Perceptions, identities and interests in South–South cooperation: the cases of Chile, Venezuela and Brazil

Bibliography

• Abdenur, A. “Emerging Powers as Normative Agents: Brazil and China within the UN Development System.” Third World Quarterly 35, no. 10 (2014): 1876–1893.10.1080/01436597.2014.971605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdenur, A., and J. M. Rampini. “A Cooperação Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento con Angola e Moçambique: Uma Visão Comparada [Brazilian Cooperation for Development with Angola and Mozambique: A Comparative View].” In Política Externa Brasileira. Cooperação Sul-Sul e Negociações Internacionais [Brazilian Foreign Policy. South-South Cooperation and International Negotiations], edited by H. Ramanzini and L. F. Ayerbe, 83–114. Sao Paulo: Cultura Académica, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, M. South–South Economic Cooperation: Emerging Trends and Future Challenges (Background Research Paper of the High-Level Panel on the Post-2015 Development Agenda, May 2013). New York: United Nations, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• AGCI (Agencia Chilena de Cooperación Internacional). Balance de Gestión Integral 2006–2010 [Balance of Integral Management 2006–2010]. Santiago de Chile: Chilean Agency for International Cooperation, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., and D. Dollar. “Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?” Journal of Economic Growth 5 (2000): 33–63.10.1023/A:1009874203400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. A., ed. Cooperation with Middle Income Countries. Madrid: Editorial Complutense, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. A. From Aid to Global Development Policy. DESA Working Paper No. 121. New York: ECOSOC, United Nations, 2012.10.18356/a39cdf00-en.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. A. Cooperation with Middle-Income Countries: An Incentive-Based Approach. AECID Working Paper No. 1. Madrid: Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. A., J. Glennie, and A. Sumner. Recipients and Contributors: Middle Income Countries and the Future of Development Cooperation. DESA Working Paper No. 135. New York: ECOSOC, United Nations, 2014.10.18356/a39cdf00-en.
   Google Scholar
• Amorim, C. Brazilian Foreign Policy under President Lula (2003–2010): An Overview. Brazilian Journal of International Politics 53 ( Special Edition) 2010: 214–240.
   Google Scholar
• Aponte, M. El Nuevo Regionalismo Estratégico. Los primeros diez años del ALBA-TCP [The New Strategic Regionalism. The First Ten Years of ALBA-TCP]. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Aponte, M., and G. Amézquita, eds. El ALBA-TCP. Origen y fruto del nuevo regionalismo latinoamericano y caribeño [ALBA-TCP. Origin and Result of the Latin American and Caribbean New Regionalism]. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ayllón, B. “Nuevos horizontes en la cooperación brasileña: proyectos estructurantes, sistemas de información y triangulación [New Horizons in Brazilian Cooperation: Structural Projects, Information Systems and Triangulation].” In La cooperación Sur–Sur y triangular en América Latina. Políticas afirmativas y prácticas transformadoras [South–South and Triangular Cooperation in Latin America. Assertive Politics and Transforming Practices], edited by B. Ayllón and T. Ojeda, 64–86. Madrid: La Catarata-IUDC, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ayllón, B. and Ojeda, T., eds. La cooperación Sur–Sur y triangular en América Latina. Políticas afirmativas y prácticas transformadoras [South–South and Triangular Cooperation in Latin America. Assertive Politics and Transforming Practices]. Madrid: La Catarata-IUDC.
   Google Scholar
• Bracho, G. In Search of a Narrative for Southern Providers. the Challenge of the Emerging Economies in to the Development Cooperation Agenda. DIE Discussion Paper 01/2015. Bonn: German Development Institute, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Briceño, J. “El ALBA como propuesta de integración regional” [ALBA as a Proposal for Regional Integration]. In América Latina y El Caribe. ALBA: ¿una nueva forma de integración regional? [Latin America and the Caribbean. ALBA: A new form of Regional Integration?], edited by J. Altmann, 19–84. Buenos Aires: Teseo-FLACSO-Fundación Carolina-OIRLA, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, S., and T. Weiss. “Emerging Powers and the UN Development System: Canvassing Global Views.” Third World Quarterly 35, no. 10 (2014): 1894–1910.10.1080/01436597.2014.971607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, T. “Petrocaribe and CARICOM: Venezuela’s Resource Diplomacy and Its Impact on Small States Regional Cooperation.” In The Diplomacies of Small States, edited by A. Cooper and T. Shaw, 143–159. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2009.10.1057/9780230246911.
