Lithium extractivism: perpetuating historical asymmetries in the ‘Green economy’

Bibliography

• Acosta, A. 2013. “Extractivism and Neoextractivism: Two Sides of the Same Curse.” In Beyond Development: Alternative Visions from Latin America, edited by M. Lang and D. Mocrani, 61–86. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Alegria Calvo, M. A., and F. Valdés Hernández. 2001. “El agua y los pueblos originarios Aymarás y Atacameños.” Revista de Derecho Administrativo Económico 6: 333–343. doi:10.7764/redae.6.9.
   Google Scholar
• Assadourian, C. S. 1982. El sistema de la economía colonial: mercado interno, regiones y espacio económico. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
   Google Scholar
• Atomic Energy Commission. 1956. “Nineteenth Semiannual Report of the Atomic Energy Commission.” U. S. G. P. Office. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1363892
   Google Scholar
• Aylwin, J., M. Didier, and O. Mora. 2021. “Human Rights Impact Assessment of SQM against the rights of Lickanantay Indigenous Peoples [Report by].” Observatorio Ciudadano, viewed 27 May 2022. https://observatorio.cl/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/eidh-sqm-english-version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Babidge, S., and P. Bolados. 2018. “Neoextractivism and Indigenous Water Ritual in Salar de Atacama, Chile.” Latin American Perspectives, 45 (5): 170–185. doi:10.1177/0094582X18782673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babidge, S., F. Kalazich, M. Prieto, and K. Yager. 2019. “‘That’s the Problem with That Lake It Changes Sides’: Mapping Extraction and Ecological Exhaustion in the Atacama.” Journal of Political Ecology 26 (1): 738–760. doi:10.2458/v26i1.23169.
   Google Scholar
• Barandiarán, J. 2018. Science and the Environment in Chile: The Politics of Expert Advice in a Neoliberal Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barandiarán, J. 2019. “Lithium and Development Imaginaries in Chile, Argentina and Bolivia.” World Development 113: 381–391. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolados García, P. 2014. “Los conflictos etnoambientales de” Pampa Colorada” y” el Tatio” en el salar de Atacama, norte de Chile: Procesos étnicos en un contexto minero y turístico transnacional.” Estudios atacameños 48: 228–248. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-10432014000200015&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., Jr., I. Scoones, A. Baviskar, M. Edelman, N. L. Peluso, and W. Wolford. 2022. “Climate Change and Agrarian Struggles: An Invitation to Contribute to a JPS Forum.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1080/03066150.2021.1956473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, H. J., and K. Dietz. 2014. “(Neo-)Extractivism – A New Challenge for Development Theory from Latin America.” Third World Quarterly 35 (3): 468–486. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.893488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustamante-Rivera, G., and T. Martin. 2018. “Beneficios compartidos y la gobernanza de la extracción de recursos naturales en territorios indígenas: aportes y limitaciones Para Latinoamérica.” Perfiles Latinoamericanos 26 (52). doi:10.18504/pl2652-009-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustos-Gallardo, B., G. Bridge, and M. Prieto. 2021. “Harvesting Lithium: Water, Brine and the Industrial Dynamics of Production in the Salar de Atacama.” Geoforum 119: 177–189. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chagnon, C. W., F. Durante, B. K. Gills, S. E. Hagolani-Albov, S. Hokkanen, S. M. J. Kangasluoma, H. Konttinen, et al. 2022. “From Extractivism to Global Extractivism: The Evolution of an Organizing Concept.” The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49 (4): 760–792. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chile National Congress. 1993. “Act 19253. Establece normas sobre protección, fomento y desarrollo de los indígenas, y crea la Corporación Nacional de Desarrollo Indígena. https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=30620&idVersion=2020-10-17&idParte=10132688
   Google Scholar
• Chilean Copper Commission (COCHILCO). 2009. “Antecedentes para una Política Pública en Minerales Estratégicos: Litio.” https://ciperchile.cl/pdfs/litio/estudio_cochilco.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Chilean Copper Commission (COCHILCO). 2013. “Mercado Internacional del Litio.” Santiago de Chile Gobierno de Chile. https://www.cochilco.cl/Mercado%20de%20Metales/InformeLi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chilean Copper Commission (COCHILCO). 2017. “Análisis del proceso de evaluación ambiental de los proyectos mineros.” https://www.cochilco.cl/Listado%20Temtico/Analisis%20proceso%20de%20evaluaci%C3%B3n%20ambiental%20proyectos%20mineros.pdf#search=SEIA
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, A., and J. Jakobsen. 2019. The Violent Technologies of Extraction. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Pivot. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26852-7.
   Google Scholar
• Durante, F., M. Kröger, and W. LaFleur. 2021. “Extraction and Extractivisms. Definitions and Concepts.” In Our Extractive Age: Expressions of Violence and Resistance. Routledge Studies of the Extractive Industries, edited by J. Shapiro and J. A. McNeish, 19–30:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Folchi, M. 2001. “Conflictos de contenido ambiental y ecologismo de los pobres no siempre pobres, ni siempre ecologistas.” Ecología Política, 22: 79–100. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=153467
   Google Scholar
• Folchi, M. 2009. “Política, ambiente y la insustentabilidad de la minería en Chile.” In Extractivismo, política y sociedad, edited by Centro Andino de Acción Popular – Centro Latinoamericano de Ecología Social, Quito, 79–106. London and New York: Routledge. https://www.rosalux.org.ec/pdfs/extractivismo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Galeano, E. 2004. Las venas abiertas de América Latina. 76th ed. México: Siglo Veintiuno.
   Google Scholar
• Göbel, B. 2014. “La minería de litio en Atacama: disputas sociales alrededor de un nuevo mineral estratégico.” In Extractivismo minero en Colombia y América Latina, edited by B. Göbel and A. Ulloa, 167–193. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Barris, M. 2017. The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Durham: Duke University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1220n3w.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2009. “Diez tesis urgentes sobre el nuevo extractivismo. Contextos y demandas bajo el progresismo sudamericano actual.” In Extractivismo, política y sociedad, edited by Centro Andino de Acción Popular – Centro Latinoamericano de Ecología Social, Quito, 187–225. http://www.gudynas.com/publicaciones/GudynasNuevoExtractivismo10Tesis09x2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2018. “Extractivisms: Tendencies and Consequences.” In Reframing Latin American Development, Routledge Critical Development Studies, edited by R. Munck and R. D. Wise, 61–76. Oxon and New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315170084-4.
   Google Scholar
• Gundermann, H., and B. Göbel. 2018. “Comunidades indígenas, empresas del litio y sus relaciones en el Salar de Atacama.” Chungará (Arica) 50 (3): 471–486. doi:10.4067/S0717-73562018005001602.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/10.1215/9780822373780
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, P. A. 2018. “The Two Sides of Pascua Lama: Social Protest, Institutional Responses, and Feedback Loops.” European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies (106): 157–182. doi:10.32992/erlacs.10398.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. 2020. “Quantifying National Responsibility for Climate Breakdown: An Equality-Based Attribution Approach for Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Excess of the Planetary Boundary.” The Lancet. Planetary Health 4 (9):e399–e404. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30196-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howe, C., and D. Boyer. 2016. “Aeolian Extractivism and Community Wind in Southern Mexico.” Public Culture 28 (2): 215–235. doi:10.1215/08992363-3427427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Trade Administration. 2022. “Chile – Country Commercial Guide.” Department of Commerce, United States. https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/chile-mining#:∼:text=Equipment%20and%20Machinery-,Chile%20is%20the%20top%20copper%20producer%20in%20the%20world%20with,and%20sodium%2C%20and%20potassium%20nitrate
   Google Scholar
• Jerez, B., I. Garcés, and R. Torres. 2021. “Lithium Extractivism and Water Injustices in the Salar de Atacama, Chile: The Colonial Shadow of Green Electromobility.” Political Geography 87: 102382. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, J. F. 2009. “A List of Bilateral Civilian Nuclear Co-Operation Agreements.” University of Calgary’s Digital Repository, Vol. 5, Calgari. https://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/47373/Treaty_List_Volume_05.pdf;jsessionid=7DEB64BCD3D229B784A84C91219371F2?sequence=11
   Google Scholar
• Khoshnava, S. M., R. Rostami, R. M. Zin, D. Štreimikienė, A. Yousefpour, W. Strielkowski, and A. Mardani. 2019. “Aligning the Criteria of Green Economy (GE) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to Implement Sustainable Development.” Sustainability 11 (17): 4615. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4615 doi:10.3390/su11174615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S. 2014. Mining Capitalism: The Relationship between Corporations and Their Critics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, A., F. Demaria, and A. Acosta. 2014. “Buen Vivir, Degrowth and Ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to Sustainable Development and the Green Economy.” Development 57 (3-4): 362–375. doi:10.1057/dev.2015.24.
   Google Scholar
• Kung, A., S. Holcombe, J. Hamago, and D. Kemp. 2022. “Indigenous Co-Ownership of Mining Projects: A Preliminary Framework for the Critical Examination of Equity Participation.” Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 40 (4): 413–435. doi:10.1080/02646811.2022.2029184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, M., C. Muñoz, and J. Sánchez. 2020. La gobernanza del litio y el cobre en los países andinos. Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., and D. B. Agusdinata. 2020. “Interdependencies of Lithium Mining and Communities Sustainability in Salar de Atacama, Chile.” Journal of Cleaner Production 260: 120838. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, J. 2019. Self-Devouring Growth. A Planetary Parable as Told from Southern Africa. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merino, R. 2020. “The Cynical State: Forging Extractivism, Neoliberalism and Development in Governmental Spaces.” Third World Quarterly 41 (1): 58–76. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1668264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midilli, A., I. Dincer, and M. Ay. 2006. “Green Energy Strategies for Sustainable Development.” Energy Policy 34 (18): 3623–3633. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment. 2013. “Decree 40, Aprueba el Reglamento del Sistema de Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental.” https://bcn.cl/2f8a8
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Mining. 1981. “Technical Report Act 18097.” Santiago de Chile. https://obtienearchivo.bcn.cl/obtienearchivo?id=recursoslegales/10221.3/37081/1/HL18097.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Lithium Commission. 2015. “Litio: Una fuente de energía una oportunidad para Chile.” Government of Chile, Santiago de Chile, https://ciperchile.cl/pdfs/2015/06/sqm/INFORME_COMISION_LITIO_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• North, L. L., and R. Grinspun. 2016. “Neo-Extractivism and the New Latin American Developmentalism: The Missing Piece of Rural Transformation.” Third World Quarterly 37 (8): 1483–1504. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1159508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, A., M. C. Benwell, and E. Aliste. 2022. “Interrogating Green Discourses in Patagonia-Aysén (Chile): Green Grabbing and Eco-Extractivism as a New Strategy of Capitalism?” Geographical Review 112 (5): 688–706. doi:10.1080/00167428.2020.1798764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C., and S. Babidge. Forthcoming. “When Is an Agreement More Than a Contract? Negotiated Agreements, Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industry in the Salar de Atacama, Chile.” Development and Change.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Observatory of Mining Conflicts of Latin America. 2019. “Marco Normativo del Litio Chileno.” Boletin N1, Santiago de Chile. https://www.ocmal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/LITIO-BOLETI%CC%81N-VERSION-FINAL-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Odell, S. D., A. Bebbington, and K. E. Frey. 2018. “Mining and Climate Change: A Review and Framework for Analysis.” The Extractive Industries and Society 5 (1): 201–214. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2017.12.004.
   Google Scholar
• Parris, T. M., and R. W. Kates. 2003. “Characterizing and Measuring Sustainable Development.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28 (1): 559–586. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poveda Bonilla. R. 2020. “Estudio de caso sobre la gobernanza del litio en Chile.” serie Recursos Naturales y Desarrollo, N° 195 (LC/TS.2020/40), Comisión Económica Para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), Santiago de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Presidency of the Republic of Chile. 1992. “Message from the President of the Republic Bill General Bases of the Environment.” Santiago de Chile. http://www.centralenergia.cl/uploads/2012/03/Bases_generales_medio_ambiente_historia_ley.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Production Development Corporation. 2016. “Resolution 214, Aprueba modificación del Convenio Básico suscrito entre CORFO, Rockwood Litio Limitada, Rockwood Lithium Inc. y Foote Minera e Inversiones Limitada.”
   Google Scholar
• Production Development Corporation. 2018. “Resolution 48, Aprueba modificación y texto refundido de contrato de proyecto y de contrato de arrendamiento de pertenencias mineras OMA, con SQM Salar S.A., SQM S.A. y SQM Potacio S.A.”
   Google Scholar
• Riofrancos, T. 2019. “What Green Costs.” Logic Magazine, issue 9. https://logicmag.io/nature/what-green-costs/
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. P., K. F. Jalal, and J. A. Boyd. 2012. An Introduction to Sustainable Development. 1st ed. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781849770477.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. D., and B. Ki-Moon. 2015. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uql/detail.action?docID=1922296
   Google Scholar
• Salazar Bravo, I., and P. M. Sepliarsky. 2021. “La crisis del 2008 y el boom de las energías renovables: El “Marketing verde” y el “Oro blanco” como parte del discurso del desarrollo y progreso Para los países emergentes.” Espacio Abierto 30 (1): 97–107. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=12266352005
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2014. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt6wpqz2.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J., and J. A. McNeish. 2021. Our Extractive Age: Expressions of Violence and Resistance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soto Hernandez, D., and P. Newell. 2022. “Oro Blanco: Assembling Extractivism in the Lithium Triangle.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (5): 945–968. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2080061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. 2019. Neo-Extractivism in Latin America: Socio-Environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, H. R., A. Videla, and F. Gutiérrez. 2017. “Explorando conflictos entre comunidades indígenas y la industria minera en Chile: Las transformaciones socioambientales de la región de Tarapacá y el caso de Lagunillas.” Estudios atacameños 55: 231–250. doi:10.4067/S0718-10432017005000019.
   Google Scholar
• US Geological Survey. 2021. “Lithium.” Department of the Interior, United States. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2021/mcs2021-lithium.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Geological Survey. 2022. “Copper.” Department of the Interior, United States. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2022/mcs2022-copper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. 2012. “Measuring Progress towards an Inclusive Green Economy, United Nations.” https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/downloads/resource/Measuring_progress_towards_an_inclusive_GE_UNEP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vela-Almeida, D., A. Gonzalez, I. Gavilán, G. M. Fenner-Sanchez, N. Torres, and V. Ysunza. 2022. “The Right to Decide: A Triad of Participation in Politicising Extractive Governance in Latin America.” The Extractive Industries and Society 9: 100875–100878. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2021.01.010.
   Google Scholar
• Voskoboynik, D. M., and D. Andreucci. 2021. “Greening Extractivism: Environmental Discourses and Resource Governance in the ‘Lithium Triangle.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 5 (2): 787–809. doi:10.1177/25148486211006345.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, H., and M. Weber. 2020. “When Means of Implementation Meet Ecological Modernization Theory: A Critical Frame for Thinking about the Sustainable Development Goals.” World Development 136: 105129. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willow, A. J. 2018. Understanding ExtrACTIVISM: Culture and Power in Natural Resource Disputes. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429467196.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, J., J. D. Van der Ploeg, S. Schneider, and T. Shanin. 2020. “The Incursions of Extractivism: Moving from Dispersed Places to Global Capitalism.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 155–183. doi:10.1080/03066150.2018.1559834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar