Interests or ideas? Explaining Brazil’s surge in peacekeeping and peacebuilding

Bibliography

• Abdenur, Adriana, and D. Neto. Brazil’s Growing Relevance to Peace and Security in Africa. Oslo: NOREF Report, 2014. doi:10.1080/15423166.2014.950118.
   Google Scholar
• Abdenur, Adriana and Charles T. Call, “A ‘Brazilian Way’?: Brazil’s Approach to Peacebuilding.” In Rising Powers and Peacebuilding, edited by Charles T. Call and Cedric de Coning, 15–38. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Amanor, Kojo. “South–South Cooperation in Africa: Historical, Geopolitical and Political Economy Dimensions of International Development.” Pretoria: IDS Bulletin 44, no. 4 (2013): 20–30. doi:10.1111/1759-5436.12039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, Alex J. and Paul D. Williams. Understanding Peacekeeping. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brysk, Alison. Global Good Samaritans: Human Rights as Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93, no. 4 (1999): 791–807. doi:10.2307/2586113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Call, Charles T. and Cedric de Coning. Rising Powers and Peacebuilding: Breaking the Mold? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Capie, David. “Indonesia as an Emerging Peacekeeping Power: Norm Revisionist or Pragmatic Provider?” Contemporary Southeast Asia 39, no. 1 (2016): 1–27. doi:10.1353/csa.2016.0012.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. “Globalization vs Democracy.” New Perspectives Quarterly 31, no. 2 (2014): 2–54.
   Google Scholar
• Carranza, Mario E. “Rising Regional Powers and International Relations Theories: Comparing Brazil and India’s Foreign Security Policies and Their Search for Great-Power Status.” Foreign Policy Analysis 13 (2017): 255–277.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Steen. “Brazil’s Foreign Policy Priorities.” Third World Quarterly. 34, no. 2, (2013): 271–286. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.775785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Andrew, and D. Flemes. “Foreign Policy Strategies of Emerging Powers in a Multipolar World: An Introductory Review.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 6 (2013): 943–962. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.802501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Robert. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Relations 10, no. 2 (1981): 126–155.
   Google Scholar
• David, Charles-Philippe. “Alice in Wonderland Meets Frankenstein: Constructivism, Realism and Peacebuilding in Bosnia.” Contemporary Security Policy 22, no. 1 (2001): 1–30. doi:10.1080/13523260512331391046.
   Google Scholar
• de Carvalho, Benjamin and Cedric de Coning. Rising Powers and the Future of Peacekeeping and Peacebuilding. Oslo: NOREF, 2013. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/175234/f194e6326ee12f80c3705117b151ef78.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Carvalho, Vinicius Mariano. “Brazilian Music at MINUSTAH – Music as a Diplomatic Weapon.” In Brazil’s Participation in MINUSTAH (2004–2017), edited by Eduarda Passarreli Hamann and Carlos Augusto Ramires Teixeira, 44–50. Rio de Janeiro: Igarapé Institute and CCOPAB, 2017, 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization. 52, no. 4 (1998): 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha and Michelle Jurkovic. “Getting a Seat at the Table: The Origins of Universal Participation and Modern Multilateral Conferences.” Global Governance. 20, no. 1 (2014): 361–373.
   Google Scholar
• Gegout, Catherine. “The West, Realism and Intervention in the Democratic Republic of Congo (1996–2006).” International Peacekeeping. 16, no. 2, (2009): 231–244. doi:10.1080/13533310802685802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Stephen. “Reimagining the Future: Some Critical Reflections 1. In Critical Perspectives on the Crisis of Global Governance, edited by Stephen Gill, 1–23. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, Andreas. “The Collapse in Cancún and the Transformation of the Global System,” www.countercurrents.org, blog entry posted September 14, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• IPEA (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada). Cooperação Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento Internacional 2010. Brasólia, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, Miles. “Rising Powers and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in a Resilient Status Quo.” International Affairs 89, no. 3 (2013): 711–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenkel, Kai Michael. “South America’s Emerging Power: Brazil as Peacekeeper.” International Peacekeeping. 17, no. 5 (2010): 644–661. doi:10.1080/13533312.2010.516958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” International Studies Quarterly 32 (1988): 379–396. doi:10.2307/2600589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert. “Lilliputians’ Dilemma: Small States in International Politics.” International Organization, 23, no. 2 (1969): 291–310. doi:10.1017/S002081830003160X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, I., B. Suyama, L. Waisbich, and M. Pomeroy. Brazil’s Engagement in International Development Cooperation: The State of the Debate. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Manicom, James and Jeffrey Reeves. “Locating Middle Powers in International Relations Theory and Power Transitions”. In Middle Powers and the Rise of China, edited by Bruce Gilley and Andrew O’Neil, 23–44. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mares, David R., and Harold A. Trinkunas. Aspirational Power: Brazil on the Long Road to Global Influence. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, Emma, Sung-Mi Kim and Danilo Marcondes. “Political Leadership and ‘Non-traditional’ Development Cooperation.” Third World Quarterly 38, no. 10 (2017): 2171–2186. doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1333416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19, no. 3, (1995): 5–49 doi:10.2307/2539078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of External Relations. Brazilian Foreign Policy Handbook. Brasilia: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Moaz, Zeev and Bruce Russett. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 87, no. 3 (1993): 624–638. doi:10.2307/2938740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, Marta Fernández, Carlos Chagas Vianna Braga and Maóra Siman Gomes. “Trapped between Many Worlds: A Post-colonial Perspective on the UN Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH).” International Peacekeeping. 19, no. 3 (2012): 377–392. doi:10.1080/13533312.2012.696389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, Suthaharan and David Rampton. “The Limits of Hybridity and the Crisis of Liberal Peace.” Review of International Studies 41, no. 1 (2015): 49–72. doi:10.1017/S0260210514000060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel, Philip and Ian Taylor. “Bugger thy Neighbour? IBSA and South–South Solidarity.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 6 (2013): 1091–1110. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.802507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novaes Miranda, André Luis. “The Pacification of Bel Air.” In Brazil’s Participation in MINUSTAH (2004-2017): Perceptions, Lessons and Practices for Future Missions, edited by Eduarda Passarreli Hamann and Carlos Augusto Ramires Teixeira. Rio: Igarapé and CCOPAB, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Patriota, Antonio Aguiar and Héctor Marcos Timerman. “Brasil e Argentina, Cooperação Nuclear.” O Estado de São Paulo, 2011. http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/discursos-artigos-e-entrevistas-categoria/ministro-das-relacoes-exteriores-artigos/4598-brasil-e-argentina-cooperacao-nuclear-o-­estado-de-s-paulo-06-7-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pickup, Megan. “Foreign Policy of the New Left: Explaining Brazil’s Southern Partnerships.” Contexto Internacional. Rio de Janeiro 38, no 1 (2016): 55–93. doi:10.1590/S0102-8529.2016380100002.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, Michael. “Peacekeeping and Critical Theory.” In The Politics of Peacekeeping, edited by A. Bellamy and P. Williams, 39–58. London: Routledge, 2004. doi:10.1080/1353331042000228445.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, Michael. “The Political Economy of Peacebuilding: A Critical Theory Perspective.” International Journal of Peace Studies. 10, no. 2 (2005): 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver. “A Genealogy of Peace and Conflict Theory,” In Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding, 14–38, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver and Mac Ginty, R. “Where Now for the Critique of the Liberal Peace?” Cooperation and Conflict 50, no. 2 (2015): 171–189. doi:10.1177/0010836714545691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver and Tellidis, I. “Emerging Actors in International Peacebuilding and Statebuilding: Status Quo or Critical States?” Global Governance 20, no. 1 (2014): 563–584.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Gideon. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51, no, (1) (1998): 144–172. doi:10.1017/S0043887100007814.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Nieto, Alejandro. “Brazil’s Grand Design for Combining Global South Solidarity and National Interests: A Discussion of Peacekeeping Operations in Haiti and Timor.” Globalizations, 9, no. 1 (2012): 161–178. doi:10.1080/14747731.2012.627719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweller, Randall L. and Xiaoyu Pu. “After Unipolarity: China’s Visions of International Order in an Era of US Decline.” International Security 36, no. 1 (2011): 41–72. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spektor, Matias. “Humanitarian Intervention Brazilian Style?” Americas Quarterly 6, no. 3 (2012): 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, Priscilla. “‘Blending’ of Aid and Private Flows in South-South Cooperation.” MA thesis in socio-economics, University of Geneva, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Stuenkel, Oliver and Matthew Taylor. Brazil on the Global Stage: Power, Ideas and the Liberal Order. London: Palgrave, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Thies, Cameron G. and Mark Nieman. Rising Powers and Foreign Policy Revisionism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. “Statement by the President of the Security Council.” S/PRST/2011/4, February 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Valença, Marcelo M. and Gustavo Carvalho. “Soft Power, Hard Aspirations: The Shifting Role of Power in Brazilian Foreign Policy.” Brazilian Foreign Policy Journal. 8, no. 3 (2014): 66–94. doi:10.1590/1981-38212014000100021.
   Google Scholar
• Velázquez, Arturo. “Why Some States Participate in UN Peace Missions While Others Do Not: An Analysis of Civil–Military Relations and Its Effects on Latin America’s Contributions to Peacekeeping Operations.” Security Studies 19, no. 1 (2010): 160–195. doi:10.1080/09636410903546822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigevani, Tullo and Gabriel Cepaluni. Brazilian Foreign Policy in Changing Times: The Quest for Autonomy from Sarney to Lula. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. “Structural Realism after the Cold War.” International Security. 25, no. 1 (2000): 5–41. doi:10.1162/016228800560372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 1979.
   Google Scholar