Reframing the rising powers debate: state transformation and foreign policy

Bibliography

• Agnew, J. “The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory.” Review of International Political Economy 1, no. 1 (1994): 53–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, C., and A. Aran. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Alder-Nissen, R., and T. Gammeltoft-Hansen. Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, E., and P. Ehin. “What Kind of Border Regime Is in the Making?: Towards a Differentiated and Uneven Border Strategy.” Cooperation and Conflict 41, no. 1 (2006): 53–71. doi:10.1177/0010836706060935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, A. “Conceptualizing the Silk Road Initiative in China’s Periphery Policy.” East Asia 33, no. 4 (2016): 309–328. doi:10.1007/s12140-016-9263-9.
   Google Scholar
• Bremmer, I. “The Mixed Fortunes of the BRICS Countries, in 5 Facts.” Time, September 1, 2017. http://time.com/4923837/brics-summit-xiamen-mixed-fortunes/
   Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. “Still Rising or Risen (or Both)? Why and How China Matters.” The Pacific Review 30, no. 6 (2017): 870–884. doi:10.1080/09512748.2017.1302976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. “Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications.” International Affairs 85, no. 4 (2009): 817–835. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00829.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. “China in International Society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible?” Chinese Journal of International Politics 3, no. 1 (2010): 5–36. doi:10.1093/cjip/pop014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, D. “Network Governance and the Making of Brazil’s Foreign Policy towards China in the 21st Century.” Contexto Internacional 38, no. 1 (2016): 9–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. G. “Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization.” Government and Opposition 32, no. 2 (1997): 251–274. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.1997.tb00161.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colson, T. “These Will Be the 21 Most Powerful Economies in 2030.” The Independent, September 2, 2017. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/nigeria-egypt-france-germany-italy-spain-uk-usa-russia-south-korea-pakistan-canada-iran-saudi-arabia-a7926336.html
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, A. Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. F., and D. Flemes. “Foreign Policy Strategies of Emerging Powers in a Multipolar World: An Introductory Review.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 6 (2013): 943–962. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.802501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M. “Introduction.” The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, edited by E. H. Carr, ix–lviii. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dossani, R., and S. Vijaykumar. “Indian Federalism and the Conduct of Foreign Policy in Border States: State Participation and Central Accommodation since 1990.” Stanford Journal of International Relations 7, no. 1 (2006). https://web.stanford.edu/group/sjir/7.1.07_dossani.html.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., and A. L. Newman. “Domestic Institutions beyond the Nation-State: Charting the New Interdependence Approach.” World Politics 66, no. 2 (2014): 331–363. doi:10.1017/S0043887114000057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemes, D. “Network Powers: Strategies of Change in the Multipolar System.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 6 (2013): 1016–1036. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.802504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramer, R. “Infographic: Here’s How the Global GDP is Divvied Up.” Foreign Policy, February 24, 2017. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/02/24/infographic-heres-how-the-global-gdp-is-divvied-up/
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., and C. N. Murphy. “Introduction: Rising Powers and the Future of Global Governance.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 2 (2013): 183–193. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.775778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S., and L. Jones. Governing Borderless Threats: Non-Traditional Security and the Politics of State Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S., and L. Jones. “Rising Powers and State Transformation: The Case of China.” European Journal of International Relations 22, no. 1 (2016): 72–98. doi:10.1177/1354066115578952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heathershaw, J. “Conclusions: Neither Built nor Formed—The Transformation of States under International Intervention.” In Statebuilding and State Formation: The Political Sociology of Intervention, edited by B. Bliesemann de Guevara, 256–257. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Heathershaw, J. and E. Schatz, eds. Paradox of Power: The Logics of State Weakness in Eurasia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, E., and G. Rangwala. Iraq in Fragments: The Occupation and Its Legacy. London: Hurst, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97, no. 2 (2003): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. “Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-Be Great Powers?” International Affairs 82, no. 1 (2006): 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00512.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. “The Future of the Liberal World Order.” Foreign Affairs 90, no. 3 (2011): 56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. “Globalisation and the Changing Architecture of the State: Regulatory State and the Politics of Negative Coordination.” Journal of European Public Policy 8, no. 1 (2001): 101–123. doi:10.1080/1350176001001859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. “The New Regulatory State and Relational Capacity.” Policy & Politics 32, no. 4 (2004): 487–501. doi:10.1332/0305573042009462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. “How Federalism Influences India’s Domestic Politics of Wto Engagement (and Is Itself Affected in the Process).” Asian Survey 43, no. 4 (2003): 598–621. doi:10.1525/as.2003.43.4.598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. “India’s States and the Making of Foreign Economic Policy: The Limits of the Constituent Diplomacy Paradigm.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 33, no. 4 (2003): 63–82. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. “Avoiding Traps, Rescaling States, Governing Europe.” In Leivathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale, edited by R. Keil and R. Mahon, 87–104. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. “Theorizing Foreign and Security Policy in an Era of State Transformation: A New Framework and Case Study of China.” Journal of Global Security Studies. Published online 24 November (2018). doi:10.1093/jogss/ogy030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L., and J. Zeng. “Understanding China’s ‘Belt and Road Initiative’: Beyond ‘Grand Strategy’ to a State Transformation Analysis. Third World Quarterly, this issue. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1559046.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F. “State Transformation and Cross-border Regionalism in Indonesia’s Periphery: Contesting the Centre. Third World Quarterly, this issue. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1620598.
   Google Scholar
• Krahmann, E. Multilevel Networks in European Foreign Policy. Reissued. London: Routledge, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Krauthammer, C. “The Unipolar Moment.” Foreign Affairs 70, no. 1 (1990): 23–33. doi:10.2307/20044692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauthammer, C. “The Unipolar Moment Revisited.” The National Interest 70 (2002/3): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Laïdi, Z. “BRICS: Sovereignty, Power and Weakness.” International Politics 49, no. 5 (2012): 614–632. doi:10.1057/ip.2012.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbein, J. Transnationalization and Regulatory Change in the Eu’s Eastern Neighbourhood: Ukraine between Brussels and Moscow. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, C. “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise.” International Security 17, no. 4 (1993): 5–51. doi:10.2307/2539020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, C. “The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States’ Unipolar Moment.” International Security 31, no. 2 (2006): 7–41. doi:10.1162/isec.2006.31.2.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leverett, F., and B. Wu. “The New Silk Road and China’s Evolving Grand Strategy.” The China Journal 77 (2017): 110–132. doi:10.1086/689684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, L. H. M. “Worlds beyond Westphalia: Daoist Dialectics and the ‘China Threat’.” Review of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2013): 549–568. doi:10.1017/S026021051200054X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. “The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe.” West European Politics 17, no. 3 (1994): 77–101. doi:10.1080/01402389408425031.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A., and S. J. Collier. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems: Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ortmann, S. “Beyond Spheres of Influence: The Myth of the State and Russia’s Seductive Power in Kyrgyzstan.” Geopolitics 23, no. 2 (2018): 404–435. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1451843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovsky, G. “Russian Politics under Putin: The System Will Outlast the Master.” Foreign Affairs 95, no. 3 (2016): 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. Governing Complex Societies: Trajectories and Scenarios. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Plagemann, J., and S. Destradi. “Populism and Foreign Policy: The Case of India.” Foreign Policy Analysis 15, no. 2 (2019): 283–301.
   Google Scholar
• Plagemann, J., and S. Destradi. “Soft Sovereignty, Rising Powers, and Subnational Foreign Policy-Making: The Case of India.” Globalizations 12, no. 5 (2015): 728–743. doi:10.1080/14747731.2014.1001596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. “Emerging Powers in an Age of Disorder.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 17, no. 3 (2011): 285–297. doi:10.1163/19426720-01703002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serfaty, S. “Moving into a Post-Western World.” The Washington Quarterly 34, no. 2 (2011): 7–23. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2011.562080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setzer, J. “How Subnational Governments Are Rescaling Environmental Governance: The Case of the Brazilian State of São Paulo.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19, no. 5 (2014): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sharafutdinova, G. “Paradiplomacy in the Russian Regions: Tatarstan’s Search for Statehood.” Europe-Asia Studies 55, no. 4 (2003): 613–629. doi:10.1080/0966813032000084028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A.-M. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• S⊘rensen, G. The Transformation of the State: Beyond the Myth of Retreat. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, J., and M. Webber. “Security Governance in Europe: A Return to System.” European Security 23, no. 2 (2014): 126–144. doi:10.1080/09662839.2013.856305.
   Google Scholar
• Sridharan, K. “Federalism and Foreign Relations: The Nascent Role of the Indian States.” Asian Studies Review 27, no. 4 (2003): 463–489. doi:10.1080/10357820308713389.
   Google Scholar
• Tanzi, A. and W. Lu. “Where Will Global GDP Growth Come from in the Next Five Years?” Bloomberg, October 28, 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-28/where-will-global-gdp-growth-come-from-in-the-next-five-years
   Google Scholar
• Tkachenko, S. L. “Regionalization of Russian Foreign and Security Policy: The Case of St Petersburg.” Working Paper No. 21. Zurich: ETH Center for Security Studies and Conflict Research, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• vom Hau, M. “State Theory: Four Analytical Traditions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, edited by S. Leibfried, E. Huber, M. Lange, J. D. Levy, and J. D. Stephens, 131–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. B. J. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, M., and M. Smith. Foreign Policy in a Transformed World. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. D. “The Evolution of China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: From a Revisionist to Status-Seeking Agenda.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 19, no. 1 (2019): 147–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, A. “More than Peripheral: How Provinces Influence China’s Foreign Policy.” The China Quarterly 235 (2018): 735–757. doi:10.1017/S0305741018000930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. Globalization and State Transformation in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar