Interventionary order and its methodologies: the relationship between peace and intervention

Bibliography

• Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. Why Nations Fail. London: Profile, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. On Violence. New York: Harcourt, 1970. doi: 10.1086/ahr/57.4.933.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York, Harcourt Brace, 1951. doi: 10.1086/ahr/57.4.933.
   Google Scholar
• Behavioural Insights Team. Better Choices: Better Deals. London: UK Cabinet Office, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Duncan. “What Is Liberalism?” Political Theory 42, no. 6 (2014): 682–715. doi: 10.1177/0090591714535103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. The Possibility of Naturalism. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker, M., Anne Brown, and Kevin P. Clements. “Hybrid Political Orders, Not Fragile States.” Peace Review 21, no. 1 (2009): 13–21. doi: 10.1080/10402650802689997.
   Google Scholar
• Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. An Agenda for Peace. New York: UN, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, R. A New Trusteeship? The International Administration of War-Torn Territories. London: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. doi: 10.1086/ahr/106.4.1322.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. “Beyond Neoliberalism: Resilience, the New Art of Governing Complexity.” Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 2, no. 1 (2014): 47–63. doi: 10.1080/21693293.2013.878544.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. Bosnia: Faking Democracy after Dayton. London: Pluto Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. International Statebuilding: The Rise of Post-Liberal Governance. London: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. Ontopolitics and the Anthropocene. London: Routledge, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. “Reconceptualising International Intervention: Statebuilding, ‘Organic Processes’ and the Limits of Causal Knowledge.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 9, no. 1 (2015): 70–88. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2015.1015247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. Resilience, the Governing of Complexity. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1967. “The Responsibility of Intellectuals.” The New York Review of Books, 8:3, February 23.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, Jean, and John L. Comaroff. Theory from the South or, How Euro-America Is Evolving toward Africa. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, William, E. Facing the Planetary. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost, eds. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DeGooyer S., Alastair Hunt, Lida Maxwell, and Samuel Moyn. The Right to Have Rights. London: Verso, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. Post-Humanitarianism. Cambridge: Polity, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. “Why Not Epistocracy?” In Desire, Identity and Existence. Essays in Honor of T. M. Penner, edited by N. Reshotko, 53–69. Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing & Publishing, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics. London: Palgrave, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison. London, Penguin, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. “Questions of Method.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Grenfell, D. “Making Modernity in Timor-Leste.” Arena Magazine 90 (2007): 9, 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. Knowledge and Human Interests, Cambridge: Polity, 1986 [1968].
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992 [1962].
   Google Scholar
• Hadjipavlou, M. “The Cyprus Conflict: Root Causes and Implications for Peacebuilding.” Journal of Peace Research 44, no. 3 (2007): 349–365. doi: 10.1177/0022343307076640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A. “Incomplete Peace and Social Stagnation: Shortcomings of the Good Friday Agreement.” Open Library of Humanities 4, no. 2 (2018): 1–31. doi: 10.16995/olh.251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallaq, Wael B. The Impossible State. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Held, David. Global Covenant. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, Marsha. “Gender, Security and Development.” Conflict, Security & Development 7, no. 1 (2007): 61–84. doi: 10.1080/14678800601176535.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Cambridge: Penguin, 1985 [1651].
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, Andrew. “Global Inequality and International Institutions.” In Global Justice, edited by Thomas Pogge, 32–54. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• ICISS (International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• James, Paul, and Nevzat Soguk. Globalization and Politics, Vol. 1: Global Political and Legal Governance. London: Sage Publications, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. “Governing through Failure and Denial: The New Resilience Agenda.” Millennium 44, no. 3 (2016): 370–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, Mary. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Oxford: Polity, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, Mary. New and Old Wars. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. Conflict of the Faculties. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1992. [1798].
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, David. A World of Struggle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, J. EU Accession and UN Peacemaking in Cyprus. London: Palgrave, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Margaret. “Postcolonialism and Global Justice.” Journal of Global Ethics 9, no. 2 (2013): 187–200. doi: 10.1080/17449626.2013.818459.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lensink, R. Structural Adjustment in Sub-Saharan Africa. London: Longman, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Herbert S. In Defense of Anthropology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, Andrew. “The Achievements of Critical Theory.” In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, edited by Ken Booth, Steve Smith, and Marysia Zalewski, 279–298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, Andrew. “The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations.” Review of International Studies 23, no. 3 (1997): 321–338. doi: 10.1017/S0260210597003215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005 [1970].
   Google Scholar
• MacGinty, R. “Everyday Peace: Bottom-up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies.” Security Dialogue 45, no. 6 (December 2014): 548–564. doi: 10.1177/0967010614550899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marijan, Branka. “The Politics of Everyday Peace in Bosnia And Herzegovina and Northern Ireland.” Peacebuilding 5, no. 1 (2017): 67–81. doi: 10.1080/21647259.2016.1265046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayall, James. Nationalism and International Society Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., and M. Acuto. “The Global Governance of Large Technical Systems.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43, no. 2 (2015). doi: 10.1177/0305829814561540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid. “Engaging Ethnographic Peace Research: Exploring an Approach.” International Peacekeeping 25, no. 5 (2018): 597–609.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Timothy. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. “The Crisis of Governance in New Subsistence States.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 36, no. 1 (2006): 75–101. doi: 10.1080/00472330680000051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, R. At War’s End. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pattberg, Philipp, and Oscar Widerberg. “Theorising Global Environmental Governance.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43, no. 2 (2015): 684–705. doi: 10.1177/0305829814561773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peo, Sorpong. “Peace through Democracy and Justice? Legacies and Lessons from the Case of Cambodia.” The Asian Journal of Peacebuilding 5, no. 1 (May 2001): 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Pogodda, Sandra, and Oliver P. Richmond. “Palestinian Unity and Everyday State Formation: Subaltern ‘Ungovernmentality’ versus Elite Interests.” Third World Quarterly 36, no. 5 (2015): 890–907. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1029909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, Michael. “Peacekeeping and Critical Theory.” International Peacekeeping 11, no. 1 (2004): 39–58. doi: 10.1080/1353331042000228445.
   Google Scholar
• Pyykkonen, Miikka. “Liberalism, Governmentality and Counter-Conduct.” Foucault Studies 20, (2015): 8–35. doi: 10.22439/fs.v0i0.4925.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. London: Harvard University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M., and David L. Harvey. “The New Science and the Old: Complexity and Realism in the Social Sciences.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22, no. 4 (1992): 353–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00224.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, Christian. Individual Rights and the Making of the International System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. Failed Statebuilding. London: Yale University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “Human Rights and the Development of a Twenty-First Century Peace Architecture: Unintended Consequences?” Australian Journal of International Affairs 73, no. 1 (2019): 45–63. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2018.1557106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “The Paradox of Peace and Power: Contamination or Enablement?” International Politics 54, no. 5 (2017): 637–658. doi: 10.1057/s41311-017-0053-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. Peace Formation and Political Order. London: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. A Post-Liberal Peace. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. “A Post-Liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday.” Review of International Studies 35, no. 3 (2009): 557–580. doi: 10.1017/S0260210509008651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. The Transformation of Peace. London: Palgrave, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P., and Jason Franks. Liberal Peace Transitions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, P. “The Social Contract and Its Critics.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, Vol. 4, edited by Mark Goldie and Robert Wokler, 347–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, James. “Toward an Ontology for Global Governance.” In Approaches to Global Governance Theory, edited by Martin Hewson and Timothy J. Sinclair, 287–303. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. London: Yale University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Anthony D. Nationalism and Modernism: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism. London: Routledge, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. New York: Zed Books, 1999, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri. “Can the Subaltern Speak?.” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Stepputat, Finn, and Jessica Larsen. Global Political Ethnography: A Methodological Approach to Studying Global Policy Regimes. DIIS Working Paper, Copenhagen, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tainter, J. A. The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Astra. “Afterword(s).” In The Right to Have Rights, edited by Stephanie DeGooyer, Alastair Hunt, Lida Maxwell, and Samuel Moyn, 103–122. London: Verso, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., and C. Sunstein. Nudge. London: Penguin Books, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. “Peacebuilding as Counterinsurgency in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.” Review of International Studies 41, no. 1 (2015): 73–98. doi: 10.1017/S0260210514000072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Government. The Belfast Agreement. UK Government Policy Papers, April 10, 1998. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-belfastagreement
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). “General Assembly Resolution.” A/RES/70/262, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). “Security Council Resolution.” S/RES/2282, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). “High-Level Meeting on Efforts Undertaken and Opportunities to Strengthen the United Nations’ Work on Peacebuilding and Sustaining Peace.” April 24–25, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations).“Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” UN General Assembly A/RES/70/1. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). Human Development Report. New York: UNDP, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, R. J. Nonintervention and International Order. London: Princeton University Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, G. Shaping Peace in Kosovo: The Politics of Peacebuilding and Statehood. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Vucetic, Srdjan. The Anglosphere: A Genealogy of a Racialized Identity in International Relations. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. Weber’s Rationalism and Modern Society: New Translations on Politics, Bureaucracy, and Social Stratification. Edited and translated by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters. London: Palgrave, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, Andreas, and Nina Glick Schiller. “Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology.” The International Migration Review 37, no. 3 (2003): 576–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00151.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaqing, Qin. “Development of International Relations Theory in China.” International Studies 46, no. 1–2 (2009): 185–201. doi: 10.1177/002088171004600212.
   Google Scholar