The politics of state capitalism in a post-liberal international order: the case of Turkey

Bibliography

• Acemoğlu, D., and J. Robinson. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty.London: Penguin Books, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoğlu, D., and M. Üçer. The Ups and Downs of Turkish Growth, 2002–2015: Political Dynamics, the European Union and the Institutional Slide. NBER Working Paper, no. 21608, 2015. https://www.nber.org/papers/w21608
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order.” Ethics & International Affairs 31, no. 3 (2017): 271–285. doi:10.1017/S089267941700020X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Aktürk, Ş. “Toward a Turkish–Russian Axis? Conflicts in Georgia, Syria, and Ukraine, and Co-Operation over Nuclear Energy.” Insight Turkey 16, no. 4 (2014): 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• AnadoluAjansi. “Erdoğan Cumhurbaşkanlığı Hükümet Sistemini Anlattı.” 21 June, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ant, O. “Erdoğan Names Himself Turkey Wealth Fund Chairman in Shakeup.” Bloomberg 12, September, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Atlı, A. “Turkey Seeking Its Place in the Maritime Silk Road.”Asia Times, February 26, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin-Duzgit, S., and E. F. Keyman. EU–Turkey Relations and the Stagnation of Turkish Democracy. Global Turkey in Europe Working Paper, no. 2, 2012. http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/GTE_WP_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Babb, S., and N. Chorev. “International Organizations: Loose and Tight Coupling in the Development Regime.” Studies in Comparative International Development 51, no. 1 (2016): 81–102. doi:10.1007/s12116-016-9217-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balding, C. “Why Democracies Are Turning against Belt and Road.” Foreign Affairs 24 October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C. “Brazil’s Liberal Neo-Developmentalism: New Paradigm or Edited Orthodox.” Review of International Political Economy 20, no. 2 (2013): 298–331. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.660183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C., and M. Blyth. “The BRICs and the Washington Consensus: An Introduction.” Review of International Political Economy 20, no. 2 (2013): 241–255. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.779374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabdallah, L. “Contesting the International Order by Integrating It: The Case of China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” Third World Quarterly 40, no. 1 (2019): 92–108. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1529539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgic, A. “Reclaiming the National Will: Resilience of Turkish Authoritarian Neoliberalism after Gezi.” South European Society and Politics 23, no. 2 (2018): 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. Great Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. [Database]
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bremmer, I. The End of the Free Market. New York: Portfolio, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bresser-Pereira, L. C. “Reflecting on New Developmentalism and Classical Developmentalism.” Review of Keynesian Economics 4, no. 3 (2016): 331–352. doi:10.4337/roke.2016.03.07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruff, I. “The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism.” Rethinking Marxism 26, no. 1 (2014): 113–129. doi:10.1080/08935696.2013.843250.
   Google Scholar
• Bugra, A., and O. Savaskan. New Capitalism in Turkey: The Relationship between Politics, Religion and Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, Y. “2023 Büyük Türkiye Doktrini Yazılmaya Başlandı.”Star, 11 August, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, Y. “Doğu’daki Ekonomik Sistemin Merkezi ‘Türkiye’ Olacak!”Star, 3 September, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, Y. “Türkiye, Avrupa Birliği Projesinin ‘Alternatifi’ Olabilir.”Star, 15 January, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, C., and D. R. Kelemen. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59, no. 3 (2007): 341–369. doi:10.1017/S0043887100020852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, G., and R. Thakur. “Will China Change the Rules of Global Order?” The Washington Quarterly 33, no. 4 (2010): 119–138. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2010.516145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10, no. 2 (1981): 126–155. doi:10.1177/03058298810100020501.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Sabah. “Five Turkish Companies Take Part in Consortium for Domestically-Made Car Production.” November 2, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Sabah. “Turkey May Become Member of BRICS Bank.” April 27, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, D., and J. G. Ikenberry. “Liberal World: The Resilient Order.” Foreign Affairs 97, no. (2018): 16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. “Facing up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26, no.1 (2015): 141–155. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doner, R. F., and B. R. Schneider. “The Middle-Income Trap: More Politics than Economics.” World Politics 68, no. 4 (2016): 608–644. doi:10.1017/S0043887116000095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, G. “Developmental Central Banking: Winning the Future by Updating a Page from the Past.” Review of Keynesian Economics 1, no. 3 (2013): 273–287. doi:10.4337/roke.2013.03.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertem, C. “Güncel-Somut Orneklerle Yeni Devlet ve Ekonomi Perspektifi.”Milliyet, March 6, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ertem, C. “NATO ve Faiz-enflasyon Meselesi Uzerine.”Milliyet, November 21, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and S. Gumuscu. “Building a Competitive Authoritarian Regime: State–Business Relations in the AKP’s Turkey.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 20, no. 4 (2018): 349–372. doi:10.1080/19448953.2018.1385924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P. Embedded Autonomy: State and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995. [Database]
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T. “The Coming Multi-Order World.” Contemporary Security Policy 37, no. 1 (2016): 3–30. doi:10.1080/13523260.2016.1150053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foa, R. S. “Modernization and Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 29, no. 3 (2018): 129–140. doi:10.1353/jod.2018.0050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, C. “A Canal through Turkey? Presidential Vote is a Test of Erdoğan’s Building Spree.”New York Times, June 21, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?” Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 3 (2007): 231–253. doi:10.1177/0010414006290784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Basic Books, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A., and G. Harris. “US Imposes Sanctions on Turkish Officials Over Detained American Pastor.”New York Times, August 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Güven, A. B. “Rethinking Development Space in Emerging Countries: Turkey’s Conservative Countermovement.” Development and Change 47, no. 5 (2016): 995–1024. doi:10.1111/dech.12254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberturk. “Avrupa Birliği Bakanlığı Artık Yok.” July 15, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, S. “The Developmental State Is Dead: Long Live the Developmental State!” In Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, edited by James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, 39–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. “The Role of Interests, Institutions, and Ideas in the Comparative Political Economy of the Industrialized Nations.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure, edited by Mark Lichbach and Alan Zuckerman, 174–207. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. “Crisis and the Structural Transformation of the State: Interrogating the Process of Change.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1, no. 3 (1999): 317–344. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00018.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. “Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the ‘Winter of Discontent.” Sociology 30, no. 2 (1996): 253–277. doi:10.1177/0038038596030002004.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. “The Great Crash of 2008 and the Reform of Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33, no. 6 (2009): 1205–1221. doi:10.1093/cje/bep050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. “Beyond the BRICS: Power, Pluralism, and the Future of Global Order.” Ethics & International Affairs 32, no. 1 (2018): 89–90. doi:10.1017/S0892679418000126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurriyet. “Cumhurbaşkanı Erdogan’dan Onemli Aciklamalar.” April 27, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hurriyet Daily News. “Chinese Bank to Lend $3.6 Billion to Turkey: Albayrak.” July 27, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hurriyet Daily News. “US ‘against’ Turkey Purchasing S-400 Missiles from Russia.” August 24, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hurriyet Daily News. “President Erdoğan Grills Turkish Central Bank over Interest Rates.” January 16, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. G. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. G. “The End of Liberal International Order?” International Affairs 94, no. 1 (2018): 7–23. doi:10.1093/ia/iix241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. G. “The Liberal International Order and Its Discontents.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38, no. 3 (2010): 509–521. doi:10.1177/0305829810366477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inalcik, H. Turkey and Europe in History. Istanbul: Eren Yayincilik, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. “Rising Powers and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in a Resilient Status Quo.” International Affairs 89, no. 3 (2013): 711–729. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köstem, S. “The Political Economy of Turkish–Russian Relations: Dynamics of Asymmetric Interdependence.” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs 23, no. 2 (2018): 10–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kurlantzick, J. State Capitalism: How the Return of Statism is Transforming the World? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kutlay, M. The Political Economies of Turkey and Greece: Crisis and Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kutlay, Mustafa, and Hüseyin Emrah Karaoğuz. “Neo-Developmentalist Turn in Global Political Economy? The Turkish Case.” Turkish Studies 19, no. 2 (2018): 289–316. doi:10.1080/14683849.2017.1405727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, C. “The US–Chinese Power Shift and the End of the Pax Americana.” International Affairs 94, no. 1 (2018): 89–111. doi:10.1093/ia/iix249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro, J. W. “The Transformation of Policy Ideas.” American Journal of Political Science 44, no. 3 (2000): 419–432. doi:10.2307/2669256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, C. A. “Sino-Capitalism: China’s Reemergence and the International Political Economy.” World Politics 64, no. 4 (2012): 741–776. doi:10.1017/S0043887112000202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology. Turkish Industrial Strategy Document. Ankara, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mounk, Y., and R. S. Foa. “The End of the Democratic Century.” Foreign Affairs 97, no. 3 (2018): 29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munyar, V. “Erdoğan Suggests Adding ‘T’ to BRICS.”Hurriyet Daily News, July 29, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, A. J. “China’s Challenge.” Journal of Democracy 26, no. 1 (2015): 156–170. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Development Bank. “The Role of BRICS in the World Economy and International Development.”2017. https://reddytoread.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/brics-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A. “Dependent versus State-permeated Capitalism: Two Basic Options for emerging Markets.” International Journal of Management and Economics 54, no. 4 (2018): 269–282. doi:10.2478/ijme-2018-0026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., T. ten Brink, S. Claar, and C. May. “Domestic Structures, Foreign Economic Policies and Global Economic Order: Implications from the Rise of Large Emerging Economies.” European Journal of International Relations 21, no. 3 (2015): 538–567. doi:10.1177/1354066114553682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. “Turkey under the Challenge of State Capitalism: The Political Economy of the Late AKP Era.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 19, no. 2 (2019): 201–225. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1594856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z., and M. Kutlay. “Global Shifts and the Limits of the EU’s Transformative Power in the European Periphery: Comparative Perspectives from Hungary and Turkey.” Government and Opposition 54, no. 2 (2019): 226–253. doi:10.1017/gov.2017.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z., and M. Kutlay. “Rising Powers in a Changing Global Order: Political Economy of Turkey in the Age of BRICs.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 8 (2013): 1416–1434. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.831541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z., and F. Senses. “Rethinking the Emerging Post-Washington Consensus.” Development and Change 36, no. 2 (2005): 263–290. doi:10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00411.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özel, I. “Emerging on an Illiberal Path: The Turkish Variety of Capitalism.” In The BRICs and Emerging Economies in Comparative Perspective, edited by Uwe Becker, 170–198. New York: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Özel, I. “Reverting Structural Reforms in Turkey: Towards an Illiberal Economic Governance?” In Global Turkey in Europe III: Democracy, Trade, and the Kurdish Question in Turkey–EU Relations, edited by Senem Aydın-Düzgit, Daniela Huber, Meltem Müftüler-Baç, E. Fuat Keyman, Michael Schwarz and Nathalie Tocci, 241–250. Rome: IAI Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Perlez, J. “US Opposing China’s Answer to World Bank.”The New York Times, October 9, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press, 1944.
   Google Scholar
• RDIF. “RDIF and Türkiye Wealth Fund Launch the Russia–Turkey Investment Fund.” April 3, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., and N. Babayan. “Democracy Promotion and the Challenges of Illiberal Regional Powers.” Democratization 22, no. 3 (2015): 381–399. doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.997716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D., A. Subramanian, and F. Trebbi. Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. NBER Working Paper, No. 9305, 2002. https://www.nber.org/papers/w9305.pdf
   Google Scholar
• RT. “Turkey Favors Switching from Dollars to National Currencies in Trade with Russia & China.” August 15, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho, A., and L. Morais. Brazil: Neoliberalism vs. Democracy. London: Pluto Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sil, R., and P. Katzenstein. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. “The Modernization Trap.” Journal of Democracy 28, no. 2 (2017): 77–91. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sputnik News. “Erdoğan: ‘Şanghay Beşlisi Içerisinde Türkiye Niye Olmasın?” 20 November, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, G. Towards a New Political Economy of Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, D. “IMF Faces China Debt Dilemma as Low Income Nations Seek Help.”Financial Times, November 22, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Taas. “Putin Comments on Russian–Turkish Relations.” August 24, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Tansel, C. B. “Reproducing Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Turkey: Urban Governance and State Restructuring in the Shadow of Executive Centralization.” Globalizations 16, no. 3 (2019): 320–335. doi:10.1080/14747731.2018.1502494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansey, Oisín, Kevin Koehler, and Alexander Schmotz. “Ties to the Rest: Autocratic Linkages and Regime Survival.” Comparative Political Studies 50, no. 9 (2017): 1221–1254. doi:10.1177/0010414016666859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TCCB. “100 Günlük İcraat Programı.” August 3, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. “Emerging World Order? From Multipolarity to Multilateralism in the G20, the World Bank, and the IMF.” Politics & Society 39, no. 3 (2011): 347–378. doi:10.1177/0032329211415503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. The Shifts and the Shocks: What We’ve Learned – and Have Still to Learn – from the Financial Crisis. London: Penguin Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Yağcı, M. “The Political Economy of Central Banking in Turkey: The Macroprudential Policy Regime and Self-Undermining Feedback.” South European Society and Politics 23, no. 4 (2018): 525–545. doi:10.1080/13608746.2018.1491103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakouchyk, K. “Beyond Autocracy Promotion: A Review.” Political Studies Review 17, no. 2 (2019): 147–160. doi:10.1177/1478929918774976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalman, G. Transition to Neoliberalism: The Case of Turkey in the 1980s. Istanbul: Bilgi University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Yörük, E., and M. Yüksel. “Class and Politics in Turkey’s Gezi Protests.” New Left Review 89, (2014): 103–123.
   Google Scholar