Disciplining the human rights of immigrants: market veridiction and the echoes of eugenics in contemporary EU immigration policies

Bibliography

• Andrijasevic, Rutvica, and William Walters. “The International Organization for Migration and the International Government of Borders.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28, no. 6 (2010): 977–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale, Tim. European Politics: A Comparative Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Andrew, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose eds. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: UCL Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bashford, Alison. “Internationalism, Cosmopolitanism, and Eugenics.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, edited by Alison Bashford and Philippa Levine, 154–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bashford, Alison, and Philippa Levine. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, Didier. “Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27 (2002): 63–92.
   Google Scholar
• Broberg, Gunnar, and Nils Roll-Hansen, eds. Eugenics and the Welfare State: Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, Graham, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, eds. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. With two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, Mitchell. The Constitution of Poverty: Toward a Genealogy of Liberal Governance. London: Routledge, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, Mitchell. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• De Hart, Betty, Tineke Strik, and Henrike Pankratz. Family Reunification, a Barrier or Facilitator of Integration? Dutch Country Report 2012. Brussels: European Commission. http://research.icmpd.org/2012.html.
   Google Scholar
• Donzelot, Jacques. “Michel Foucault and Liberal Intelligence.” Economy and Society 37, no. 1 (2008): 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Migration Network. “Ad-hoc Query on Asylum Support Rates 2013.” http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/reports/docs/ad-hoc-queries/protection/458_emn_ad-hoc_query_on_asylum_support_rateswider_dissemination_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EuroStat. “Third Country Nationals refused Entry at the External Borders – Annual Data (rounded) [migr_eirfs].” Accessed February 2, 2014. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=migr_eirfs&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild, Henry P. Immigration: A World Movement and its American Significance. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1913.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976. Translated by David Macey. New York: Picador, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality Volume 1. London: Penguin Books, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy, and Linda Gordon. “A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the US Welfare State.” Signs 19, no. 2 (1994): 309–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeden, Michael. “Eugenics and Ideology.” Historical Journal 26, no. 4 (1983): 959–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken, Christina. “Immigrant Anxieties: 1990s Immigration Reform and the Neoliberal Consensus.” PhD diss., Bowling Green State University, Ohio, 2007. http://etd.ohiolink.edu/send-pdf.cgi/Gerken%20Christina.pdf?bgsu1180034821.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, Ben. “Foucault’s Critical (yet Ambivalent) Affirmation: Three Figures of Rights.” In Social & Legal Studies 20, no. 3 (2011): 283–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of the United States. Reports of the Immigration Commission (Dillingham Commission Report). Vol. 41. Statements and Recommendations of Submitted by Societies and Organizations Interested in the Subject of Immigration. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1911.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn Rafter, Nicole, ed. White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies 1877–1919. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Randall, and Desmond S. King. Sterilized by the State: Eugenics, Race, and the Population Scare in Twentieth-century North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, Bernard E. The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Immigration Restriction League. The Present Aspect of the Immigration Problem. Publications of the Immigration Restriction League No. 1. 2nd ed., 1894. Accessed April 27, 2012. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:1116995.
   Google Scholar
• Inda, Jonathan X. Targeting Immigrants: Government, Technology, and Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Migration. Laws for Legal Immigration in 27 EU Member States 2009. http://publications.iom.int/bookstore/free/IML_16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kasli, Zeynep, and Ayse Parla. “Broken Lines of Il/Legality and the Reproduction of State Sovereignty: The Impact of Visa Policies on Immigrants to Turkey from Bulgaria.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 34, no. 2 (2009): 203–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevles, Daniel J. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• King, Desmond S., and Making Americans. Immigration, Race, and the Origins of the Diverse Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• King, Desmond, and Randall Hansen. “Eugenic Ideas, Political Interests, and Policy Variance: Immigration and Sterilization Policy in Britain and the US.” World Politics 53, no. 2 (2001): 237–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, Thomas C. “Retrospectives: Eugenics and Economics in the Progressive Era.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, no. 4 (2005): 207–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert, Randy K., and Daniel O’Connor. “Security Assemblages: Airport Security, Flexible Work, and Liberal Governance.” Alternatives 28, no. 3 (2003): 331–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, Angus. Our Own Master Race: Eugenics in Canada, 1885–1945. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, Lois. “Self as Enterprise: Dilemmas of Control and Resistance in Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics.” Theory, Culture & Society 26, no. 6 (2009): 55–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Lydia. “Governing at a Distance: The Elaboration of Controls in British Immigration.” In International Migration Review 32, no. 4 (1998): 949–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottier, Véronique. “Eugenics and the State: Policy-making in a Comparative Perspective.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, edited by Alison Bashford and Philippa Levine, 134–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Odysseos, Louiza. “Human Rights, Liberal Ontogenesis and Freedom: Producing a Subject for Neoliberalism?” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38, no. 3 (2010): 747–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascouau, Yves, with Henri Labayle. Conditions for Family Reunification under Strain: A Comparative Study in Nine EU Member States 2011. Brussels: European Policy Centre. http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_1369_conditionsforfamily.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pickens, Donald K. Eugenics and the Progressives. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Rajas, Jarmila. “State Racist Governmentality: A Foucaultian Discourse Theoretical Analysis of Finnish Immigration Policy.” Doctoral thesis, Loughborough University, 2014. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/14967.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, Edmund. “Social Demography and Eugenics in the Interwar United States.” Population and Development Review 29, no. 4 (2003): 547–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Christine. Preaching Eugenics: Religious Leaders and the American Eugenics Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, William. “Blaming the Victim.” In Race, Class, and Gender in the United States: An Integrated Study, edited by S. Paula Rothenberg, 572–581. 5th ed. New York: Worth Publishers, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, Mark B. “When the Exception becomes the Rule: Borders, Sovereignty, and Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 12, no. 4 (2008): 365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, Peter. Not Fit for Our Society: Immigration and Nativism in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, Steven. “Biological Determinism and the Narrative of Adjustment: The High School Biology Textbooks of Truman Jesse Moon, c. 1921–1963.” Curriculum Inquiry 37, no. 2 (2007): 159–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, Eleanor, Emma Fenelon and Nuala Mole. Family Reunification, a Barrier or Facilitator of Integration? United Kingdom Country Report 2012. Brussels: European Commission. http://research.icmpd.org/2012.html.
   Google Scholar
• Silber, Rachel. “Eugenics, Family and Immigration Law in the 1920’s.” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 11, no. 4 (1997): 859–900.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, Alexandra M. “Buildings, Boundaries, and Blood: Medicalization and Nation-building on the US–Mexico Border, 1910–1930.” Hispanic American Historical Review 79, no. 1 (1999): 41–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triebl, Katrin, and Christin Klindworth. Family Reunification, a Barrier or Facilitator of Integration? German Country Report 2012. Brussels: European Commission. http://research.icmpd.org/2012.html.
   Google Scholar
• Turda, Marius. Modernism and Eugenics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Venn, Couze. “Neoliberal Political Economy, Biopolitics and Colonialism.” Theory, Culture & Society 26, no. 6 (2009): 206–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, Sarah. “Producing Bodies and Borders: A Review of Immigrant Medical Examinations in Canada.” Surveillance and Society 6, no. 2 (2009): 128–141.
   Google Scholar
• Wyndham, Diana H. “Striving for National Fitness: Eugenics in Australia, 1910s to 1930s.” PhD diss., Department of History, University of Sydney, 1996.
   Google Scholar