Applications of Random-Utility-based Multi-region Input–Output Models of Transport and the Spatial Economy

References

• Abraham, J. E. (1998). A review of the MEPLAN modelling framework from a perspective of urban economics. Calgary: University of Calgary, Department of Civil Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham, J. E., & Hunt, J. D. (1999a). Firm location in the MEPLAN model of Sacramento. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1685, 187–198. doi: 10.3141/1685-24
   Google Scholar
• Abraham, J. E., & Hunt, J. D. (1999b). Policy analysis using the Sacramento MEPLAN land use–transportation interaction model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1685, 199–208. doi: 10.3141/1685-25
   Google Scholar
• Abraham, J. E., & Hunt, J. D. (2003). Design and application of the PECAS land use modeling system. Davis, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• de la Barra, T. (1989). Integrated land use and transport modelling: Decision chains and hierarchies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. (2008). Computable general equilibrium analysis in transportation. In D. A. Hensher, K. J. Button, K. E. Haynes, & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Handbook of transport geography and spatial systems (pp. 269–289). Howard House: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J., & Mercenier, J. (2011). General equilibrium models for transportation economics. In A. de Palma, R. Lindsey, E. Quinet, & R. Vickerman (Eds.), Handbook in transport economics (pp. 21–45). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Burfisher, M. E. (2011). Introduction to computable general equilibrium models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E. (2001). 4.6.1 Multiregional input–output (MRIO) models. In E. Cascetta (Ed.), Transportation systems engineering: Theory and methods (pp. 232–243). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E., Di Gangi, M., & Conigliaro, G. (1996). A multi-regional input–output model with elastic trade coefficients for the simulation of freight transport demand in Italy. Transportation Planning Methods. Proceedings of Seminar E Held at the PTRC European Transport Forum, Brunel University, England, PTRC Education and Research Services Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E., Marzano, V., & Papola, A. (2008). Multi-regional input –output models for freight demand simulation at a national level. In M. E. Ben-Akiva, H. Meersman, & E. Van der Voorde (Eds.), Recent developments in transport modelling: Lessons for the freight sector (pp. 93–116). Howard House: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E., Marzano, V., & Papola, A. (2012). A multimodal elastic trade coefficients MRIO model for freight demand in Europe. Proceedings of the Freight Transport Modeling Colloquium in memory of Prof. Marvin L. Manheim. Antwerp: University of Antwerp — Department of Transport and Regional Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Chenery, H. (1953). Regional analysis. In H. B. Chenery, P. G. Clark, & V. Cao-Pinna (Eds.), The structure and growth of the Italian economy (pp. 97–116). Rome: United States Mutual Security Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. L., Lenzen, M., & Kenway, S. J. (2011). The ins and outs of water use — a review of multi-region input–output analysis and water footprints for regional sustainability analysis and policy. Economic Systems Research, 23(4), 353–370. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2011.633500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X., & Kockelman, K. M. (2012). Tracking transportation and industrial production across a nation: Applications of RUBMRIO model for U.S. trade patterns. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2269, 99–109. doi: 10.3141/2269-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echenique, M. (2008). Econometric models of land use and transportation. In D. A. Hensher, K. J. Button, K. E. Haynes, & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Handbook of transport geography and spatial systems (pp. 185–202). Howard House: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Echenique, M. (2011). Land use/transport models and economic assessment. Research in Transportation Economics, 31(1), 45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Echenique, M. H., Flowerdew, A. D., Hunt, J. D., Mayo, T. R., Skidmore, I. J., & Simmonds, D. C. (1990). The MEPLAN models of Bilbao, Leeds and Dortmund. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 10(4), 309–322. doi: 10.1080/01441649008716764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman, A. F., & Vassallo, J. M. (2013). A methodology for assessing regional economic impacts of charging HGVs in Spain: An integrated approach through a random utility based multiregional input–output and a road transportation network model. Proceedings of the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, H., Kim, T. J., & Boyce, D. (2005). Implementation and estimation of a combined model of interregional, multimodal commodity shipments and transportation network flows. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 39, 65–79. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2004.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, R. (2010). (Towards) a complete database of peer-reviewed articles on environmentally extended input–output analysis. 18th International Input–Output Conference. Sydney: Statistics Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, T., & Kockelman, K. M. (2007). The introduction of dynamic features in a random-utility-based multiregional input–output model of trade, production, and location choice. Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, M., Levinson, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2008). Models of transportation and land use change: A guide to the territory. Journal of Planning Literature, 22(4), 323–340. doi: 10.1177/0885412207314010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isard, W. (1951). Interregional and regional input –output analysis: A model of a space-economy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 33(4), 318–328. doi: 10.2307/1926459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T. J., Ham, H., & Boyce, D. E. (2002). Economic impacts of transportation network changes: Implementation of a combined transportation network and input –output model. Papers in Regional Science, 81, 223–246. doi: 10.1007/s101100100101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockelman, K. M., Jin, L., Zhao, Y., & Ruiz Juri, N. (2005). Tracking land use, transport, and industrial production using random-utility-based multiregional input–output models: Applications for Texas trade. Journal of Transport Geography, 13, 275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Park, J., Gordon, P., Moore, J. E., II, & Richardson, H. W. (2012). Estimating the state-by-state economic impacts of a foot-and-mouth disease attack. International Regional Science Review, 35(1), 26–47. doi: 10.1177/0160017610390939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., Foran, B., Lobefaro, L., & Geschke, A. (2012). International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature, 486, 109–112. doi: 10.1038/nature11145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105–125. doi: 10.2307/1927837
   Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. W. (1951). The structure of American economy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. W. (1953). Studies in the structure of the American economy: Theoretical and empirical explorations in input –output analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maoh, H., Kanaroglou, P., & Woudsma, C. (2008). Simulation model for assessing the impact of climate change on transportation and the economy in Canada. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2067, 84–92. doi: 10.3141/2067-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, V., & Papola, A. (2004). Modelling freight demand at a national level: Theoretical developments and application to Italian demand. Proceedings of the 2004 European Transport Conference. Strasbourg, France: Association for European Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, V., & Papola, A. (2008). A multi-regional input–output model for the appraisal of transport investments in Europe. Proceedings of the 2008 European Transport Conference. Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands: Association for European Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. J. (2006). Integrated urban models: Theoretical prospects. 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input–output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, L. N. (1955). The stability of interregional trading patterns and input–output analysis. The American Economic Review, 45(5), 803–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto, N., & Inomata, S. (2011). To what extent will the shock be alleviated? The evaluation of China's counter-crisis fiscal expansion. In S. Inomata (Ed.), Asia beyond the global economic crisis: The transmission mechanism of financial shocks (pp. 144–168). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Economic Models, Inc. (2013). Regional economic models, inc. Retrieved from The REMI Model: http://www.remi.com/the-remi-model
   Google Scholar
• Rose, A. (1995). Input–output economics and computable general equilibrium models. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6(3), 295–304. doi: 10.1016/0954-349X(95)00018-I
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz Juri, N., & Kockelman, K. M. (2004). Extending the random-utility-based multiregional input–output model: Incorporating land-use constraints, domestic demand and network congestion in a model of Texas trade. Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz Juri, N., & Kockelman, K. M. (2006). Evaluation of the trans-Texas corridor proposal: Application and enhancements of the random-utility-based multiregional input–output model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132(7), 531–539. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:7(531)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, F., & Musolino, G. (2009). Multiple equilibria in spatial–economic transport interaction models. Proceedings of the 2009 European Transport Conference. London: Association for European Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F., & Musolino, G. (2012). A unifying modelling framework to simulate the spatial economic transport interaction process at urban and national scales. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmond, D. C. (1999). The design of the DELTA land-use modelling package. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(5), 665–684. doi: 10.1068/b260665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H. (2003). The saga of integrated land use-transport modeling: How many more dreams before we wake up? 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tukker, A., & Dietzenbacher, E. (2013). Global multiregional input–output frameworks: An introduction and outlook. Economic Systems Research, 25(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2012.761179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, M. (2008). Overview of land-use transport models. In D. A. Hensher, K. J. Button, K. E. Haynes, & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Handbook of transport geography and spatial systems (pp. 127–146). Howard House: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T. (2009). A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 211–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., & Barrett, J. (2007). Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Kockelman, K. M. (2004). The random-utility-based multiregional input–output model: Solution existence and uniqueness. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38, 789–807. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2003.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zondag, B., & de Jong, G. (2011). The development of the TIGRIS XL model: A bottom-up approach to transport, land-use and the economy. Research in Transportation Economics, 31(1), 55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.11.008
   Google Scholar