   Google Scholar
• Burgues, S. “Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War.” International Relations 22, no. 1 (2008): 65–84.10.1177/0047117807087243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgues, S. Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War. Florida: University Press of Florida, 2009.10.5744/florida/9780813033334.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Cabral, L., and J. Weinstock. Brazil: An Emerging Aid Player. ODI Briefing Paper 64. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cabral, L., and J. Weinstock. Brazilian Technical Cooperation for Development. Drivers, Mechanics and Future Prospects. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi, S., T. Fues, and E. Sidiropoulos. Development Cooperation and Emerging Powers. New Partners or Old Patterns? Chicago, IL: Zed Books, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chekel, J. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations.” World Politics 50, no. 2 (1998): 324–348.10.1017/S0043887100008133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrales, J. “Conflicting Goals in Venezuela′s Foreign Policy.” In Venezuela′s Petro-Diplomacy. Hugo Chávez′s Foreign Policy, edited by R. Clem and A. Maingot, 33–48. Florida: University Press of Florida, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• DAC-OECD (Development Assistance Committe – Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). Special Review of Chile. Paris: Organisation for Economic and Cooperation Development, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. California: University of California Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Glennie, J. The Role of Aid to Middle-Income Countries: A Contribution to Evolving EU Development Policy. ODI Working Paper No. 331. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, Ch. “The New Development Cooperation Landscape: Actors, Approaches, Architecture.” Journal of International Development 25 (2013): 769–786.10.1002/jid.2940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. Theory of Communicative Action. Vol 1. Reason and the Rationalization of the Society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• IPEA (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada). Cooperação Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento Internacional (COBRADI): O Brasil e os Fundos Multilaterais de Desenvolvimento [Brazilian Cooperation for the International Development (COBRADI): Brazil and the Multilateral Development Funds]. Brasilia: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., ed. Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Lechini, G. “Is South–South Co-operation Still Possible? The Case of Brazil’s Strategy and Argentina’s Impulses towards the New South Africa and Africa.” In Politics and Social Movements in a Hegemonic World Lessons from Africa, Asia and Latin America, edited by A. Boron and G. Lechini, 319–346. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lengyel, M., and B. Malacalza. “What Do We Talk When We Talk about South–South Co-Operation?” Paper presented at The Construction of a Concept from Empirical Basis, IPSA-ECPR Joint Conference, Sao Paulo, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E. From Recipients to Donors. Emerging Powers and the Changing Development Landscape. Chicago: ZED Books, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E. “The Changing Geographies of Foreign Aid and Development Cooperation: Contributions from Gift Theory.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37, no. 2 (2012): 256–272.10.1111/tran.2012.37.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhr, T. Counter-Globalization and Socialism in the 21st Century. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Muhr, T. “Beyond ‘BRICS’: Ten Theses on South–South Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 4 (2016): 630–648.10.1080/01436597.2015.1108161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. The Pattern of Aid Giving: The Impact of Good Governance on Development Finance. London: Routledge, 2003.10.4324/SE0266.
   Google Scholar
• Ojeda, T. “La cooperación Sur–Sur de Venezuela en el siglo XXI [Venezuelan South–South Cooperation in the 21st entury].” In La cooperación Sur–Sur y triangular en América Latina. Políticas afirmativas y prácticas transformadoras [South–South and Triangular Cooperation in Latin America. Assertive Politics and Transforming Practices], edited by B. Ayllón and T. Ojeda, 229–246. Madrid: La Catarata – IUDC, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, N. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Petrocaribe. Management Report June 2015. Puerto La Cruz: Petrocaribe, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M. “La cooperación venezolana en América Latina: de la retórica a la acción [Venezuelan Cooperation in Latin America: From Rhetoric to Action].” América Latina Hoy 63 (2013): 113–137.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, D. Emerging Donors in International Development Assistance: A Synthesis Report. Canada: Carleton University, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. Constructing the World Polity. Essays on International Institutionalization. New York: Routledge, 1998.10.4324/9780203424261.
   Google Scholar
• Sanahuja, J.A. “La integración regional, los proyectos bolivarianos y la Unión de Naciones Sudamericanas (UNASUR)” [Regional Integration, the Bolivarian Projects and the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR)]. In Venezuela y la revolución bolivariana [Venezuela and the Bolivarian Revolution], edited by IUGM, 201–250. Instituto Universitario Gutiérrez Mellado, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sanahuja, J. A. “¿Un mundo unipolar, multipolar o apolar? La naturaleza y la distribución del poder en la sociedad internacional contemporánea [A Uni-polar, Multipolar or Non-polar World? The Nature and Distribution of Power in the Contemporary International Society].” In Cursos de Derecho Internacional de Vitoria-Gasteiz 2007 [International Law Courses of Vitoria-Gasteiz 2007], edited by F. J. Quel and J. J. Álvarez, 297–384. País Vasco: Universidad del País Vasco, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Santander, G. “La cooperación Sur–Sur: experiencias de interés e implicaciones para el sistema internacional de ayuda [South–South Cooperation: Relevant Experiences and Implications for the International Aid System].” Revista Sistema 220 (2011): 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Santander, G. “Venezuela: el donante bolivariano [Venezuela: The Bolivarian Donor].” In Nuevos donantes y cooperación Sur–Sur: estudios de caso [New Donors and South–South Cooperation: Cases Studies), edited by G. Santander, 87–107. Madrid: ICEI, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Santander, G. “La cooperación chilena: una realidad en tránsito [Chilean Cooperation: A Reality in Transition].” In La cooperación Sur–Sur y triangular en América Latina: políticas afirmativas y prácticas transformadoras [South–South and Triangular Cooperation in Latin America. Assertive Politics and Transforming Practices], edited by B. Ayllón and T. Ojeda, 87–111. Madrid: La Catarata-IUDC, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Santander, G. Identidades e intereses en la cooperación Sur–Sur: los casos de Chile, Venezuela y Brasil [Identities and Interests in South–South Co-operation: The Cases of Chile, Venezuela and Brazil]. Madrid: La Catarata-ICEI, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schablitzki, J. The BRICS Development Bank: A New Tool for South–South Cooperation? BPC Policy Brief, No. 5(1). Rio de Janeiro: BRICS Policy Center, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schirm, S. “Leaders in Need of Followers: Emerging Powers in Global Governance.” In Power in the 21st Century. International Security and International Political Economy in a Changing World, edited by E. Fels, J. F. Kremer, and K. Kronenberg, 211–236. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• SEGIB. Report on South–South Cooperation in Ibero-America 2013–2014. Madrid: Secretaría General Iberoamericana, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Serbin, A. Chávez, Venezuela y la reconfiguración política de América Latina y el Caribe [Chávez, Venezuela and the Political Reshaping of Latin America and the Caribbean]. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Soares de Lima, M. R., and M. Hirst. “Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities.” International Affairs 82(I) 2006: 21–40.10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00513.x.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, M. The Next Convergence: The Future of Economic Growth in a Multispeed World. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. States and Markets. London: Pinter, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. The Retreat of the State. The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.10.1017/CBO9780511559143
   Google Scholar
• Tejasvi, A. South–South Capacity Development: The Way to Grow? Capacity Development Briefs No. 20. Washington: World Bank Institute, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tooze, R. “Ideology, Knowledge and Power in International Relations and International Political Economy.” In Strange Power. Shaping the Parameters of International Relations and International Political Economy, edited by Thomas C. Lawton, James N. Rosenau, and Amy C. Verdun, 175–195. Aldershot, Ashgate, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Tooze, R. “Susan Strange, Academic International Relations and the Study of International Political Economy.” New Political Economy 5, no. 2 (2000): 280–289.10.1080/713687770.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. The Human Development Report 2013. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veen, A. M. Ideas, Interests and Foreign Aid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511842177.
   Google Scholar
• Vigevani, T., and G. Cepaluni. Brazilian Foreign Policy in Changing times. The Quest for Autonomy from Sarney to Lula. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Walz, J., and V. Ramachandran. Brave New World. A Literature Review of Emerging Donors and the Changing Nature of Foreign Assistance. CDG Working Paper No. 273. Washington: Center for Global Development, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. “The Agent–Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41, no. 3 (1987): 335–370.10.1017/S002081830002751X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46, no. 2 (1992): 391–425.10.1017/S0020818300027764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1017/CBO9780511612183.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. IBSA Six Years on: Co-Operation in a New Global Order. SAIIA Policy Briefing No. 8. Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. “The New Balancing Act: International Relations Theory and Venezuela’s Foreign Policy.” In The Revolution in Venezuela: Social and Political Change under Chávez, edited by T. Ponniah and J. Eastwood, 259–280. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. Global Development Horizons 2011. Multipolarity: The New Global Economy. Washington: World Bank, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank and IPEA (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada). Bridging the Atlantic. Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa South–South Partnering for Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank-IPEA, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• WWICS. Emerging Powers: India, Brazil and South Africa (IBSA) and the Future of South–South Cooperation. ( Special Report). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zehfuss, M. “Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison.” European Journal of International Relations 7, no. 3 (2001): 315–348.10.1177/1354066101007003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, F., and K. Smith. “More Actors, More Money, More Ideas for International Development Cooperation.” Journal of International Development 23 (2011): 723–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar