Is it possible to achieve a good life for all within planetary boundaries?

Bibliography

• Alexander, S., J. Rutherford, and J. Floyd. “A Critique of the Australian National Outlook Decoupling Strategy: A Limits to Growth Perspective.” Ecological Economics 145 (2018): 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alier, J. M. “Socially Sustainable Economic De-growth.” Development and Change 40, no. 6 (2009): 1099–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., and A. Bows. “Beyond ‘Dangerous’ Climate Change: Emission Scenarios for a New World.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 369, no. 1934 (2011): 20–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., and G. Peters. “The Trouble with Negative Emissions.” Science 354, no. 6309 (2016): 182–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chancel, L., and T. Piketty. Carbon and Inequality: From Kyoto to Paris. Paris: Paris School of Economics, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cimadamore, A., G. Koehler., and T. Pogge, eds. Poverty and the Millennium Development Goals: A Critical Look Forward. London: Zed Books, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich, M., S. Giljum, S. Lutter, and C. Polzin. Green Economies around the World. Implications of Resource Use for Development and the Environment. Vienna: SERI, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Edward, P. “The Ethical Poverty Line: A Moral Quantification of Absolute Poverty,” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 2 (2006): 377–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzoni, J. M., and D. Sánchez-Ancochea. The Quest for Universal Social Policy in the South: Actors, Ideas and Architectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fuss, S., et al. “Betting on Negative Emissions”. Nature Climate Change 4, no. 10 (2014): 850–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, V., et al. “Biomass-Based Negative Emissions Difficult to Reconcile with Planetary Boundaries,” Nature Climate Change 8 (2018): 151–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. “The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions.” Cornerstone: William Heinemann, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. “The True Extent of Global Poverty and Hunger: Questioning the Good News Narrative of the Millennium Development Goals.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 5 (2016): 749–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, T. G., G. D. Peterson, and A. Gonzalez. “A Cross‐National Analysis of How Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss.” Conservation Biology 23, no. 5 (2009): 1304–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, C., and A. Sumner. “Gasoline, Guns, and Giveaways: Is There New Capacity for Redistribution to End Three Quarters of Global Poverty?” Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 433 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. “In Defence of Degrowth.” Ecological Economics, 70, no. 5 (2011): 873–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, C. “Why Ending Extreme Poverty Isn’t Good Enough,” Bloomsburg Businessweek, April 29 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Lahoti, R., and S. Reddy. “$1.90 per Day: What Does It Say?” Institute for New Economic Thinking, 2015. Accessed August 1, 2016. https://www.ineteconomics.org/ideas-papers/blog/1-90-per-day-what-does-it-say?p=ideas-papers/blog/1-90-per-day-what-does-it-say.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, A., et al. “What if Negative Emissions Technologies Fail at Scale?” Climate Policy (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Leeds University. “A Good Life for All Within Planetary Boundaries.” Accessed May 1, 2018. http://goodlife.leeds.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• López-Calva, L. F., and E. Ortiz-Juarez. “A Vulnerability Approach to the Definition of the Middle Class.” Journal of Economic Inequality 12, no. 1 (2014): 23–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NDTV, “Poverty in India 2.5 Times The Official Figure: Study,” February 20, 2014. http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/poverty-in-india-2-5-times-the-official-figure-study-551445. Accessed August 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• New Economics Foundation. “How Poor Is Poor? Toward a Rights-Based Poverty Line,” 2010.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill et al., “Supplementary Materials,” Downloaded From http:goodlife.leeds.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, D. W., A. L. Fanning, W. F. Lamb, and J. K. Steinberger. “A Good Life for All Within Planetary Boundaries.” Nature Sustainability 1, no. 2 (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prashad, V. “Making Poverty History,” Jacobin, November 10, 2014. Accessed August 1, 2016. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/11/making-poverty-history/.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, L. “Who is Not Poor? Proposing a Higher International Standard for Poverty,” Working Paper 33, Center for Global Development (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Raworth, K. “A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can We Live within the Doughnut.” Oxfam Policy and Practice: Climate Change and Resilience 8, no. 1 (2012): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Raworth, K. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. Stuart Chapin III, E. Lambin, T. M. Lenton, et al. “Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Ecology and Society 14, no. 2 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schandl, H., et al. “Decoupling Global Environmental Pressure and Economic Growth.” Journal of Cleaner Production 132 (2016): 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. et al. “Biophysical and Economic Limits to Negative CO2 Emissions.” Nature Climate Change 6, no. 1 (2016): 42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S. E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E. M. Bennett, R. Biggs, et al. “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet.” Science 347, no. 6223 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, A., A. Anshory Yusuf, and Y. Suara. “The Prospects of the Poor: A Set of Poverty Measures Based on the Probability of Remaining Poor (or Not) in Indonesia.” Center for Economics and Development Studies (CEDS) Working Paper. Bandung: Padjadjaran University, Indonesia, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Resource Efficiency: Potential and Economic Implications. A report from the International Resource Panel, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, A. “Child Health on a Dollar a Day: Some Tentative Cross-country Comparisons,” Social Science and Medicine 57, no. 9 (2003): 1529–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J., et al. “Is Decoupling GDP Growth from Environmental Impact Possible?” PloS One 11, no. 10 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. World Development Report 1999/2000. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2000.
   Google Scholar