Sustainability Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Existing Tools and Methods

References

• Almansa, C., & Calatrava, J. (2007). Reconciling sustainability and discounting in cost-benefit analysis: A methodological proposal. Ecological Economics, 60(4), 712–725. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., & Muench, S. T. (2013). Sustainability trends measured by the greenroads rating system. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2357(206), 24–32. doi:10.3141/2357-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W., & Lepech, M. D. (2009, September). Treatment of uncertainties in life cycle assessment. Paper presented at The 10th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR09), Osaka.
   Google Scholar
• Barfod, M. B., Salling, K. B., & Leleur, S. (2011). Composite decision support by combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analysis. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 167–175. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, R. A. (1982, June). Intergenerational equity: The capital-environment trade-off. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 9(2), 165–185. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(82)90020-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beria, P., Maltese, I., & Mariotti, I. (2011, June). Comparing cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis : The evaluation of neighbourhoodś sustainable mobility. Paper presented at the XIII Riunione Scientifica Della Società Italiana Degli Economisti Dei Trasporti E Della Logistica (SIET), Messina.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, A. L., & Nellthorp, J. (2000). Transport project appraisal in the European Union. Transport Policy, 7(1), 51–60. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00010-X
   Google Scholar
• Browne, D., & Ryan, L. (2011). Comparative analysis of evaluation techniques for transport policies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(3), 226–233. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundtland World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42-187.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chaharbaghi, K., & Willis, R. (1999). The study and practice of sustainable development. Engineering Management Journal, 9(1), 41–48. Retrieved from http://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/em_19990115
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W. L., & Li, H. (2005). Analytic network process applied to project selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(4), 459–466. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:4(459)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciegis, R., Ramanauskiene, J., & Martinkus, B. (2009). The concept of sustainable development and its use for sustainability Scenarios. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 2(62), 28–37. Retrieved from http://www.ktu.edu/lt/mokslas/zurnalai/inzeko/62/1392-2758-2009-2-62-28.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M., Paulli, C., Tetreault, Z., & Thomas, J. (2009). Green guide for roads rating system. Worcester: Published reports of the Worcester Polytechnical Institute. Retrieved from http://www.wpi.edu/Images/CMS/CEE/Green_Guide_for_Roads_Rating_System.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clevenger, C. M., Ozbek, M. E., & Simpson, S. (2013, April). Review of sustainability rating systems used for infrastructure projects. Paper presented a The 49th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings, San Luis Obispo, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cundrič, A., Kern, T., & Rajkovič, V. (2008). A qualitative model for road investment appraisal. Transport Policy, 15(4), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.05.003.A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S., & Tam, E. K. (2005). Indicators and framework for assessing sustainable infrastructure. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 32(1), 30–44. doi:10.1139/l04-101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Butter, F. A. G., & Verbruggen, H. (1994). Measuring the trade-off between economic growth and a clean environment. Environmental & Resource Economics, 4(2), 187–208. doi:10.1007/BF00692203
   Google Scholar
• Dennison, F., Azapagic, A., Clift, R., & Colbourne, J. (1998). Assessing management options for wastewater treatment works in the context of life cycle assessment. Water Science and Technology, 38(11), 23–30. doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00636-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondero, G., Rodgers, K., & Hurley, P. T. (2013, January). Developing a comprehensive sustainable transportation analysis framework. Paper presented at The 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washingtong, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century. New Society. doi:http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tqem.3310080106
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2006). Handbook for trade sustainability impact assessment. Published reports of the European Commission. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/march/tradoc_127974.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Impact assessment guidelines. Published reports of the European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/iag_2009_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration. (2012). INVEST sustainable highways self-evaluation tool. Published reports of the Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved from https://www.sustainablehighways.org/INVEST_1.0_Compendium_Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Stream, C. (2001). Environmental protection versus economic development: A false trade-off? Public Administration Review, 61(3), 313–321. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesz, T. L., Tourreilles, F. A., Han, A.-W., & Fernandez, J. E. (1980). Comparison of multicriteria optimization methods in transport project evaluation. Transportation Research Record, (751), 38–41. Retrieved from http://worldcat.org/issn/03611981
   Google Scholar
• Frohwein, H. I., Lambert, J. H., Haimes, Y. Y., & Schiff, L. A. (1999). Multicriteria framework to aid comparison of roadway improvement projects. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 125(3), 224–230. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:3(224)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambatese, J. A., & Rajendran, S. (2005, April). Sustainable roadway construction: Energy consumption and material waste generation of roadways. Paper presented at the Construction Research Congress 2005 of the American Society of Civil Engineers, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• George, C. (2001). Sustainability appraisal for sustainable development: Integrating everything from jobs to climate change. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(2), 95–106. doi:10.3152/147154601781767104
   Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., Boon, W., & Van Wee, B. (2009). Social impacts of transport: Literature review and the state of the practice of transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Transport Reviews, 29(1), 69–90. doi:10.1080/01441640802130490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, D., Blackwood, D., Banks, L., & Wilson, F. (2011). Sustainable development indicators for major infrastructure projects. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, 164(1), 15–24. doi:10.1680muen.800020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, G. (1985). A multicriteria method for transportation investment planning. Transportation Research Part A: General, 19(1), 29–41. doi:10.1016/0191-2607(85)90004-4
   Google Scholar
• Gradus, R., & Smulders, S. (1993). The trade-off between environmental care and long-term growth-Pollution in three prototype growth models. Journal of Economics, 58(1), 25–51. doi:10.1007/BF01234800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant-Muller, S. M., Mackie, P., Nellthorp, J., & Pearman, A. (2001). Economic appraisal of European transport projects: The state-of-the-art revisited. Transport Reviews, 21, 237–261. doi:10.1080/01441640119423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grießhammer, R., Benoît, C., Dreyer, L. C., Flysjö, A., Mazijn, B., Méthot, A., & Weidema, B. (2006). Feasibility study : Integration of social aspects into LCA. Retrieved from http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Library/UNEP-SETACLifeCycleInitiativeTFonSocialIssues-FeasibilityStudy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gühnemann, A., Laird, J. J., & Pearman, A. D. (2012). Combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis to prioritise a national road infrastructure programme. Transport Policy, 23, 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., Hepburn, C. J., Tol, R. S. J., & Anthoff, D. (2006). Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 205–216. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2005.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauschild, M. Z., Dreyer, L. C., & Jørgensen, A. (2008). Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective — Lessons learned. CIRP Annals–Manufacturing Technology, 57, 21–24. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, C. J., & Koundouri, P. (2007). Recent advances in discounting: Implications for forest economics. Journal of Forest Economics, 13, 169–189. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2007.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, A. (2012, January). Overview of sustainability rating system trends in transportation. Paper presented at The 92nd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC. Retrieved from http://terralogicss.com/resources.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B. F., & Horn, G. T. (1997). Building public confidence in energy planning: A multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas. Energy Policy, 25(3), 357–375. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00025-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment, 409(19), 3578–3594. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hueting, R., & Reijnders, L. (2004). Broad sustainability contra sustainability: The proper construction of sustainability indicators. Ecological Economics, 50(3–4), 249–260. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyard, A. (2012). Cost-benefit analysis according to Sen: An application in the evaluation of transport infrastructures in France. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(4), 707–719. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniestra, J. G., & Gutiérrez, J. G. (2009). Multicriteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 512–526. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2008.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InterAmerican Development Bank. (2015, January). Adapting U.S. sustainability tool for roadway project in South America. Paper presented at the 94th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://amonline.trb.org/trb57535-2015-1.1793793/t008-1.1817812/829-1.1803401/p15-5785-1.1817843/p15-5785-1.1817844?login_formerror=auth&qr=1
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Consulting Engineers. (2012). State of the world report 2012. Sustainable infrastructure. Published reports of the International Federation of national Member Associations of consulting engineers (FIDIC). Retrieved from http://fidic.org/books/state-world-report-2012-sustainable-infrastructure
   Google Scholar
• Janic, M. (2003). Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed Rail, Transrapid maglevand air passenger transport in Europe. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26(6), 491–512. doi:10.1080/0308106032000167373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, H., Moura, F., & Domingos, T. (2014). Transport infrastructure project evaluation using cost-benefit analysis. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111, 400–409. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.073
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, A., Le Bocq, A., Nazarkina, L., & Hauschild, M. (2008). Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(2), 96–103. doi:10.1065/lca2007.11.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2013). A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10, 1176–1210. doi:10.1080/15732479.2013.795978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keoleian, G. A., & Spitzley, D. V. (2006). Life cycle based sustainability metrics. In Sustainability science and engineering: Defining principles (pp. 127–159). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Khorramshahgol, R., & Steiner, H. (1988). Resource analysis in project evaluation: A multicriteria approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39(9), 795–803. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2583522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, K., Stagl, S., Madlener, R., & Omann, I. (2009). Sustainable energy futures: Methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(3), 1063–1074. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kula, E., & Evans, D. (2011). Dual discounting in cost-benefit analysis for environmental impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(3), 180–186. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Edil, T., Benson, C., & Tinjum, J. (2011, January). Evaluation of variable affecting sustainable highway design using the Be2st-in-HighwaysTM system. Paper presented at the 90th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, E., & Olmsted, S. (2015, January). The collaborative benefits of using FHWA's INVEST–A state department of transportation sustainability implementation case study. Paper presented at The 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, S. (2012, June). International experiences on sustainable scoring system: Comparisons and applications. Paper presented at The 6th International Association for China Planning Conference, Wuhan.
