17
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Trade in conventional armaments

Defense spending, nondefense spending, and the need for fiscal restraint: Two models of the presidential budgetary processFootnote∗∗

&
Pages 66-106 | Published online: 28 Sep 2007

Notes

  • Wildavsky , A. 1964 . The Politics of the Budgetary Process , Boston : Little, Brown and Company .
  • Huntington , S.P. 1961 . The Common Defense: Strategic Programs in National Defense , New York : Columbia University Press .
  • Crecine , J.P. 1971 . “ ‘Defence Budgeting’ ” . In Studies in Budgeting , Edited by: Byrne , F.R. , Charnes , A. , Cooper , W.W. , Davis , O.A. and Gilford , D. 210 – 261 . Amsterdam : North Holland Publishing Company .
  • Allison , G.T. 1971 . Essence of Decision , Boston : Little, Brown and Company .
  • Halperin , M. and Kanter , A. 1973 . Readings in American Foreign Policy: A Bureaucratic Perspective , Boston : Little, Brown and Company .
  • Crecine , J.P. 1971 . Op. cit.
  • Crecine , J.P. and Fischer , G.W. 1973 . “ ‘On Resource Allocation in the U.S. Department of Defense’ ” . In Political Science Annual Edited by: Potter , C.P. Vol. 4 , 181 – 236 .
  • Crecine , J.P. , Kamlet , M.S. , Mowery , D.C. and Winer , M. 1979 . The Role of OMB in Executive Branch Budgetary Decision Making , Technical Report, Department of Social Science Working Paper, Carnegie‐Mellon University .
  • Crecine , J.P. 1971 . Op. cit.
  • Crecine , J.P. and Fischer , G. 1973 . Op. cit.
  • Haveman , J. 1979 . Congressional Budget Reform , New York : Basic Books . suggests that this is not yet the case
  • Crecine and Fischer . 1973 . Op. cit. are an exception to this rule
  • Richardson , L. 1960 . Arms and Insecurity , Pittsburgh : Boxwood Press .
  • Ostrom , C.W. Jr. 1977 . ‘Evaluating Alternative Foreign Policy Decision‐Making Models: An Empirical Test Between An Arms Race Model and An Organizational Politics Model’ . Journal of Conflict Resolution , : 235 – 266 .
  • Davis , O.A. , Dempster , M.A.H. and Wildavsky , A. 1974 . ‘Toward a Predictive Theory of Government Expenditure: U.S. Domestic Appropriations’ . British Journal of Political , 4 : 419 – 452 . Science
  • Davis , O.A. , Dempster , M.A.H. and Wildavsky , A. 1966 . ‘A Theory of the Budgetary Process’ . American Political Science Review , 60 : 529 – 547 .
  • Davis , O.A. , Dempster , M.A.H. and Wildavsky , A. 1971 . “ ‘On the Process of Budgeting II: An Empirical Study of Congressional Appropriations’ ” . In Studies in Budgeting , Edited by: Byrne , R.F. 210 – 261 . Amsterdam : North Holland Publishing Company .
  • Davis , O.A. 1974 . Op. cit.
  • Stromberg , J. 1970 . The Internal Mechanisms of the Defense Budgetary Process: Fiscal 1953–1968 , Santa Monica : The RAND Corporation . RM ‐6243 ‐PR
  • Enthoven , A. and Smith , W.K. 1971 . How Much is Enough? , New York : Harper‐Colophon Books .
  • Crecine , J.P. 1971 . Op.cit.
  • Crecine , J.P. and Fischer , G. 1973 . Op. cit.
  • Wildavsky , A. 1964 . Op. cit.
  • Ostrom , C.W. Jr. 1978 . ‘'A Reactive Linkage Model of the U.S. Defense Expenditure Policymaking Processes’ . American Political Science Review , 72 : 941 – 957 .
  • Kamlet , M.S. and Mowery , D.C. 1980 . ‘The Budgetary Base in Federal Resource Allocation’ . American Journal of Political Science , 24 : 804 – 821 .
  • Collins , J.M. 1978 . American and Soviet Military Trends Since the Cuban Missile Crisis , The Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University .
  • Lee , W.T. 1976 . “ ‘Soviet Defense Expenditures’ ” . In Arms, Men, and Military Budgets: Issues for Fiscal Year 1977 , Edited by: Schneider , W. and Hoeber , F.P. New York : Crane Russak .
  • Tufte , E.R. 1978 . Political Control of the Economy , Princeton : Princeton University Press .
  • Allison , G.T. 1971 . Op. cit.
  • Halperin , M. and Kanter , A. 1973 . Op. cit.
  • Allison , G.T. and Morris , F.A. 1975 . ‘Armaments and Arms Control: Exploring the Determinants of Military Weapons’ . Daedalus , 104 : 99 – 130 .
  • Collins , J.M. 1978 . Op. cit.
  • Lee , W.T. 1976 . Op. cit.)
  • Department of Social Science, Carnegie‐Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • The research reported here was supported by National Science Foundation Grant, NSF‐SOC‐76–84488. This paper is partly based on a presentation to the American Political Science Association National Meetings, Washington, D.C., August 1979.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.