A Post-development Hoax? (Re)-examining the Past, Present and Future of Development Studies

Bibliography

• Abrahamsen, R. “African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge.” African Affairs 102 (2003): 189–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkire, S. “Why the Capabilities Approach?” Journal of Human Development 6, no. 1 (2005): 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Alatas, S. F. “Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in Social Science.” Current Sociology 51, no. 5 (2003): 599–613.
   Google Scholar
• Alatas, S. F. “Academic Dependency in Social Sciences: Reflections on India and Malaysia.” American Studies International 38 (2000): 80–96.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasson, S. “Orientalism and African Development Studies: The ‘Reductive Repetition’ Motif in Theories of African Underdevelopment.” Third World Quarterly 26, no. 6 (2005): 971–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apter, David. Some Conceptual Approaches to the Study of Modernization. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. “Modernization Theory and the Sociological Study of Development.” Journal of Development Studies 7, no. 2 (1971): 141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, J. N. In Defense of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, J. N. “Globalization Increases Ethical Outcomes and Improves Moral Character.” In Globalization, edited by Noël Merino, 74–80. Detroit, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, P. “Accumulation by Dispossession in Africa: False Diagnosis and Dangerous Prescriptions.” In Neoliberalism and Globalization in Africa: Contestations on the Embattled Continent, edited by Joseph Mensah, 17–32. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Botchway, K. “The Paradox of Empowerment: Reflections on a Case Study from Northern Ghana.” World Development 29, no. 1 (2001): 135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, R., and J. Cavanagh. Development Redefined: How the Market met its Match. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Brohman, J. “Universalism, Eurocentrism, and Ideological Bias in Development Studies: From Modernisation to Neoliberalism.” Third World Quarterly 16, no. 1 (1995): 121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderisi, R. The Trouble with Africa: Why Foreign Aid isn’t Working. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, J., and A. Haanstra. “Development Made Sexy: How it Happened and What it Means.” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 8 (2008): 1475–1489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, F. H., and E. Faletto. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., and K. Brock. “What do Buzzwords do for Development Policy: A Critical Look at ‘Participation’, ‘Empowerment’ and ‘Poverty Reduction’.” Third World Quarterly 26, no. 7 (2005): 1043–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. The Bottom Billion: Why Poor Countries are Failing and What can be Done about It. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. E. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Dollar, D. “Globalization, Poverty and Inequality since 1980.” World Bank Research Observer 20, no. 2 (2005): 145–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollar, D., and A. Kraay. “Growth is Good for the Poor.” Journal of Economic Growth 7, no. 3 (2002): 195–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, T. “The Structure of Dependency.” American Economic Review 60, no. 2 (1970): 231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield, M. “Racism, Migration and Development: The Foundations of Planetary Order.” Progress in Development Studies 6, no. 1 (2006): 68–78.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. “The Making and Unmaking of the Third World through Development.” In The Post-development Reader, edited by M. Rahnema (with V. Bawtree), 85–93. London: Zed Books, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. “Beyond the Search for a Paradigm? Post-development and Beyond.” Development 43, no. 4 (2000): 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. “Planning.” In The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. 2nd ed., edited by Wolfgang Sachs. London: Zed Books, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Esteva, G. “Development.” In The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. 2nd ed., edited by Wolfgang Sachs. London: Zed Books, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B. “The Developmental State is Dead – Long Live Social Capital?” Development and Change 30 (1999): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, B. “Development as Zombieconomics in the Age of Neoliberalism.” Third World Quarterly 30, no. 5 (2009): 885–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A. G. “The Development of Underdevelopment.” Monthly Review 18, no. 4 (1966): 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. G. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil. Chile and Brazil: Monthly Review Press, New York, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Frediani, A. A. “Sen’s Capability Approach as a Framework to the Practice of Development.” Development in Practice 20, no. 2 (2010): 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda-Parr, S. “The Human Development Paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s Ideas on Capabilities.” Feminist Economics 9, nos. 2–3 (2003): 301–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, S. “How the Poor Develop the Rich.” In The Post-development Reader, edited by M. Rahnema (with V. Bawtree). London: Zed Books, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gilman, N. Mandarins of the Future: Modernization in Cold War America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. “From Globalization to the New Imperialism.” In Critical Globalization Studies, edited by Richard P. Appelbaum and William I. Robinson, 91–100. New York, NY: Routledge, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. “Cultures Count” (foreword). In Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, edited by Lawrence E. Harrison and Samuel P. Huntington. xiii–xvii. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hyden, G. African Politics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I.“Development as Planned Poverty.” In The Post-development Reader, edited by M. Rahnema (with V. Bawtree). London: Zed Books, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• In, K. J. “Academic Dependency: Western-centrism in Korean Political Science.” Korea Journal 46 (2006): 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, C., and R. N. Gwynne. “Relevance of Structuralist and Dependency Theories in the Neoliberal Period: A Latin American Perspective.” Journal of Development Studies 16, no. 1 (2000): 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Name Bullies. Toronto: Knopf, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, U. “An Agenda for Thinking about ‘Race’ in Development.” Progress in Development Studies 6, no. 1 (2006): 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Latouche, S.“Paradoxical Growth.” In The Post-development Reader, edited by M. Rahnema (with V. Bawtree). London: Zed Books, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. Race against Time. Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Leys, C. The Rise and Fall of Development Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press/East African Educational Publishers, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, A. “Feminist Post-development Thought.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 31, nos. 3–4 (2003): 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Litonjua, M. D. “Third World/Global South: From Development to Globalization to Imperial Project.” Journal of Third World Studies XXVII, no.1 (2010): 107–132.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, M. H. “The Future of Gender and Development after 9/11: Insights from Postcolonial Feminism and Transnationalism.” Third World Quarterly 30, no. 5 (2009): 921–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, S. “Post-development Theory and the Question of Alternatives: A View from Africa.” Third World Quarterly 25, no. 2 (2004): 373–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbebe, J. A., and L. Meintjes. “Necropolitics.” Popular Culture 15, no. 1 (2003): 11–40.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. “Globalization and Development Studies.” In Critical Globalization Studies, edited by Richard P. Appelbaum, and William I. Robinson, 111–120. New York, NY: Routledge, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mensah, J. “Cultural Dimensions of Globalization in Africa: A Dialectical Interpretation of the Local and the Global.” In Neoliberalism and Globalization in Africa: Contestations on the Embattled Continent, edited by Joseph Mensah, 33–54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Migdal, J. S. “Studying the State.” In Comparative Politics, edited by Mark Irving, and Alan S. Zuckerman, 162–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Moore-Sieray, D. “Towards a Decolonization of Scholarship in Africa and a Vision for the 1990s and Beyond.” Journal of Third World Studies XIII, no. 2 (1996): 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Nederveen Pieterse, J. Development Theory Deconstructions/Reconstructions, 2nd ed.. London: Sage, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg, J. In Defense of Global Capitalism. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. “Human Rights and Human Capabilities.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 20 (2007): 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nustad, K. G. “Development: The Devil We Know?” Third World Quarterly 22, no. 4 (2001): 479–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick, S., and J. Sirkin. Breaking the Poverty Cycle: The Human Basis for Sustainable Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rahnema, M. “Introduction.” In The Post-development Reader, edited by M. Rahnema (with V. Bawtree). London: Zed Books, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rahnema M. (with V. Bawtree). The Post-development Reader, London: Zed Books, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rathgeber, E. M. “wid, wad, gad: Trends in Research and Practice.” Journal of Developing Areas 24 (1990): 489–502.
   Google Scholar
• Rist, G. “Development as a Buzzword.” Development in Practice 17, no. 4 (2007): 485–491.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, P. A World Made Sexy: Freud to Madonna. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. D. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities of Our Time. New York, NY: Penguin Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, W.“Introduction.” In The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. 2nd ed. London: Zed Books, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. Orientalism. New York, NY: Random House, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, K. Rethinking Capitalist Development: Primitive Accumulation, Governmentality & Post-colonial Capitalism. London: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, F. J. “Paradigm Lost, Paradigms Regained? Development Studies in the 21st Century.” Third World Quarterly 21, no. 1 (2000): 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. Development as Freedom. New York, NY: Knopf, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. “Human Rights and Capabilities.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 6, no. 2 (2005): 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D. “Separated by Common Ground? Bringing (Post)development and (Post)colonialism Together.” Geographical Journal 172, no. 1 (2006): 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal, R. “Women, Gender and Development: The Evolution of Theories and Practice.” Psychology & Developing Societies 15, no. 2 (2003): 165–185.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. S. “Discourses on Development: Beyond the ‘African Tragedy’.” In Beyond the ‘African Tragedy’: Discourses on Development and the Global Economy, edited by Malinda S. Smith, 1–22. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. “The Satanic Geographies of Globalization: Uneven Development in the 1990s.” Public Culture 10, no. 1 (1997): 169–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soros, G. On Globalization. New York, NY: Public Affairs, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, A. “Post-development Theory: Romanticism and Pontius Pilate Politics.” Development 43, no. 4 (2000): 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, A. “What is Development Studies?” Development in Practice 16, no. 6 (2006): 644–650.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. C. “Depoliticising Development: The Uses and Abuses of Participation.” Development in Practice 6, no. 1 (1996): 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. C. “Thinking Race, Thinking Development.” Third World Quarterly 23, no. 3 (2002): 407–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. “What Washington Means by Policy Reform.” In Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, M. “The next 10 Years in Development Studies: From Modernization to Multiple Modernities, in Theory and Practice II.” European Journal of Development Research 21 (2009): 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. Globalization, Growth and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar