Health During the COVID-19 Quarantine?” Environmental Research 196: 110420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, A. S., R. Gill, and C. Scharff. 2017. “Aesthetic Labour: Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism.” In Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism, edited by A. S. Elias, R. Gill, and C. Scharff, 26–86. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1988. “Technologies of the Self.” In A Seminar with Michel Foucault, edited by L. H. Martin Martin, H. Gutman, and P. H. Hutton, 16–49. Amherst: University of Massachusets Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Middlesex: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 1964. The Heart of Man. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Gangneux, J. 2021. “‘It is an Attitude’: The Normalisation of Social Screening via Profile Checking on Social Media.” Information, Communication & Society 24 (7): 994–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1668460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. 2019. “Surveillance is a Feminist Issue.” In The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Feminism, edited by T. Oren and A. Press, 148–161. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halonen, M., and S. Leppänen. 2017. “‘Pissis Stories’: The Self and the Other as Gendered, Sexualized and Class-based Performance on Social Media.” In Social Media Discourse, (Dis)identifications and Diversities. (Routledge Studies in Sociolinguistics), edited by S. Leppänen, Elina Westinen, and Samu Kytölä, 39–61. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Han, K., and L. Ruan. 2019. “Effects of Indoor Plants on Self-reported Perceptions: A Systemic Review.” Sustainability 11(16): 4506. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, M. 2013. “Atms, Teleprompters and Photobooths: A Short History of Neoliberal Optics.” New Formations 80 (1): 194–208. https://doi.org/10.3898/NewF.80/81.11.2013
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, L., K. Ohashi, J. Sinanan, H. Horst, S. Pink, F. Kato, and B. Zhou. 2020. Digital Media Practices in Households Kinship Through Data. Amsterdam: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, L. 2018. “The Wild Growth of the ‘Plantfluencer’.” The Sunday Times, November 12 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for the language of Finland. n.d. “Yleiskieli ja asiatyylit.” Accessed May 5, 2023. http://www.kielitoimistonohjepankki.fi/haku/Yleiskieli/ohje/751.
   Google Scholar
• Jäntti, S., T. Saresma, S. Leppänen, S. Järvinen, and P. Varis. 2018. “Homing Blogs as Ambivalent Spaces for Feminine Agency.” Feminist Media Studies 18: 888–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1396234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, C. 2003. Transgression. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, J. N. 2008. “Polylingual Languaging Around and Among Children and Adolescents.” International Journal of Multilingualism 5 (3): 161–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14790710802387562.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S., and E. O. Wilson. 1993. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, S. 2012. “Linguistic and Discursive Hybridity on the Translocal Internet: The Case of Web Writing.” In Language Mixing and Code-switching in Writing: Approaches to Mixed-language Written Discourse, edited by M. Sebba, S. Mahootian, and C. Jonsson, 233–254. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, Sirpa. 2015. “Dog Blogs as Ventriloquism: Authentication of the Human Voice.” Discourse, Context and Media 8: 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppänen, S. 2020. “Revisualization of Classed Motherhood in Social Media.” In Visualizing Digital Media: Interactional and Ideological Perspectives, edited by C. Thurlow, F. Diémoz, and C. Dürscheid, 107–129. Basel: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, S., and A. Elo. 2016. “Buffalaxing The Other: Superdiversity in Action on YouTube.” In Language and Superdiversity, edited by K. Arnaut, J. Blommaert, B. Rampton, and M. Spotti, 110–130. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, S., and S. Kytölä. 2016. “Investigating Multilingualism and Multi-semioticity as Communicative Resources in Social Media.” In Researching Multilingualism: Critical and Ethnographic Approaches, edited by Marilyn Martin-Jones and Deirdre Martin, 155–171. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, Sirpa, Anne Pitkänen-Huhta, Tarja Nikula, Samu Kytölä, Timo Törmäkangas, Kari Nissinen, Leila Kääntä, et al. 2011. National Survey on the English Language in Finland: Uses, Meanings and Attitudes. Helsinki: Research unit for the variation, contacts and change in English. [Online.] Accessed April 22, 2022 http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/05.
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, S., and E. Westinen. 2022. “Upsets in Social Media: Performative Interrogations of Language and Belonging by Persons of Color.” International Journal for the Sociology of Language 2022 (275): 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2021-0047.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2016. The Quantified Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. 2018. The Culture of Surveillance: Watching as a Way of Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mapes, G. 2018. “(De)constructing Distinction: Class Inequality and Elite Authenticity in Mediatized Food Discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 22 (3): 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe, J. M., A. Bartley, and F. Collins. 2017. “Digital Belongings: The Intersections of Social Cohesion, Connectivity and Digital Media.” Ethnicities 17 (1): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796816654174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. 2012. “The Public Domain: Surveillance in Everyday Life.” Surveillance and Society 9 (4): 378–393. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v9i4.4342
   Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, T. 1997. “The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault’s Panopticon Revisited.” Theoretical Criminology 1 (2): 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480697001002003
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2008. The Logic of Care. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Novaes Reis, S., M. Valquíria dos Reis, and ÂM Pereira do Nascimento. 2020. “Pandemic, Social Isolation and the Importance of People-Plant Interaction.” Ornamental Horticulture 26 (3): 399–412. Accessed January 15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1590/2447-536x.v26i3.2185
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Urrestarazu, L., M. P. Kaltsidi, P. A. Nektarios, G. Markakis, V. Loges, K. Perini, and R. Fernandez-Canero. 2021. “Particularities of Having Plants at Home During the Confinement Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126919.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., and E. Schulz. 2021. “Greening Home: Caring for Plants Indoors.” Australian Geographer 52 (4): 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2021.2014021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampton, B. 2013. “Styling in a Language Learned Later in Life.” The Modern Language Journal 97 (2): 360–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12010.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SWNS Research Medium. 2020. “Seven in 10 Millennials Consider Themselves ‘Plant Parents’. A Survey Conducted by Article. February 4, 2020.” Accessed March 30, 2022. https://swns-research.medium.com/seven-in-10-millennials-consider-themselves-plant-parents-11ef0b34773c.
   Google Scholar
• Trottier, D. 2012. Social Media as Surveillance: Rethinking Visibility in a Converging World. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, K., N. Bhullar, J. Durkin, N. Gyamfi, and D. Jackson. 2020. “Family Violence and COVID-19: Increased Vulnerability and Reduced Options for Support.” International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 29 (4): 549–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. 2013a. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. 2013b. “Facebook and the Engineering of Connectivity: A Multi-Layered Approach to Social Media Platforms.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 19 (2): 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512457548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1984. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, A. 2015. “Brand Intimacy, Female Friendship and Digital Surveillance Networks.” New Formations 84: 228–245. https://doi.org/10.3898/NewF:84/85.11.2015
   Google Scholar