   Google Scholar
• Liimatainen, V. (2012). Life cycle assessment guideline for protection relay : 615 series. Retrieved from http://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/43465
   Google Scholar
• Loiseau, E., Junqua, G., Roux, P., & Bellon-Maurel, V. (2012). Environmental assessment of a territory: An overview of existing tools and methods. Journal of Environmental Management, 112, 213–25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, P., & Preston, J. (1998). Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal. Transport Policy, 5(1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(98)00004-3
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, S. (2013). Carbon emissions and cost benefit analyses ( Working Paper No. 2013-32). Sweden: International Transport Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuhashi, R., Hikita, K., & Ishitani, H. (1996). Model analyses for sustainable energy supply taking resource and environmental constraints into consideration. Energy Conversion and Management, 37(6), 1253–1258. doi:10.1016/0196-8904(95)00329-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, R., Schirmer, H., Hirsch, A. (2014). A sustainability rating system for roads in developing countries. Bridges, 10, 1086–1096. doi: 10.1061/9780784478745.103
   Google Scholar
• Muench, S. T., Armstrong, A., & Allen, B. (2012). Sustainable roadway design and construction in federal lands highway program. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2271(-1), 19–30. doi:10.3141/2271-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munasinghe, M., Sunkel, O., & Miguel, C. D. (2001). The sustainability of long-term growth: Socioeconomic and ecological perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20023109930.html
   Google Scholar
• Munda, G. (1995). Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment: Theory and applications in ecological economics. Physica-Verlag. Retrieved from http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19961806871.html
   Google Scholar
• Munda, G. (2004). Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(3), 662–677. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00369-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munda, G., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1998). Sustainable development: Concepts, rationalities and strategies. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3188-1
   Google Scholar
• National Cooperative Highway Research Program-NCHRP. (2011). A guidebook for sustainability performance measurement for transportation agencies (Report 708). Washington, DC. Published reports of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Retrieved from http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/166313.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, S., & Spash, C. L. (2001). Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmatic syntheses: A critical appraisal. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4), 567–585. doi:10.1068/c9s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. L., Fliedner, G., & Currie, K. (1995). Comparison of the REMBRANDT system with analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 82(3), 522–539. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0340-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omura, M. (2004). Cost-Benefit analysis revisited: Is it a useful tool for sustainable development? Kobe University Economic Review, 50, 43–58. Retrieved from http://www.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/repository/00399714.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ophus, E., & Digernes, V. (1996). Life-cycle assessment of an alkyd emulsion : Improvements in environmental performance. Surface Coatings International, 79(4), 155–176. Retrieved from http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=3076576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, S. (2000). Contexts and drivers for operationalizing sustainable development. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Civil Engineering, 138(6), 9–15. doi:10.1680/cien.2000.138.6.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, S., Sommer, F., & Uren, S. (2003). Sustainable development: Understanding the concept and practical challenge*. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability, 156(1), 19–26. doi:10.1680/ensu.2003.156.1.19
   Google Scholar
• Paul, B. D. (2008). A history of the concept of sustainable development: Literature review. The Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 17(2), 576–580. Retrieved from http://steconomice.uoradea.ro/anale/volume/2008/v2-economy-and-business-administration/101.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D., Groom, B., Hepburn, C., & Koundouri, P. (2003). Valuing the future: Recent advances in social discounting. World Economics, 4(2), 121–141. doi:10.1.1.121.130
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D., & Nash, C. (1981). The social appraisal of projects–a text in cost-benefit-analysis. London: Macmillan. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://A1982NP40600029
   Google Scholar
• Radermacher, W. (1999). Indicators, green accounting and environment statistics — information requirements for sustainable development. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 339–354. doi:10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raluy, R. G., Serra, L., & Uche, J. (2005). Life cycle assessment of desalination technologies integrated with renewable energies. Desalination, 183(1), 81–93. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., & Bras, B. (2008). A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(5), 374–388. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, R., Bilos, A., & Wilkinson, S. (2009). International comparison of sustainable rating tools. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 1(1), 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.costar.com/josre/JournalPdfs/01-Sustainable-Rating-Tools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reid, L., Davis, A., & Bevan, T. (2012, January). An approach for integrating sustainability into roadway project development. Paper presented at The 92nd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Samberg, S., Bassok, A., & Holman, S. (2012). Method for evaluation of sustainable transportation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2242, 1–8. doi:10.3141/2242-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers, T. M., Jessop, A. T., & Hills, P. J. (2003). Multi-criteria evaluation of transport options — flexible, transparent and user-friendly? Transport Policy, 10(2), 95–105. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00049-5
   Google Scholar
• Säynäjoki, E., Kyrö, R., Heinonen, J., & Junnila, S. (2012). An assessment of the applicability of three international neighbourhood sustainability rating systems to diverse local conditions, with a focus on Nordic case areas. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 3(2), 96–104. doi:10.1080/2093761X.2012.696319
   Google Scholar
• Sev, A. (2011). A comparative analysis of building environmental assessment tools and suggestions for regional adaptations. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 28, 231–245. doi:10.1080/10286608.2011.588327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelbourn, M. A., Bouchlaghem, D. M., Anumba, C. J., Carillo, P. M., Khalfan, M. M., & Glass, J. (2006). Managing knowledge in the context of sustainable construction. ITcon, 11, 57–71. Retrieved from http://itcon.org/data/works/att/2006_4.content.07629.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, F. J. (2006). Project evaluation, sustainability and accountability: Combining cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and multi-criteria analysis (MCA) (Doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen. Retrieved from http://www.waddenacademie.nl/fileadmin/inhoud/pdf/06-wadweten/Proefschriften/Thesis_Sytsma.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, S. P., Clevenger, C. M., Ozbek, M. E., Kohlman, E. R., & Atadero, R. (2014, January). A framework for assessing transportation sustainability rating systems for implementation in U.S . State departments of transportation. Paper presented at the 93rd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Stamford, L., & Azapagic, A. (2011). Sustainability indicators for the assessment of nuclear power. Energy, 36(10), 6037–6057. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stripple, H. (2001). Life cycle assessment of road: A pilot study for inventory analysis. ( Report 96). Sweden: Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stripple, H., & Erlandsson, M. (2004). Methods and possibilities for application of life cycle assessment in strategic environmental assessment of transport infrastructures (Report B1661). Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgill, R. E., Van Dyke, C., McCormack, S., & Kreis, S. D. (2015, January). Case analysis of inherent programmatic sustainability resulting from application of context sensitive design principles. Paper presented at The 94th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sumaila, U. R., & Walters, C. (2005). Intergenerational discounting: A new intuitive approach. Ecological Economics, 52, 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahara, K., Kojima, T., & Inaba, A. (1997). Evaluation of CO2 payback time of power plants by LCA. Energy Conversion and Management, 38, S615–S620. doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(97)00005-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEP and CEPS. (2010). Study on social impact assessment as a tool for mainstreaming social inclusion and social protection concerns in public policy in EU Member States. London: Published reports of the European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/166313.aspx Retrieved from http://csdle.lex.unict.it/docs/labourweb/Study-on-Social-Impact-Assessment-as-a-tool-for-mainstreaming-social-inclusion-and-social-protection/2459.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Thomopoulos, N., Grant-Muller, S., & Tight, M. R. (2009). Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evaluation: Current practice and a proposed methodology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(4), 351–359. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar, G. J., Love, P. E., & Crawford, R. H. (2004). Hybrid life-cycle inventory for road construction and use. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), 43–49. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(43)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. Y., & Chang, A. S. (2012). Framework for developing construction sustainability items: The example of highway design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 127–136. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudela, A., Akiki, N., & Cisternas, R. (2006). Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(5), 414–423. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugwu, O. O., Kumaraswamy, M. M., Wong, A., & Ng, S. T. (2006). Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 2: A case study in bridge design. Automation in Construction, 15(2), 229–238. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2005.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B. (2007). Rail infrastructure: Challenges for cost–benefit analysis and other ex ante Evaluations. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(1), 31–48. doi:10.1080/03081060701207995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veeravigrom, M., Muench, S. T., & Kosonen, H. (2015, January). A global framework for sustainable roadway rating system. Paper presented at The 94th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Vickerman, R. (2007). Cost–benefit analysis and large-scale infrastructure projects: State of the art and challenges. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(4), 598–610. doi:10.1068/b32112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. (2010). Environmental justice, impact assessment and the politics of knowledge: The implications of assessing the social distribution of environmental outcomes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(5), 312–318. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955279502&partnerID=40&md5=0d2b63e45841482e9901059637477c1f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2263–2278. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L., & Lee, G. J. (2009). Operational research and sustainable development: Tackling the social dimension. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(3), 683–692. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar