We are not all the same: taking gender seriously in food sovereignty discourse

Bibliography

• Agarwal, Bina. “Food Sovereignty, Food Security and Democratic Choice: Critical Contradictions, Difficult Conciliations.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6 (2014): 1247–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman, Julia, Ruth Meinzen-Dick, and Agnes Quisumbing. “The Gender Implications of Large-scale Land Deals.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 1 (2012): 49–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. “Labour Regimes and Social Change under Colonialism.” In Survival and Change in the Third World, edited by Ben Crow, Henry Bernstein, Lawrence Harris, Terry Byres, Diane Elson, John Humphrey, Hazel Johnson, Ed Rhodes, Mary Thorpe, and David Wield, 30–49. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. “‘Changing before our very Eyes’: Agrarian Questions and the Politics of Land in Capitalism Today.” Journal of Agrarian Change 4, nos. 1–2 (2004): 190–225.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. “Food Sovereignty via the ‘Peasant Way’: A Sceptical View.” Journal of Peasant Studies 46, no. 6 (2014): 1031–1063.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, Tom. Peasants, Populism, and Postmodernism: The Return of the Agrarian Myth. London: Frank Cass, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Caro Molina, Pamela E. “Feminism and Food Sovereignty: Oxfam Online Discussion Essay.” 2012. http://blogs.oxfam.org/en/blogs/feminism-and-food-sovereignty.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, Ben, and Ian Scoones. “Contested Paradigms of ‘Viability’ in Redistributive Land Reform: Perspectives from Southern Africa.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 1 (2010): 31–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley, Elizabeth, and Clara Mi Young Park. The Gender and Equity Implications of Land-related Investments on Labour and Income-generating Opportunities: Tanzania Case Study. Rome: FAO, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, Elizabeth, Martha Osorio, and Clara Mi Young Park. The Gender and Equity Implications of Land-related Investments on Land Access and Labour and Income-generating Opportunities: A Case Study of Selected Agricultural Investments in Lao PDR. Rome: FAO, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Deere, Carmen Diana. “What Difference does Gender Make? Rethinking Peasant Studies.” Feminist Economics 1, no. 1 (1995): 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The Gender and Equity Implications of Land-related Investments on Land Access, Labour and Income-generating Opportunities: A Case Study of Selected Agricultural Investments in Zambia. Rome: FAO, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. The Gender and Equity Implications of Land-related Investments on Land Access, Labour and Income-generating Opportunities in Northern Ghana: The Case Study of Integrated Tamale Fruit Company. Rome: FAO, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture 2010–2011: Women in Agriculture – Closing the Gender Gap for Development. Rome: FAO, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Cecile. “Gender Analysis of Land: Beyond Land Rights for Women?” Journal of Agrarian Change 3, no. 4 (2003): 453–480.
   Google Scholar
• Julia, and Ben White. “Gendered Experiences of Dispossession: Oil Palm Expansion in a Dayak Hibun Community in West Kalimantan.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39, nos. 3–4 (2012): 995–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Via Campesina (LVC). Women of Via Campesina International Manifesto. Accessed August 6, 2013. http://www.viacampesina.org/en/index.php/our-conferences-mainmenu-28/6-jakarta-2013/resolutions-and-declarations/1451-women-of-via-campesina-international-manifesto-2.
   Google Scholar
• LVC. “Women’s Assembly Evaluates its Global Campaign to ‘Stop the Violence Against Women’ and Makes Plans for the Future.” Accessed August 22, 2013. http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/our-conferences-mainmenu-28/6-jakarta-2013/1418-women-s-assembly-evaluates-its-global-campaign-to-stop-the-violence-against-women-and-makes-plans-for-the-future.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, Christian. “Fragmented Sovereignty: Land Reform and Dispossession in Laos.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4 (2011): 885–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsalve Suárez, Sofía. “Gender and Land.” In Promised Land: Competing Visions of Agrarian Reform, edited by Peter M. Rosset, Raj Patel, and Michael Courville, 192–207. Oakland, CA: Food First Books, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• O’Laughlin, Bridget. “Gender Justice, Land and the Agrarian Question in Southern Africa.” In Peasants and Globalizations: Political Economy, Rural Transformation and the Agrarian Question, edited by Haroon A Akram-Lodhi and Cristóbal Kay, 190–213. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, Raj. “Food Sovereignty.” Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 3 (2009): 663–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, Rajeev. “Food Sovereignty: Power, Gender, and the Right to Food.” PLoS Medicine 9, no. 6 (2012). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, Shahra. Agrarian Change, Gender and Land Rights. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, Shahra. “Engendering the Political Economy of Agrarian Change.” Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1 (2009): 197–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, Stephanie. “Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective.” Sex Roles 59, nos. 5–6 (2008): 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg Jan Douwe. The Art of Peasant Farming: A Chayanovian Manifesto. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• White, Ben, Saturnino M. Borras Jr., Ian Scoones, and Ruth Hall. “The New Enclosures: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Land Deals.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39, nos. 3–4 (2012): 619–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, Ann, and Naila Kabeer. Living with Uncertainty: Gender, Livelihood and Pro-poor Growth in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa. IDS Working Paper 134. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wittman, Hannah. “Food Sovereignty: A New Rights Framework for Food and Nature?” Environment and Society: Advances in Research 2, no. 1 (2011): 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Wittman, Hannah, Annette Desmarais, and Nettie Wiebe. “The Origins & Potential of Food Sovereignty.” In Food Sovereignty: Reconnecting Food, Nature and Community, edited by Hannah Wittman, Annette Desmarais and Nettie Wiebe, 1–12. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing, 2010.
   Google Scholar