Stakeholder-specific data acquisition and urban freight policy evaluation: evidence, implications and new suggestions

References

• Aftabuzzaman, M., & Mazloumi, E. (2011). Achieving sustainable urban transport mobility in post peak oil era. Transport Policy, 18(5), 695–702. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyol, D., & De Koster, R. (2013). Non-dominated time-window policies in city distribution. Production and Operations Management, 22(3), 739–751. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alho, A., & Silva, J. (2015). Utilizing urban form characteristics in urban logistics analysis: A case study in Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Transport Geography, 42, 57–71. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J., Browne, M., & Cherrett, T. (2012a). Investigating relationships between road freight transport, facility location, logistics management and urban form. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 45–57. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J., Browne, M., & Cherrett, T. (2012b). Survey techniques in urban freight transport studies. Transport Reviews, 32(3), 287–311. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2012.665949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, N., Van Duin, R., & Tavasszy, L. (2014). Ontology-based multi-agent system for urban freight transportation. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(2), 133–153. doi:10.1080/12265934.2014.920696
   Google Scholar
• Anand, N., Yang, M., Van Duin, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2012). GenCLOn: An ontology for city logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(15), 11944–11960. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Allen, J., & Browne, M. (2005). Urban logistics––How can it meet policy makers sustainability objectives? Journal of Transport Geography, 13, 71–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, N. (2013). The milk run revisited: A load factor paradox with economic and environmental implications for urban freight transport. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 51, 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, N., Woxenius, J., & Lammgard, C. (2013). Review of road Hauliers’ measures for increasing transport efficiency and sustainability in urban freight distribution. Transport Reviews, 33(1), 107–127. doi:10.1080/01441647.2013.763866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. (2007). Guidelines for preparing a design and monitoring framework. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., & Chauhan, S. (2012). A hybrid approach integrating affinity diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(2), 573–584. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S., & Goyal, S. (2011). A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(1–2), 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.07.023
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, E., Lindholm, M., & Whiteing, A. (2013). A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: Addressing stakeholder needs. Journal of Transport Geography, 32, 93–101. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.013
   Google Scholar
• Basbas, S., & Bouhouras, E. (2012). Sustainable mobility and goods distribution system. The case study of the central area of Thessaloniki. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 13(2), 603–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrends, S., Lindholm, M., & Woxenius, J. (2008). The impact of urban freight transport: A definition of sustainability from an actor's perspective. Transportation Planning and Technology, 31(6), 693–713. doi:10.1080/03081060802493247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliemer, M. C. J., & Rose, J. M. (2005). Efficiency and sample size requirements for stated choice studies (Working Paper). Sidney: Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Boussier, J. M., Cucu, T., Ion, L., & Breuil, D. (2011). Simulation of goods delivery process. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(9), 913–930. doi:10.1108/09600031111175852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M., & Allen, J. (1999). The impact of sustainability policies on urban freight transport and logistics systems. In H. Meersman, E. Van De Voorde, & W. Winkelmans (Eds.), 8th World conference on transport research (pp. 505–518). Antwerp: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M., & Gomez, M. (2011). The impact on urban distribution operations of upstream supply chain constraints. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(9), 896–912. doi:10.1108/09600031111175843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Allen, J., Wainwright, I., Palmer, A., & Williams, I. (2014). London 2012: Changing delivery patterns in response to the impact of the games on traffic flows. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(2), 244–261. doi:10.1080/12265934.2014.929508
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R., & Staelin, R. (1982). Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(3), 288–301. doi: 10.2307/3151563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrett, T., Allen, J., McLeod, F., Maynard, S., Hickford, A., & Browne, M. (2012). Understanding urban freight activity – Key issues for freight planning. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 22–32. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cidell, J. (2012). Flows and pauses in the urban logistics landscape: The municipal regulation of shipping container mobilities. Mobilities, 7(2), 233–245. doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.654995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, J., Merchan, D., & Torres, S. (2014). Redesigning a retail distribution network in restricted urban areas: A case study on beverage distribution in the historic center of Quito. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 12(5), 850–859. doi: 10.1016/S1665-6423(14)70591-7
   Google Scholar
• Crainic, T., Ricciardi, N., & Storchi, G. (2009). Models for evaluating and planning city logistics systems. Transportation Science, 43(4), 432–454. doi:10.1287/trsc.1090.0279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dablanc, L. (2007). Goods transport in large European cities: Difficult to organize, difficult to modernize. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 41(3), 280–285. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dablanc, L. (2008). Urban goods movement and air quality policy and regulation issues in European cities. Journal of Environmental Law, 20(2), 245–266. doi:10.1093/jel/eqn005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dablanc, L. (2011). City distribution, a key element of the urban economy: Guidelines for practitioners. In C. Macharis & S. Melo (Eds.), City distribution and urban freight transport (pp. 13–36). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dablanc, L., Giuliano, G., Holliday, K., & O'Brien, T. (2013). Best practices in urban freight management: Lessons from an international survey. Transportation Research Record, 2379, 29–38. doi:10.3141/2379-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielis, R., Rotaris, L., & Marcucci, E. (2010). Urban freight policies and distribution channels. European Transport, 46, 114–146.
   Google Scholar
• Deflorio, F., Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Perboli, G., & Tadei, R. (2012). The influence of time windows on the costs of urban freight distribution services in city logistics applications. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 12(3), 256–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez, A., Holguín-Veras, J., Ibeas, A., & dell'Olio, L. (2012). Receivers’ response to new urban freight policies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 886–896. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.804
   Google Scholar
• van Duin, J., & van der Heijden, R. (2012). Towards governance on noise between municipality and terminal operator by the use of simulation modelling. Journal of Computational Science, 3(4), 216–227. doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehmke, J. F., Meisel, S., & Mattfeld, D. C. (2012). Floating car based travel times for city logistics. Transportation Research Part C, 21(1), 338–352. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrizi, E., Farcomeni, A., & Gatta, V. (2012). Modelling work history patterns in the Italian labour market. Statistical Methods & Applications, 21, 227–247. doi: 10.1007/s10260-012-0189-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felici, G., & Gatta, V. (2008). The analysis of service quality through stated preferences and rule-based classification. In G. Felici & C. Vercellis (Eds.), Mathematical methods for knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 65–81). Hershey: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-528-3
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M., Maoh, H., Ryan, J., Kanaroglou, P., & Rashidi, T. (2012). Transferability and enhancement of a microsimulation model for estimating urban commercial vehicle movements. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 358–369. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figliozzi, M. A. (2011). The impacts of congestion on time-definitive urban freight distribution networks CO2 emission levels: Results from a case study in Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Part C, 19(5), 766–778. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnegan, C., Finlay, H., O'Mahony, M., & O'Sullivan, D. (2005). Urban freight in Dublin city center, Ireland – Survey analysis and strategy evaluation. Freight anaylsis, evaluation, and modeling: 2005 Thomas B. Deen Distinguished Lecture, 1941, 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Friesz, T., Mookherjee, R., HoIguin-Veras, J., & Rigdon, M. (2008). Dynamic pricing in an urban freight environment. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological, 42(4), 305–324. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesz, T. L., Lee, I., & Lin, C. C. (2011). Competition and disruption in a dynamic urban supply chain. Transportation Research Part B, 45(8), 121–1231.
   Google Scholar
• Frischknecht, B. D., Eckert, C., Geweke, J., & Louviere, J. J. (2014). A simple method to estimate preference parameters for individuals. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(1), 35–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatta, V., & Marcucci, E. (2013). Urban freight transport policies: Joint accounting of non-linear attribute effects and discrete mixture heterogeneity (Working Paper CREI, 1–19). Rome: University of Roma Tre.
   Google Scholar
• Gatta, V., & Marcucci, E. (2014). Urban freight transport and policy changes: Improving decision makers’ awareness via an agent-specific approach. Transport Policy, 36, 248–252. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatta, V., & Marcucci, E. (in press). Behavioural implications of non-linear effects on urban freight transport policies: The case of retailers and transport providers in Rome. Case Study on Transport Policy. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2015.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Gatta, V., Marcucci, E., & Scaccia, L. (2015). On finite sample performance of confidence intervals methods for willingness to pay measures. Transportation Research part A: Policy and Practice, 82, 169–192.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmelmayr, V. C., Cordeau, J. F., & Crainic, T. G. (2012). An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for two-echelon vehicle routing problems arising in city logistics. Computers & Operations Research, 39(12), 3215–3228. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2012.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis. A primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., & Puckett, S. (2005). Refocusing the modelling of freight distribution: Development of an economic-based framework to evaluate supply chain behaviour in response to congestion charging. Transportation, 32(6), 573–602. doi:10.1007/s11116-004-7615-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., Puckett, S., & Rose, J. (2007). Agency decision making in freight distribution chains: Establishing a parsimonious empirical framework from alternative behavioural structures. Transportation Research Part B, 41, 924–949. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2007.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., & Chow, G. (1999). Interacting agents and discrete choices in logistics outsourcing: A conceptual framework, world transport research, Vol 3: Transport modelling/assessment (pp. 365–376). (H. Meersman, E. Van de Voorde, & W. Winkelman). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S., Stathopoulos, A., & Daly, A. (2012). Allowing for heterogeneous decision rules in discrete choice models: An approach and four case studies. Transportation, 39(3), 565–559. doi: 10.1007/s11116-011-9365-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguin-Veras, J. (2008). Necessary conditions for off-hour deliveries and the effectiveness of urban freight road pricing and alternative financial policies in competitive markets. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 42(2), 392–413. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2007.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguín-Veras, J., Aros-Vera, F., & Browne, M. (2015). Agent interactions and the response of supply chains to pricing and incentives. Economics of Transportation, 4(3), 147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ecotra.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguin-Veras, J., Polimeni, J., Cruz, B., Xu, N., List, G., Nordstrom, J., & Haddock, J. (2005). Off-peak freight deliveries – Challenges and stakeholders’ perceptions. Transportation Research Record, 1906, 42–48. doi: 10.3141/1906-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguin-Veras, J., Silas, M., Polimeni, J., & Cruz, B. (2007). An investigation on the effectiveness of joint receiver-carrier policies to increase truck traffic in the off-peak hours - Part I: The behavior of receivers. Networks & Spatial Economics, 7(3), 277–295. doi:10.1007/s11067-006-9002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguin-Veras, J., Silas, M., Polimeni, J., & Cruz, B. (2008). An investigation on the effectiveness of joint receiver-carrier policies to increase truck traffic in the off-peak hours - Part II: The behavior of carriers. Networks & Spatial Economics, 8(4), 327–354. doi:10.1007/s11067-006-9011-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J., & Zwerina, K. (1996). The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 307–317. doi: 10.2307/3152127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaller, M., Holguin-Veras, J., & Hodge, S. (2013). Parking in the city challenges for freight traffic. Transportation Research Record, 2379, 46–56. doi:10.3141/2379-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., You, S., Ritchie, S. G., Saphores, J. D., Jayakrishnan, R., & Ogunseitan, O. (2012). Assessing air quality and health benefits of the clean truck program in the Alameda corridor. Transportation Research Part A, 46(8), 1177–1193.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, B., & Riehle, E. (2013). Bikes for urban freight? Experience from Europe. Transportation Research Record, 2379, 39–45. doi:10.3141/2379-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., Choy, K. L., Ho, G. T. S., Lam, H. Y., Pang, G. K. H., & Chin, K. S. (2014). A decision support system for optimizing dynamic courier routing operations. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(15), 6917–6933. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M., & Behrends, S. (2012). Challenges in urban freight transport planning – A review in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 129–136. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M., & Browne, M. (2013). Local authority cooperation with urban freight stakeholders: A comparison of partnership approaches. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 13(1), 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M. E., & Blinge, M. (2014). Assessing knowledge and awareness of the sustainable urban freight transport among Swedish local authority policy planners. Transport Policy, 32, 124–131. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macário, R., Galelo, A., & Martins, P. (2008). Business models in urban logistics. Ingeniería Y Desarrollo, 24, 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, C. (2004). The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport: The MAMCA methodology. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 25–26, 114–120.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., & Bernardini, A. (2015). Reviewing the use of multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach. Transport Policy, 37, 177–186. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., & Melo, S. (2011). City distribution and urban freight transport. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., & Milan, L. (2015). Transition through dialogue: A stakeholder based decision process for cities: The case of city distribution. Habitat International, 45, 82–91. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., Van Hoeck, E., Verlinde, S., Debauche, W., & Witlox, F. (2011). Multi-actor multi-criteria analysis: A case study on night-time delivery for urban distribution. In C. Macharis & S. Melo (Eds.), City distribution and urban freight transport (pp. 101–119). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mamasis, K., Minis, I., & Dikas, G. (2013). Managing vehicle breakdown incidents during urban distribution of a common product. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(6), 925–937. doi: 10.1057/jors.2012.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., & Danielis, R. (2007). Attribute cut-offs in freight service selection. Transportation Research Part E – Logistics and Transportation Review, 43, 506–515. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., & Danielis, R. (2008). The potential demand for a urban freight consolidation centre. Transportation, 35(2), 269–284. doi:10.1007/s11116-007-9147-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., Danielis, R., Paglione, G., & Gatta, V. (2007). Centri urbani di distribuzione delle merci e politiche del traffico: una valutazione empirica tramite le preferenze dichiarate. In VV.AA. (Eds.), Sviluppo sostenibile, tutela dell'ambiente e della salute umana (pp. 373–378). Perugia: Morlacchi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., & Gatta, V. (2011). Regional airport choice: Consumer behaviour and policy implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 70–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., & Gatta, V. (2012). Dissecting preference heterogeneity in consumer stated choices. Transport Research Part E, 48(1), 331–339. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., & Gatta, V. (2013). Intra-agent heterogeneity in urban freight distribution: The case of own-account operators. International Journal of Transport Economics, 40(2), 267–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., & Gatta, V. (2014). Behavioral modeling of urban freight transport. Testing non-linear policy effects for retailers. In J. Gonzalez-Feliu, F. Semet, & J.-L. Routhier (Eds.), Sustainable urban logistics: Concepts, methods and information systems (pp. 227–243). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., Gatta, V., & Scaccia, L. (2015). Urban freight, parking and pricing policies: An evaluation from a transport providers’ perspective. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 74, 239–249. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., Gatta, V., Stathopoulos, A., & Valeri, E. (2011). Designing an efficient stated ranking experiment for ex-ante urban freight policy evaluation in a three agent type context: Retailers, own-account and carriers (Working Papers of Italian society of Transport Economics). Parma: Siet.
   Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., Gatta, V., Valeri, E., & Stathopoulos, A. (2013). Urban freight transport modelling: An agent-specific approach. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., Gatta, V., Stathopoulos, A., & Valeri, E. (2013). Urban freight policy acceptability: Eliciting agent specific preferences via efficient experimental design. Zeitschrift Fur Verkehrswissenschaft, 3, 237–259.
   Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., Marini, M., & Ticchi, D. (2005). Road pricing as a citizen-candidate game. European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, 31, 28–45.
   Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., Stathopoulos, A., Gatta, V., & Valeri, E. (2012). A stated ranking experiment to study policy acceptance: The case of freight operators in Rome's LTZ. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 11(3), 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Marquez, L., & Salim, V. (2007). Assessing impacts of urban freight measures on air toxic emissions in Inner Sydney. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(4), 515–525. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, S., Kwan, H., & Roorda, M. J. (2013). Comparing GPS and non-GPS survey methods for collecting urban goods and service movements. International Journal of Transport Economics, 40(2), 183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, F., & Cherrett, T. (2011). Loading bay booking and control for urban freight. International Journal of Logistics – Research and Applications, 14(6), 385–397. doi:10.1080/13675567.2011.641525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motraghi, A. (2013). Rail research projects: Case studies. Research in Trasportation Economics, 41, 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motraghi, A., & Marinov, M. (2012). Analysis of urban freight by rail using event based simulation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 25, 73–89. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2012.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munuzuri, J., Cortes, P., Grosso, R., & Guadix, J. (2012). Selecting the location of minihubs for freight delivery in congested downtown areas. Journal of Computational Science, 3(4), 228–237. doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munuzuri, J., Cortes, P., Guadix, J., & Onieva, L. (2012). City logistics in Spain: Why it might never work. Cities, 29(2), 133–141. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munuzuri, J., Grosso, R., Cortes, P., & Guadix, J. (2013). Estimating the extra costs imposed on delivery vehicles using access time windows in a city. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 41, 262–275. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munuzuri, J., Larraneta, J., Onieva, L., & Cortes, P. (2005). Solutions applicable by local administrations for urban logistics improvement. Cities, 22(1), 15–28. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. P., Prins, C., & Prodhon, C. (2012). Solving the two-echelon location routing problem by a GRASP reinforced by a learning process and path relinking. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(1), 113–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourinejad, M., Wenneman, A., Habib, K. N., & Roorda, M. J. (2014). Truck parking in urban areas: Application of choice modelling within traffic microsimulation. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 64, 54–64. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuzzolo, A., Comi, A., & Rosati, L. (2014). City logistics long-term planning: Simulation of shopping mobility and goods restocking and related support systems. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(2), 201–217. doi:10.1080/12265934.2014.928601
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L., Dutra, N., Correia, V., Neto, A., & Guerra, A. (2012). Adoption assessment by carriers and retailers to use an urban consolidation center – A case study in Brazil. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 783–795. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.147
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., & Woxenius, J. (2014). Localisation of freight consolidation centres serving small road hauliers in a wider urban area: Barriers for more efficient freight deliveries in Gothenburg. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 25–33. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orme, B. (1998). Sample size issues for conjoint analysis studies (Report No.1). Sawtooth Software Technical Paper, Sequim.
   Google Scholar
• Österle, I., Aditjandra, P., Vaghi, C., Grea, G., & Zunder, T. (2015). The role of a structured stakeholder consultation process within the establishment of a sustainable urban supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(3), 284–299. doi: 10.1108/SCM-05-2014-0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perboli, G., Tadei, R., & Vigo, D. (2011). The two-echelon capacitated vehicle routing problem: Models and math-based heuristics. Transportation Science, 45(3), 364–380. doi: 10.1287/trsc.1110.0368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillac, V., Gueret, C., & Medaglia, A. L. (2012). An event-driven optimization framework for dynamic vehicle routing. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 414–223. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckett, S., Hensher, D., & Battellino, H. (2006). The adjustment of supply chains to new states: A qualitative assessment of decision relationships with reference to congestion charging. International Journal of Transport Economics, 33(3), 313–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckett, S., Hensher, D., Rose, J., & Collins, A. (2007). Design and development of a stated choice experiment for interdependent agents: Accounting for interactions between buyers and sellers of urban freight services. Transportation, 34(4), 429–451. doi:10.1007/s11116-007-9114-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quak, H., & de Koster, M. (2007). Exploring retailers’ sensitivity to local sustainability policies. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1103–1122. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quak, H., & de Koster, M. (2009). Delivering goods in urban areas: How to deal with urban policy restrictions and the environment. Transportation Science, 43(2), 211–227. doi:10.1287/trsc.1080.0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quak, H. J. (2011). Urban freight transport: The challenge of sustainability. In C. Macharis & S. Melo (Eds.), City distribution and urban freight transport (pp. 13–36). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, A., Taniguchi, E., & Thompson, R. (2014). Application of exact route optimization for the evaluation of a city logistics truck ban scheme. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(2), 117–132. doi:10.1080/12265934.2014.930672
   Google Scholar
• Regue, R., & Bristow, A. (2013). Appraising freight tram schemes: A case study of Barcelona. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 13(1), 56–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roorda, M. J. (2011). Data collection strategies for benchmarking urban goods movement across Canada. Transportation Letters, 3(3), 175–199. doi: 10.3328/TL.2011.03.03.175-199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J. (2006). Designing efficient data for stated choice experiments. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J. (2012). Ngene. Choice-metrics (1.1). Retrieved from http://www.choice-metrics.com/download.html
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J. (2013). Sample size requirements of stated choice experiments. Transportation, 40, 1021–1041. doi: 10.1007/s11116-013-9451-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, F., & Comi, A. (2011). Measures for sustainable freight transportation at urban scale: Expected goals and tested results in Europe. Journal of Urban Planning and Development – ASCE, 137(2), 142–152. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadhu, S. L. N. S., Tiwari, G., & Jain, H. (2014). Impact of cycle rickshaw trolley (CRT) as non-motorised freight transport in Delhi. Transport Policy, 35, 64–70. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandor, Z., & Wedel, M. (2001). Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers’ prior beliefs. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 430–444. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.38.4.430.18904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sándor, Z., & Wedel, M. (2005). Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 210–218. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.42.2.210.62285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathaye, N., Harley, R., & Madanat, S. (2010a). Unintended environmental impacts of nighttime freight logistics activities. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 44(8), 642–659. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathaye, N., Horvath, A., & Madanat, S. (2010b). Unintended impacts of increased truck loads on pavement supply-chain emissions. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 44(1), 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, L. (1996). A theoretical framework – from an applied engineering perspective. In Mobility, transport and traffic: In the perspective of growth, competitiveness, employment (pp. 71–79). Paris: Euro-case. Retrieved from http://www.euro-case.org/index.php/publications/archives.html
   Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos, A., Valeri, E., & Marcucci, E. (2012). Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 34–45. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos, A., Valeri, E., Marcucci, E., Gatta, V., Nuzzolo, A., & Comi, A. (2011). Urban freight policy innovation for Rome's LTZ: A stakeholder perspective. In C. Macharis & S. Melo (Eds.), Multiple views on city distribution: A state of the art (pp. 75–100). London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Swait, J. (2001). A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cut-offs. Transportation Research B, 35(10), 903–928. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00030-8
   Google Scholar
• Tadic, S., Zecevic, S., & Krstic, M. (2014a). A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(18), 8112–8128. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadic, S., Zecevic, S., & Krstic, M. (2014b). Ranking of logistics system scenarios for central business district. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 26(2), 159–167. doi:10.7307/ptt.v26i2.1349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, J., Taniguchi, E., & Qureshi, A. (2012). Evaluation of distance-based and cordon-based urban freight road pricing in e-commerce environment with multiagent model. Transportation Research Record, 2269, 127–134. doi:10.3141/2269-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, J., Taniguchi, E., & Qureshi, A. (2014). Multi-agent systems modelling approach to evaluate urban motorways for city logistics. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(2), 154–165. doi:10.1080/12265934.2014.929020
   Google Scholar
• Triantafyllou, M. K., Cherrett, T. J., & Browne, M. (2014). Urban freight consolidation centers case study in the UK retail sector. Transportation Research Record, 2411, 34–44. doi:10.3141/2411-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ville, S., Gonzalez-Feliu, J., & Dablanc, L. (2013). The limits of public policy intervention in urban logistics: Lessons from Vicenza (Italy). European Planning Studies, 21(10), 1528–1541. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachs, M. (2013). Turning cities inside out: Transportation and the resurgence of downtowns in North America. Transportation, 40(6), 1159–1172. doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9501-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, S., & Reuter, C. (2012). Status quo of city logistics in scientific literature systematic review. Transportation Research Record, 2269, 110–116. doi: 10.3141/2269-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., & Moodie, D. (2011). Locating urban logistics terminals and shopping centres in a Chinese city. International Journal of Logistics – Research and Applications, 14(3), 164–176. doi:10.1080/13675567.2011.609159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., Peeta, S., & Friesz, T. (2005). Dynamic game theoretic model of multi-layer infrastructure networks. Networks & Spatial Economics, 5, 147–178. doi: 10.1007/s11067-005-2627-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Kwon, O. (2011). Selecting a location for a city logistics facility: A fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 9(1), 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. W., & Wang, X. K. (2014). Decision-making process for developing urban freight consolidation centers: Analysis with experimental economics. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 140(2), 1–7. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zunder, T., Aditjandra, P., & Carnaby, B. (2014). Developing a local research strategy for city logistics on an academic campus. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(2), 262–277. doi:10.1080/12265934.2014.926830
   Google Scholar