Cycling provision separated from motor traffic: a systematic review exploring whether stated preferences vary by gender and age

References

• Akar, G., Fischer, N., & Namgung, M. (2013a). Bicycling choice and gender case study: The Ohio State University. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7, 347–365. doi:10.1080/15568318.2012.673694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akar, G., Fischer, N., & Namgung, M. (2013b). Why women bicycle less? Case study: The Ohio State University. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7, 347–365. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2012.673694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, R. (2015). Adults’ attitudes towards child cycling: A study of the impact of infrastructure. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 15, 92–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, R., & Crosweller, S. (2015). Investigating the rates and impacts of near misses and related incidents among UK cyclists. Journal of Transport & Health, 2 (3), 379–393. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, R., Woodcock, J., & Goodman, A. (2015). Does more cycling mean more diversity in cycling? Transport Reviews. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1014451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakos, C. (1995). Environmental and Travel Preferences of Cyclists. Transportation Research Record No. 1438, Research Issues on Bicycling, Pedestrians, and Older Drivers. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., & Zaly Shah, M. (2013). Non-motorised level of service: Addressing challenges in pedestrian and bicycle level of service. Transport Reviews, 33, 166–194. doi:10.1080/01441647.2013.775613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bekkum, E.lizabeth J. (2011). Understanding and encouraging cycle commuting in workplace setting: A psychological perspective. Ann Arbor: The University of Edinburgh (United Kingdom).
   Google Scholar
• Berggren, M., Graves, A., Pickus, H., & Hand Wirtis, L. (2012). The 20s Bikeway: Clinton to Steele. Retrieved from https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/466646
   Google Scholar
• Bergström, A., & Magnusson, R. (2003). Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37, 649–666. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhoft, I. M., & Carstensen, G. (2008). Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11, 83–95. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2007.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson, M., & Eliasson, J. (2012). The value of time and external benefits in bicycle appraisal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 673–683. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. (1988). Realism and adaptation in designing hypothetical travel choice concepts. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22 (1), 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brick, E., McCarthy, O., & Caulfield, B. (2012). Bicycle Infrastructure Preferences – A case study of Dublin (p. 18). Transportation Research Board 91st meeting. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Chataway, E. S., Kaplan, S., Nielsen, T. A. S., & Prato, C. G. (2014). Safety perceptions and reported behavior related to cycling in mixed traffic: A comparison between Brisbane and Copenhagen. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 23, 32–43. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley, M., Rissel, C., & Lloyd, B. (2007). All dressed up and nowhere to go? A qualitative research study of the barriers and enablers to cycling in inner Sydney. Road and Transport Research, 16, 42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damant-Sirois, G., & El-Geneidy, M. A. (2015). Who cycles more? Determining cycling frequency through a segmentation approach in Montreal, Canada. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D. G., Halliday, M. E., Mayes, M., & Pocock, R. L. (1997). Attitudes to cycling: A qualitative and conceptual framework. Berkshire: TRL.
   Google Scholar
• Deenihan, G., & Caulfield, B. (2015). Do tourists value different levels of cycling infrastructure? Tourism Management, 46, 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Bordagaray, M., & Ortúzar, J. D. D. (2014). Modeling the effects of pro bicycle infrastructure and policies toward sustainable urban mobility. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 140, 04014001. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2008). Local Transport Note 2/08: Cycle Infrastructure Design. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. E., Kingham, S., Copsey, S., & Pearlman Hougie, D. J. (2003). Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: Will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 8, 53–67. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00018-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, J., Goddard, T., Monsere, M. C., & McNeil, N. (2015). Can protected bike lanes help close the gender gap in cycling? Lessons from five cities. TRB 94th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Retrieved from http://docs.trb.org/prp/15-3481.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J., & McNeil, N. (2014). Four types of cyclists? Examination of typology for better understanding of bicycling behavior and potential. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2387, 129–138. doi:10.3141/2387-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emond, C. R., Tang, W., & Handy, S. L. (2009). Explaining gender difference in bicycling Behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2125, 16–25. doi:10.3141/2125-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fietsberaad. (2007). Fietsberaad Publication11b. The effect of the increase in the number of immigrants and aging on bicycle use. Utrecht: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, H., & Morgan, J. M. (1985). Attitudes to cycling (TRRL Research Report). Berkshire.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, J. (2009). Cyclecraft. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, G. (1998). Transport implications of leisure cycling. Berkshire: Transport Research Laboratory. http://www.trl.co.uk/reports-publications/trl-reports/transport-planning/report/?reportid=2508
   Google Scholar
