Engendering social and environmental safeguards in REDD+: lessons from feminist and development research

Bibliography

• Acharya, K. P., and P. Gentle. Improving the Effectiveness of Collective Action: Sharing Experiences from Community Forestry in Nepal.. Working Paper No. 54. (2006). Accessed from EconPapers. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/fprworpps/54.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. “Conceptualising Environmental Collective Action: Why Gender Matters.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 24, no. 3 (2000): 283–310. 10.1093/cje/24.3.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. “Does Women’s Proportional Strength affect their Participation? Governing Local Forests in South Asia.” World Development 38, no. 1 (2010): 98–112. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. “Gender and Command over Property: A Critical Gap in Economic Analysis in South Asia.” World Development 22, no. 10 (1994): 1455–1478. 10.1016/0305-750X(94)90031-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. “Gender and Land Rights Revisited: Exploring New Prospects via the State, Family and Market.” Journal of Agrarian Change 3, nos. 1–2 (2003): 184–224. 10.1111/1471-0366.00054
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. “Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual Framework.” World Development 29, no. 10 (2001): 1623–1648. 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00066-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. “The Power of Numbers in Gender Dynamics: Illustrations from Community Forestry Groups.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 1 (2015): 1–20. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.936007.10.1080/03066150.2014.936007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., G. Yadama, R. Andrade, and A. Bhattacharya. Decentralization and Environmental Conservation: Gender Effects from Participation in Joint Forest Management. CAPRi Working Paper No. 53. (2006). Accessed from http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fpr:worpps:53.
   Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson, S. “Forty Years of Gender Research and Environmental Policy: Where do we Stand?” Women’s Studies International Forum 47, Part B (2014): 295–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson, Seema. Gender, Development and Environmental Governance. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson, S. “Virtue and Vulnerability: Discourses on Women, Gender and Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 21, no. 2 (2011): 744–751. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banana, A., M. Bukenya, E. Arinaitwe, and B. Birabwa. Gender, Tenure and Community Forests in Uganda. Working Paper No. 87. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Benería, L., and G. Sen. “Class and Gender Inequalities and Women’s Role in Economic Development: Theoretical and Practical Implications.” Feminist Studies 8, no. 1 (1982): 157–176. 10.2307/3177584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. E. “Women in Community Forestry Organizations: An Empirical Study in Thailand.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 25, S9 (2010): 62–68. 10.1080/02827581.2010.506974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, J. “Converting the Wetlands, Engendering the Environment: The Intersection of Gender with Agrarian Change in the Gambia.” Economic Geography 69, no. 4 (1993): 29–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, E. A., and E. Mwangi. “Women’s Participation in Forest Management: A Cross-country Analysis.” Global Environmental Change 23, no. 1 (2013): 193–205. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. “Whose Voices? Whose Choices? Reflections on Gender and Participatory Development.” World Development 31, no. 8 (2003): 1325–1342. 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00086-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, D. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11, no. 4 (1988): 275–298. 10.1111/scps.1988.11.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Di Gregorio, M., M. Brockhaus, T. Cronin, E. Muharrom, L. Santoso, S. Mardiah, and M. Büdenbender. “Equity and REDD+ in the Media: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Discourses.” Ecology and Society: A Journal of Integrative Science for Resilience and Sustainability 18, no. 2 (2013): 39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, R. “Introducing New Feminist Political Ecologies.” Geoforum 42, no. 2 (2011): 129–132. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25, nos. 25–26 (1990): 56–80. 10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, S., and V. Ramasar. “Widows: Agents of Change in a Climate of Water Uncertainty.” Journal of Cleaner Production 60 (2013): 34–42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gezon, L. L. “Marriage, Kin, and Compensation: A Socio-political Ecology of Gender in Ankarana, Madagascar.” Anthropological Quarterly 75, no. 4 (2002): 675–706. 10.1353/anq.2002.0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupte, M. “Participation in a Gendered Environment: The Case of Community Forestry in India.” Human Ecology 32, no. 3 (2004): 365–382. 10.1023/B:HUEC.0000028086.63366.3d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurung, J., and A. Billah Setyowati. Re-envisioning REDD+: Gender, Forest Governance and REDD+ in Asia. Brief #4 of 4. 2012. Accessed from Rights and Resources. http://www.rightsandresources.org/documents/files/doc_5225.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. “Gender Analysis of Land: Beyond Land Rights for Women?” Journal of Agrarian Change 3, no. 4 (2003): 453–480. 10.1111/1471-0366.00062
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. “Resolving Risk? Marriage and Creative Conjugality.” Development and Change 38, no. 1 (2007): 107–129. 10.1111/dech.2007.38.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Cecile, and Molly Chattopadhyay. “Identities and Livelihoods: Gender, Ethnicity, and Nature in a South Bihar Village.” In Agrarian Environments: Resources, Representations, and Rule in India, edited by Arun Agrawal and K. Sivaramakrishnan, 147–169. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, S. “Unequal Knowledges in Jharkhand, India: De-romanticizing Women’s Agroecological Expertise.” Development and Change 31, no. 5 (2000): 961–985. 10.1111/dech.2000.31.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadka, M., S. Karki, B. S. Karky, R. Kotru, and K. B. Darjee. “Gender Equality Challenges to the REDD+ Initiative in Nepal.” Mountain Research and Development 34, no. 3 (2014): 197–207. 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-13-00081.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, A. M., T. Dokken, A. Duchelle, S. Atmadja, I. A. P. Resosudarmo, P. Cronkleton, M. Cromberg, W. Sunderlin, A. Awono, and G. Selaya. “The Role of Women in Early REDD+ Implementation: Lessons for Future Engagement.” International Forestry Research. 17, no. 1 (2015): 43–65. 10.1505/146554815814725031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Tania Murray. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J. “Women and Politics: Minority Representation or Critical Mass?” Parliamentary Affairs 54, no. 4 (2001): 743–758. 10.1093/parlij/54.4.743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, Yen Hoang, E. Mwangi, and M. Wan. “Gender Analysis in Forestry Research: Looking Back and Thinking Ahead.” International Forestry Review 13, no. 2 (2011): 245–258. 10.1505/146554811797406589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Dick, R. S., L. R. Brown, H. S. Feldstein, and A. R. Quisumbing. “Gender, Property and Natural Resources.” World Development 25, no. 8 (1997): 1303–1315. 10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00027-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menton, M., C. Ferguson, R. Lelmu-Brown, S. Leonard, M. Brockhaus, A. E. Duchelle, and C. Martius. Further Guidance for REDD+ Safeguard Information Systems? An Analysis of Positions in the UNFCCC Negotiations. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” Feminist Review 30 (1988): 61–88. 10.1057/fr.1988.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, R. “Institutional Dynamics and Participatory Spaces: The Making and Unmaking of Participation in Local Forest Management in India.” IDS Bulletin 35, no. 2, (2004): 26–32. 10.1111/idsb.2004.35.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollett, S., and C. Faria. “Messing with Gender in Feminist Political Ecology.” Geoforum 45 (2013): 116–125. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, H. L. A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Moraga, C., and G. Anzaldúa. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Watertown, MA: Persephone Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, David. “Is Good Policy Unimplementable? Reflections on the Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice.” Development and Change 35, no. 4 (2004): 639–671. 10.1111/dech.2004.35.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukasa, C., A. Tibazalika, A. Mango and H. Muloki. Gender and Forestry in Uganda: Policy, Legal and Institutional Frameworks. Working Paper 89. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mwangi, E., R. Meinzen-Dick, and Y. Sun. “Gender and Sustainable Forest Management in East Africa and Latin America.” Ecology and Society 16 (2011): 17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. “The Nature of Gender: Work, Gender, and Environment.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (2006): 165–185. 10.1068/d01k
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. J. “Bounding Difference: Intersectionality and the Material Production of Gender, Caste, Class and Environment in Nepal.” Geoforum 42, no. 2 (2011): 153–162. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach Brown, H. C. “Gender, Climate Change and REDD+ in the Congo Basin Forests of Central Africa.” International Forestry Review 13, no. 2 (2011): 163–176. 10.1505/146554811797406651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, B., and M. Buchy. “Institutional Exclusion of Women in Community Forestry: Is Women-only Strategy a Right Answer?“ In Twenty-five Years of Community Forestry: Contribution to Millennium Development Goals, edited by K. R. Kanel, P. Mathema, B. R. Kandel, D. R. Niraula, A. R. Sharma and M. Gautam, 399–408. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference of Community Forestry. Nepal, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. G. “Taking Stands: A Feminist Perspective on ‘Other’ Women's Activism in Forestry Communities of Northern Vancouver Island.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 7, no. 4 (2000): 363–387. 10.1080/713668882
   Google Scholar
• Rey, D., J. Roberts, S. Korwin, L. Rivera, U. Ribet, and P. Ferro. A Guide for Consistent Implementation of REDD+ Safeguards. London: ClientEarth, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, D., and D. Edmunds. “Women, Men and Trees: Gender, Power and Property in Forest and Agrarian Landscapes.” World Development 25, no. 8 (1997): 1351–1371. 10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00036-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandbrook, C., F. Nelson, W. M. Adams, and A. Agrawal. “Carbon, Forests and the REDD Paradox.” Oryx 44, no. 3 (2010): 330–334. 10.1017/S0030605310000475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijapati, B. “Gender, Institutions and Development in Natural Resource Management: A Study of Community Forestry in Nepal.” PhD diss., London School of Economics and Political Science, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sunam, R. K., and J. McCarthy. “Advancing Equity in Community Forestry: Recognition of the Poor Matters.” International Forestry Review 12, no. 4 (2010): 370–382. 10.1505/ifor.12.4.370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., E. Mwangi, and R. Meinzen-Dick. “Is Gender an Important Factor Influencing User Groups’ Property Rights and Forestry Governance? Empirical Analysis from East Africa and Latin America.” International Forestry Review 13, no. 2 (2011): 205–219. 10.1505/146554811797406598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperation under the Convention, Decision 1/CP.16, FCC/CP/2010/7 Add.1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. Decision on Guidance on Systems for Providing Information on How Safeguards are Addressed and Respected and Modalities Relating to Forest Reference Emission Levels and Forest Reference Levels as Referred to in Decision 1/CP.16, Decision 12/CP.17. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Gender Equality and Sustainable Development. Doc A/69/156. New York: United Nations, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD. The Business Case for Mainstreaming Gender in REDD. Geneva: UN-REDD Programme Secretariat, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD. UN-REDD+ Programme Guidance Note on Gender Sensitive REDD+. Geneva: UN-REDD Programme Secretariat, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Villamour, G. B., G. Desrianti, R. Akiefnawati, S. Awanizalman, and K. M. van Noordwijk. “Gender Influences Decisions to change Land Use Practices in Tropical Forest Margins of Jambi, Indonesia.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Climate Change 18, no. 6 (2013): 733–755.
   Google Scholar
• Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., C. McDermott, M. J. Vijge, and B. Cashore. “Trade-offs, Co-benefits and Safeguards: Current Debates on the Breadth of REDD+.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4, no. 6 (2012): 646–653. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEDO. From Research to Action, Leaf by Leaf: Getting Gender Right in REDD+SES. Women’s Environment and Development Organization, 2013. http://www.wedo.org/library/wedo-launches-from-research-to-action-leaf-by-leaf-getting-gender-right-in-redd-ses.
   Google Scholar
• Westholm, L., and S. Arora-Jonsson. “Defining Solutions, Finding Problems: Deforestation, Gender, and REDD+ in Burkina Faso.” Conservation and Society 13, no. 2 (2015): 189–199. 10.4103/0972-4923.164203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar