Does local ownership bring about effectiveness? The case of a transnational advocacy network

Bibliography

• Arensman, B., J. Barrett, A. van Bodegom, D. Klaver, W. Richert, C. van Waegeningh, M. van Wessel, et al. MFS II Joint Evaluation of International Lobbying and Advocacy. The Hague: NWO, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J., M. van Wessel, and D. Hilhorst. Advocacy for Development: Effectiveness, Monitoring and Evaluation. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, D. “Aid Effectiveness: Bringing Country Ownership (and Politics) Back in.” Conflict, Security and Development 12, no. 5 (2012): 537–558.10.1080/14678802.2012.744184
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. “The Professionals and the Powerless: Whose Reality Counts.” World Summit for Social Development 40, no. 1 (1995): 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• DFID UK Department for International Development. DFID’s Approach to Value for Money. London: July, 2011. Accessed December 1, 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67479/DFID-approach-value-money.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donais, T. “Empowerment or Imposition? Dilemmas of Local Ownership in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding Processes.” Peace & Change 34, no. 1 (2009): 3–26.10.1111/pech.2009.34.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. “Making Sense of Accountability: Conceptual Perspectives for Northern and Southern Nonprofits.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14, no. 2 (2003): 191–212.10.1002/nml.v14:2
   Google Scholar
• Eyben, R. “Supporting Inclusive and Democratic Ownership. a ‘How to Note’ for Donors.” OECD DAC. Consultation: 29–30 November (2010). Accessed December 1, 2016. http://cso-effectiveness.org/IMG/pdf/enabling_environment_institute_for_development_studies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., I. Guijt, C. Roche, C. Shutt. The Politics of Evidence and Results in International Development. Playing the Game to Change the Rules? Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, 2015.10.3362/9781780448855
   Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., and L. Savage. “Emerging and Submerging Powers Imagined Geographies in the New Development Partnership at the Busan Fourth High Level Forum.” The Journal of Development Studies 49, no. 4 (2013): 457–469.10.1080/00220388.2012.733372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, J. “Policy Experiments, Democratic Ownership and Development Assistance.” Development Policy Review 28, no. 5 (2010): 515–534.10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, A. Civil Society, NGDOs and Social Development: Changing the Rules of the Game. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, J. “Messages of Exclusion: Gender, Movements, and Symbolic Boundaries.” Gender and Society 11 (1997): 178–199.10.1177/089124397011002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict. GPPAC Strategic plan 2011-2015. The Hague: GPPAC. January. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, L., G. Mohan, and H. Yanacopulos. “Networks as Transnational Agents of Development.” Third World Quarterly 25, no. 5 (2004): 839–855.10.1080/0143659042000231983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskyns, C. “Gender and Transnational Democracy: The Case of the European Union.” In Gender Politics in Global Governance, edited by M. K.Meyer and E.Prugl, 72–87. Lanham: Bowman & Littlefield, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, A. “NGOs’ Transnational Advocacy Networks: ‘Legitimacy’ to ‘Political Responsibility?”.” Global Networks 1, no. 4 (2001): 331–352.10.1111/glob.2001.1.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. A., and R. D. Benford. “The Collective Identity, Solidarity and Commitment.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule and H Kriesi, 433–457. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Independent Commission for Aid Impact. ICAI’s Approach to Effectiveness and Value for Money. Report 1, November, UK, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J., and F. Polletta. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27, no. 1 (2001): 283–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, L., and P. van Tuijl. “Political Responsibility in Transnational NGO Advocacy.” World Development 28, no. 12 (2000): 2051–2065.10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00078-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, H., and H. Anheier. “Global Connectedness: The Structure of Transnational NGO Networks.” Global Civil Society 6 (2005): 240–265.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M., and K. Sikkink. Activists beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Korten, D. C. “Third Generation NGO Strategies: A Key to People-Centered Development.” World Development 15 (1987): 145–159.10.1016/0305-750X(87)90153-7
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology (1995): 95–117.10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, S. “The Social Construction of Scale.” Progress in Human Geography 24, no. 2 (2000): 219–242.10.1191/030913200674086272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Criteria for Evaluating Development Assistance. Paris: OECD, 1991, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The Accra Agenda for Action. Paris: OECD, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-Operation. Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and P. Kenis. “Modes of Network Governance: Structures, Management and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration and Research 18, no. 2 (2008): 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., A. Fish, and J. Sydow. “Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks.” Journal of Management 33, no. 3 (2007): 479–516.10.1177/0149206307302554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, H. “‘Local Ownership’ in Conflict Transformation Projects. Partnership, Participation or Patronage?” Berghof Occasional Paper 27, September (2006): 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, O. P. “Beyond Local Ownership in the Architecture of International Peacebuilding.” Formerly Global Review of Ethnopolitics 11, no. 4 (2012): 354–375.10.1080/17449057.2012.697650
   Google Scholar
• Riddell, R. C. “Does Foreign Aid Really Work?” Australian Aid and International Development Workshop. Canberra: February (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Saz-Carranza, A. Uniting Diverse Organizations. Managing Goal-Oriented Advocacy Networks. New York: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Saz-Carranza, A., and S. M. Ospina. “The Behavioural Dimension of Governing Interorganizational Goal-Directed Networks. Managing the Unity-Diversity Tension.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (2011): 327–365.10.1093/jopart/muq050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shawki, N. “Organizational Structure and Strength and Transnational Campaign Outcomes: A Comparison between Two Transnational Advocacy Networks.” Global Networks 11, no. 1 (2011): 97–117.10.1111/glob.2011.11.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1, 21 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. H. Internal Affairs. How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2012.10.7591/cornell/9780801450792.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. “World Bank, Global Fund, Partner to Expand Results-Based Financing for Maternal and Child Health.” Press release, 11 December, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Yogita, M., L. Johannes, G. Kumar. Output-Based Aid: Lessons Learned and Best Practices. World Bank, 2010.
   Google Scholar