International relations and the ‘Global South’: from epistemic hierarchies to dialogic encounters

Bibliography

• Anderson, Gary L. “Can Participatory Action Research (PAR) Democratize Research, Knowledge, and Schooling? Experiences from the Global South and North.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 30, no. 5 (2017): 427–431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1303216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, J. Marshall. International Relations in Uncommon Places: Indigeneity, Cosmology, and the Limits of International Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pınar. “Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR?” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2008): 5–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701726392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaney, David L., and Arlene B. Tickner. “International Relations in the Prison of Colonial Modernity.” International Relations 31, no. 1 (2017): 71–75. doi:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogues, Anthony. Black Heretics, Black Prophets. New York: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, Martin. I and Thou. Translated by Ronald Gregor Smith. New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Burchill, Scott, Andrew Linklater, and Richard Devetak. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Red Globe Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Capan, Zeynep G. “Decolonising International Relations?” Third World Quarterly 38, no. 1 (2017): 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1245100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for ‘Indian’ Pasts?” Representations 37 (1992): 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2928652.
   Google Scholar
• Chimni, Bhupinder S., and Siddharth Mallavarappu, eds. International Relations: Perspectives from the Global South. New Delhi: Pearson, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, Christine. In Service and Servitude: Foreign Female Domestic Workers and the Malaysian “Modernity” Project. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Dainotto, Roberto. “South by Chance: Southern Questions on the Global South.” The Global South 11, no. 2 (2017): 39–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.2979/globalsouth.11.2.03.
   Google Scholar
• Duck, Leigh Anne. “The Global South via the US South.” 2015. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/6399/1/voices012015_concepts_of_the_global_south.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, Tim, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. “Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise The Latin American modernity/coloniality research program”. Cultural Studies, no. 21 (2007): 179–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506.
   Google Scholar
• Fals-Borda, Orlando., and Mohammad A. Rahman. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. New York, NY: Intermediate Technology/Apex, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Figueira, Dorothy M. “‘The Global South’: Yet Another Attempt to Engage the Other.” The Global South 1, no. 1 (2007): 144–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.2979/GSO.2007.1.1.144.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Georgis, Mariam, and Nicole V. T. Lugosi. “(Re)Inserting Race and Indigeneity in International Relations Theory: A Post-Colonial Approach.” Global Change, Peace & Security 26, no. 1 (2014): 71–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2014.867845.
   Google Scholar
• Gittins, Phill. “Doing Participatory Action Research as a Doctoral Student in the Peace and Conflict Studies Field.” Peace and Conflict Studies 26, no. 2 Article 5 (2019). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol26/iss2/5.
   Google Scholar
• Grovogui, Siba. “A Revolution Nonetheless: The Global South in International Relations.” The Global South 5, no. 1 (2011): 175–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/gbs.2011.0010.
   Google Scholar
• Gruffyd Jones, Branwen, ed. Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hagman, Jonas, and Thomas J. Biersteker. “Beyond the Published Discipline: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of International Studies.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 2 (2014): 291–315. doi:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialism, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, Sebastian. “A Thirdspace Approach to the ‘Global South’: Insights from the Margins of a Popular Category.” Third World Quaterly (2020). 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1712999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, Sebastian, Jacqueline Braveboy-Wagner, and Günther Maihold. “The ‘Global South’ in the Study of World Politics: Examining a Meta Category.” Third World Quarterly This volume (2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, John M. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Stanley. “An American Social Science.” Daedalus 106, no. 3 (1977): 41–60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i20024487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovey, Rebecca. “Critical Pedagogy and International Studies: Reconstructing Knowledge through Dialogue with the Subaltern.” International Relations 18, no. 2 (2004): 241–254. .
   Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, Naem, and David Blaney. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. London: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Robert, Georg Sørensen, and Jørgen Møller. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kloß, Sinah Theres. “The Global South as Subversive Practice: Challenges and Potentials of a Heuristic Concept.” The Global South 11, no. 2 (2017): 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.2979/globalsouth.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, Friedrich. “The Monologue of ‘Science.’” International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2003): 124–128. 9488.501019_2 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, Sankaran. “Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 26, no. 4 (2001): 401–442. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40645028. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540102600403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattuca, Lisa R. “Curricula in International Perspective.” In International Handbook of Higher Education, edited by M. Tight, 39–40. New York: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Levander, Caroline, and Walter Mignolo. “Introduction: The Global South and World Dis/Order.” The Global South 5, no. 1 (2011): 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/gbs.2011.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Mallavarappu, Siddharth. 2019. “Interview – Siddharth Mallavarappu.” https://www.e-ir.info/2018/05/27/interview-siddharth-mallavarapu/
   Google Scholar
• Matos-Ala, Jacqueline de. “Making the Invisible, Visible: Challenging the Knowledge Structures Inherent in International Relations Theory in Order to Create Knowledge Plural Curricula.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 60, no. 1 (2017): e021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201700122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, Walter. “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom.” Theory, Culture & Society 26, no. 7–8 (2009): 159–181. doi:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, Walter. “The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference.” South Atlantic Quarterly 101, no. 1 (2002): 57–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-101-1-57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming’ate, Felix Lamech Mogambi. “The Global South: What Does It Mean to Kenya.” 2015. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/6399/1/voices012015_concepts_of_the_global_south.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Katherine. Sex among Allies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Mu, Enrique, and Milagros Pereyra-Rojas. “Impact on Society Versus Impact on Knowledge: Why Latin American Scholars Do Not Participate in Latin American Studies.” Latin American Research Review 50, no. 2 (2015): 216–238. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43670297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2015.0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neufeld, Mark, and Teresa Healy. “Above the ‘American Discipline’: A Canadian Perspective on Epistemological and Pedagogical Diversity.” In International Relations – Still an American Social Science?, edited by R. Crawford and D. Jarvis, 243–253. Albany, NY: State of New York University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Ingo and Wiebke , Wemheuer-Vogelaar, eds. Globalizing International Relations Scholarship Amidst Divides and Diversity. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pletsch, Carl E. “The Three Worlds, or the Division of Social Scientific Labor, Circa 1950–1975.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 23, no. 4 (1981): 565–590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500013566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quijano, Aníbal. Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, Duke University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, Shulamit, and Lynn Davidman. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, Meera. “Avatars of Eurocentrism in the Critique of the Liberal Peace.” Security Dialogue 44, no. 3 (2013): 259–278. doi:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. “Public Sphere and Epistemologies of the South.” Africa Development 37, no. 1 (2012): 43–67.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Nina. “Between Promise and Skepticism: The Global South and Our Role as Engaged Intellectuals.” The Global South 11, no. 2 (2017): 18–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.2979/globalsouth.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, Ananya. “Decolonising International Relations: Confronting Erasures through Indigenous Knowledge Systems.” International Studies 58, no. 1 (2021): 25–40. doi:.
   Google Scholar
• Shilliam, Robbie, ed. International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Linda T. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Otago University Press : Dunedin, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1988: 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, Maria. Naming In/Security – Constructing Identity: Mayan Women in Guatemala on the Eve of Peace. Goteborg: Padrigu Thesis Series, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, Arlene B. “Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 32, no. 2 (2003): 295–324. doi:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner, Arlene B. and Smith, Karen, eds. International Relations from the Global South Worlds of Difference. Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, Judith A. “Feminism Meets International Relations: Some Methodological Issues.” In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, edited by Brooke A. Ackerly, Maria Stern, and Jacqui True. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 19–41.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Karen. “Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement.” International Political Sociology 12, no. 3 (2018): 215–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/oly005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waever, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 687–727. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbich, Laura, Supriya Roychoudhury, and Sebastian Haug. “Beyond the Single Story: ‘Global South’ Polyphonies.” Third World Quarterly, This volume (2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Maggie, and Chris Andersen. Indigenous Statistics: A Quantitative Research Methodology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wemheuer-Vogelaar, Wiebke, Peters, Ingo, Kemmer, Laura, Kleinn, Alina, Linke-Behrens, Luisa and Mokry, Sabine. “The Global IR Debate in the Classroom.” In International Relations from the Global South Worlds of Difference, edited by Arlene B. Tickner and Karen Smith. Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar