What/who is still missing in International Relations scholarship? Situating Africa as an agent in IR theorising

Bibliography

• Alao, Abiodun, and Olonisakin Funmi. “Post-Cold War Africa: Ethnicity, Ethnic Conflict and Security.” In Africa after the Cold War: The Changing Perspectives on Security, edited by Adebayo Oyebade and Abiodun Alao, 117–142. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A., and Barry Buzan. “Why is there no Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 287–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations and Regional Worlds.” International Studies Quarterly (2014). doi: 10.1111/isqu.12171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agathangelou, A. M., and L. H. M. Ling. “The House of IR: from Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism.” International Studies Review 6, no. 4 (2004): 21–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ake, Claude. Social Science as Imperialism: The Theory of Political Development. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Alatas, Syed Farid. “Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in Social Science.” Current Sociology 51, no. 5 (2003): 599–613.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, Nathan, and Eyene Okpanachi. “Trends of Epistemic Oppression and Academic Dependency in Africa’s Development: The Need for a New Intellectual Path.” Journal of Pan-African Studies 5, no. 8 (2012): 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, R. “Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique.” Millennium 17, no. 2 (1988): 227–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoob, Mohammed. “Subaltern Realism: International Relations Theory meets the Third World.” In International Relations Theory and the Third World, edited by Stephanie Neuman, 31–54. St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pinar. “Thinking past ‘Western’ IR?” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2008): 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaney, David, and Naeem Inayatullah. “International Relations from Below.” Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal, 663–674. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Boele van Hensbroek, P. Political Discourses in African Thought: 1860 to the Present. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. “Africa in International Relations: A Comment on IR Theory, Anarchy and Statehood.” Review of International Studies 32 (2006): 119–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, G. Chinese Perspectives on International Relations: A Framework for Analysis. London: Macmillan, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, C. Africa and the International System: The Politics of State Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Scarlett, Cornelissen, Fantu Cheru, and Tim Shaw, eds. Africa and International Relations in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. “Towards a Posthegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun.” In Approaches to World Order, edited by R Cox and T Sinclair, 144–173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• de Carvalho, Benjamin, Halvard Leira, and John M. Hobson. “The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths that your Teachers still tell you about 1648 and 1919.” Millennium 39, no. 3 (2011): 735–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Y. “The Chinese Conception of National Interest in International Relations.” China Quarterly 154 (1998): 308–329.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. C., and T. M. Shaw, eds. Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory. Palgrave: Basingstoke, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. “Hermeneutical Injustice.” Epistemic Injustice 30 (2007): 147–176.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichs, Jörg. “International Relations Theory in France.” Journal of International Relations and Development 4, no. 2 (2001): 118–137.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, Francis. “The End of History?” The National Interest 16 (1989): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gareau, Frederick H. “Another Type of Third World Dependency: The Social Sciences.” International Sociology 3, no. 2 (1988): 171–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., and R. Keohane, eds. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, Martin, Steven C. Roach, and M. Scott Solomon. Fifty Key Thinkers in International Relations. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Grovogui, S. N. “Rituals of Power: Theory, Languages, and Vernaculars of International Relations.” Alternatives 23 (1998): 499–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruffyd Jones, Branwen. Decolonizing International Relations. Lanhanm, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gruffyd Jones, B. “Introduction: International Relations, Eurocentrism, and Imperialism.” In Decolonizing International Relations, edited by Branwen Gruffydd Jones, 1–19. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, Sandra. “International Relations Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity.” In Decolonizing International Relations, edited by Branwen Gruffydd Jones, 43–63. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, Sophie, and William Brown. “In from the Margins? The Changing Place of Africa in International Relations.” International Affairs 89, no. 1 (2013): 69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Errol A. “Hidden in Plain Sight: Racism in International Relations Theory.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20, no. 1 (2013): 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, John M. “Is Critical Theory always for the White West and for Western Imperialism? Beyond Westphalia towards a Post-racist Critical IR.” Review of International Studies 33, no. S1 (2007): 91–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations.” Daedalus 106, no. 3 (1977): 41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, N., and D. L. Blaney. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. “If not a Clash then What? Huntington, Nishida Kitaro and the Politics of Civilization.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 2 (2002): 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Richard, Daniel Maliniak, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, and Michael J. Tierney. “One Discipline or Many? Survey of International Relations Faculty in Ten Countries.” Teaching, Research and International Policy (TRIP) Project, Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, February 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tom, Keating. “Ethical Reflections on Promoting Democracy.” In The Ethics of Global Governance, edited by Antonio Franceschet. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. Activists Beyond Boarders: Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorf, E. “The Dominance of American Approaches in International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 16, no. 2 (1987): 207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle, Kathryn. “Moving in from the Periphery: Africa and the Study of International Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 12, no. 2 (2005): 364–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, Douglas. “African Lessons for International Relations Research.” World Politics 56, no. 1 (2003): 114–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizée, Pierre P. A Whole New World: Reinventing International Studies for the Post-Western World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Malaquias, A. “Reformulating International Relations Theory: African Insights and Challenges.” In Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory, edited by K. C Dunn and T. M Shaw. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• March, James, and Olsen Johan. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Order.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 943–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazrui, A. A. The African Condition: A Political Diagnosis. London: Heinemann, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, Walter D. “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom.” Theory, Culture & Society 26, nos. 7–8 (2009): 159–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitter, R. “An Uneasy Engagement: Chinese Ideas of Global Order and Justice in Historical Perspective.” In Order and Justice in International Relations, edited by R. Foot, J. L. Gaddis and A. Hurrell, 207–235. New York: Oxford, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld, Mark. The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Nkiwane, T. “Africa and International Relations: Regional Lessons for a Global Discourse.” International Political Science Review 22, no. 3 (2001): 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkiwane, Tandeka, C. “The End of History? African Challenges to Liberalism in International Relations.” In Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory, edited by K. C. Dunn and T. M. Shaw, 103–111. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Nyango’oro, J. E., ed. Civil Society and Democratic Development in Africa: Perspectives from Eastern and Southern Africa. Harare: Mwengo, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Pasha, M. “Ibn Khaldun and World Order.” In Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, edited by S. Gill and J. Mittelman, 56–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Yaqinq. “Why there is no Chinese International Relations Theory.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7 (2007): 313–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse-Kappen, T. “Explaining the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis meet the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 34, no. 1 (1996): 53–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul, J. S. “‘For Fear of being condemned as Old Fashioned’: Liberal Democracy vs. Popular Democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Review of African Political Economy 73 (1997): 339–353.
   Google Scholar
• Saurin, Julian. “International Relations as Imperial Illusion; or, the Need to Decolonize IR.” In Decolonizing International Relations, edited by Branwen Gruffydd Jones, 23–42. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Shilliam, Robbie, ed. International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Shilliam, Robbie. “Non-Western Thought and International Relations.” In International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism, and Investigations of Global Modernity, edited by Robbie Shilliam, 1–11. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sindjoun, Luc. “L’Afrique dans la science des relations internationales: notes introductives et provisoires pour une sociologie de la connaissance internationaliste.” Paper presented at the HSRC/CODESRIA meeting, Johannesburg, September 14–18, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Karen. “Has Africa got Anything to Say? African Contributions to the Theoretical Development of International Relations.” The Round Table 98, no. 402 (2009): 269–284.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve. “Singing our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (2004): 499–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve. “The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: ‘Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline’.” International Studies Review 4, no. 2 (2002): 67–85.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Caroline, and Peter Wilkin. “Still waiting after all these Years: ‘The Third World’ on the Periphery of International Relations.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6 (2004): 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, Anne. “Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation.” Millennium 17, no. 3 (1988): 429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner, Arlene. “Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies.” International Studies Perspectives 4 (2003): 325–350.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, Arlene. “Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World.” Millennium 32, no. 2 (2003): 295–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner, Arlene B., and Ole Waever, eds, International Relations Scholarship around the World. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tieku Thomas. “The Challenge of Africa’s Embedded Personhood to Global Studies.” Paper presented at the ISA’s 49TH Annual Convention, ‘Bridging Multiple Divides’, San Francisco, March 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tieku, Thomas. “Collectivist Worldview: Its Challenge to International Relations.” In Africa and International Relations in the 21st Century, edited by Scarlett Cornelissen, Fantu Cheru and Tim Shaw, 36–50. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, Ole. “The Sociology of a not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 687–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wæver, Ole. “The Rise and Fall of Inter-paradigm Debate.” In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, edited by S. Smith, K. Booth and M. Zalewski, 149–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. B. Security, Sovereignty and the Challenge of World Politics. Canberra: Peace Research Centre, Australian National University, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. “The State is a Person in International Theory.” Review of International Studies 30, no. 2 (2004): 289–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yew, L. The Disjunctive Empire of International Relations. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Zegeye, A., and M. Vambe. “Knowledge Production and Publishing in Africa.” Development Southern Africa 23, no. 3 (2006): 333–349.
   Google Scholar
• Zeleza, P. T. Manufacturing African Studies and Crises. Dakar: CODESRIA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. “System, Empire and State in Chinese International Relations.” Review of International Studies 27 (2001): 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar