Locating the ‘South’ in China’s connectivity politics

Bibliography

• Abdenur, Adriana Erthal. “Emerging Powers as Normative Agents: Brazil and China within the UN Development System.” Third World Quarterly 35, no. 10 (2014): 1876–1893. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.971605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, Chris, and Ana Cristina Alves. “China’s Regional Forum Diplomacy in the Developing World: Socialisation and the ‘Sinosphere.’” Journal of Contemporary China 26, no. 103 (2017): 151–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1206276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, Mark, and Jinghan Zeng. “The BRICS and Global Governance: China’s Contradictory Role.” Third World Quarterly 39, no. 10 (2018): 1962–1978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1438186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, Abanti. “Conceptualizing the Silk Road Initiative in China’s Periphery Policy.” East Asia 33, no. 4 (2016): 309–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-016-9263-9.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., and Colin Flint. “The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative.” Geopolitics 22, no. 2 (2017): 223–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, William A. “China’s ‘Asia Dream’: The Belt Road Initiative and the New Regional Order.” Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 1, no. 3 (2016): 226–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891116647806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Stephen. “Thailand Is Beidou Navigation Network’s First Overseas Client.” South China Morning Post, April 4, 2013. http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1206567/thailand-beidou-navigation-networks-first-overseas-client
   Google Scholar
• Coward, Martin. “Against Network Thinking: A Critique of Pathological Sovereignty.” European Journal of International Relations 24, no. 2 (2018): 440–463. . doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117705704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Lili. “77 Guo Jituan” [“The Group of 77”]. Guoji Ziliao Xinxi 2001, no. 4 (2001): 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, Klaus, and Alan Hemmings. “Arctic and Antarctic Regionalism.” In Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories, edited by Anssi Paasi, John Harrison and Martin Jones, 489–503. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Limin. “Beiji liyi youguanzhe ‘shenden jiangou’” [“The Construction of China’s Identity of ‘Arctic Stakeholder.’” Pacific Journal 2017, no. 6 (2017): 65–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.14015/j.cnki.1004–8049.2017.6.006.
   Google Scholar
• Efferink, Leonhardt van. “Martin Lewis: Metageographies, Postmodernism and Fallacy of Unit Comparability.” August, 2010. https://exploringgeopolitics.org/interview_lewis_martin_metageographies_postmodernism_fallacy_of_unit_comparability_historical_spatial_ideological_development_constructs_taxonomy_ideas_systems/
   Google Scholar
• Eisenman, Joshua. “Contextualizing China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” Written Testimony for the USCC Submitted on January 19, 2018. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Eisenman_USCC%20Testimony_20180119.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eisenman, Joshua, and David H. Shinn. “China and Africa.” In The Palgrave Handbook of African Colonial and Postcolonial History, edited by Martin S. Shanguhyia, and Toyin Falola, 839–854. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Eom, Janet, Deborah Brautigam, and Lina Benabdallah. The Path Ahead: The 7th Forum on China–Africa Cooperation. SAIS-CARI Briefing Paper, no. 1, China Africa Research Initiative, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum, Evan A. “Reluctant Stakeholder: Why China’s Highly Strategic Brand of Revisionism Is more Challenging than Washington Thinks.” Macro Polo, April 27, 2018. https://macropolo.org/reluctant-stakeholder-chinas-highly-strategic-brand-revisionism-challenging-washington-thinks
   Google Scholar
• FOCAC/Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC. “Declaration of the 1st Meeting of the China–Africa Think Tank Forum.” November 23, 2011. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/zflt/eng/xsjl/t880276.htm
   Google Scholar
• Geldart, Carol, and Peter Lyon. “The Group of 77: A Perspective View.” International Affairs 57, no. 1 (1980): 79–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2619360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godehardt, Nadine. No End of History: A Chinese Alternative Concept of International Order? SWP Research Paper, 2016. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-461135
   Google Scholar
• Godehardt, Nadine, and Paul J. Kohlenberg. “China’s Global Connectivity Politics: A Meta-Geography in the Making.” In The Multidimensionality of Regions in World Politics, edited by Paul J. Kohlenberg and Nadine Godehardt, Abingdon: Routledge, 2020 (forthcoming September).
   Google Scholar
• Godehardt, Nadine, and Paul J. Kohlenberg. “Konnektivitätspolitik: Geopolitik auf Chinesisch.” Politikum no. 2, 2019. https://wochenschau-verlag.de/neue-geopolitik-2872.html
   Google Scholar
• Hala, Martin. “China in Xi’s ‘New Era’: Forging a ‘New Eastern Bloc.’” Journal of Democracy 29, no. 2 (2018): 83–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Mette Halskov, Hongtao Li, and Rune Svarverud. “Ecological Civilization: Interpreting the Chinese Past, Projecting the Global Future.” Global Environmental Change 53 (2018): 195–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Guangqiang. “Zhongguo-beiji guanxi de biaoda yu fenxi; shijie ditu de shijiao” [Representation and Analysis of China–Arctic Relationship: From the Perspective of World Maps”] The Journal of International Studies [Guoji zhengzhi yanjiu] 2017, no. 3 (2017): 38–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Yong. “Nannan hezuo shiye xia de zhongguo-zhongdongou guojiahezuo” [“China–Central and Eastern European Countries’ Cooperation from the Perspective of South–South Cooperation”]. Journal of Social Sciences [Shehui Kexue] 2017, no. 10 (2017): 3–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.13644/j.cnki.cn31-1112.2017.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Istenič, Saša. “China–CEE Relations in the 16 + 1 Format and Implications for Taiwan.” Paper Presented at the 14th Annual Conference on China–EU Relations and the Taiwan Question, Shanghai, October 19–21, 2017. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/projekt_papiere/Taiwan2ndTrack_Sa%C5%A1a_Isteni%C4%8D_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jakóbowski, Jakub. “Chinese-Led Regional Multilateralism in Central and Eastern Europe, Africa and Latin America: 16 + 1, FOCAC, and CCF.” Journal of Contemporary China 27, no. 113 (2018): 659–673. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1458055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasa, Sjur, Anne T. Gullberg, and Gørild Heggelund. “The Group of 77 in the International Climate Negotiations: Recent Developments and Future Directions.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 8, no. 2 (2008): 113–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-007-9060-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Samuel S. “Behavioural Dimensions of Chinese Multilateral Diplomacy.” The China Quarterly 72 (1977): 713–742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000020476.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlenberg, Paul Joscha, and Nadine Godehardt. “China’s Global Connectivity Politics. On Confidently Dealing with Chinese Initiatives.” SWP Comment no. 17 (2018): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlenberg, Paul Joscha, Nadine Godehardt, Stephen Aris, Fred Sündermann, Aglaya Snetkov, and Juliet Jane Fall. Introducing UNSCdeb8 (Beta): A Database for Corpus-Driven Research on the United Nations Security Council. SWP Working Paper Asia Division no. 1. June 2019. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/arbeitspapiere/UNSCdeb8_Security_Council_Database.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Dev. China’s Global Internet Ambitions: Finding Roots in ASEAN. ICS Occasional Paper, no. 14. 2017. https://www.icsin.org/uploads/2017/07/24/95ef81ecfcb1118bcfbf94b369d0ef1e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Martin W., and Kären Wigen. The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Xiaoyun, and JinXiao. “Xin nannan hezuo de xingqi: Zhonguo zuowei lujing” [“The Rise of New South–South Cooperation: China as a Path”]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition) 2017, no. 5 (2017): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, Wei. “Zhongguo tese daguo waijiao de lilungoujian yu shijian” [“Theoretical Basis and Practical Innovation of Big Power Diplomacy with Chinese Characteristics”]. Frontiers, no. 10 (2019): 70–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.16619/j.cnki.rmltxsqy.2019.10.010.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Jing. “Zhongguo yu fazhanzhong guojia diqu zhengti waijiao xianzhuang pinggu yu weilai zhanwang” [“China’s Diplomacy vis-à-vis the Developing World: Evaluation and Prospects”]. Global Review [Guoji Zhanwang] 2017, no. 2 (2017): 40–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.13851/j.cnki.gjzw.201702003.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Jia. “Jinzhuan Guojia Zhiku Hezuo de Xianzhuang, Kunjing, yu Celüe” [“The Status Quo, Dilemma and Strategy of the Cooperation of Difficult BRICS Countries”]. Think Tank Theory and Practice [Zhiku Lilun yu Shijian] 3, no. 2 (2018): 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Maximilian, and Dániel Balázs. “Modern Silk Road Imaginaries and the Co-Production of Space.” In Rethinking the Silk Road China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Emerging Eurasian Relations, edited by Maximilian Mayer, 205–226. Singapore: Springer, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Morvaridi, Behrooz, and Caroline Hughes. “South–South Cooperation and Neoliberal Hegemony in a Post-Aid World.” Development and Change 49, no. 3 (2018): 867–892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, Zhanghong. “‘Yidaiyilu’ jianshe de weilai fazhan qushi [“Future Development Trends of ‘Belt and Road’ Construction”]. China Social Science Network, April 22, 2017. http://www.cssn.cn/sf/bwsfgyk/yc_jjx/201704/t20170422_3495396.shtml
   Google Scholar
• People’s Daily. “CPC Holds High-Level Dialogue with World Political Parties Beijing.” November 30, 2017. http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/1130/c90000-9299100.html
   Google Scholar
• Reinalda, Bob. Routledge History of International Organizations: From 1815 to the Present Day. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Priscilla. The Cold War: Interpreting Conflict through Primary Documents. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, Nadège. “China’s ‘Belt and Road Initiative’: Underwhelming or Game-Changer?” The Washington Quarterly 40, no. 1 (2017): 127–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2017.1302743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiek, Sebastian. Movement on the Silk Road, China’s “Belt and Road” Initiative as an Incentive for Intergovernmental Cooperation and Reforms at Central Asia’s Borders. SWP Research Paper, no. 12, 2017. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/research_papers/2017RP12_ses.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Adam. Chinese Cyber Diplomacy in a New Era of Uncertainty. Hoover Institution Aegis Paper Series, no. 1703, 2017. https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/segal_chinese_cyber_diplomacy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smolnik, Franziska. “Georgia Positions Itself on China’s New Silk Road: Relations between Tbilisi and Beijing in the Light of the Belt-and-Road Initiative.” SWP Comment, no. 13, 2018. https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/georgia-positions-itself-on-chinas-new-silk-road
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, Camilla T. N. China as an Arctic Great Power: Potential Implications for Greenland and the Danish Realm. Danish Defense Policy Brief. February, 2018. http://www.fak.dk/publikationer/Documents/Policy%20Brief%202018%2001%20februar%20UK.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Christian, and Siddharth Tripathi. “India’s Response to the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative – New Partners and New Formats.” SWP Comment No. 7, 2018. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2018C07_wgn_Tripathi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Wawa. “China, the Western Balkans and the EU: Can Three Tango?” Euractiv, May 17, 2018. https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/opinion/china-the-western-balkans-and-the-eu-can-three-tango/
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, Jessica Chen. “A World Safe for Autocracy: China’s Rise and the Future of Global Politics.” Foreign Affairs 98 (2019): 92–102. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2019-06-11/world-safe-autocracy
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Jordan. China’s Alternative to GPS and Its Implications for the United States. US–China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2017. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/Staff%20Report_China%27s%20Alternative%20to%20GPS%20and%20Implications%20for%20the%20United%20States.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Xiaofeng, Song. (宋效峰). “Xinxing guojiguanxi: neihan, lujing yu fanshi” [“New Type of International Relations: Meaning, Methods and Paradigms”]. Social Sciences in Xinjiang, 2 (2019): 65–71. https://www.sohu.com/a/321194940_618422.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Minchen, and Yan Zhang.“ ’G77 + Zhongguo’ Dui Nannan Hezuo de Zuoyong Tanxi” [“An Analysis of the Role of ‘G77+ China’ in South–South Cooperation”]. Journal of Chengdu Teachers College 33, no. 3 (2017): 105–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-5642.2017.003.105.
   Google Scholar
• Zha, Daojiong. “Nannan hezuo yundong licheng: dui ‘Yidai Yilu’ de Qishi” [“The History of the South–South Cooperation Movement: Implications for BRI”]. Development Finance Research [Kaifaxing Jinrong Yanjiu] no. 3 (2018): 3–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.16556/j.cnki.kfxjr.2018.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Chun. “Zhongguo dui fazhan zhong diqu zhangti waijiao yanjiu” [“Research on China’s Collective Diplomacy for Developing Regions”]. Global Review [Guoji Zhanwang] 2018, no. 5 (2018): 18–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.13851/j.cnki.gjzw.201805002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Qingmin. “Zhongguo dui fazhanzhong guojia zhengce de buju” [“The Composition of China’s Policy on Developing Countries”]. Foreign Affairs Review [Waijiao Pinglun] no. 1 (2007): 22–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.13569/j.cnki.far.2007.01.005.
   Google Scholar