The Eurocentrism of dependency theory and the question of ‘authenticity’: a view from Turkey

Notes

• See, for example, Arturo Escobar, ‘Imagining a post-development era? Critical thought, development and social movements’, Social Text, 31/32, 1992, pp 20–56; Frans Schuurman, (ed), Beyond the Impasse: New Directions in Development Theory, London: Zed Press, 1993; and Colin Leys, The Rise and Fall of Development Theory, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• See, for example, Dean Tibbs, ‘Modernization theory and the comparative study of socities: a critical perspective’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15, 1973, pp 199–06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark Berger, ‘The end of the Third World?’, Third World Quarterly, 15(2), 1994, pp 257–75.
   Google Scholar
• Jan N. Pieterse, ‘Dilemmas of development discourse: the crisis of developmentalism and the comparative method’, Development and Change, 22(1), 1991, pp 5–9; and Arturo Escobar, Encountering Development, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984; and Pauline Marie Rosenau, Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• For prominent examples of this literature, see Wolfgang Sachs, (ed), The Development Dictionary, London: Zed Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• P J O'Brien, ‘A critique of Latin American theories of dependency’, in I Oxaal, T Barnett & D Booth (eds), Beyond the Sociology of Development, London: Routledge, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando H Cardoso, ‘The consumption of dependency theory in the United States’, Latin American Research Review, 12(3), 1977, p 11
   Google Scholar
• On Russian-dominated Asia, see H C D'Encausse & S Schräm, Marxism and Asia, London: Allen Lane, 1969. On the Indian subcontinent, see Bipan Chandra, ‘Colonial India: British versus Indian views of development’, Review, 14(1), 1991, pp 81–67. On Eastern Europe and the Middle East, see Dilek Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies in an Uncertain World, 1929–1939, Lcidan: EJ Brill, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• See Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• This account draws on Haldun Gülalp, ‘Nationalism, statism, and the Turkish revolution: an early “dependency” theory’, Review of Middle East Studies, 4, 1988, pp 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Şevket Süreyya Aydemir, Inkilap ve Kadro, Ankara: Bilgi, 1932, p 44.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall Berman, All That is Solid Melts into Air, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid, pp 34–35.
   Google Scholar
• Alex Callinicos, Against Postmodernism, New York: St Martin's Press, 1990, p 171.
   Google Scholar
• James Petras, ‘The retreat of the intellectuals’, Socialism and Democracy, 12, 1991, pp 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Roxborough, Theories of Underdevelopment, London: Macmillan, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• André Gunder Frank, ‘The development of underdevelopment’, in Frank, Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Colin Leys, ‘Underdevelopment and dependency: critical notes’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 7(1), 1977, pp 92–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T Dos Santos, ‘The crisis of development theory and the problem of dependence in Latin America’, in Henry Bernstein (ed), Underdevelopment and Development, London: Penguin, and T Halperin-Donghi, ‘Dependency theory and Latin American historiography’, Latin American Research Review, 17(1), 1982, pp 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Haldun Gülalp, ‘Debate on capitalism and development: the theories of Samir Amin and Bill Warren’, Capital & Class, 28, 1986, pp 139–159.
   Google Scholar
• Immanuel Wallerstein, ‘Crisis as transition’ in S Amin, G Arrighi A G Frank & I Wallerstein, Dynamics of Global Crisis, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Henry Bernstein & H Nicholas, ‘Pessimism of the intellect, pessimism of the will? A response to Gunder Frank’, Development and Change, 15(2), 1983.
   Google Scholar
• André Gunder Frank, ‘A theoretical introduction to 5000 years of world system history’, Review, 13(2), 1990, pp 155–248.
   Google Scholar
• Immanuel Wallerstein, ‘The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: concepts for comparative analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16, 1974, pp 387–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, for example, Robert Brenner, ‘On the origins of capitalist development: a critique of neo-Smithian Marxism’, New Left Review, 104, 1977, pp 26–92; and Ernesto Laclau, Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory, London: Verso, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• James Petras, & Howard Brill, ‘The tyranny of globalism’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 15(4), 1985; and Haldun Gülalp, ‘Dependency and world-system theories: varying political implications’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 17(2), 1987, pp 131–139.
   Google Scholar
• James Mittelman (ed), Globalization: Critical Perspectives, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Nigel Harris, The End of the Third World, London: I B Tauris, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• David Booth, ‘Marxism and development sociology: interpreting the impasse’, World Development, 13(7), 1985, pp 761–787; and Leslie Sklair, ‘Transcending the impasse: metatheory, theory, and empirical research in the sociology of development and underdevelopment’, World Development, 16, 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escober, ‘Imagining a post-development era?’.
   Google Scholar
• Immanuel Wallerstein, Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms, New York: Blackwell, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, ‘Dilemmas of development discourse’, p 15.
   Google Scholar
• Roxborough, Theories of Underdevelopment.
   Google Scholar
• Henry Bernstein, ‘Sociology of underdevelopment versus sociology of development?’, in David Lehmann (ed), Development Theory: Four Critical Studies, London: Frank Cass, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Haldun Gülalp, ‘Globalizing postmodernism: Islamist and Western social theory’, Economy and Society, 26(3), 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldun Gülalp, ‘The crisis of Westernization in Turkey: Islamism versus nationalism’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 1995, pp 175–182.
   Google Scholar
• The following account draws on Gülalp, ‘Globalizing postmodernism’; and Haldun Gülalp, ‘Modernization policies and Islamist politics in Turkey’, in Sibel Bozdoǧgan & Reşat Kasaba (eds), Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, ‘Imagining a post-development era?’, pp 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Bulaç, Din ve Moderniun, Istanbul: Endiiliis Yayinlari, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Gyan Prakash, ‘Subaltern studies as postcolonial criticism’, American Historical Review, 99(5), 1994, pp 1475–1490.
   Google Scholar
• Ismet Özel, Üç Mesele: Teknik, Medeniyet ve Yabancilaşma, Istanbul: Çidam Yayinlari, 1992, p 83.
   Google Scholar
• Partha Chatterjee, Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse?, London: Zed Books, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, ‘Imagining a post-development era?’, p 27.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmet Tabakoǧlu, “Islam Iktisadi Açisindan “Kalkinma“ ‘, in Ahmet Tabakoǧlu & Ismail Kurt (eds), Iktisadi Kalkinma ve Islam, Istanbul: Islami Ilimler Arajtirma Vakfi Yayinlari, 1987, p 244.
   Google Scholar
• Beşir Hamitoǧullari, ‘Iktisadi Vahşi Büyümenin Bunalimlari ve Islam Kalkinma Modelinin Vaadettikleri’, in Tabakoǧlu & Kurt, Iktisadi Kalkinma ve Islam, pp 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ersin Gürdoǧan, Teknolojinin ötesi, Istanbul: Iz Yayincilik, 1991, pp 16–17, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid, pp 25–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid, pp 154, 158.
   Google Scholar
• Maria Mies, ‘Gender and global capitalism’, in Leslie Sklair (ed), Capitalism and Development, London: Routledge, 1994, p 120.
   Google Scholar
• Gürdoǧan, Teknolojinin Ötesi, pp 23, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Contemporary Sociology, 26(3) 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ayşe Öncü, ‘Crossing borders into Turkish sociology with Gunder Frank and Michel Foucault’, Contemporary Sociology, 26(3), 1997, pp 267–270; and Maria Celia Paoli, ‘European theory in Brazilian sociology’, Contemporary Sociology, 26(3), 1997, pp 296–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elizabeth Jelin, ‘Don't cry for me, Argentina, or the globalization of Peronism’, Contemporary Sociology, 26(3), 1997, p 302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott Lash, Sociology of Postmodernism, London: Routledge, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Samin Amin, Unequal Development, London: Harvester Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Barry Smart, ‘Modernity, postmodernity and the present’, in Bryan S Turner (ed), Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity, London: Sage Publications, 1990, p 27.
   Google Scholar