• Ghekiere, A., Van Cauwenberg, J., de Geus, B., Clarys, P., Cardon, G., Salmon, J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Deforche, B. (2014). Critical environmental factors for transportation cycling in children: A qualitative study using bike-along interviews. PLoS ONE, 9, e106696. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghekiere, A., Van Cauwenberg, J., Mertens, L., Clarys, P., de Geus, B., Cardon, G.,  … Deforche, B. (2015). Assessing cycling-friendly environments for children: Are micro-environmental factors equally important across different street settings? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 54. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0216-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, A., Sahlqvist, S., Ogilvie, S., & on behalf of the iConnect Consortium. (2014). New walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: One- and 2-year findings from the UK iConnect Study. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9), e38–e46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, K. N., Mann, J., Mahmoud, M., & Weiss, A. (2014). Synopsis of bicycle demand in the City of Toronto: Investigating the effects of perception, consciousness and comfortability on the purpose of biking and bike ownership. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 70, 67–80. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heesch, K. C., Sahlqvist, S., & Garrard, J. (2012). Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: A cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 106. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., Panter, J., Mackett, R., & Ogilvie, D. (2015). Changes in mode of travel to work: A natural experimental study of new transport infrastructure. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 81. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0239-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30, 59–96. doi:10.1080/01441640903187001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. (1994). Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice. Transportation, 21(2), 107–133. doi: 10.1007/BF01098788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Jones, T. (2015). Rhetoric and reality: Understanding the English cycling situation. In P. Cox (Ed.), Cycling cultures (pp. 63–77). Chester: University of Chester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. G., & Harkey, D. L. (1997). Cyclists’ perception of risk in a virtual environment: Effects of lane conditions, traffic speed, and traffic volume, traffic congestion and traffic safety in the 21st century: Challenges, innovations, and opportunities. pp. 132–138. Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=576013
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. D., & Abraham, J. E. (2007). Influences on bicycle use. Transportation, 34, 453–470. doi:10.1007/s11116-006-9109-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jothi Basu, R., Subramanian, N., & Cheikhrouhou, N. (2015). Review of full truckload transportation service procurement. Transport Reviews, 35(5), 599–621. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1038741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. J., Johnson, P. J., & Tilahun, N. (2005). Gender differences in bicycling behavior and facility preferences. Research on Women's Issues in Transportation, Volume 2: Technical papers Report of a Conference. Transportation Research Board: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kroes, E. P., & Sheldon, R. J. (1988). Stated preference methods. An introduction. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22 (1), 11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, B., Vattikuti, V., & Brannick, M. (1997). Real-time human perceptions: Toward a bicycle level of service. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1578, 119–126. doi:10.3141/1578-15
   Google Scholar
• Landis, B., Vattikuti, V., Ottenberg, R., Petritsch, T., Guttenplan, M., & Crider, L. (2003). Intersection level of service for the bicycle through movement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828, 101–106. doi:10.3141/1828-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. R., Pakrashi, V., Ghosh, B., & Szeto, W. Y. (2013). Perception of safety of cyclists in Dublin City. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 499–511. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Wang, W., Liu, P., Schneider, R., & Ragland, D. R. (2012). Investigating bicyclists’ perception of comfort on physically separated bicycle paths in Nanjing, China. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2317, 76–84. doi:10.3141/2317-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, A. C., Wen, X., & Zhou, L. (2014). Gender and used/preferred differences of bicycle routes, parking, intersection signals, and bicycle type: Professional middle class preferences in Hangzhou, China. Journal of Transport and Health, 1, 124–133. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., & Dill, J. (2015). Do people’s perceptions of neighborhood bikeability match “reality”? 94th Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board TRB. Retrieved from http://docs.trb.org/prp/15-5739.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ma, L., Dill, J., & Mohr, C. (2014). The objective versus the perceived environment: What matters for bicycling? Transportation, 41, 1135–1152. doi: 10.1007/s11116-014-9520-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumda, B. B., Mitra, S., & Pareekh, P. (2015). Methodological framework to obtain key factors influencing choice of bicycle as a mode. 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board TRB. Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1339467
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, L., Van Holle, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Deforche, B., Salmon, J., Nasar, J.,  … Van Cauwenberg, J. (2014). The effect of changing micro-scale physical environmental factors on an environment’s invitingness for transportation cycling in adults: An exploratory study using manipulated photographs. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11, n.p. doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0088-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, A., Watkins, K., & Le Dantec, A. C. (2015). Socio-demographic influence on rider type self classification with respect to bicycling. 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board TRB. Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1339455
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2014). 2011 census analysis — Cycling to work. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H., Rizo, C., Enkin, M., & Jadad, A. (2005). What is eHealth (3): A systematic review of published definitions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(1). doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., Kendrick, D., Mulvaney, C., Coleman T., & Royal, S. (2011). Non-legislative interventions for the promotion of cycle helmet wearing by children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11. Art. No.: CD003985. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003985.pub3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, A. J., Corben, F. B., Charlton, L. J., Fildes, N. B., & Rothengatter, A. J. (2005). Creating a safe environment for older cyclists: Lessons learnt from a review of worlds best practice measures (pp. 12).
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, J., Wardman, M., & Page, M. (2007). Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 364–371. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petritsch, T., Ozkul, S., McLeod, P., Landis, B., & McLeod, D. (2009). Quantifying bicyclists’ perceptions of shared-use paths adjacent to the roadway. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2198, 124–132. doi:10.3141/2198-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2008). Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28(4), 495–528. doi: 10.1080/01441640701806612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryley, T. (2006). Estimating cycling demand for the journey to work or study in West Edinburgh, Scotland. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1982, 187–193. doi:10.3141/1982-24
   Google Scholar
• Ryley, T. J. (2005). A study of individual travel behaviour in Edinburgh, to assess the propensity to use non-motorised modes. Ann Arbor: Napier University (United Kingdom).
   Google Scholar
• Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Dillon, L. I., Frank, L. D., Adams, M. A., Cain, K. L., & Saelens, B. E. (2013). Environmental and demographic correlates of bicycling. Preventive Medicine, 57, 456–460. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, R. L. (2014). Roadway design preferences among drivers and bicyclists in the Bay Area, in: TRB Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Paper submitted for presentation at the 9 3rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research 42 Board, Washington DC, January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Segadilha, A. B. P., & Sanches, S. da P. (2014). Identification of factors that influence cyclistś route choice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 160, 372–380. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.149
   Google Scholar
• Sener, I. N., Eluru, N., & Bhat, C. R. (2009). Who are bicyclists? Why and how much are they bicycling? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2134, 63–72. doi:10.3141/2134-08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer Davies Gleave. (2010a). Cycling behaviour survey analysis 2. London: Transport for London.
   Google Scholar
• Steer Davies Gleave. (2010b). Cycle behaviour survey analysis 3. London: Transport for London.
   Google Scholar
• Steer Davies Gleave. (2012). Cycle route choice study. London: Transport for London.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbach, R., Green, J., Datta, J., & Edwards, P. (2011). Cycling and the city: A case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices. Social Science and Medicine, 72, 1123–1130. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, M., & Bhat, C. (2003). Commuter bicyclist route choice: Analysis using a stated preference survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828, 107–115. doi:10.3141/1828-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilahun, N. Y., Levinson, D. M., & Krizek, K. J. (2007). Trails, lanes, or traffic: Valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41, 287–301. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tin Tin, S., Woodward, A., Thornley, S., Langley, J., Rodgers, A., & Ameratunga, S. (2010). Cyclists’ attitudes toward policies encouraging bicycle travel: Findings from the Taupo Bicycle Study in New Zealand. Health Promotion International, 25, 54–62. doi:10.1093/heapro/dap041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, G. (2014). Planning and designing transport systems to ensure safe travel for women. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper No. 2014-04. Retrieved from http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/jtrc/DiscussionPapers/DP201404.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Transport for London. (2014). London cycling design standards. London: Author. Retrieved from https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and-reports/cycling
   Google Scholar
• Twaddle, H., Hall, F., & Bracic, B. (2010). Latent bicycle commuting demand and effects of gender on commuter cycling and accident rates. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2190, 28–36. doi:10.3141/2190-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Holle, V., Van Cauwenberg, J., Deforche, B., Goubert, L., Maes, L., Nasar, J., … De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Environmental invitingness for transport-related cycling in middle-aged adults: A proof of concept study using photographs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 432–446. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, G. B. B., Kliemann Neto, F. J., & Amaral, F. G. (2014). Governance, governance models and port performance: A systematic review. Transport Reviews, 34(5), 645–662. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2014.946458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliet, J. (2014). How many wheels will it be today? An exploratory research into variables useful for modeling bicycle mode choice with a discrete choice model ( MSc Thesis). University of Twente, Enschede. Retrieved from http://essay.utwente.nl/65179/
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., & Notteboom, T. (2014). The adoption of liquefied natural gas as a ship fuel: A systematic review of perspectives and challenges, Transport Reviews, 34(6), 749–774. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2014.981884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., Tight, M., & Page, M. (2007). Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transportation Research A, 41, 339–359.
   Google Scholar
• Westerdijk, P. K. (1990). Pedestrian and pedal cyclist route choice criteria ( Working Paper). Leeds: Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2257/
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, J. A., Lancsar, E., Rixon, K., Golenko, X., & Ratcliffe, J. (2014). A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 7(4), 365–386. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0063-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, M., & Teschke, K. (2010). Route preferences among adults in the near market for bicycling: Findings of the cycling in cities study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 25, 40–47. doi:10.4278/ajhp.081006-QUAN-236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooliscroft, B., & Ganglmair-Wooliscroft, A. (2014). Improving conditions for potential New Zealand cyclists: An application of conjoint analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Sahlqvist, S., McMinn, A., Griffin, S., & Ogilvie, D. (2010). Interventions to promote cycling: Systematic review, BMJ, 341, c5293–c5293. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar